Lesion symptom mapping of manipulable object naming in nonfluent aphasia: Can a brain be both embodied and disembodied?

REFERENCES

• Andersson, J., Jenkinson, M., & Smith, S. (2010). Non-linear registration, aka spatial normalisation (FMRIB Technical Report TR07JA2).
   Google Scholar
• Arévalo, A., Perani, D., Cappa, S. F., Butler, A., Bates, E., & Dronkers, N. (2007). Action and object processing in aphasia: From nouns and verbs to the effect of manipulability. Brain and Language, 100(1), 79–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldo, J. V., Wilkins, D. P., Ogar, J., Willock, S., & Dronkers, N. F. (2011). Role of the precentral gyrus of the insula in complex articulation. Cortex, 47(7), 800–807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W., Simmons, W. K., Barbey, A. K., & Wilson, C. D. (2003). Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(2), 84–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, E., Wilson, S. M., Saygin, A. P., Dick, F., Sereno, M. I., Knight, R. T., & Dronkers, N. F. (2003). Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping. Nature Neuroscience, 6(5), 448–450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauchamp, M. S., Lee, K. E., Haxby, J. V., & Martin, A. (2002). Parallel visual motion processing streams for manipulable objects and human movements. Neuron, 34(1), 149–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder, J. R., & Desai, R. H. (2011). The neurobiology of semantic memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(11), 527–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., & Conant, L. L. (2009). Where Is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex, 19(12), 2767–2796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binney, R. J., Embleton, K. V., Jefferies, E., Parker, G. J. M., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2010). The ventral and inferolateral aspects of the anterior temporal lobe are crucial in semantic memory: Evidence from a novel direct comparison of distortion-corrected fMRI, rTMS, and Semantic Dementia. Cerebral Cortex, 20(11), 2728–2738. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhq019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonner, M. F., Peelle, J. E., Cook, P. A., & Grossman, M. (2013). Heteromodal conceptual processing in the angular gyrus. Neuroimage, 71, 175–186.doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonner, M. F., Vesely, L., Price, C., Anderson, C., Richmond, L., Farag, C., … Grossman, M. (2009). Reversal of the concreteness effect in semantic dementia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 26(6), 568–579. doi:919094196 [pii]10.1080/02643290903512305 [doi]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosco, G., Carrozzo, M., & Lacquaniti, F. (2008). Contributions of the human temporoparietal junction and MT/V5+ to the timing of interception revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Journal of Neuroscience, 28(46), 12071–12084. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2869-08.2008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulenger, V., Mechtouff, L., Thobois, S., Broussolle, E., Jeannerod, M., & Nazir, T. A. (2008). Word processing in Parkinson's disease is impaired for action verbs but not for concrete nouns. Neuropsychologia, 46(2), 743–756. doi:S0028–3932(07)00357-0 [pii]10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.10.007 [doi]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulenger, V., Roy, A. C., Paulignan, Y., Deprez, V., Jeannerod, M., & Nazir, T. A. (2006). Cross-talk between language processes and overt motor behavior in the first 200 msec of processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(10), 1607–1615. doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.10.1607 [doi]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breedin, S. D., Saffran, E. M., & Coslett, H. B. (1994). Reversal of the concreteness effect in a patient with semantic dementia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11(6), 617–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buxbaum, L. J., Kyle, K., Grossman, M., & Coslett, H. B. (2007). Left inferior parietal representations for skilled hand-object interactions: Evidence from stroke and corticobasal degeneration. Cortex, 43(3), 411–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buxbaum, L. J., Schwartz, M. F., & Carew, T. G. (1997). The role of semantic memory in object use. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14(2), 219–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capitani, E., Laiacona, M., Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2003). What are the facts of semantic category-specific deficits?. A critical review of the clinical evidence. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20(3–6), 213–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., & Shelton, J. R. (1998). Domain-specific knowledge systems in the brain: The animate-inanimate distinction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10(1), 1–34. doi:10.1162/089892998563752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao, L. L., & Martin, A. (1999). Cortical regions associated with perceiving, naming, and knowing about colors. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(1), 25–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao, L. L., & Martin, A. (2000). Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage, 12(4), 478–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, A. (2010). Disembodying cognition. Language and Cognition, 2(1), 79–116.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chouinard, P. A., & Goodale, M. A. (2010). Category-specific neural processing for naming pictures of animals and naming pictures of tools: An ALE meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia, 48(2), 409–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coccia, M., Bartolini, M., Luzzi, S., Provinciali, L., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2004). Semantic memory is an amodal, dynamic system: Evidence from the interaction of naming and object use in semantic dementia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21(5), 513–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crutch, S. J., & Warrington, E. K. (2003). The selective impairment of fruit and vegetable knowledge: A multiple processing channels account of fine-grain category specificity. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20(3–6), 355–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. R. (1989). Time-locked multiregional retroactivation: A systems-level proposal for the neural substrates of recall and recognition. Cognition, 33(1–2), 25–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Zubicaray, G., Arciuli, J., & McMahon, K. (2013). Putting an “end” to the motor cortex representations of action words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(11), 1957–1974. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devlin, J. T., Russell, R. P., Davis, M. H., Price, C. J., Moss, H. E., Fadili, M. J., & Tyler, L. K. (2002). Is there an anatomical basis for category-specificity? Semantic memory studies in PET and fMRI. Neuropsychologia, 40(1), 54–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dick, F., Saygin, A. P., Galati, G., Pitzalis, S., Bentrovato, S., D'Amico, S., … Pizzamiglio, L. (2007). What is involved and what is necessary for complex linguistic and nonlinguistic auditory processing: Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging and lesion data. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(5), 799–816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, S. L., Van Hoesen, G. W., Cassell, M. D., & Poremba, A. (2009). Parcellation of human temporal polar cortex: A combined analysis of multiple cytoarchitectonic, chemoarchitectonic, and pathological markers. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 514(6), 595–623. doi:10.1002/cne.22053 [doi]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dove, G. (2009). Beyond perceptual symbols: A call for representational pluralism. Cognition, 110(3), 412–431. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.11.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dronkers, N. F. (1996). A new brain region for coordinating speech articulation. Nature, 384(6605), 159–161. doi:10.1038/384159a0 [doi]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dronkers, N. F., Wilkins, D., van Valin, R. D., Redfern, B., & Jaeger, J. J. (2004). Lesion analysis of the brain areas involved in language comprehension. Cognition, 92, 145–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druks, J., Masterson, J., Kopelman, M., Clare, L., Rose, A., & Rai, G. (2006). Is action naming better preserved (than object naming) in Alzheimer's disease and why should we ask?. Brain and Language, 98(3), 332–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumoulin, S. O., Bittar, R. G., Kabani, N. J., Baker, C. L. Jr., Le Goualher, G., Bruce Pike, G., & Evans, A. C. (2000). A new anatomical landmark for reliable identification of human area V5/MT: A quantitative analysis of sulcal patterning. Cerebral Cortex, 10(5), 454–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). Peabody picture vocabulary test (PPVT-III). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Fairhall, S. L., & Caramazza, A. (2013). Brain regions that represent amodal conceptual knowledge. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(25), 10552–10558. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0051-13.2013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farah, M. J., & Feinberg, T. E. (2000). Visual object agnosia. Farah, Martha J.
   Google Scholar
• Farah, M. J., & McClelland, J. L. (1991). A computational model of semantic memory impairment: Modality specificity and emergent category specificity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120(4), 339–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, S., Howard, D., & Patterson, K. (1994). Abstract word meaning deafness. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11(1), 1–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1891). On Aphasia (E. Stengel, Trans.). New York: International University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gage, N., & Hickok, G. (2005). Multiregional cell assemblies, temporal binding and the representation of conceptual knowledge in cortex: A modern theory by a 'classical' neurologist, Carl Wernicke. Cortex, 41(6), 823–832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain's concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3), 455–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcea, F. E., & Mahon, B. Z. (2012). What is in a tool concept? Dissociating manipulation knowledge from function knowledge. Memory and Cognition, 40, 1303–1313. doi:10.3758/s13421-012-0236-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez Rothi, L. J., Ochipa, C., & Heilman, K. M. (1997). A cognitive neuropsychological model of limb praxis and apraxia. In L. J. Gonzaelz Rothi & K. M. Heilman (Eds.), Apraxia: The neuropsychology of action (pp. 29–49). Hove England: Psychology Press/Erlbaum (UK) Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E. (1983). The assessment of aphasia and related disorders (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger Philadelphia.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, M., Anderson, C., Khan, A., Avants, B., Elman, L., & McCluskey, L. (2008). Impaired action knowledge in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurology, 71(18), 1396–1401. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000319701.50168.8c
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, J. Jr., & Gordon, B. (1992). Neural subsystems for object knowledge. Nature, 359(6390), 60–64. doi:10.1038/359060a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41, 301–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauk, O., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Neurophysiological distinction of action words in the Fronto-Central cortex. Human Brain Mapping, 21(3), 191–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillis, A. E., & Caramazza, A. (1991). Category-specific naming and comprehension impairment: A double dissociation. Brain, 114(Pt 5), 2081–2094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoenig, K., Sim, E. J., Bochev, V., Herrnberger, B., & Kiefer, M. (2008). Conceptual flexibility in the human brain: Dynamic recruitment of semantic maps from visual, motor, and motion-related areas. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(10), 1799–1814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, P., Jones, R. W., & Ralph, M. A. (2012). The degraded concept representation system in semantic dementia: Damage to pan-modal hub, then visual spoke. Brain, 135(Pt 12), 3770–3780. doi:10.1093/brain/aws282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, P., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2013). Shapes, scents and sounds: Quantifying the full multi-sensory basis of conceptual knowledge. Neuropsychologia, 51(1), 14–25. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.11.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1962). Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. Journal of Physiology, 160, 106–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1977). Ferrier lecture. Functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences, 198(1130), 1–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubel, D. H., Wiesel, T. N., & Stryker, M. P. (1978). Anatomical demonstration of orientation columns in macaque monkey. Journal of Computational Neurology, 177(3), 361–380. doi:10.1002/cne.901770302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkinson, M., Beckmann, C. F., Behrens, T. E., Woolrich, M. W., & Smith, S. M. (2012). FSL. Neuroimage, 62(2), 782–790. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.015
   Google Scholar
• Kable, J. W., & Chatterjee, A. (2006). Specificity of action representations in the lateral occipitotemporal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(9), 1498–1517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kan, I. P., Kable, J. W., Van Scoyoc, A., Chatterjee, A., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2006). Fractionating the left frontal response to tools: Dissociable effects of motor experience and lexical competition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(2), 267–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandel, E. (2006). In search of memory. New York, New York: W.W. Norton and Company, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (1983). The Boston naming test. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger.
   Google Scholar
• Kellenbach, M. L., Brett, M., & Patterson, K. (2001). Large, colorful, or noisy? Attribute- and modality-specific activations during retrieval of perceptual attribute knowledge. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 1(3), 207–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellenbach, M. L., Hovius, M., & Patterson, K. (2005). A pet study of visual and semantic knowledge about objects. Cortex, 41(2), 121–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemmerer, D., Rudrauf, D., Manzel, K., & Tranel, D. (2012). Behavioral patterns and lesion sites associated with impaired processing of lexical and conceptual knowledge of actions. Cortex, 48(7), 826–848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kertesz, A. (1982). The Western Aphasia battery revised (WAB-R). New York, NY: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Kiefer, M., & Pulvermüller, F. (2012). Conceptual representations in mind and brain: Theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions. Cortex, 48(7), 805–825. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolster, H., Peeters, R., & Orban, G. A. (2010). The retinotopic organization of the human middle temporal area MT/V5 and its cortical neighbors. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(29), 9801–9820. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2069-10.2010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambon Ralph, M. A., Pobric, G., & Jefferies, E. (2008). Conceptual knowledge is underpinned by the temporal pole bilaterally: Convergent evidence from rTMS. Cerebral Cortex, 19(4), 832. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambon Ralph, M. A., Sage, K., Jones, R. W., & Mayberry, E. J. (2010). Coherent concepts are computed in the anterior temporal lobes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 107(6), 2717–2722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libon, D. J., McMillan, C., Avants, B., Boller, A., Morgan, B., Burkholder, L., … Grossman, M. (2012). Deficits in concept formation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neuropsychology, 26(4), 422–429. doi:10.1037/a0028668
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2003). Constraining questions about the organisation and representation of conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20(3–6), 433–450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2008). A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology: Paris, 102(1–3), 59–70. doi:S0928-4257(08)00019-3 [pii]10.1016/j.jphysparis.2008.03.004 [doi]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2009). Concepts and categories: A cognitive neuropsychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 27–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2011). What drives the organization of object knowledge in the brain? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(3), 97–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malikovic, A., Amunts, K., Schleicher, A., Mohlberg, H., Eickhoff, S. B., Wilms, M., … Zilles, K. (2007). Cytoarchitectonic analysis of the human extrastriate cortex in the region of V5/MT+: A probabilistic, stereotaxic map of area hOc5. Cereb Cortex, 17(3), 562–574. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhj181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. (2007). The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 25–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A., Haxby, J. V., Lalonde, F. M., Wiggs, C. L., & Ungerleider, L. G. (1995). Discrete cortical regions associated with knowledge of color and knowledge of action. Science, 270(5233), 102–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A., Ungerleider, L. G., & Haxby, J. V. (2000). Category specificity and the brain: The sensory/motor model of semantic representations of objects. In M. S. Gazanniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (2 ed., pp. 1023–1036). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, A., Wiggs, C. L., Ungerleider, L. G., & Haxby, J. V. (1996). Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge. Nature, 379(6566), 649–652. doi:10.1038/379649a0 [doi]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2012). Conducting behavioral research on Amazon's mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 44(1), 1–23. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L., McNaughton, B. L., & O'Reilly, R. C. (1995). Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: Insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychological Review, 102(3), 419–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRae, K., Cree, G. S., Seidenberg, M. S., & McNorgan, C. (2005). Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things. Behavior Research Methods, 37(4), 547–559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meteyard, L., Cuadrado, S. R., Bahrami, B., & Vigliocco, G. (2012). Coming of age: A review of embodiment and the neuroscience of semantics. Cortex: A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 48(7), 788–804. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2010.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, I. R., Plotzker, A., & Ezzyat, Y. (2007). The enigmatic temporal pole: A review of findings on social and emotional processing. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 130(7), 1718–1731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orban, G. A., Fize, D., Peuskens, H., Denys, K., Nelissen, K., Sunaert, S., … Vanduffel, W. (2003). Similarities and differences in motion processing between the human and macaque brain: Evidence from fMRI. Neuropsychologia, 41(13), 1757–1768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papeo, L., Lingnau, A., Agosta, S., Pascual-Leone, A., Battelli, L., & Caramazza, A. (2014). The origin of word-related motor activity. Cerebral Cortex. Advance online publication. doi:10.1093/cercor/bht423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H., Rogalski, Y., Rodriguez, A. D., Zlatar, Z., Benjamin, M., Harnish, S., … Reilly, J. (2011). Perceptual cues used by listeners to discriminate fluent from nonfluent narrative discourse. Aphasiology, 25(9), 998–1015. doi:10.1080/02687038.2011.570770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, K. (2007). The reign of typicality in semantic memory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 362(1481), 813–821. doi:1MW426N6VV32M223 [pii] 10.1098/rstb.2007.2090 [doi]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, K., Nestor, P. J., & Rogers, T. T. (2007). Where do you know what you know? The representation of semantic knowledge in the human brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(12), 976–987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pazzaglia, M., Pizzamiglio, L., Pes, E., & Aglioti, S. M. (2008). The sound of actions in apraxia. Current Biology, 18(22), 1766–1772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelphrey, K. A., Morris, J. P., Michelich, C. R., Allison, T., & McCarthy, G. (2005). Functional anatomy of biological motion perception in posterior temporal cortex: An fMRI study of eye, mouth and hand movements. Cerebral Cortex, 15(12), 1866–1876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pobric, G., Jefferies, E., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2007). Anterior temporal lobes mediate semantic representation: Mimicking semantic dementia by using rTMS in normal participants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 104(50), 20137–20141. doi:0707383104 [pii]10.1073/pnas.0707383104 [doi]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postle, N., Ashton, R., McFarland, K., & de Zubicaray, G. I. (2013). No specific role for the manual motor system in processing the meanings of words related to the hand. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 11. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postle, N., McMahon, K. L., Ashton, R., Meredith, M., & de Zubicaray, G. I. (2008). Action word meaning representations in cytoarchitectonically defined primary and premotor cortices. Neuroimage, 43(3), 634–644. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.006 [doi]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulvermüller, F. (2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(7), 576–582. doi:nrn1706 [pii]10.1038/nrn1706 [doi]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulvermüller, F. (2013). Semantic embodiment, disembodiment or misembodiment? In search of meaning in modules and neuron circuits. Brain and Language, 127(1), 86–103. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2013.05.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulvermüller, F., Härle, M., & Hummel, F. (2001). Walking or talking?: Behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of action verb processing. Brain and Language, 78(2), 143–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulvermüller, F., Moseley, R. L., Egorova, N., Shebani, Z., & Boulenger, V. (2014). Motor cognition-motor semantics: Action perception theory of cognition and communication. Neuropsychologia, 55, 71–84. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly, J., Cross, K., Troiani, V., & Grossman, M. (2007). Single word semantic judgments in Semantic Dementia: Do phonology and grammatical class count? Aphasiology, 21(6/7/8), 558–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly, J., & Martin, N. (in press). Transcortical sensory aphasia and semantic processing. In L. Gonzalez Rothi & A. M. Raymer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of aphasia and language disorders. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, J., & Peelle, J. E. (2008). Effects of semantic impairment on language processing in semantic dementia. Seminars in Speech and Language, 29, 32–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reilly, J., Peelle, J. E., Antonucci, S. M., & Grossman, M. (2011). Anomia as a marker of distinct semantic memory impairments in Alzheimer's disease and semantic dementia. Neuropsychology, 25(4), 413–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly, J., Rodriguez, A., Peelle, J. E., & Grossman, M. (2011). Frontal lobe damage impairs process and content in semantic memory: Evidence from category specific effects in progressive nonfluent aphasia. Cortex, 47, 645–658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riva, D., Nichelli, F., & Devoti, M. (2000). Developmental aspects of verbal fluency and confrontation naming in children. Brain and Language, 71(2), 267–284. doi:10.1006/brln.1999.2166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, T. T., Hocking, J., Noppeney, U., Mechelli, A., Gorno-Tempini, M. L., Patterson, K., & Price, C. J. (2006). Anterior temporal cortex and semantic memory: Reconciling findings from neuropsychology and functional imaging. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 6(3), 201–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, T. T., Hodges, J. R., Lambon Ralph, M. A., & Patterson, K. (2003). Object recognition under semantic impairment: The effects of conceptual regularities on perceptual decisions. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(5–6), 625–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, T. T., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Garrard, P., Bozeat, S., McClelland, J. L., Hodges, J. R., & Patterson, K. (2004). Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: A neuropsychological and computational investigation. Psychological Review, 111(1), 205–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, T. T., & McClelland, J. L. (2004). Semantic cognition: A parallel distributed processing approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rorden, C. (2007). MRIcron (Version Beta 7). Retrieved from http://www.cabiatl.com/mricro/mricron/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Rorden, C., Fridriksson, J., & Karnath, H. O. (2009). An evaluation of traditional and novel tools for lesion behavior mapping. Neuroimage, 44(4), 1355–1362. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosch, E. H. (1973). Natural categories. Cogn Psychol, 4(3), 328–350. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90017-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosci, C., Chiesa, V., Laiacona, M., & Capitani, E. (2003). Apraxia is not associated to a disproportionate naming impairment for manipulable objects. Brain and Cognition, 53(2), 412–415. doi:10.1016/s0278-2626(03)00156-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabsevitz, D. S., Medler, D. A., Seidenberg, M., & Binder, J. R. (2005). Modulation of the semantic system by word imageability. Neuroimage, 27(1), 188–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacchett, C., & Humphreys, G. W. (1992). Calling a squirrel a squirrel but a canoe a wigwam: A category-specific deficit for artefactual objects and body parts. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 9(1), 73–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon, J. P., McMullen, P. A., & Filliter, J. H. (2010). Norms for two types of manipulability (graspability and functional usage), familiarity, and age of acquisition for 320 photographs of objects. Behavior Research Methods, 42(1), 82–95. doi:10.3758/brm.42.1.82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samson, D., & Pillon, A. (2003). A case of impaired knowledge for fruit and vegetables. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20(3–6), 373–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samson, D., Pillon, A., & De Wilde, V. (1998). Impaired knowledge of visual and non-visual attributes in a patient with a semantic impairment for living entities: A case of a true category-specific deficit. Neurocase, 4(4–5), 273–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartori, G., Gnoato, F., Mariani, I., Prioni, S., & Lombardi, L. (2007). Semantic relevance, domain specificity and the sensory/functional theory of category-specificity. Neuropsychologia, 45(5), 966–976. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.08.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartori, G., & Lombardi, L. (2004). Semantic relevance and semantic disorders. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(3), 439–452. doi:10.1162/089892904322926773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saygin, A. P., Dick, F., Wilson, S. M., Dronkers, N. F., & Bates, E. (2003). Neural resources for processing language and environmental sounds: Evidence from aphasia. Brain, 126(Pt 4), 928–945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, W. K., Reddish, M., Bellgowan, P. S., & Martin, A. (2010). The selectivity and functional connectivity of the anterior temporal lobes. Cerebral Cortex, 20(4), 813–825. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp149 [doi]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sporns, O., Honey, C. J., & Kotter, R. (2007). Identification and classification of hubs in brain networks. PLoS One, 2(10), e1049. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turken, A. U., & Dronkers, N. F. (2011). The neural architecture of the language comprehension network: Converging evidence from lesion and connectivity analyses. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 5, 1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Visser, M., Jefferies, E., Embleton, K. V., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2012). Both the middle temporal gyrus and the ventral anterior temporal area are crucial for multimodal semantic processing: Distortion-corrected fMRI evidence for a double gradient of information convergence in the temporal lobes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(8), 1766–1778. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser, M., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2011). Differential contributions of bilateral ventral anterior temporal lobe and left anterior superior temporal gyrus to semantic processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(10), 3121–3131. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waller, A. (1850). Experiments on the section of the glossopharyngeal and hypoglossal nerves of the frog, and observations of the alterations produced thereby in the structure of their primitive fibres. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 140, 423–429.
   Google Scholar
• Warrington, E. K. (1975). The selective impairment of semantic memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27(4), 635–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warrington, E. K., & McCarthy, R. (1983). Category specific access dysphasia. Brain, 106(Pt 4), 859–878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warrington, E. K., & McCarthy, R. A. (1987). Categories of knowledge. Further fractionations and an attempted integration. Brain, 110, 1273–1296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warrington, E. K., & Shallice, T. (1984). Category specific semantic impairments. Brain, 107(3), 829–854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging. (2009, April). Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM8). Retrieved from http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/software/
   Google Scholar
• Wernicke, C. (1874). Der aphasische symptomemkomplex: Eine psychologische Studie auf anatomischer basis. Breslau: Cohn und Weigert.
   Google Scholar
• Willems, R. M., & Casasanto, D. (2011). Flexibility in embodied language understanding. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilms, M., Eickhoff, S. B., Specht, K., Amunts, K., Shah, N. J., Malikovic, A., & Fink, G. R. (2005). Human V5/MT+: Comparison of functional and cytoarchitectonic data. Anatomy and Embryology (Berl), 210(5–6), 485–495. doi:10.1007/s00429-005-0064-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu, D. H., Morganti, A., & Chatterjee, A. (2008). Neural substrates of processing path and manner information of a moving event. Neuropsychologia, 46(2), 704–713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yushkevich, P. A., Piven, J., Hazlett, H. C., Smith, R. G., Ho, S., Gee, J. C., & Gerig, G. (2006). User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: Significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage, 31(3), 1116–1128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar