Non-fluent speech following stroke is caused by impaired efference copy

References

• Baldo, J. V., Klostermann, E. C., & Dronkers, N. F. (2008). It’s either a cook or a baker: Patients with conduction aphasia get the gist but lose the trace. Brain and Language, 105(2), 134–140. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2007.12.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson, D. F. (1967). Fluency in aphasia: Correlation with radioactive scan localization. Cortex, 3, 373–394. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(67)80025-X
   Google Scholar
• Boersma, P. (2001). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5(9/10), 341–345. Available at: http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/paul/papers/speakUnspeakPraat_glot2001.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436. doi: 10.1163/156856897X00357
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Butler, R. A., Ralph, M. A. L., & Woollams, A. M. (2014). Capturing multidimensionality in stroke aphasia: Mapping principal behavioural components to neural structures. Brain, 137(12), 3248–3266. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S., & Aiken, L. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Dabul, B. L. (2000). Apraxia battery for adults (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
   Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A. (1997). Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic patients. Psychological Review, 104, 801–838. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.4.801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drummond, S. S., Gallagher, T. M., & Mills, R. H. (1981). Word-retrieval in aphasia: An investigation of semantic complexity. Cortex, 17(1), 63–81. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(81)80007-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelter, S. T., Gostynski, M., Papa, S., Frei, M., Born, C., Ajdacic-Gross, V., … Lyrer, P. A. (2006). Epidemiology of aphasia attributable to first ischemic stroke: Incidence, severity, fluency, etiology, and thrombolysis. Stroke, 37(6), 1379–1384. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000221815.64093.8c
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feenaughty, L., Tjaden, K., Benedict, R. H., & Weinstock-Guttman, B. (2013). Speech and pause characteristics in multiple sclerosis: A preliminary study of speakers with high and low neuropsychological test performance. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 27(2), 134–151. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2012.751624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feyereisen, P., Pillon, A., & Partz, M. P. D. (1991). On the measures of fluency in the assessment of spontaneous speech production by aphasic subjects. Aphasiology, 5(1), 1–21. doi: 10.1080/02687039108248516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feyereisen, P., Verbeke-Dewitte, C., & Seron, X. (1986). On fluency measures in aphasic speech. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 8(4), 393–404. doi: 10.1080/01688638608401329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridriksson, J., Basilakos, A., Hickok, G., Bonilha, L., & Rorden, C. (2015). Speech entrainment compensates for Broca’s area damage. Cortex, 69, 68–75. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.04.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridriksson, J., Hubbard, H. I., Hudspeth, S. G., Holland, A. L., Bonilha, L., Fromm, D., & Rorden, C. (2012). Speech entrainment enables patients with Broca’s aphasia to produce fluent speech. Brain, 135(12), 3815–3829. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridriksson, J., Yourganov, G., Bonilha, L., Basilakos, A., Den Ouden, D. B., & Rorden, C. (2016). Revealing the dual streams of speech processing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 201614038.
   Google Scholar
• Geschwind, N. (1979). Specialization of the human brain. Scientific American, 241(3), 180–199. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0979-180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H. (1992). Diagnosis of conduction aphasia. In S. E. Kohn (Ed.), Conduction aphasia (pp. 39–49). Hillsdale,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H. (1993). Understanding aphasia. San Diego: Academic Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E. (1972). The assessment of aphasia and related disorders. Philadelphia, PA: Lea and Febiger.
   Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E., & Barresi, B. (2001). Boston diagnostic aphasia examination (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., Quadfasel, F. A., & Timberlake, W. H. (1964). Phrase length and the type and severity of aphasia. Cortex, 1(2), 133–153. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(64)80018-6
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, J. K. (1998). The fluency dimension in aphasia. Aphasiology, 12(7-8), 673–688. doi: 10.1080/02687039808249565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guenther, F. H. (2006). Cortical interactions underlying the production of speech sounds. Journal of Communication Disorders, 39(6), 350–365. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2006.06.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guenther, F. H. (2016). Neural control of speech. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guenther, F. H., Ghosh, S., & Tourville, J. A. (2006). Neural modeling and imaging of the cortical interactions underlying syllable production. Brain and Language, 96(3), 280–301. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2005.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guenther, F., Hampson, M., & Johnson, D. (1998). A theoretical investigation of reference frames for the planning of speech movements. Psychological Review, 105(4), 611–633. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.105.4.611-633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halai, A. D., Woollams, A. M., & Ralph, M. A. L. (2017). Using principal component analysis to capture individual differences within a unified neuropsychological model of chronic post-stroke aphasia: Revealing the unique neural correlates of speech fluency, phonology and semantics. Cortex, 86, 275–289. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.04.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickok, G. (2012). Computational neuroanatomy of speech production. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13(2), 135–145. doi: 10.1038/nrg3118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickok, G. (2015). Towards an integrated psycholinguistic, neurolinguistic, sensorimotor framework for speech production. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(1), 52–59. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2013.852907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickok, G., Houde, J., & Rong, F. (2011). Sensorimotor integration in speech processing: Computational basis and neural organization. Neuron, 69(3), 407–422. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.01.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2007). The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(5), 393–402. doi: 10.1038/nrn2113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houde, J. F., & Chang, E. F. (2015). The cortical computations underlying feedback control in vocal production. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 33, 174–181. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2015.04.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houde, J. F., & Nagarajan, S. S. (2011). Speech production as state feedback control. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 82. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, D., & Patterson, K. (1992). The pyramids and palm trees test: A test of semantic access from words and pictures. London: Harcourt Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141–151. doi: 10.1177/001316446002000116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kertesz, A. (1982). Western Aphasia battery. New York: Grune and Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Kertesz, A. (2007). The Western Aphasia battery-revised. New York: Grune and Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Kleiner, M., Brainard, D., & Pell, D. (2007). What’s new in psychtoolbox-3? Perception, 36, 1–1. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/03010066070360S101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambon Ralph, M. A., Snell, C., Fillingham, J. K., Conroy, P., & Sage, K. (2010). Predicting the outcome of anomia therapy for people with aphasia post CVA: Both language and cognitive status are key predictors. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 20(2), 289–305. doi: 10.1080/09602010903237875
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of Lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 1–75. Available at: http://www.socsci.ru.nl/ardiroel/BBS1999.pdf.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtheim, L. (1885). On aphasia. Brain, 7, 443–484. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195177640.003.0020
   Google Scholar
• Mathworks, Inc., Natick, MA. (1993). MATLAB.
   Google Scholar
• Niziolek, C., Nagarajan, S. S., & Houde, J. H. (2013). What does motor efference copy represent? Evidence from speech production. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(41), 16110–16116. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2137-13.2013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H., Rogalski, Y., Rodriguez, A. D., Zlatar, Z., Benjamin, M., Harnish, S., … Reilly, J. (2011). Perceptual cues used by listeners to discriminate fluent from nonfluent narrative discourse. Aphasiology, 25(9), 998–1015. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2011.570770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolBox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442. doi: 10.1163/156856897X00366
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Poeck, K. (1983). Fluency. In C. Code (Ed.), The characteristics of aphasia (pp. 23–32). Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Roach, A., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Grewal, R. S., & Brecher, A. (1996). The Philadelphia naming test: Scoring and rationale. Clinical Aphasiology, 24, 121–133.
   Google Scholar
• Strand, E. A., Duffy, J. R., Clark, H. M., & Josephs, K. (2014). The apraxia of speech rating scale: A tool for diagnosis and description of apraxia of speech. Journal of Communication Disorders, 51, 43–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2014.06.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. K. (2011). Northwestern assessment of verbs and sentences. Evanston,IL: Northwestern University.
   Google Scholar
• Tian, X., & Poeppel, D. (2010). Mental imagery of speech and movement implicates the dynamics of internal forward models. Frontiers in Psychology 1, 166. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00166 [PubMed:21897822].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjaden, K., & Wilding, G. E. (2004). Rate and loudness manipulations in Dysarthria: Acoustic and perceptual findings. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 766–783. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeulen, J., Bastiaanse, R., & Van Wageningen, B. (1989). Spontaneous speech in aphasia: A correlational study. Brain and Language, 36(2), 252–274. doi: 10.1016/0093-934X(89)90064-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, E., Snow, C., & Prins, R. (1975). Spontaneous speech of aphasic patients: A psycholinguistic analysis. Brain and Language, 2, 281–303. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(75)80071-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Marchina, S., Norton, A. C., Wan, C. Y., & Schlaug, G. (2013). Predicting speech fluency and naming abilities in aphasic patients. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 831. doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00831
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Mathalon, D. H., Roach, B. J., Reilly, J., Keedy, S. K., Sweeney, J. A., & Ford, J. M. (2014). Action planning and predictive coding when speaking. Neuroimage, 91, 91–98. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wayland, S., & Taplin, J. E. (1982). Nonverbal categorization in fluent and nonfluent anomic aphasics. Brain and Language, 16(1), 87–108. doi: 10.1016/0093-934X(82)90074-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wernicke, C. (1874). The symptom complex of aphasia: A psychological study on an anatomical basis. In R. S. Cohen, & M. W. Wartofsky (Eds.), Boston studies in the philosophy of science (pp. 34–97). Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1874/1969.
   Google Scholar
• Yorkston, K. M., & Beukelman, D. R. (1980). An analysis of connected speech samples of aphasic and normal speakers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 45(1), 27–36. doi: 10.1044/jshd.4501.27
   PubMedGoogle Scholar