From word superiority to word inferiority: Visual processing of letters and words in pure alexia

REFERENCES

• Adelman, J. S., Marquis, S. J., & Sabatos-Devito, M. G. (2010). Letters in words are read simultaneously, not in left-to-right sequence. Psychological Science, 21, 1799–1801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., … Treiman, R. (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445–459.
   Google Scholar
• Behrmann, M., Black, S. E., & Bub, D. (1990). The evolution of pure alexia: A longitudinal study of recovery. Brain & Language, 39, 405–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrmann, M., Nelson, J., & Sekuler, E. B. (1998). Visual complexity in letter-by-letter reading: “Pure” alexia is not pure. Neuropsychologia, 36, 1115–1132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrmann, M., & Plaut, D. C. (2012). Bilateral hemispheric processing of words and faces: Evidence from word impairments in prosopagnosia and face impairments in pure alexia. Cerebral Cortex, Advance Access. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrmann, M., Plaut, D. C., & Nelson, J. (1998). A literature review and new data supporting an interactive account of letter-by-letter reading. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 7–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrmann, M., & Shallice, T. (1995). Pure alexia: a nonspatial visual disorder affecting letter activation. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12, 409–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergenholtz, H. (1992). Dansk frekvens ordbog. Copenhagen: G.E.C. Gads Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bowers, J. S., Bub, D. N., & Arguin, M. (1996). A characterisation of the word superiority effect in a case of letter-by-letter surface alexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13, 415–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bub, D. N., Black, S., & Howell, J. (1989). Word recognition and orthographic context effects in a letter-by-letter reader. Brain & Language, 36, 357–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bundesen, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 97, 523–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bundesen, C., & Habekost, T. (2008). Principles of visual attention: Linking mind and brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bundesen, C., Habekost, T., & Kyllingsbæk, S. (2005). A neural theory of visual attention: Bridging cognition and neurophysiology. Psychological Review, 112, 291–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattell, J. M. (1886). The time it takes to see and name objects. Mind, 11, 63–65.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Martinaud, O., Lemer, C., Lehericy, S., Samson, Y., Obadia, M., Sclachevsky, A., & Dehaene, S. (2003). Visual word recognition in the left and right hemispheres: Anatomical and functional correlates of peripheral alexias. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 1313–1333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, J. R., & Howell, D. C. (1998). Comparing an individual's test score against norms derived from small samples. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 12, 482–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, J. R., & Garthwaite, P. H. (2002). Investigation of the single case in neuropsychology: Confidence limits on the abnormality of test scores and test score differences. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1196–1208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, J. R., & Garthwaite, P. H. (2005). Testing for suspected impairments and dissociations in single-case studies in neuropsychology: evaluation of alternatives using monte carlo simulations and revised tests for dissociations. Neuropsychology, 19, 318–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, J. R., & Garthwaite, P. H. (2007). Comparison of a single case to a control or normative sample in neuropsychology: development of a Bayesian approach. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 24, 343–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, J. R., Garthwaite, P. H., & Gray, C. D. (2003). Wanted: fully operational definitions of dissociations in single-case studies. Cortex, 39, 357–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (2011). The unique role of the visual word form area in reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 254–262.
   Google Scholar
• Dyrholm, M., Kyllingsbæk, S., Espeseth, T., & Bundesen, C. (2011). Generalizing parametric models by introducing trial-by-trial parameter variability: the case of TVA. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 55, 416–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farah, M. J. (2004). Visual Agnosia (2nd ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habekost, T., & Starrfelt, R. (2009). Visual attention capacity: A review of TVA-based patient studies. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50, 23–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley, J. R., & Kay, J. (1996) Reading speed in pure alexia. Neuropsychologia, 34, 1165–1174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, J. C. (1981). Understanding word perception: Clues from studying the word-superiority effect. In O. J. L. Tzeng & H. Singer (Eds.). Perception of print. Reading research in experimental psychology (pp. 65–84). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, T. R., & Bevan, K. M. (1994). Word superiority over isolated letters: The neglected case of forward masking. Memory & Cognition, 22, 133–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasten, E., Gothe, J., Bunzenthal, U., & Sabel, B. A. (1999). Kampimetrische Untersuhung visueller Funktionen am Computermonitor. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 207, 97–118.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, J., & Hanley, R. (1991). Simultaneous form perception and serial letter recognition in a case of letter-by-letter reading. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8, 249–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsbourne, M., & Warrington, E. K. (1962). A disorder of simultaneous form perception. Brain, 85, 461–486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koaiva, N., Ong, Y. H., Brown, M. M., Acheson, J., Plant, G. T., & Leff, A. P. (2012). A “web app” for diagnosing hemianopia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 83, 1222–1224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyllingsbæk, S. (2006). Modeling visual attention. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 123–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laws, K. R. (2005). “Illusions of normality”: A methodological critique of category-specific naming. Cortex, 41, 842–851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leff, A. P., Spitsyna, G., Plant, G. T., & Wise, R. J. S. (2006). Structural anatomy of pure and hemianopic alexia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 77, 1004–1007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund, K., & Burgess, C. (1996). Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 28, 203–208.
   Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psycholical Review, 88, 375–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mycroft, R. H., Behrmann, M., & Kay, J. (2009). Visuoperceptual deficits in letter-by-letter reading?. Neuropsychologia, 47, 1733–1744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, C. J., & Devlin, J. T. (2011). The interactive account of ventral occipito-temporal contributions to reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 246–253.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., & Johnson, E. L. (2005). Letter-by-letter acquired dyslexia is due to the serial encoding of letters. Psychological Science, 16, 530–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reicher, G. M. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 275–280.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reuter-Lorenz, P.A., & Brunn, J.L. (1990) A prelexical basis for letter-by-letter reading: A case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 7, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosazza, C., Appollonio, I., Isella, V., & Shallice, T. (2007). Qualitatively different forms of pure alexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 24, 393–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shallice, T. (1988). From neuropsychology to mental structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Starrfelt, R., & Behrmann, M. (2011). Number reading in pure alexia – a review. Neuropsychologia, 49, 2283–2298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starrfelt, R., Gerlach, C., Habekost, T., & Leff, A. P. (2013). Word-superiority in pure alexia. Behavioural Neurology, 26, 167–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starrfelt, R., Habekost, T., & Gerlach, C. (2010). Visual processing in pure alexia: a case study. Cortex, 46, 242–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starrfelt, R., Habekost, T., & Leff, A. (2009). Too little, too late: reduced visual span and speed characterize pure alexia. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 2880–2890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starrfelt, R., Nielsen, S., Habekost, T., & Andersen, T. (2013). How low can you go: normal spatial frequency sensitivity in a patient with pure alexia. Brain and Language, 126, 188–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starrfelt, R., Petersen, A., & Vangkilde, S. (2013). Don't words come easy? A psychophysical exploration of word superiority. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, article no. 519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warrington, E. K. & Langdon, D. (1994). Spelling dyslexia: a deficit of the visual word-form. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 57, 211–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warrington, E. K., & Langdon, D. W. (2002). Does the spelling dyslexic read by recognizing orally spelled words? An investigation of a letter-by-letter reader. Neurocase, 8, 210–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weekes, B. S. (1997). Differential effects of number of letters on word and nonword naming latency. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 50, 439–456.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, D. D. (1970). Processes in word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 59–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar