On compensatory strategies and computational models: The case of pure alexia

REFERENCES

• Arguin, M., Bub, D. N., & Bowers, J. (1998). Extent and limits of covert letter activation in letter-by-letter reading. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 53–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, J., Hanif, H., Eklinder Björnström, L., & Hills, C. (2014). The word-length effect in reading: A review. Cognitive Neuropsychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/02643294.2014.895314
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Behrmann, M., Black, S. E., & Bub, D. N. (1990). The evolution of pure alexia: A longitudinal study of recovery. Brain and Language, 39, 405–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrmann, M., & Plaut, D. C. (2013). Distributed circuits, not circumscribed centers, mediate visual recognition. Trends in Cognitive Science, 17, 210–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrmann, M., Plaut, D. C., & Nelson, J. (1998). A literature review and new data supporting an interactive account of letter-by-letter reading. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 7–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrmann, M., & Shallice, T. (1995). Pure alexia: A nonspatial visual disorder affecting letter activation. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12, 409–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrmann, M., Shomstein, S. S., Black, S. E., & Barton, J. J. S. (2001). The eye movements of pure alexic patients during reading and nonreading tasks. Neuropsychologia, 39, 983–1002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bub, D., Cancelliere, A., & Kertesz, A. (1985). Whole-word and analytic translation of spelling-to-sound in a non-semantic reader. In K. Patterson, M. Coltheart, & J. Marshall (Eds.), Surface dyslexia (pp. 15–34). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A. (1986). On drawing inferences about the structure of normal cognitive systems from the analysis of patterns of impaired performance: The case for single-patient studies. Brain and Cognition, 5, 41–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., & Hillis, A. (1990). Where do semantic errors come from? Cortex, 26, 95–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual-route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. P. (2002). Modelling high-level cognitive processes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Coslett, H. B., & Saffran, E. M. (1989). Evidence for preserved reading in “pure” alexia. Brain, 112, 327–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coslett, H. B., Saffran, E. M., Greenbaum, S., & Schwartz, M. F. (1993). Reading in pure alexia. The effect of strategy. Brain, 116, 21–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (2011). The unique role of the visual word form in reading. Trends in Cognitive Science, 15, 254–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., Sigman, M., & Vinckier, F. (2005). The neural code for written words: A proposal. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9, 335–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elman, J. L. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14, 179–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, R. B., & Alexander, M. P. (1984). Pictures, images and pure alexia: A case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 1, 9–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2009). Watching the word go by: On the time-course of component processes in visual word recognition. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3, 128–156.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hanley, J. R., & Kay, J. (1992). Does letter-by-letter reading involve the spelling system? Neuropsychologia, 30, 237–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, L. (1982). Orthography and word recognition in reading. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hillis, A. E., Rapp, B., Romani, C., & Caramazza, A. (1990). Selective impairment of semantics in lexical processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 7, 191–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinton, G., & Shallice, T. (1991). Lesioning an attractor network: Investigations of acquired dyslexia. Psychological Review, 98, 74–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, D. (1991). Letter-by-letter readers: Evidence for parallel processing. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual recognition (pp. 34–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, R. B. (1989). Recognizing orally spelled words: An analysis of procedures shared with reading and spelling. Brain and Language, 37, 201–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsbourne, M., & Warrington, E. K. (1962). A disorder of simultaneous form perception. Brain, 85, 461–486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolk, H. H. J., & Heeschen, C. (1992). Agrammatism, paragrammatism and the management of language. Language and Cognitive Processes, 7, 89–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladavas, E., Shallice, T., & Zanella, M. T. (1997). Preserved semantic access in neglect dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 35, 257–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, J., & Newcombe, F. (1973). Patterns of paralexia: A psycholinguistic approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2, 175–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, R., & Warrington, E. K. (1986). Phonological reading: Phenomena and paradoxes. Cortex, 22, 359–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, J., & Rumelhart, D. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCloskey, M., & Schubert, T. (2014). Shared versus separate processes for letter and digit identification. Cognitive Neuropsychology Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/02643294.2014.869202
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Misch, D., & Frankl, D. (1929). Beitrag zur Alexielehre. European Neurology, 71, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Montant, M., Nazir, T. A., & Poncet, M. (1998). Pure alexia and the viewing position effect in printed words. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 93–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mozer, M., & Behrmann, M. (1990). On the interaction of selective attention and lexical knowledge: A connectionist account of neglect dyslexia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2, 96–123.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mozer, M., & Behrmann, M. (1992). Reading with attentional impairments: A brain-damaged model of neglect and attentional dyslexia. In R. G. Reilly & N. E. Sharkey (Eds.), Connectionist approaches to natural language processing (pp. 409–460). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behaviour. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Shwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research and theory (pp. 1–18). New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Osswald, K., Humphreys, G. W., & Olson, A. (2002). Words are more than the sum of their parts: Evidence for detrimental effects of word-level information in alexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19, 675–695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, K., & Kay, J. (1982). Letter-by-letter reading: Psychological descriptions of a neurological syndrome. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 34A, 411–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2007). Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 114, 273–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2010). Beyond single syllables: Large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the Connectionist Dual Process (CDP++) model. Cognitive Psychology, 61, 106–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaut, D. C. (1999). A connectionist approach to word reading and acquired dyslexia: Extension to sequential processing. Cognitive Science, 23, 543–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaut, D. C., & Behrmann, M. (2011). Complementary neural representations for faces and words: A computational exploration. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 28, 251–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J., Seidenberg, M., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaut, D. C., & Shallice, T. (1993). Deep dyslexia: A case study of connectionist neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10, 377–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, C. J., & Devlin, J. T. (2011). The interactive account of ventral occipitotemporal contributions to reading. Trends in Cognitive Science, 15, 246–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, C. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1992). Letter-by-letter reading? Functional deficits and compensatory strategies. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 9, 427–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, C. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1995). Contrasting effects of letter-spacing in alexia: Further evidence that different strategies generate word length effects in reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 48, 573–597.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rapcsak, S. Z., Rubens, A. B., & Laguna, J. F. (1990). From letters to words: Procedures for word recognition in letter-by-letter reading. Brain and Language, 38, 504–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuter-Lorenz, P., & Brunn, J. (1990). A prelexical basis for letter-by-letter reading: A case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 7, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. J., Lambon Ralph, M. A., & Woollams, A. M. (2010). When does less yield more? The impact of severity upon implicit recognition in pure alexia. Neuropsychologia, 48, 2437–2446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, T. T., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Garrard, P., Bozeat, S., McClelland, J. L., Hodges, J. R., & Patterson, K. (2004). Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: A neuropsychological and computational investigation. Psychological Review, 111, 205–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosazza, C., Apollonio, I., Isella, V., & Shallice, T. (2007). Qualitatively different forms of pure alexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 24, 393–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shallice, T. (1988). From neuropsychology to mental structure. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shallice, T., & Cooper, R. J. (2011). The organisation of mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shallice, T., & Saffran, E. (1986). Lexical processing in the absence of explicit word identification: Evidence from a letter by-letter reader. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 3, 429–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shallice, T., & Warrington, E. K. (1977). The possible role of selective attention in acquired dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 15, 31–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shallice, T., Warrington, E., & McCarthy, R. (1983). Reading without semantics. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A, 111–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperling, G. (1967). Successive approximations to a model of short-term memory. Acta Psychologica, 27, 285–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warrington, E. K. (1975). The selective impairment of semantic memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27, 635–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warrington, E. K., & Langdon, D. (1994). Spelling dyslexia: A deficit of the visual word-form. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 57, 211–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warrington, E. K., & Langdon, D. (2002). Does the spelling dyslexic read by recognizing oraly spelled words? An investigation of a letter-by-letter reader. Neurocase, 8, 210–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warrington, E. K., & Shallice, T. (1980). Word-form dyslexia. Brain, 103, 99–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warrington, E. K., & Taylor, A. (1973). The contribution of right parietal lobe to object recognition. Cortex, 9, 152–164.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woollams, A. M. (2014). Connectionist neuropsychology: Uncovering ultimate causes of acquired dyslexia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 369, 20120398.
   Google Scholar
• Woollams, A. M., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Plaut, D. C., & Patterson, K. (2007). SD-squared: On the association between semantic dementia and surface dyslexia. Psychological Review, 114, 316–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorzi, M., Houghton, G., & Butterworth, B. (1998). Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1131–1161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar