The role of LIFG-based executive control in sentence comprehension

References

• Bader, M. (1998). Prosodic influences on reading syntactically ambiguous sentences. In J. D. Fodor & F. Ferreira (Eds.), Reanalysis in sentence processing (pp. 1–46). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, Y., & Trueswell, J. C. (2010). Children's (in)ability to recover from garden paths in a verb-final language: Evidence for developing control in sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106, 41–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christianson, K., Hollingworth, A., Halliwell, J. F., & Ferreira, F. (2001). Thematic roles assigned along the garden-path linger. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 368–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christianson, K., Williams, C. C., Zacks, R. T., & Ferreira, F. (2006). Younger and older adults’ “good-enough” interpretations of garden-path sentences. Discourse Processes, 42(2), 205–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, J. R., & Howell, D. C. (1998). Comparing an individual's test score against norms derived from small samples. The Clinical Neuropsychologist (Neuropsychology Development and Cognition Section D), 12, 482–486.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test-IV. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F. (2003). The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 47(2), 164–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., Bailey, K. G. D., & Ferraro, V. (2002). Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 11–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., & Clifton, C. (1986). The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 25(3), 348–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. M. (1990). Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: Evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 555–568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. M. (1998). Syntactic reanalysis, thematic processing, and sentence comprehension. In J. D. Fodor & F. Ferreira (Eds.), Reanalysis in sentence processing (pp. 73–100). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Fodor, J. D., & Inoue, A. (1994). The diagnosis and cure of garden paths. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23, 407–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fodor, J. D., & Inoue, A. (1998). Attach anyway. In J. D. Fodor & F. Ferreira (Eds.), Reanalysis in sentence processing (pp. 101–141). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Frazier, L., & Clifton, C. (1998). Sentence reanalysis and visibility. In J. D. Fodor & F. Ferreira (Eds.), Reanalysis in sentence processing reanalysis in sentence processing (pp. 143–176). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 178–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman, M. L., & Martin, R. C. (2001). Dissociable components of short-term memory and their relation to long-term learning. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18, 193–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, N., & Gvion, A. (2007). As far as individuals with conduction aphasia understood these sentences were ungrammatical: Garden path in conduction aphasia. Aphasiology, 21, 570–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gahl, S., Jurafsky, D., & Roland, D. (2004). Verb subcategorization frequencies: American english corpus data, methodological studies, and cross-corpus comparisons. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 432–443.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garnsey, S. M., Pearlmutter, N. J., Myers, E., & Lotocky, M. A. (1997). The contributions of verb bias and plausibility to the comprehension of temporarily ambiguous sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 58–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorrell, P. (1995). Syntax and parsing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gorrell, P. (1998). Syntactic analysis and reanalysis in sentence processing. In J. D. Fodor & F. Ferreira (Eds.), Reanalysis in sentence processing (pp. 201–245). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gvion, A., & Friedmann, N. (2012). Does phonological working memory limitation affect sentence comprehension? A study of conduction aphasia. Aphasiology, 26, 494–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, A. C., & Martin, R. C. (2005). Dissociations among tasks involving inhibition: A single-case study. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, A. C., & Martin, R. C. (2007). Proactive interference in a semantic short-term memory deficit: Role of semantic and phonological relatedness. Cortex, 43, 112–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd, E., Stewart, A. J., & Serratrice, L. (2011). Children do not overcome lexical biases where adults do: The role of the referential scene in garden-path recovery. Journal of Child Language, 38, 222–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, A., & Osterhout, L. (2005). The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(2), 205–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, R. L. (1998). Reanalysis and limited repair parsing: Leaping off the garden path. In J. D. Fodor & F. Ferreira (Eds.), Reanalysis in sentence processing (pp. 247–286). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Linebarger, M. C., Schwartz, M. F., & Saffran, E. M. (1983). Sensitivity to grammatical structure in so-called agrammatic aphasics. Cognition, 13, 361–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. C. (2006). The neuropsychology of sentence processing: Where do we stand? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 74–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. C., Lesch, M. F., & Bartha, M. C. (1999). Independence of input and output phonology in word processing and short-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 3–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novick, J. M., Hussey, E., Teubner-Rhodes, S., Harbison, J. I., & Bunting, M. F. (2014). Clearing the garden-path: Improving sentence processing through cognitive control training. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(2), 186–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novick, J. M., Kan, I. P., Trueswell, J. C., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2009). A case for conflict across multiple domains: Memory and language impairments follow damage to ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 26, 527–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novick, J. M., Trueswell, J. C., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2005). Cognitive control and parsing: Reexamining the role of broca's area in sentence comprehension. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 263–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novick, J. M., Trueswell, J. C., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2010). Broca's area and language processing: Evidence for the cognitive control connection. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4, 906–924.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchett, B. L. (1992). Grammatical competence and parsing performance. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Kambe, G., Duffy, S. A. (2000). The effect of clause wrap-up on eye movements during reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 53, 1061–1080.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosinski, R. R., Golinkoff, R. M., & Kukish, K. S. (1975). Automatic semantic processing in a picture-word interference task. Child Development, 46, 247–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffran, E. M., Schwartz, M. F., & Linebarger, M. C. (1998). Semantic influences on thematic role assignment: Evidence from normals and aphasics. Brain and Language, 62(2), 255–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snedeker, J., & Trueswell, J. C. (2004). The developing constraints on parsing decisions: The role of lexical-biases and referential scenes in child and adult sentence processing. Cognitive Psychology, 49, 238–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.
   Google Scholar
• Sturt, P. (2007). Semantic re-interpretation and garden path recovery. Cognition, 105(2), 477–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturt, P., & Crocker, M. W. (1996). Monotonic syntactic processing: A cross-linguistic study of attachment and reanalysis. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 449–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturt, P., & Crocker, M. W. (1998). Generalized monotonicity for reanalysis models. In J. D. Fodor & F. Ferreira (Eds.), Reanalysis in sentence processing (pp. 365–400). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Sturt, P., Pickering, M. J., & Crocker, M. W. (1999). Structural change and reanalysis difficulty in language comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 136–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trueswell, J. C., Sekerina, I., Hill, N. M., & Logrip, M. L. (1999). The kindergarten-path effect: Studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition, 73, 89–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuong, L. C. & Martin, R. C. (2011). LIFG-based attentional control and the resolution of lexical ambiguities in sentence context. Brain and Language, 116, 22–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuong, L. C., & Martin, R. C. (2014). Domain-specific executive control and the revision of misinterpretations in sentence comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes, 29, 312–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weighall, A. (2008). The kindergarten path effect revisited: Children's processing of structural ambiguities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 99, 75–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberg, A. (1993). Parameters in the theory of sentence processing: Minimal commitment theory goes east. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22, 339–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. P., & Garnsey, S. M. (2009). Making simple sentences hard: Verb bias effects in simple direct object sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 368–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye, Z., & Zhou, X. (2009). Conflict control during sentence comprehension: fMRI evidence. NeuroImage, 48, 280–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar