312
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Short Reports

Untangling letter confusability and word length effects in pure alexia

&
Pages 442-456 | Received 22 Apr 2015, Accepted 24 Oct 2015, Published online: 06 Jan 2016

References

  • Ajax, E. T. (1967). Dyslexia without agraphia: Prognostic considerations. Archives of Neurology, 17, 645–652. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1967.00470300087014
  • Arguin, M., & Bub, D. (2005). Parallel processing blocked by letter similarity in letter-by-letter dyslexia: A replication. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 589–602. doi:10.1080/02643290442000202
  • Arguin, M., Fiset, S., & Bub, D. (2002). Sequential and parallel letter processing in letter-by-letter reading. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19, 535–555. doi: 10.1080/02643290244000040
  • Barton, J. J. S., Hanif, H. M., Bjornstrom, L. E., & Hills, C. (2014). The word-length effect in reading: A review. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 31, 378–412. doi:10.1080/02643294.2014.895314
  • Behrmann, M., Nelson, J., & Sekuler, E. B. (1998). Visual complexity in letter-by-letter reading: “Pure” alexia is not pure. Neuropsychologia, 36, 1115–1132. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00005-0
  • Behrmann, M., Plaut, D. C., & Nelson, J. (1998). A literature review and new data supporting an interactive account of letter-by-letter reading. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 7–51. doi:10.1080/026432998381212
  • Behrmann, M., Shomstein, S. S., Black, S. E., & Barton, J. J. S. (2001). The eye movements of pure alexic patients during reading and nonreading tasks. Neuropsychologia, 39, 983–1002. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00021-5
  • Breaugh, J. A. (2006). Rethinking the control of nuisance variables in theory testing. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20, 429–443. doi:10.1007/s10869-005-9009-y
  • Chang, Y. N., Furber, S., & Welbourne, S. (2012). Modelling normal and impaired letter recognition: Implications for understanding pure alexic reading. Neuropsychologia, 50, 2773–2788. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.031
  • Chialant, D., & Caramazza, A. (1998). Perceptual and lexical factors in a case of letter-by-letter reading. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 167–201. doi:10.1080/026432998381258
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Cohen, L., Henry, C., Dehaene, S., Martinaud, O., Lehericy, S., Lemer, C., et al. (2004). The pathophysiology of letter-by-letter reading. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1768–1780. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.04.018
  • Cohen, L., Martinaud, O., Lemer, C., Lehericy, S., Samon, Y., Obadia, M., et al. (2003). Visual word recognition in the left and right hemispheres: Anatomical and functional correlates of peripheral alexias. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 1313–1333. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhg079
  • Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC Psycholinguistic Database [Electronic version]. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 33, 497–505. doi: 10.1080/14640748108400805
  • Cosky, M. J. (1976). The role of letter recognition in word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 4, 207–214. doi:10.3758/BF03213165
  • Coslett, H. B., & Saffran, E. M. (1989). Evidence for preserved reading in “pure alexia”. Brain, 112, 327–359. doi: 10.1093/brain/112.2.327
  • Coslett, H. B., Saffran, E. M., Greenbaum, S., & Schwartz, H. (1993). Reading in pure alexia: The effect of strategy. Brain, 116, 21–37. doi: 10.1093/brain/116.1.21
  • Cushman, C. L., & Johnson, R. L. (2011). Age-of-acquisition effects in pure alexia. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 1726–1742. doi:10.1080/17470218.2011.556255
  • Davis, C. J. (2005). N-Watch: A program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 65–70. doi: 10.3758/BF03206399
  • Farah, M. J. M., & Wallace, M. A. (1991). Pure alexia as a visual impairment: A reconsideration. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8, 313–334. doi: 10.1080/02643299108253376
  • Fiset, D., Arguin, M., Bub, D., Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (2005). How to make the word-length effect disappear in letter-by-letter dyslexia implications for an account of the disorder. Psychological Science, 16, 535–541. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01571.x
  • Fiset, D., Arguin, M., & McCabe, E. (2006). The breakdown of parallel letter processing in letter-by-letter dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 240–260. doi:10.1080/02643290442000437
  • Fiset, D., Gosselin, F., Blais, C., & Arguin, M. (2006). Inducing letter-by-letter dyslexia in normal readers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1466–1476. doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.9.1466
  • Fiset, S., Arguin, M., & Fiset, D. (2006). An attempt to simulate letter-by-letter dyslexia in normal readers. Brain and Language, 98, 251–263. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2006.05.003
  • Friedman, R. B., & Alexander, M. P. (1984). Pictures, images, and pure alexia: A case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 1, 9–23. doi:10.1080/02643298408252014
  • Gaillard, R., Naccache, L., Pinel, P., Clemenceau, S., Volle, E., Hasboun, D., … Cohen, L. (2006). Direct intracranial, FMRI, and lesion evidence for the causal role of left inferotemporal cortex in reading. Neuron, 50, 191–204. doi:S0896–6273(06)00228-5[pii]10.1016/j.neuron.2006.03.031
  • Gilmore, G. C., Hersh, H., Caramazza, A., & Griffin, J. (1979). Multidimensional letter similarity derived from recognition errors. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 425–431. doi: 10.3758/BF03199852
  • Hodge, D. C. (1962). Legability of a uniform-stroke width alphabet: Relative legibility of upper and lower-case letters. Journal of Engineering Psychology, 1, 34–46.
  • Howard, D. (1991). Letter-by-letter readers: Evidence for parallel processing. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 34–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
  • Johnson, R. L., & Rayner, K. (2007). Top-down and bottom-up effects in pure alexia: Evidence from eye movements. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2246–2257. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.02.026
  • Juhasz, B. J., & Rayner, K. (2003). Investigating the effects of a set of intercorrelated variables on eye fixation durations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1312–1318. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1312
  • Leff, A., & Starrfelt, R. (2014). Alexia: Diagnosis, treatment, and theory. Springer-Verlag: London.
  • Loomis, J. M. (1982). Analysis of tactile and visual confusion matrices. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 41–52. doi:10.3758/BF03206199
  • McCandliss, B. D., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2003). The visual word form area: Expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 293–299. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00134-7
  • Montant, M., & Behrmann, M. (2001). Phonological activation in pure alexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18, 697–727. doi:10.1080/02643290143000042
  • Mycroft, R. H., Behrmann, M., & Kay, J. (2009). Visuoperceptual deficits in letter-by-letter reading? Neuropsychologia, 47, 1733–1744. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.02.014
  • Myers, J. L., & Well, A. D. (2003). Research design and statistical analysis (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Osswald, K., Humphreys, G. W., & Olson, A. (2002). Words are more than the sum of their parts: Evidence for detrimental effects of word-level information in alexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19, 675–695. doi:10.1080/02643290244000103
  • Patterson, K., & Kay, J. (1982). Letter-by-letter reading: Psychological descriptions of a neurological syndrome. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 34, 411–441. doi:10.1080/14640748208400852
  • Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457–1506. doi:10.1080/17470210902816461
  • Rayner, K., & Johnson, R. L. (2005). Letter-by-letter acquired dyslexia is due to the serial encoding of letters. Psychological Science, 16, 530–534. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01570.x
  • Roberts, D. J., Lambon Ralph, M. A., & Woollams, A. M. (2010). When does less yield more? The impact of severity upon implicit recognition in pure alexia. Neuropsychologia, 48, 2437–2446. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.04.002
  • Saffran, E. M., & Coslett, H. B. (1998). Implicit vs. letter-by-letter reading in pure alexia: A tale of two systems. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 141–165. doi:10.1080/026432998381249
  • Schilling, H. E. H., Rayner, K., & Chumbley, J. I. (1998). Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences. Memory & Cognition, 26(6), 1270–1281. doi: 10.3758/BF03201199
  • Schubert, T., & McCloskey, M. (2013). Prelexical representations and processes in reading: Evidence from acquired dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 30, 360–395. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2014.880677
  • Shallice, T., & Saffran, E. (1986). Lexical processing in the absence of explicit word identification: Evidence from a letter-by-letter reader. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 3, 429–458. doi:10.1080/02643298608252030
  • Staller, J., Buchanan, D., Singer, M., Lappin, J., & Webb, W. (1978). Alexia without agraphia: An experimental case study. Brain and Language, 5(3), 378–387. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(78)90033-0
  • Starrfelt, R., Neilsen, S., Habekost, T., & Andersen, T. S. (2013). How low can you go? Spatial frequency sensitivity in a patient with pure alexia. Brain & Language, 126, 188–192. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2013.05.006
  • Starrfelt, R., & Shallice, T. (2014). What's in a name? The characterization of pure alexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 31, 367–377. doi:10.1080/02643294.2014.924226
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education Inc.
  • Tadros, K., Dupuis-Roy, N., Fiset, D., & Arguin, M. (2010). The use of spatial frequencies for visual word recognition in each cerebral hemisphere. Journal of Vision, 10, 1324. doi: 10.1167/10.7.1324
  • Tadros, K., Fiset, D., Gosselin, F., & Arguin, M. (2009). A medium spatial frequency trough causes letter-by-letter dyslexia in normal readers. Journal of Vision, 9, 822. doi: 10.1167/9.8.822
  • Townsend, J. T. (1971). Theoretical analysis of an alphabetic confusion matrix. Perception & Psychophysics, 9, 40–50. doi:10.3758/BF03213026
  • van der Heijden, A. H., Malhas, M. S., & van den Roovaart, B. P. (1984). An empirical interletter confusion matrix for continuous-line capitals. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 35, 85–88. doi:10.3758/BF03205927
  • Warrington, E. K., & Shallice, T. (1980). Word form dyslexia. Brain, 103, 99–112. doi: 10.1093/brain/103.1.99
  • Wurm, L. H., & Fisicaro, S. A. (2014). What residualizing predictors in regression analyses does (and what it does not do). Journal of Memory and Language, 72, 37–48. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2013.12.003

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.