3,475
Views
32
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Issue: Pure alexia

What's in a name? The characterization of pure alexia

&

REFERENCES

  • Badecker, W., & Caramazza, A. (1985). On considerations of method and theory governing the use of clinical categories in neurolinguistics and cognitive neuropsychology: The case against agrammatism. Cognition, 20, 97–125.
  • Barton, J. J. S., Hanif, H. M., Björnström, L. E., & Hills, C. (2014). The word length effect in reading: A review. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 31, 378–412. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2014.895314
  • Barton, J. J. S., Sekunova, A., Sheldon, C., Johnston, S., Iaria, G., & Scheel, M. (2010). Reading words, seeing style: The neuropsychology of word, font and handwriting perception. Neuropsychologia, 48, 3868–3877. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.09.012
  • Behrmann, M., Nelson, J., & Sekuler, E. B. (1998). Visual complexity in letter-by-letter reading: “Pure” alexia is not pure. Neuropsychologia, 36, 1115–1132. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00005-0
  • Behrmann, M., & Plaut, D. C. (2014). Bilateral hemispheric processing of words and faces: Evidence from word impairments in prosopagnosia and face impairments in pure Alexia. Cerebral Cortex, 24, 1102–1118. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs390
  • Behrmann, M., & Plaut, D. C. (2013). Distributed circuits, not circumscribed centers, mediate visual recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 210–219. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.03.007
  • Behrmann, M., Plaut, D. C., & Nelson, J. (1998). A literature review and new data supporting an interactive account of letter-by-letter reading. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 7–51. doi:10.1080/026432998381212
  • Behrmann, M., Shomstein, S. S., Black, S. E., & Barton, J. J. S. (2001). The eye movements of pure alexic patients during reading and nonreading tasks. Neuropsychologia, 39, 983–1002. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00021-5
  • Caramazza, A. (1986). On drawing inferences about the structure of normal cognitive systems from the analysis of patterns of impaired performance: The case for single-patient studies. Brain and Cognition, 5, 41–66.
  • Caramazza, A., & Coltheart, M. (2006). Cognitive neuropsychology twenty years on. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 3–12.
  • Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Specialization within the ventral stream: The case for the visual word form area. Neuroimage, 22, 466–476. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.049
  • Cohen, L., Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Lehericy, S., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Henaff, M. A., & Michel, F. (2000). The visual word form area: Spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. Brain, 123, 291–307.
  • Cohen, L., Henry, C., Dehaene, S., Martinaud, O., Lehéricy, S., Lemer, C., & Ferrieux, S. (2004). The pathophysiology of letter-by-letter reading. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1768–1780. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.04.018
  • Cohen, L., Martinaud, O., Lemer, C., Lehericy, S., Samson, Y., Obadia, M., … Dehaene, S. (2003). Visual word recognition in the left and right hemispheres: Anatomical and functional correlates of peripheral alexias. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 1313–1333. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhg079
  • Coltheart, M. (1980). Deep dyslexia: A right-hemisphere hypothesis. In M. Coltheart, K. Patterson, & J. C. Marshall (Eds.), Deep dyslexia (2nd ed., pp. 326–380). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Coltheart, M. (1998). Seven questions about pure alexia (letter-by-letter reading). Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 1–6.
  • Coslett, H. B., Saffran, E. M., Greenbaum, S., & Schwartz, H. (1993). Reading in pure alexia. Brain, 116, 21–37.
  • Crawford, J. R., & Garthwaite, P. H. (2002). Investigation of the single case in neuropsychology: Confidence limits on the abnormality of test scores and test score differences. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1196–1208.
  • Crawford, J. R., Garthwaite, P. H., & Ryan, K. (2011). Comparing a single case to a control sample: Testing for neuropsychological deficits and dissociations in the presence of covariates. Cortex, 47, 1166–1178. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2011.02.017
  • Cumming, T. B., Patterson, K., Verfaellie, M., & Graham, K. S. (2006). One bird with two stones: Abnormal word length effects in pure alexia and semantic dementia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 1130–1161. doi:10.1080/02643290600674143
  • Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (2011). The unique role of the visual word form area in reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 254–262. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.04.003
  • Dejerine, J. (1892). Contribution à l’étude anatomo-pathologique et clinique des différentes variétés cécité verbale. Comptes Rendus Hebdomaladaires des Séances et Mémoires de la Société de Biologie, 4, 61–90.
  • Epelbaum, S., Pinel, P., Gaillard, R., Delmaire, C., Perrin, M., Dupont, S., … Cohen, L. (2008). Pure alexia as a disconnection syndrome: New diffusion imaging evidence for an old concept. Cortex, 44, 962–974. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2008.05.003
  • Farah, M. J., & Wallace, M. A. (1991). Pure alexia as a visual impairment: A reconsideration. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8, 313–334. doi:10.1080/02643299108253376
  • Fiset, D., Arguin, M., Bub, D., Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (2005). How to make the word-length effect disappear in letter-by-letter dyslexia: Implications for an account of the disorder. Psychological Sciences, 16, 535–541.
  • Fiset, D., Arguin, M., & McCabe, E. (2006). The breakdown of parallel letter processing in letter-by-letter dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 240–260.doi:10.1080/02643290442000437
  • Fiset, D., Gosselin, F., Blais, C., & Arguin, M. (2006). Inducing letter-by-letter dyslexia in normal readers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1466–1476. doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.9.1466
  • Gaillard, R., Naccache, L., Pinel, P., Clemenceau, S., Volle, E., Hasboun, D.,… Cohen, L. (2006). Direct intracranial, FMRI, and lesion evidence for the causal role of left inferotemporal cortex in reading. Neuron, 50, 191–204. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.03.031
  • Habekost, T., Petersen, A., Behrmann, M., & Starrfelt, R. (2014). From word superiority to word inferiority: Visual processing of letters and words in pure alexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 31, 413–436. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2014.906398
  • Henry, C., Gaillard, R., Volle, E., Chiras, J., Ferrieux, S., Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (2005). Brain activations during letter-by-letter reading: A follow-up study. Neuropsychologia, 43, 1983–1989. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.04.007
  • Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (1987). To see but not to see. A case study of visual agnosia. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Leff, A. P., Crewes, H., Plant, G. T., Scott, S. K., Kennard, C., & Wise, R. J. (2001). The functional anatomy of single-word reading in patients with hemianopic and pure alexia. Brain, 124, 510–521. doi:10.1093/brain/124.3.510
  • Leff, A. P., Spitsyna, G., Plant, G. T., & Wise, R. J. (2006). Structural anatomy of pure and hemianopic alexia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 77, 1004–1007. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2005.086983
  • Maher, L. M., Clayton, M. C., Barrett, A. M., Schober Peterson, D., & Gonzalez Rothi, L. J. (1998). Rehabilitation of a case of pure alexia: Exploiting residual abilities. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 4, 636–647.
  • McCloskey, M., Fischer-Baum, S., & Schubert, T. (2014). Representation of letter position in single-word reading: Evidence from acquired dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 30, 396–428. doi:10.1080/02643294.2014.880675
  • McCloskey, M., & Schubert, T. (2014). Shared versus separate processes for letter and digit identification. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 31, 437–460. doi:10.1080/02643294.2013.869202
  • Mycroft, R. H., Behrmann, M., & Kay, J. (2009). Visuoperceptual deficits in letter-by-letter reading?. Neuropsychologia, 47, 1733–1744. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.02.014
  • Patterson, K., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (1999). Selective disorders of reading?. Current Opinion Neurobiology, 9, 235–239.
  • Patterson, K., & Plaut, D. C. (2009). “Shallow draughts intoxicate the brain”: Lessons from cognitive science for cognitive neuropsychology. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 39–58. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01012.x
  • Pflugshaupt, T., Gutbrod, K., Wurtz, P., von Wartburg, R., Nyffeler, T., de Haan, B.,… Mueri, R. M. (2009). About the role of visual field defects in pure alexia. Brain, 132, 1907–1917. doi:10.1093/brain/awp141
  • Price, C. J., & Devlin, J. T. (2011). The interactive account of ventral occipitotemporal contributions to reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 246–253. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.04.001
  • Price, C. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1992). Letter-by-letter reading? Functional deficits and compensatory strategies. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 9, 427–457.
  • Purcell, J., Shea, J., & Rapp, B. (2014). Beyond the VWFA: The orthography-semantics interface in spelling and reading. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 31, 482–511. doi:10.1080/02643294.2014.909399
  • Rayner, K., & Johnson, R. L. (2005). Letter-by-letter acquired dyslexia is due to the serial encoding of letters. Psychological Science, 16, 530–534. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01570.x
  • Roberts, D. J., Lambon Ralph, M. A., & Woollams, A. M. (2010). When does less yield more? The impact of severity upon implicit recognition in pure alexia. Neuropsychologia, 48, 2437–2446. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.04.002
  • Roberts, D. J., Woollams, A. M., Kim, E., Beeson, P. M., Rapcsak, S. Z., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2013). Efficient visual object and word recognition relies on high spatial frequency coding in the left posterior fusiform gyrus: Evidence from a case-series of patients with ventral occipito-temporal cortex damage. Cerebral Cortex, 23, 2568–2580. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs224
  • Saffran, E. M., Bogyo, L. C., Schwartz, M. F., & Marin, O. S. (1980). Does deep dyslexia reflect right-hemisphere reading?. In M. Coltheart, K. Patterson, & J. C. Marshall (Eds.), Deep dyslexia (2nd ed., pp. 381–406). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Schubert, T., & McCloskey, M. (2014). Prelexical representations and processes in reading: Evidence from acquired dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 30, 360–395. doi:10.1080/02643294.2014.880677
  • Sebastian, R., Gomez, Y., Leigh, R., Davis, C., Newhart, M., & Hillis, A. E. (2014). The roles of occipitotemporal cortex in reading, spelling, and naming. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 31, 512–529. doi:10.1080/02643294.2014.884060
  • Shallice, T. (1988). From neuropsychology to mental structure (1st ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Shallice, T. (2014). On compensatory strategies and computational models: The case of pure alexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 31, 530–544. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2014.884060
  • Sheldon, C. A., Abegg, M., Sekunova, A., & Barton, J. J. (2012). The word-length effect in acquired alexia, and real and virtual hemianopia. Neuropsychologia, 50, 841–851. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.01.020
  • Starrfelt, R., & Behrmann, M. (2011). Number reading in pure alexia—A review. Neuropsychologia, 49, 2283–2298. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.04.028
  • Starrfelt, R., Habekost, T., & Gerlach, C. (2010). Visual processing in pure alexia: A case study. Cortex, 46, 242–255. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2009.03.013
  • Starrfelt, R., Habekost, T., & Leff, A. P. (2009). Too little, too late: Reduced visual span and speed characterize pure alexia. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 2880–2890. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp059
  • Starrfelt, R., Nielsen, S., Habekost, T., & Andersen, T. S. (2013). How low can you go: Spatial frequency sensitivity in a patient with pure alexia. Brain and Language, 126, 188–192. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2013.05.006
  • Warrington, E. K., & Shallice, T. (1980). Word-form dyslexia. Brain, 103, 99–112. doi:10.1093/brain/103.1.99
  • Woollams, A. M., Hoffman, P., Roberts, D., Lambon Ralph, M., & Patterson, K. (2014). What lies beneath: A comparison of reading aloud in pure Alexia and semantic Dementia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 31, 461–481. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2014.882300
  • Yong, K. X., Warren, J. D., Warrington, E. K., & Crutch, S. J. (2013). Intact reading in patients with profound early visual dysfunction. Cortex, 49, 2294–2306. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2013.01.009