How modality-specific is morphology?

References

• Afonso, O., & Álvarez, C. J. (2011). Phonological effects in handwriting production: Evidence from the implicit priming paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1474–1483. doi: 10.1037/a0024515
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albright, A., & Hayes, B. (2003). Rules vs. Analogy in English past tenses: A computational/experimental study. Cognition, 90, 119–161. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00146-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alegre, M., & Gordon, P. (1999). Frequency effects and the representational status of regular inflections. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 41–61. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1998.2607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, S. R. (1992). A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, H. R., Piepenbrock, R., & Van Rijin, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Badecker, W., & Caramazza, A. (1987). The analysis of morphological errors in a case of acquired dyslexia. Brain and Language, 32, 278–305. doi: 10.1016/0093-934X(87)90129-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badecker, W., & Caramazza, A. (1989). A lexical distinction between inflection and derivation. Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 108–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badecker, W., Hillis, A., & Caramazza, A. (1990). Lexical morphology and its role in the writing process: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia. Cognition, 35, 205–243. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(90)90023-D
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badecker, W., Rapp, B., & Caramazza, A. (1996). Lexical morphology and the two orthographic routes. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13, 161–176. doi: 10.1080/026432996381980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., et al. (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445–459. doi: 10.3758/BF03193014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basso, A., Taborelli, A., & Vignolo, L. A. (1978). Dissociated disorders of speaking and writing in aphasia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 41, 556–563. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.41.6.556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, L. (2001). Morphological productivity (Vol. 95). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, H., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Seidenberg, M. S., McClelland, J. L., & Patterson, K. (2003). Deficits in phonology and past-tense morphology: What’s the connection? Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 502–526. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00538-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonin, P., Peereman, R., & Fayol, M. (2001). Do phonological codes constrain the selection of orthographic codes in written picture naming? Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 688–720. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2000.2786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booij, G. (2006). Inflection and derivation. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language & linguistics (Vol. 5, pp. 654–661). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Bozic, M., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2010). Neurocognitive contexts for morphological complexity: Dissociating inflection and derivation. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4, 1063–1073. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00254.x
   Google Scholar
• Bub, D., & Kertesz, A. (1982). Deep agraphia. Brain and Language, 17, 146–165. doi: 10.1016/0093-934X(82)90011-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchwald, A. B., Gagnon, B., & Miozzo, M. (2017). Identification and remediation of phonological and motor errors in acquired sound production impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60 (6S), 1726–1738. https://jslhr.pubs.asha.org/article.aspx?articleid=2635218 doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-16-0240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchwald, A. B., Rapp, B., & Stone, M. (2007). Insertion of discrete phonological units: An articulatory and acoustic investigation of aphasic speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 910–948. doi: 10.1080/01690960701273532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bybee, J. L. (2010). Language, usage and complexity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., & Hillis, A. E. (1991). Lexical organization of nouns and verbs in the brain. Nature, 349, 788–790. doi: 10.1038/349788a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cholin, J., Rapp, B., & Miozzo, M. (2010). When do combinatorial mechanisms apply in the production of inflected words? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 27, 334–359. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2010.524467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clahsen, H. (1999). Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisciplinary study of German inflections. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 991–1060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulmas, F. (2003). Writing systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Critten, S., Connelly, V., Dockrell, J. E., & Walter, K. (2014). Inflectional and derivational morphological spelling abilities of children with specific language impairment. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 948–948. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00948
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crystal, D. (2013). Spell it out: The curious, enthralling and extraordinary story of English spelling. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Damian, M. F., Dorjee, D., & Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H. (2011). Long-term repetition priming in spoken and written word production: Evidence for a contribution of phonology to handwriting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 813–826. doi: 10.1037/a0023260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., Oppenheim, G. M., & Kittredge, A. K. (2008). Saying the right word at the right time: Syntagmatic and paradigmatic interference in sentence production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 583–608. doi: 10.1080/01690960801920735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). Peabody picture test-revised manual for forms L and M. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, A. W. (2016). Reading, writing and dyslexia (classic edition): A cognitive analysis. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, S. R. (2001). History of writing. London: Reaktion Books.
   Google Scholar
• Folk, J. R., Rapp, B., & Goldrick, M. (2002). The interaction of lexical and sublexical information in spelling: What’s the point? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19, 653–671. doi: 10.1080/02643290244000184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith, U. (1979). Reading by eye and writing by ear. In P. A. Kolers, M. Wrolstad, & H. Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language 1 (pp. 379–390). New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldrick, M., Folk, J. R., & Rapp, B. (2010). Mrs. Malaprop’s neighborhood: Using word errors to reveal neighborhood structure. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 113–134. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.11.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, R. A., & Caramazza, A. (1985). The johns hopkins dysgraphia battery. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. (1963). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of language (pp. 73–113). Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haspelmath, M. (2002). Understanding morphology. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Hotopf, N. (1980). Slips of the pen. In U. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 287–307). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Joanisse, M. F., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Impairments in verb morphology after brain injury: A connectionist model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96, 7592–7597. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.13.7592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juel, C., & Minden-Cupp, C. (2000). Learning to read words: Linguistic units and instructional strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 458–492. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.35.4.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (1983). Boston naming test. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.
   Google Scholar
• Katamba, F., & Stonham, J. (2006). Morphology. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, J., Lesser, R., & Coltheart, M. (1992). PALPA: Psycholinguistic assessments of language processing in aphasia. Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kertesz, A. (1982). Western aphasia battery. New York: Grune & Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, S. E., & Melvold, J. (2000). Effects of morphological complexity on phonological output deficits in fluent and nonfluent aphasics. Brain and Language, 73, 323–346. doi: 10.1006/brln.2000.2179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laiacona, M., Capitani, E., Zonca, G., Scola, I., Saletta, P., & Luzzatti, C. (2009). Integration of lexical and sublexical processing in the spelling of regular words: A multiple single–case study in Italian dysgraphic patients. Cortex, 45, 804–815. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.10.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laine, M., Niemi, J., Koivuselkä, P., & Hyönä, J. (1995). Morphological processing of polymorphemic nouns in a highly inflected language. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12, 457–502. doi: 10.1080/02643299508252005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lhermitte, F., & Dérousné, J. (1974). Paraphasies et jargonaphasies dans le langage oral avec conservation du langage écrit. Genèse des neologismes. Revue Neurologique, 130, 21–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberman, I. Y., & Shankweiler, D. (1985). Phonology and the problems of learning to read and write. Remedial and Special Education, 6, 8–17. doi: 10.1177/074193258500600604
   Google Scholar
• Lichtheim, L. (1885). On aphasia. Brain, 7, 433–484. doi: 10.1093/brain/7.4.433
   Google Scholar
• Marangolo, P., & Piras, F. (2008). Dissociations in processing derivational morphology: The right basal ganglia involvement. Neuropsychologia, 46, 196–205. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.07.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. F. (1995). The acquisition of the English past tense in children and multilayered connectionist networks. Cognition, 56, 271–279. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)00656-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (1997). Dissociating types of mental computation. Nature, 387, 592–594. doi: 10.1038/42456
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miceli, G., & Caramazza, A. (1988). Dissociation of inflectional and derivational morphology. Brain and Language, 35, 24–65. doi: 10.1016/0093-934X(88)90100-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miozzo, M. (2003). On the processing of regular and irregular forms of verbs and nouns: Evidence from neuropsychology. Cognition, 87, 101–127. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00200-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miozzo, M., & Gordon, P. (2005). Facts, events, and inflection: When language and memory dissociate. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1074–1086. doi: 10.1162/0898929054475163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, D. R. (2014). Writing systems: Language production, and modes of rationality. In M. Goldrick, V. Ferreira, & M. Miozzo (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language production (pp. 329–337). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. (1991). Rules of language. Science, 253(5019), 530–535. doi: 10.1126/science.1857983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu, Q., Damian, M. F., & Li, X. (2016). Phonology contributes to writing: Evidence from a masked priming task. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31, 251–264. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1091086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, B., Benzing, L., & Caramazza, A. (1997). The autonomy of lexical orthography. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 71–104. doi: 10.1080/026432997381628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, B., & Caramazza, A. (1997). The modality-specific organization of grammatical categories: Evidence from impaired spoken and written sentence production. Brain and Language, 56, 248–286. doi: 10.1006/brln.1997.1735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, B., Fischer-Baum, S., & Miozzo, M. (2015). Modality and morphology: What we write may not be what we say. Psychological Science, 26, 892–902. doi: 10.1177/0956797615573520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riddoch, M. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1993). BORB: Birmingham object recognition battery. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L., & PDP Research Group. (1986). On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In J. L. McClelland, & D. E. Rumelhart (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Vol 1. Foundations (pp. 216–217). Cambridge, MA: MITPress.
   Google Scholar
• Scalise, S. (1988). Inflection and derivation. Linguistics, 26, 561–581. doi: 10.1515/ling.1988.26.4.561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuster, V. P., & Miozzo, M. (in press). The processing of inflected and derived words. Cognitive Neuropsychology.
   Google Scholar
• Steffler, D. J. (2001). Implicit cognition and spelling development. Developmental Review, 21, 168–204. doi: 10.1006/drev.2000.0517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephany, U. (1982). Inflectional and lexical morphology: A linguistic continuum. Glossologia, 1, 27–55.
   Google Scholar
• Stockall, L., & Marantz, A. (2006). A single route, full decomposition model of morphological complexity: MEG evidence. The Mental Lexicon, 1, 85–123. doi: 10.1075/ml.1.1.07sto
   Google Scholar
• Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2016). Choosing between alternative spellings of sounds: The role of context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 1154–1159. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullman, M. T. (2004). Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92(1), 231–270. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullman, M. T., Corkin, S., Coppola, M., Hickok, G., Growdon, J. H., Koroshetz, W. J., & Pinker, S. (1997). A neural dissociation within language: Evidence that the mental dictionary is part of declarative memory, and that grammatical rules are processed by the procedural system. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 266–276. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1997.9.2.266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venezky, R. L. (1999). The American way of spelling: The structure and origins of American English orthography. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar