The processing of inflected and derived words in writing

References

• Alario, F. X., Schiller, N. O., Domoto-Reilly, K., & Caramazza, A. (2003). The role of phonological and orthographic information in lexical selection. Brain and Language, 84, 372–398. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00556-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amenta, S., & Crepaldi, D. (2012). Morphological processing as we know it: An analytical review of morphological effects in visual word identification. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 232. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, S. R. (1992). A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., Đurđević, D. F., Hendrix, P., & Marelli, M. (2011). An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. Psychological Review, 118, 438–481. doi: 10.1037/a0023851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R., Piepenbrock, R., & Van Rijin, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D., Thomson, N., & Buchanan, M. (1975). Word length and the structure of short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14(6), 575–589. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80045-4
   Google Scholar
• Badecker, W., & Caramazza, A. (1987). The analysis of morphological errors in a case of acquired dyslexia. Brain and Language, 32, 278–305. doi: 10.1016/0093-934X(87)90129-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badecker, W., & Caramazza, A. (1989). A lexical distinction between inflection and derivation. Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 108–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badecker, W., Hillis, A., & Caramazza, A. (1990). Lexical morphology and its role in the writing process: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia. Cognition, 35, 205–243. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(90)90023-D
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badecker, W., Rapp, B., & Caramazza, A. (1996). Lexical morphology and the two orthographic routes. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13, 161–176. doi: 10.1080/026432996381980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B. … Treiman, R. (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445–459. doi: 10.3758/BF03193014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, L. (2001). Morphological productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Booij, G. (1996). Inherent versus contextual inflection and the spilt morphology hypothesis. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1995 (pp. 1–16). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Booij, G. (2006). Inflection and derivation. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language & linguistics (Vol. 5, pp. 654–661). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Bozic, M., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2010). Neurocognitive contexts for morphological complexity: Dissociating inflection and derivation. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4, 1063–1073. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00254.x
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, J. L. (1985). Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, J. (2007). Frequency of use and the organization of language. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., & Hillis, A. E. (1991). Lexical organization of nouns and verbs in the brain. Nature, 3, 37–76.
   Google Scholar
• Cholin, J., Rapp, B., & Miozzo, M. (2010). When do combinatorial mechanisms apply in the production of inflected words? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 27, 334–359. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2010.524467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clahsen, H. (1999). Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisciplinary study of German inflections. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 991–1060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damian, M. F., Dorjee, D., & Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H. (2011). Long-term repetition priming in spoken and written word production: Evidence for a contribution of phonology to handwriting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 813–826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deacon, H., Conrad, N., & Pacton, S. (2008). A statistical learning perspective on children’s learning about graphotactic and morphological regularities in spelling. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 49(2), 118–124. doi: 10.1037/0708-5591.49.2.118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dressler, W. U. (1989). Prototypical differences between inflection and derivation. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunicationsforschung, 42, 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, A. W. (2016). Reading, writing and dyslexia (classic edition): A cognitive analysis. London: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Folk, J. R., & Jones, A. C. (2004). The purpose of lexical/sublexical interaction during spelling: Further evidence from dysgraphia and articulatory suppression. Neurocase, 10, 65–69. doi: 10.1080/13554790490960512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folk, J. R., Rapp, B., & Goldrick, M. (2002). The interaction of lexical and sublexical information in spelling: What’s the point? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19, 653–671. doi: 10.1080/02643290244000184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, M. A., Davis, M. H., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2010). Derivational morphology and base morpheme frequency. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 117–130. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, R. A., & Caramazza, A. (1985). The Johns Hopkins dysgraphia battery. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, N. L., Patterson, K., & Hodges, J. R. (1997). Progressive dysgraphia: Co-occurrence of central and peripheral impairments. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 975–1005. doi: 10.1080/026432997381321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna, P. R., Hanna, J. S., Hodges, R. E., & RudorfJr, E. H. (1966). Phoneme-grapheme correspondences as cues to spelling improvement. U.S. Office of Education Cooperative Research Program Monograph 16. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1–1716.
   Google Scholar
• Haspelmath, M. (1996). Word-class-changing inflection and morphology theory. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1995 (pp. 43–66). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Haspelmath, M. (2002). Understanding morphology. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, J., & Baayen, H. (2003). Phonotactics, parsing and productivity. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 15, 99–130.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, H., Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2006). Children use vowels to help them spell consonants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94, 27–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2005.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillis, A. E., & Caramazza, A. (1995). Converging evidence for the interaction of semantic and sublexical phonological information in accessing lexical representations for spoken output. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12, 187–227. doi: 10.1080/02643299508251996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillis, A. E., Rapp, B., & Caramazza, A. (1999). When a rose is a rose in speech but a tulip in writing. Cortex, 35, 337–356. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70804-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houghton, G., & Zorzi, M. (2003). Normal and impaired spelling in a connectionist dual-route architecture. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 115–162. doi: 10.1080/02643290242000871
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katamba, F., & Stonham, J. (2006). Morphology. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, J., Lesser, R., & Coltheart, M. (1992). Psycholinguistic assessment of language processing in aphasia. Hove: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, N., & Bryant, P. (2003). Do beez buzz? Rule-based and frequency-based knowledge in learning to spell plural -s. Child Development, 74(1), 63–74. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn, S. E., & Melvold, J. (2000). Effects of morphological complexity on phonological output deficits in fluent and nonfluent aphasia. Brain and Language, 73, 323–346. doi: 10.1006/brln.2000.2179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laine, M., Niemi, J., Koivuselkä-Sallinen, P., & Hyönä, J. (1995). Morphological processing of polymorphemic nouns in a highly inflected language. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12, 457–502. doi: 10.1080/02643299508252005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marangolo, P., & Piras, F. (2008). Dissociations in processing derivational morphology: The right basal ganglia involvement. Neuropsychologia, 46, 196–205. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.07.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3–33. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.101.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miceli, G., Capasso, R., & Caramazza, A. (1999). Sublexical conversion procedures and the interaction of phonological and orthographic lexical forms. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 16, 557–572. doi: 10.1080/026432999380726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miceli, G., & Caramazza, A. (1988). Dissociation of inflectional and derivational morphology. Brain and Language, 35, 24–65. doi: 10.1016/0093-934X(88)90100-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miceli, G., & Costa, V. (2014). The role of lexical and sublexical orthography in writing: autonomy, interaction and neurofunctional correlates. In M. Goldrick, V. Ferreira, & M. Miozzo (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language production, (pp. 358–378). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miozzo, M., Shuster, V. P., & Fischer-Baum, S. (2018). How modality specific is morphology? Cognitive Neuropsychology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2018.1491833
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunes, T., Bryant, P., & Bindman, M. (1997). Morphological spelling strategies: Developmental stages and processes. Developmental Psychology, 33, 637–649. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.33.4.637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacton, S., Fayol, M., & Perruchet, P. (2005). Children’s implicit learning of graphotactic and morphological regularities. Child Development, 76(2), 324–339. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00848_a.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papagno, C., & Girelli, L. (2005). Writing through the phonological buffer: A case of progressive writing disorder. Neuropsychologia, 43, 1277–1287. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perlmutter, D. (1988). The split-morphology hypothesis: Evidence from Yiddish. In M. Hammond, & M. Noonan (Eds.), Theoretical morphology: Approaches in modern linguistics (pp. 79–100). Orlando: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plank, F. (1994). Inflection and derivation. In R. E. Asher (Ed.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics (Vol. 3, pp. 1671–1678). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rapp, B., Epstein, C., & Tainturier, M. (2002). The integration of information across lexical and sublexical processes in spelling. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19, 1–29. doi: 10.1080/0264329014300060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, B., & Fischer-Baum, S. (2014). Representation of orthographic knowledge. In M. Goldrick, V. Ferreira, & M. Miozzo (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language production, (pp. 338–357). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rapp, B., Fischer-Baum, S., & Miozzo, M. (2015). Modality and morphology: What we write may not be what we say. Psychological Science, 26, 892–902. doi: 10.1177/0956797615573520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scalise, S. (1988). Inflection and derivation. Linguistics, 26, 561–581. doi: 10.1515/ling.1988.26.4.561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S., & Gonnerman, L. M. (2000). Explaining derivational morphology as the convergence of codes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 353–361. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01515-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuster, V. P., & Miozzo, M. (2016, November). Is there corn when you write corner? Evidence of decomposition in written production of semantically transparent and opaque words. Poster presented at the Psychonomic Society 57th Annual Meeting, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Shuster, V. P., & Miozzo, M. (2017). A selective morpho-phonological deficit? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 34(1–2), 52–63. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2017.1308344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephany, U. (1982). Inflectional and lexical morphology: A linguistic continuum. Glossologia, 1, 27–55.
   Google Scholar
• Taft, M. (1994). Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 271–294. doi: 10.1080/01690969408402120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2006). Spelling as statistical learning: Using consonantal context to spell vowels. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 642–652. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venezky, R. L. (1999). The American way of spelling. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., & Damian, M. F. (2010). Impact of phonology on the generation of handwritten responses: Evidence from picture-word interference tasks. Memory & Cognition, 38, 519–528. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.4.519
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar