The analysis of perseverations in acquired dysgraphia reveals the internal structure of orthographic representations

REFERENCES

• Badecker, W. (1996). Representational properties common to phonological and orthographic output systems. Lingua, 99, 55–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanken, G., Schäfer, C., Tucha, O., & Lange, K. W. (1999). Serial processing in graphemic encoding. Evidence from letter exchange errors in a multilingual patient. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 12, 13–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchwald, A., & Rapp, B. (2006). Consonants and vowels in orthographic representation. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 308–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchwald, A., & Rapp, B. (2009). Distinctions between orthographic long-term memory and working memory. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 26, 724–751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, J. S., & Tate, H. (2002). Does a reading lexicon provide orthographic representations for spelling? Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 518–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., & Miceli, G. (1990). The structure of graphemic representations. Cognition, 37, 243–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., Miceli, G., Villa, G., & Romani, C. (1987). The role of the graphemic buffer in spelling: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia. Cognition, 26, 59–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carreiras, M., Alvarez, C. J., & de Vega, M. (1993). Syllable frequency and visual word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 766–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassar, M., & Treiman, R. (1997). The beginnings of orthographic knowledge: Children's knowledge of double letters in words. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 631–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chetail, F., & Content, A. (2012). The internal structure of chaos: Letter category determines visual word perceptual units. Journal of Memory and Language, 67, 371–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chetail, F., & Content, A. (2013). Segmentation of Written Words in French. Language and Speech, 56, 125–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clements, G. N. (1999). Affricates as noncontoured stops. In O. Fujimura, B. D. Joseph, & B. Palek (Eds.), Proceedings of LP ‘99: Item Order in Language and Speech (pp. 271–299). Prague: The Karolinum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Endress, A. D., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (2009). Perceptual and memory constraints on language acquisition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 348–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer-Baum, S., Charny, J., & McCloskey, M. (2011). Both-edges representation of letter position in reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 1083–1089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer-Baum, S., McCloskey, M., & Rapp, B. (2010). Representation of letter position in spelling: Evidence from acquired dysgraphia. Cognition, 115, 466–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer-Baum, S., & Rapp, B. (2012). Underlying cause(s) of letter perseveration errors. Neuropsychologia, 50, 305–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folk, J., & Rapp, B. (2004). Interaction of lexical and sublexical information in spelling: Evidence from nonword priming. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 565–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, J. A. (1976). Autosegmental phonology (Vol. 159). Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, B. (1989). Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology. Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 253–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, V. M., & Carruthers, J. (1998). The relation between reading and spelling in skilled adult readers. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 264–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houghton, G., Glasspool, D., & Shallice, T. (1994). Spelling and serial recall: Insights from a competitive queueing model. In G. D. A. Brown & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of spelling: Theory, process and intervention (pp. 365–404). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Houghton, G., & Zorzi, M. (2003). Normal and impaired spelling in a connectionist dual-route architecture. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 115–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A. C., Folk, J. R., & Rapp, B. (2009). All letters are not equal: Subgraphemic texture in orthographic working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 35, 1389–1402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jónsdóttir, M. K., Shallice, T., & Wise, R. (1996). Phonological mediation and the graphemic buffer disorder in spelling: Cross-language differences? Cognition, 59, 169–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, D. (1976). Syllable-based generalizations in English phonology (Vol. 156). Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
   Google Scholar
• Kandel, S., Alvarez, C., & Vallée, N. (2006). Syllables as processing units in handwriting production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 18–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandel, S., Hérault, L., Grosjacques, G., Lambert, E., & Fayol, M. (2009). Orthographic vs. phonologic syllables in handwriting production. Cognition, 110, 440–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandel, S., Soler, O., Valdois, S., & Gros, C. (2006). Graphemes as motor units in the acquisition of writing skills. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19, 313–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandel, S., & Spinelli, E. (2010). Processing complex graphemes in handwriting production. Memory & Cognition, 38, 762–770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandel, S., & Valdois, S. (2006). Syllables as functional units in a copying task. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 432–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (1983). The Boston Naming Test. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, L., & Baldasare, J. (1983). Syllable coding in printed word recognition by children and adults. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 245–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, J., Lesser, R., & Coltheart, M. (1992). Psycholinguistic assessment of language processing in aphasia. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. H., & Taft, M. (2009). Are onset and codas important in processing letter position? A comparison of TL effects in English and Korean. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 530–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupker, S. J., Acha, J., Davis, C. J., & Perea, M. (2012). An investigation of the role of grapheme units in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 1491–1516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcel, T. (1980). Phonological awareness and phonological representation: Investigation of a specific spelling problem. In U. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 373–404). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martensen, H. E., Maris, E., & Dijkstra, A. F. J. (2003). Phonological ambiguity and context sensitivity: On sublexical clustering in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 375–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCloskey, M., Badecker, W., Goodman-Schulman, R. A., & Aliminosa, D. (1994). The structure of graphemic representations in spelling: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11, 341–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCloskey, M., Macaruso, P., & Rapp, B. (2006). Grapheme-to-lexeme feedback in the spelling system: Evidence from a dysgraphic patient. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 278–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miceli, G., & Capasso, R. (2006). Spelling and dysgraphia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 110–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monsell, S. (1987). On the relation between lexical input and output pathways for speech. In D. A. Allport, D. G. MacKay, W. Prinz, & E. Scheerer (Eds.), Language perception and production: Relationships among listening, speaking, reading and writing (pp. 273–311). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, A. C., & Caramazza, A. (2004). Orthographic structure and deaf spelling errors: Syllables, letter frequency, and speech. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 57, 385–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, A. C., & Nickerson, J. F. (2001). Syllabic organization and deafness: Orthographic structure or letter frequency in reading? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 54, 421–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, K. (1986). Lexical but nonsemantic spelling? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 3, 341–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philipose, L. E., Gottesman, R. F., Newhart, M., Kleinman, J. T., Herskovits, E. H., Pawlak, M. A., … Hillis, A. E. (2007). Neural regions essential for reading and spelling of words and pseudowords. Annals of Neurology, 62, 481–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pring, L. (1981). Phonological codes and functional spelling units: Reality and implications. Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 573–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinzmetal, W., Treiman, R., & Rho, S. H. (1986). How to see a reading unit. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 461–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell, J., Turkeltaub, P., Eden, G., & Rapp, B. (2011). Examining the central and peripheral processes of written word production through meta-analysis. Frontiers in Language Sciences, 2, article 239.
   Google Scholar
• Rapcsak, S. Z., & Beeson, P. M. (2004). The role of left posterior inferior temporal cortex in spelling. Neurology, 62, 2221–2229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, B. (1992). The nature of sublexical orthographic organization: The bigram trough hypothesis examined. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 33–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, B., & Dufor, O. (2011). The neurotopography of written word production: An fMRI investigation of the distribution of sensitivity to length and frequency. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 4067–4081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, B., Epstein, C., & Tainturier, M. J. (2002). The integration of information across lexical and sublexical processes in spelling. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19, 1–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, B., & Fischer-Baum, S. (2013). The structure of orthographic representations. In V. Ferreria, M. Goldrick & M. Miozzo (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Language Production. New York: Oxford University Press. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199735471.013.026
   Google Scholar
• Rapp, B., & Lipka, K. (2011). The literate brain: The relationship between spelling and reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(5), 1180–1197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2006). Masked phonological priming effects in English: Are they real? Do they matter? Cognitive Psychology, 53, 97–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read, C. (1986). Children’s creative spelling. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Rey, A., & Schiller, N. O. (2005). Graphemic complexity and multiple print-to-sound associations in visual word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 33, 76–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rey, A., Ziegler, J. C., & Jacobs, A. M. (2000). Graphemes are perceptual reading units. Cognition, 75, B1–B12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D. E., & Norman, D. A. (1982). Simulating a skilled typist: A study of skilled cognitive-motor performance. Cognitive Science, 6, 1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spoehr, K., & Smith, E. (1973). The role of syllables in perceptual processing. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 71–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, S. (2001). Separate modifiability, mental modules, and the use of pure and composite measures to reveal tem. Acta Psychologica, 106, 147–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taft, M. (1979). Lexical access via an orthographic code: The Basic Orthographic Syllabic Structure (BOSS). Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 21–39.
   Google Scholar
• Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1976). Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 15, 607–620.
   Google Scholar
• Tainturier, M. J., & Caramazza, A. (1996). The status of double letters in graphemic representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 53–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tainturier, M. J., & Rapp, B. (2001). The spelling process. In B. Rapp (Ed.), The handbook of cognitive neuropsychology: What deficits reveal about the human mind (pp. 233–262). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tainturier, M. J., & Rapp, B. (2003). Is a single graphemic buffer used in reading and spelling? Aphasiology, 17, 537–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tainturier, M. J., & Rapp, B. (2004). Complex graphemes as functional spelling units: Evidence from acquired dysgraphia. Neurocase, 10, 122–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treiman, R. (1991). Children's spelling errors on syllable-initial consonant clusters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 346–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treiman, R., Zukowski, A., & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995). What happened to the “n” of sink? Children's spellings of final consonant clusters. Cognition, 55, 1–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsapkini, K., & Rapp, B. (2010). The orthography-specific functions of the left fusiform gyrus: Evidence of modality and category specificity. Cortex, 46, 185–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, J., & Romani, C. (2000). Consonant-vowel encoding and orthosyllables in a case of acquired dysgraphia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 641–663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler Memory Scale (3rd ed.). London: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Zesiger, P., Orliaguet, J. P., Boë, L. J., & Mounoud, P. (1994). The influence of syllabic structure in handwriting and typing production. In C. Faure & G. Lorette & A. Vinter (Eds.), Advances in Handwriting and Drawing: A multidisciplinary approach (pp. 389–401). Paris: Europia.
   Google Scholar