The word-length effect in reading: A review

References

• Ablinger, I., & Domahs, F. (2009). Improved single-letter identification after whole-word training in pure alexia. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 19, 340–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adis-Castro, G., & Postman, L. (1957). Psychophysical methods in the study of word recognition. Science, 125, 193–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aghababian, V., & Nazir, T. A. (2000). Developing normal reading skills: Aspects of the visual processes underlying word recognition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 76, 123–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajax, E. T. (1967). Dyslexia without agraphia. Prognostic considerations. Archives of Neurology, 17, 645–652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arguin, M., & Bub, D. (2005). Parallel processing blocked by letter similarity in letter by letter dyslexia: A replication. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22. doi:10.1080/02643290442000202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arguin, M., & Bub, D. N. (1993). Single-character processing in a case of pure alexia. Neuropsychologia, 31, 435–458. doi:10.1016/0028–3932(93)90059-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arguin, M., & Bub, D. N. (1994). Pure alexia: Attempted rehabilitation and its implications for interpretation of the deficit. Brain and Language, 47, 233–268. doi:S0093–934X(84)71051–0 [pii] 10.1006/brln.1994.1051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arguin, M., Fiset, S., & Bub, D. (2002). Sequential and parallel letter processing in letter-by-letter dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19. doi:10.1080/02643290244000040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachoud-Levi, A. C., & Bartolomeo, P. (2003). Mechanisms of pure alexia: Spatially based impairment, letter identification deficit, or both? Neurocase: The Neural Basis of Cognition, 9, 164–176. doi:10.1076/neur.9.2.164.15069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D., Thomson, N., & Buchanan, M. (1975). Word length and the structure of short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 575–589.
   Google Scholar
• Bahill, A. T., Clark, M. R., & Stark, L. (1975). The main sequence, a tool for studying human eye movements. Mathematical Biosciences, 24, 191–204.
   Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1985). The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production? Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 89–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Sergent-Marshall, S. D., Spieler, D. H., & Yap, M. (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 133, 283–316. doi:10.1037/0096–3445.133.2.283 2004–14313–007 [pii]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartolomeo, P., Bachoud-Lévi, A. C., Chokron, S., & Degos, J. D. (2002). Visually- and motor-based knowledge of letters: Evidence from a pure alexic patient. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1363–1371. doi:10.1016/S0028–3932(01)00209-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeson, P. M. (1998). Treatment for letter-by-letter reading: A case study. In N. Helm-Estabrooks & A. L. Holland (Eds.), Clinical decision making in aphasia treatment (pp. 153–177). Brooklyn: Singlular Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beeson, P. M., & Insalaco, D. (1998). Acquired alexia: Lessons from successful treatment. [Case Reports Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.]. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society: JINS, 4, 621–635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeson, P. M., Magloire, J. G., & Robey, R. R. (2005). Letter-by-letter reading: Natural recovery and response to treatment. Behavioural Neurology, 16, 191–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrmann, M., Black, S. E., & Bub, D. (1990). The evolution of pure alexia: A longitudinal study of recovery. Brain and Language, 39, 405–427. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(90)90148-A
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrmann, M., & McLeod, J. (1995). Rehabilitation for pure alexia: Efficacy of therapy and implications for models of normal word recognition. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 5, 149–180. doi:10.1080/09602019508520179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrmann, M., Nelson, J., & Sekuler, E. B. (1998). Visual complexity in letter-by-letter reading: “pure” alexia is not pure. Neuropsychologia, 36, 1115–1132. doi:10.1016/S0028–3932(98)00005–0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrmann, M., Plaut, D. C., & Nelson, J. (1998). A literature review and new data supporting an interactive account of letter-by-letter reading. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 7–51. doi:10.1080/026432998381212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrmann, M., & Shallice, T. (1995). Pure alexia: A nonspatial visual disorder affecting letter activation. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12, 409–454. doi:10.1080/02643299508252004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrmann, M., Shomstein, S. S., Black, S. E., & Barton, J. J. S. (2001). The eye movements of pure alexic patients during reading and nonreading tasks. Neuropsychologia, 39, 983–1002. doi:10.1016/S0028–3932(01)00021-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijeljac-Babic, R., Millogo, V., Farioli, F., & Grainger, J. (2004). A developmental investigation of word length effects in reading using a new on-line word identification program. Reading and Writing, 17, 411–431.
   Google Scholar
• Bowers, J. S., Bub, D. N., & Arguin, M. (1996). A characterization of the word superiority effect in a case of letter-by-letter surface alexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13, 415–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bub, D. N., & Arguin, M. (1995). Visual word activation in pure alexia. Brain and Language, 49, 77–103. doi:10.1006/brln.1995.1022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bub, D. N., Arguin, M., & Lecours, A. R. (1993). Jules Dejerine and his interpretation of pure alexia. Brain and Language, 45, 531–559. doi:10.1006/brln.1993.1059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bub, D. N., Black, S., & Howell, J. (1989). Word recognition and orthographic context effects in a letter-by- letter reader. Brain and Language, 36, 357–376. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(89)90073-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buxbaum, L. J., Glosser, G., & Coslett, H. B. (1999). Impaired face and word recognition without object agnosia. Neuropsychologia, 37, 41–50. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00048-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chetail, F. (2014). Effect of number of syllables in visual word recognition: New insights from the lexical decision task. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2013.876504
   Google Scholar
• Chialant, D., & Caramazza, A. (1998). Perceptual and lexical factors in a case of letter-by-letter reading. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 167–201. doi:10.1080/026432998381258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Henry, C., Dehaene, S., Martinaud, O., Lehéricy, S., Lemer, C., & Ferrieux, S. (2004). The pathophysiology of letter-by-letter reading. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1768–1780. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.04.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Martinaud, O., Lemer, C., Lehericy, S., Samson, Y., Obadia, M., … Dehaene, S. (2003). Visual word recognition in the left and right hemispheres: Anatomical and functional correlates of peripheral alexias. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 1313–1333. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhg079
   Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosky, M. J. (1976). The role of letter recognition in word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 4, 207–214. doi:10.3758/BF03213165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coslett, H. B., & Saffran, E. M. (1989). Evidence for preserved reading in 'pure alexia'. Brain, 112, 327–359. doi:10.1093/brain/112.2.327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coslett, H. B., Saffran, E. M., Greenbaum, S., & Schwartz, H. (1993). Reading in pure alexia. The effect of strategy. Brain, 116, 21–37. doi:10.1093/brain/116.1.21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dejerine, J. (1892). Contribution à l'étude anatomo-pathologique et clinique des différentes variétés cécité verbale. Comptes Rendus Hebdomaladaires des Séances et Mémoires de la Société de Biologie, 4, 61–90.
   Google Scholar
• Dejerine, J., & Pelissier, A. (1914). Contribution à l'étude de la cécité verbale pure. Encephale, 7, 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• De Luca, M., Di Pace, E., Judica, A., Spinell, D., & Zoccolotti, P. (1999). Eye movement patterns in linguistic and non-linguistic tasks in developmental surface dyslexia. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]. Neuropsychologia, 37, 1407–1420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doctor, E. A., Sartori, G., & Saling, M. M. (1990). A letter-by-letter reader who could not read nonwords. Cortex, 26, 247–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doggett, D., & Richards, L. G. (1975). Re-examination of effect of word length on recognition thresholds. American Journal of Psychology, 88, 583–594. doi:10.2307/1421895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichelman, W. H. (1970). Familiarity effects in the simultaneous matching task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 275–282.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksen, C. W., Pollack, M. D., & Montague, W. E. (1970). Implicit speech: Mechanism in perceptual encoding? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 84, 502–507.
   Google Scholar
• Farah, M. J., & Wallace, M. A. (1991). Pure alexia as a visual impairment: A reconsideration. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8, 313–334. doi:10.1080/02643299108253376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrand, L. (2000). Reading aloud polysyllabic words and nonwords: The syllabic length effect reexamined. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 142–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiset, D., Arguin, M., Bub, D., Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (2005). How to make the word-length effect disappear in letter-by-letter dyslexia: Implications for an account of the disorder. Psychological Science, 16, 535–541. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01571.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiset, D., Arguin, M., & McCabe, E. (2006). The breakdown of parallel letter processing in letter-by-letter dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23. doi:10.1080/02643290442000437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiset, D., Gosselin, F., Blais, C., & Arguin, M. (2006). Inducing letter-by-letter dyslexia in normal readers. J. Cogn Neurosci., 18, 1466–1476. doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.9.1466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiset, S., Arguin, M., & Fiset, D. (2006). An attempt to simulate letter-by-letter dyslexia in normal readers. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]. Brain and Language, 98, 251–263. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2006.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I., & Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 627–635.
   Google Scholar
• Frederiksen, J. R., & Kroll, J. F. (1976). Spelling and sound: Approaches to the internal lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 361–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, R. B., & Hadley, J. A. (1992). Letter-by-letter surface alexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 9, 185–208. doi:10.1080/02643299208252058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, R. B., & Lott, S. N. (2000). Rapid word identification in pure Alexia is lexical but not semantic. Brain and Language, 72, 219–237. doi:10.1006/brln.2000.2286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaillard, R., Naccache, L., Pinel, P., Clemenceau, S., Volle, E., Hasboun, D., … Cohen, L. (2006). Direct intracranial, FMRI, and lesion evidence for the causal role of left inferotemporal cortex in reading. Neuron, 50, 191–204. doi:S0896–6273(06)00228-5 [pii] 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.03.031
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H., & Zurif, E. (1975). Bee but not be: Oral reading of single words in aphasia and alexia. Neuropsychologia, 13, 181–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmore, G. C., Hersh, H., Caramazza, A., & Griffin, J. (1979). Multidimensional letter similarity derived from recognition errors. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 425–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habekost, T., & Starrfelt, R. (2006). Alexia and quadrant-amblyopia: Reading disability after a minor visual field deficit. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2465–2476. doi:S0028–3932(06)00145-X [pii] 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.04.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley, J. R., & Kay, J. (1992). Does letter-by-letter reading involve the spelling system? Neuropsychologia, 30, 237–256. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(92)90003-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley, J. R., & Kay, J. (1996). Reading speed in pure alexia. Neuropsychologia, 34, 1165–1174. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(96)00039-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, L., Olson, A., & Humphreys, G. (2013). Overcoming the effect of letter confusability in letter-by-letter reading: A rehabilitation study. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 23, 429–462. doi:10.1080/09602011.2013.776500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hautala, J., Hyona, J., & Aro, M. (2011). Dissociating spatial and letter-based word length effects observed in readers' eye movement patterns. Vision Research, 51, 1719–1727. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2011.05.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Heijden, A. H., Malhas, M. S., & van den Roovaart, B. P. (1984). An empirical interletter confusion matrix for continuous-line capitals. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 85–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, C., Gaillard, R., Volle, E., Chiras, J., Ferrieux, S., Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (2005). Brain activations during letter-by-letter reading: A follow-up study. Neuropsychologia, 43, 1983–1989. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.04.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holcomb, P. J., & Grainger, J. (2006). On the time course of visual word recognition: An event-related potential investigation using masked repetition priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1631–1643. doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.10.1631
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howes, D. H., & Solomon, R. L. (1951). Visual duration thresholds as a function of word probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 401–410.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hudson, P. T. W., & Bergman, M. W. (1985). Lexical knowledge in word recognition - word-length and word-frequency in naming and lexical decision tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 46–58. doi:10.1016/0749-596x(85)90015-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyona, J., & Olson, R. K. (1995). Eye fixation patterns among Dyslexic and normal readers - effects of word-length and word-frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 21, 1430–1440. doi:10.1037//0278-7393.21.6.1430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingles, J. L., & Eskes, G. A. (2008). A comparison of letter and digit processing in letter-by-letter reading. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 14, 164–173. doi:10.1017/S1355617708080119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalbert, A., Neath, I., Bireta, T. J., & Surprenant, A. M. (2011). When does length cause the word length effect? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 338–353. doi:10.1037/a0021804, 2010–26164–001 [pii]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalbert, A., Neath, I., & Surprenant, A. M. (2011). Does length or neighborhood size cause the word length effect? Memory & Cognition, 39, 1198–1210. doi:10.3758/s13421-011-0094-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jared, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1990). Naming multisyllabic words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 92–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. L., & Rayner, K. (2007). Top-down and bottom-up effects in pure alexia: Evidence from eye movements. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2246–2257. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.02.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juhasz, B. J., & Rayner, K. (2003). Investigating the effects of a set of intercorrelated variables on eye fixation durations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1312–1318. doi:10.1037/0278–7393.29.6.1312 2003–09575–019 [pii]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, A. (2000). Parafoveal processing in word recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 53, 429–455. doi:10.1080/713755901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacey, E. H., Lott, S. N., Snider, S. F., Sperling, A., & Friedman, R. B. (2010). Multiple oral re-reading treatment for alexia: The parts may be greater than the whole. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 20, 601–623. doi:10.1080/09602011003710993
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leff, A. P., Crewes, H., Plant, G. T., Scott, S. K., Kennard, C., & Wise, R. J. (2001). The functional anatomy of single-word reading in patients with hemianopic and pure alexia. Brain, 124, 510–521. doi:10.1093/brain/124.3.510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leff, A. P., Spitsyna, G., Plant, G. T., & Wise, R. J. (2006). Structural anatomy of pure and hemianopic alexia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 77, 1004–1007. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2005.086983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomis, J. M. (1982). Analysis of tactile and visual confusion matrices. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 41–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lott, S. N., & Friedman, R. B. (1999). Can treatment for pure alexia improve letter-by-letter reading speed without sacrificing accuracy? Brain and Language, 67, 188–201. doi:10.1006/brln.1999.2054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher, L. M., Clayton, M. C., Barrett, A. M., Schober Peterson, D., & Gonzalez Rothi, L. J. (1998). Rehabilitation of a case of pure alexia: Exploiting residual abilities. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 4, 636–647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, V. E. G., & de Jong, P. F. (2006). The effect of word length on lexical decision in dyslexic and normal reading children. Brain and Language, 98, 140–149. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2006.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, M. (1978). From print to sound in mature readers as a function of reader ability and two forms of orthographic regularity. Memory and Cognition, 6, 568–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGinnies, E., Comer, P. B., & Lacey, O. L. (1952). Visual-recognition thresholds as a function of word length and word frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44, 65–69.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McKeeff, T. J., & Behrmann, M. (2004). Pure alexia and covert reading: Evidence from Stroop tasks. [References]. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21, 443–458. doi:10.1080/02643290342000429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, B., Juhasz, B. J., & Rayner, K. (2006). The orthographic uniqueness point and eye movements during reading. British Journal of Psychology, 97, 191–216. doi:10.1348/000712605X66845
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moody, S. (1988). The Moyer reading technique re-evaluated. Cortex, 24, 473–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyer, S. B. (1979). Rehabilitation of alexia: A case study. Cortex, 15, 139–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muncer, S. J., & Knight, D. C. (2012). The bigram trough hypothesis and the syllable number effect in lexical decision. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 2221–2230. doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.697176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mycroft, R. H., Behrmann, M., & Kay, J. (2009). Visuoperceptual deficits in letter-by-letter reading? Neuropsychologia, 47, 1733–1744. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.02.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New, B., Ferrand, L., Pallier, C., & Brysbaert, M. (2006). Reexamining the word length effect in visual word recognition: New evidence from the English Lexicon project. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 45–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newbigging, P. L., & Hay, J. M. (1962). The practice effect in recognition threshold determinations as a function of word frequency and length. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 16, 177–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Regan, J. K., & Jacobs, A. M. (1992). Optimal viewing position effect in word recognition: A challenge to current theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 185–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osswald, K., Humphreys, G. W., & Olson, A. (2002). Words are more than the sum of their parts: Evidence for detrimental effects of word-level information in alexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19, 675–695. doi:10.1080/02643290244000103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, K., & Kay, J. (1982). Letter-by-letter reading: Psychological descriptions of a neurological syndrome. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, Human Experimental Psychology, 34, 411–441. doi:10.1080/14640748208400852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelli, D. G., Farell, B., & Moore, D. C. (2003). The remarkable inefficiency of word recognition. Nature, 423, 752–756. doi:10.1038/Nature01516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perri, R., Bartolomeo, P., & Silveri, M. C. (1996). Letter dyslexia in a letter-by-letter reader. Brain and Language, 53, 390–407. doi:10.1006/brln.1996.0055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, C., & Ziegler, J. C. (2002). Cross-language computational investigation of the length effect in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 990–1001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pflugshaupt, T., Gutbrod, K., Wurtz, P., von Wartburg, R., Nyffeler, T., de Haan, B., … Mueri, R. M. (2009). About the role of visual field defects in pure alexia. Brain, 132, 1907–1917. doi:10.1093/brain/awp141
   Google Scholar
• Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, C. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1992). Letter-by-letter reading? Functional deficits and compensatory strategies. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 9, 427–457. doi:10.1080/02643299208252067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, C. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1995). Contrasting effects of letter-spacing in alexia: Further evidence that different strategies generate word length effects in reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 48, 573–597.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Radeau, M., Mousty, P., & Bertelson, P. (1989). The effect of the uniqueness point in spoken-word recognition. Psychological Research, 51, 123–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapcsak, S. Z., & Beeson, P. M. (2004). The role of left posterior inferior temporal cortex in spelling. Neurology, 62, 2221–2229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, B. C., & Caramazza, A. (1991). Spatially determined deficits in letter and word processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8, 275–311. doi:10.1080/02643299108253375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457–1506. doi:10.1080/17470210902816461, 911217562 [pii]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., & Johnson, R. L. (2005). Letter-by-letter acquired dyslexia is due to the serial encoding of letters. Psychological Science, 16, 530–534. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01570.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., & McConkie, G. W. (1976). What guides a reader's eye movements? Vision Research, 16, 829–837. doi:0042–6989(76)90143–7 [pii]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1987). Eye movements in reading: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 327–362). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., & Raney, G. E. (1996). Eye movement control in reading: A comparison of two types of models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1188–1200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2003). The E-Z reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 445–476; discussion 477–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhart, S., Schaadt, A. K., Adams, M., Leonhardt, E., & Kerkhoff, G. (2013). The frequency and significance of the word length effect in neglect dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 51, 1273–1278. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.03.006, S0028–3932(13)00078-X [pii]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., & Brunn, J. L. (1990). A Prelexical basis for letter-by-letter reading: A case-study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 7, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, L. G., & Heller, F. P. (1976). Recognition thresholds as a function of word length. The American Journal of Psychology, 89, 455–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, L. G., & Hempstead, J. D. (1973). Auditory pretraining as a determinant of visual thresholds for Pseudowords. American Journal of Psychology, 86, 325–329. doi:10.2307/1421440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. T. (1976). The effects of stimulus attributes upon latency of word recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 67, 315–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosazza, C., Appollonio, I., Isella, V., & Shallice, T. (2007). Qualitatively different forms of pure alexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 24, 393–418. doi:10.1080/02643290701377877
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig, M. R., & Postman, L. (1958). Frequency of usage and the perception of words. Science, 127, 263–266. doi:10.1126/Science.127.3293.263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sage, K., Hesketh, A., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2005). Using errorless learning to treat letter-by-letter reading: Contrasting word versus letter-based therapy. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 15, 619–642. doi:10.1080/09602010443000155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuel, A. G., van Santen, J. P., & Johnston, J. C. (1982). Length effects in word perception: We is better than i but worse than you or them. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 91–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuels, S. J., LaBerge, D., & Bremer, C. (1978). Units of word recognition: Evidence for developmental changes. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 715–720.
   Google Scholar
• Schiepers, C. (1980). Response latency and accuracy in visual word recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 27, 71–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling, H. H., Rayner, K., & Chumbley, J. I. (1998). Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences. Memory & Cognition, 26, 1270–1281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuett, S., Heywood, C. A., Kentridge, R. W., & Zihl, J. (2008). The significance of visual information processing in reading: Insights from hemianopic dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 46, 2445–2462. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.04.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekuler, E. B., & Behrmann, M. (1996). Perceptual cues in pure Alexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13, 941–974. doi:10.1080/026432996381746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shallice, T., & Saffran, E. (1986). Lexical processing in the absence of explicit word identification - evidence from a letter-by-letter reader. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 3, 429–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheldon, C. A., Abegg, M., Sekunova, A., & Barton, J. J. (2012). The word-length effect in acquired alexia, and real and virtual hemianopia. Neuropsychologia, 50, 841–851. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.01.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheldon, C. A., Malcolm, G. L., & Barton, J. J. (2008). Alexia with and without agraphia: An assessment of two classical syndromes. The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, 35, 616–624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinelli, D., De Luca, M., Di Filippo, G., Mancini, M., Martelli, M., & Zoccolotti, P. (2005). Length effect in word naming in reading: Role of reading experience and reading deficit in Italian readers. Developmental Neuropsychology, 27, 217–235. doi:10.1207/s15326942dn2702_2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spitzyna, G. A., Wise, R. J. S., McDonald, S. A., Plant, G. T., Kidd, D., Crewes, H., & Leff, A. P. (2007). Optokinetic therapy improves text reading in patients with hemianopic alexia - A controlled trial. Neurology, 68, 1922–1930.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staller, J., Buchanan, D., Singer, M., Lappin, J., & Webb, W. (1978). Alexia without agraphia: An experimental case study. Brain and Language, 5, 378–387. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(78)90033-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starrfelt, R., Habekost, T., & Gerlach, C. (in press). Visual processing in pure alexia: A case study. Cortex. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2009.03.013
   Google Scholar
• Starrfelt, R., Habekost, T., & Leff, A. P. (2009). Too little, too late: Reduced visual span and speed characterize pure alexia. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 2880–2890. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry, P., Samuels, S. J., & Laberge, D. (1976). Effects of letter degradation and letter spacing on word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 577–585. doi:10.1016/0022-5371(76)90052-9
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, J. T. (1971). Theoretical analysis of an alphabetic confusion matrix. Perception & Psychophysics, 9, 40–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trauzettel-Klosinski, S., & Brendler, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading with hemianopic field defects: The significance of clinical parameters. Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 236, 91–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuomainen, J., & Laine, M. (1991). Multiple oral rereading technique in rehabilitation of pure alexia. Aphasiology, 5, 401–409. doi:10.1080/02687039108248542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upton, N. J., Hodgson, T. L., Plant, G. T., Wise, R. J., & Leff, A. P. (2003). "Bottom-up" and "top-down" effects on reading saccades: A case study. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 74, 1423–1428. doi:10.1136/jnnp.74.10.1423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergilino-Perez, D., Collins, T., & Dore-Mazars, K. (2004). Decision and metrics of refixations in reading isolated words. Vision Research, 44, 2009–2017. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2004.03.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitu, F., O'Regan, J. K., & Mittau, M. (1990). Optimal landing position in reading isolated words and continuous text. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 583–600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warrington, E. K., & Shallice, T. (1980). Word-form dyslexia. Brain, 103, 99–112. doi:10.1093/brain/103.1.99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weekes, B. S. (1997). Differential effects of number of letters on word and nonword naming latency. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 439–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodhead, Z. V., Penny, W., Barnes, G. R., Crewes, H., Wise, R. J., Price, C. J., & Leff, A. P. (2013). Reading therapy strengthens top-down connectivity in patients with pure alexia. Brain, 136, 2579–2591. doi:10.1093/brain/awt186, awt186 [pii]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodworth, R. S. (1938). Experimental psychology. New York: Henry Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Yap, M. J., & Balota, D. A. (2009). Visual word recognition of multisyllabic words. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 502–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarkoni, T., Balota, D., & Yap, M. (2008). Moving beyond Coltheart's N: A new measure of orthographic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 971–979. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.5.971, 15/5/971 [pii]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., Jacobs, A. M., & Braun, M. (2001). Identical words are read differently in different languages. Psychological Science, 12, 379–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoccolotti, P., De Luca, M., Di Pace, E., Gasperini, F., Judica, A., & Spinelli, D. (2005). Word length effect in early reading and in developmental dyslexia. Brain and Language, 93, 369–373. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2004.10.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar