Cognitive processes in spatial mapping: Evidence from a developmental spatial deficit

References

• Abell, F., Happé, F., & Frith, U. (2000). Do triangles play tricks? Attribution of mental states to animated shapes in normal and abnormal development. Cognitive Development, 15(1), 1–16. doi: 10.1016/S0885-2014(00)00014-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amorim, M. A. (2003). “What is my avatar seeing?”: The coordination of “out-of-body” and “embodied” perspectives for scene recognition across views. Visual Cognition, 10(2), 157–199. doi: 10.1080/713756678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avenanti, A., Bolognini, N., Maravita, A., & Aglioti, S. M. (2007). Somatic and motor components of action simulation. Current Biology, 17(24), 2129–2135. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.11.045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avenanti, A., Candidi, M., & Urgesi, C. (2013). Vicarious motor activation during action perception: Beyond correlational evidence. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benton, A. L., Hamsher, N. R., & Spreen, O. (1983). Contributions to neuropsychological assessment: A clinical manual. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Catmur, C., Walsh, V., & Heyes, C. (2009). Associative sequence learning: The role of experience in the development of imitation and the mirror system. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1528), 2369–2380. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavallo, A., Ansuini, C., Capozzi, F., Tversky, B., & Becchio, C. (2017). When far becomes near: Perspective taking induces social remapping of spatial relations. Psychological Science, 28(1), 69–79. doi: 10.1177/0956797616672464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filimon, F. (2015). Are all spatial reference frames egocentric? Reinterpreting evidence for allocentric, object-centred, or world-centred reference frames. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 941. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. H., Everett, B. A., Croft, K., & Flavell, E. R. (1981). Young children’s knowledge about visual-perception—further evidence for the Level 1–Level 2 distinction. Developmental Psychology, 17, 99–103. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.17.1.99
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franz, E. A., Ford, S., & Werner, S. (2007). Brain and cognitive processes of imitation in bimanual situations: Making inferences about mirror neuron systems. Brain Research, 1145, 138–149. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.01.136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furlanetto, T., Gallace, A., Ansuini, C., & Becchio, C. (2014). Effects of arm crossing on spatial perspective-taking. PLOS ONE, 9(4), e95748. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0095748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graf, R. (1994). Self-rotation and spatial reference: The psychology of partner-centred localisations. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Grèzes, J., & Decety, J. (2001). Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: A meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 12(1), 1–19. doi:10.1002/1097-0193(200101)12:1<1::AID-HBM10>3.0.CO;2-V
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegarty, M., & Waller, D. (2004). A dissociation between mental rotation and perspective-taking spatial abilities. Intelligence, 32, 175–191. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2003.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. The American Journal of Psychology, 57(2), 243–259. doi: 10.2307/1416950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. (1993). Inverting the Simon effect by intention. Psychological Research, 55(4), 270–279. doi: 10.1007/BF00419687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keehner, M., Guerin, S. A., Miller, M. B., Turk, D. J., & Hegarty, M. (2006). Modulation of neural activity by angle of rotation during imagined spatial transformations. NeuroImage, 33(1), 391–398. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler, K., & Thomson, L. A. (2010). The embodied nature of spatial perspective taking: Embodied transformation versus sensorimotor interference. Cognition, 114(1), 72–88. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkham, A. J., & Tipper, S. P. (2015). Spatial compatibility interference effects: A double dissociation between two measures. Visual Cognition, 23(8), 1043–1060. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2015.1110653
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klatzky, R. (1998). Allocentric and egocentric spatial representations: Definitions, distinctions, and interconnections. Spatial Cognition, 1404, 1–17. doi: 10.1007/3-540-69342-4_1
   Google Scholar
• Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility–a model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97(2), 253–270. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.97.2.253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornblum, S., Stevens, G. T., Whipple, A., & Requin, J. (1999). The effects of irrelevant stimuli: 1. The time course of stimulus–stimulus and stimulus–response consistency effects with Stroop-like stimuli, Simon-like tasks, and their factorial combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(3), 688–714. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.25.3.688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozhevnikov, M., & Hegarty, M. (2001). A dissociation between object manipulation spatial ability and spatial orientation ability. Memory & Cognition, 29(5), 745–756. doi: 10.3758/BF03200477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (1996). Frames of reference and Molyneux’s question: Crosslinguistic evidence. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 109–169). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, G. D., & Sadler, D. D. (1996). A computational analysis of the apprehension of spatial relations. In Language and space. (pp. 493–529). Cambridge, MA, US: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mainwaring, S. D., Tversky, B., Ohgishi, M., & Schiano, D. J. (2003). Descriptions of simple spatial scenes in English and Japanese. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 3(1), 3–42. doi: 10.1207/S15427633SCC0301_2
   Google Scholar
• May, M. (2004). Imaginal perspective switches in remembered environments: Transformation versus interference accounts. Cognitive Psychology, 48(2), 163–206. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0285(03)00127-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCloskey, M. (2001). Spatial representation in mind and brain. In B. Rapp (Ed.), What deficits reveal about the human mind/brain: A handbook of cognitive neuropsychology (pp. 101–132). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1997). Explaining facial imitation: A theoretical model. Early Development and Parenting, 6(3–4), 179–192. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0917(199709/12)6:3/4<179::AID-EDP157>3.0.CO;2-R
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelon, P., & Zacks, J. M. (2006). Two kinds of visual perspective taking. Perception & Psychophysics, 68(2), 327–337. doi:10.3758/BF03193680
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olson, G. M., & Laxar, K. (1973). Asymmetries in processing the terms “right” and “left”. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 100(2), 284–290. doi: 10.1037/h0035453
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1928). The child’s conception of the world. London, UK: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd. doi:10.4324/9781315006215
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1956). The child’s conception of space. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Rigal, R. (1994). Right-left orientation: Development of correct use of right and left terms. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79(3), 1–20. doi: 10.2466/pms.1994.79.3.1259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schober, M. F. (1993). Spatial perspective-taking in conversation. Cognition, 47(1), 1–24. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90060-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schober, M. F. (1995). Speakers, addressees, and frames of reference: Whose effort is minimised in conversations about locations? Discourse Processes, 20(2), 219–247. doi: 10.1080/01638539509544939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shusterman, A., & Li, P. (2016). Frames of reference in spatial language acquisition. Cognitive Psychology, 88, 115–161. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., & Wang, H. (2010). Perception of space by multiple intrinsic frames of reference. PLOS ONE, 5(5), e10442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surtees, A. D., & Apperly, I. A. (2012). Egocentrism and automatic perspective taking in children and adults. Child Development, 83(2), 452–460. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01730.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surtees, A., Apperly, I., & Samson, D. (2013). Similarities and differences in visual and spatial perspective-taking processes. Cognition, 129(2), 426–438. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.06.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surtees, A. D. R., Noordzij, M. L., & Apperly, I. A. (2012). Sometimes losing your self in space: Children’s and adults’ spontaneous use of multiple spatial reference frames. Developmental Psychology, 48(1), 185–191. doi: 10.1037/a0025863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarampi, M. R., Heydari, N., & Hegarty, M. (2016). A tale of two types of perspective taking: Sex differences in spatial ability. Psychological Science, 27(11), 1507–1516. doi: 10.1177/0956797616667459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., & Wagner, R. K. (1999). Towre: Test of word reading efficiency. Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, B., & Hard, B. M. (2009). Embodied and disembodied cognition: Spatial perspective-taking. Cognition, 110(1), 124–129. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.10.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wraga, M., Creem, S. H., & Proffitt, D. R. (2000). Updating displays after imagined object and viewer rotations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(1), 151–168. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.26.1.151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwickel, J. (2009). Agency attribution and visuospatial perspective taking. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(6), 1089–1093. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.6.1089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar