Delayed processing of global shape information is associated with weaker top-down effects in developmental prosopagnosia

References

• Avidan, G., Tanzer, M., & Behrmann, M. (2011). Impaired holistic processing in congenital prosopagnosia. Neuropsychologia, 49(9), 2541–2552. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentin, S., Degutis, J. M., D'Esposito, M., & Robertson, L. C. (2007). Too many trees to see the forest: Performance, event-related potential, and functional magnetic resonance imaging manifestations of integrative congenital prosopagnosia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(1), 132–146. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.1.132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, J. R., Garthwaite, P. H., & Porter, S. (2010). Point and interval estimates of effect sizes for the case-controls design in neuropsychology: Rationale, methods, implementations, and proposed reporting standards. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 27(3), 245–260. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2010.513967
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidoff, J., & Donnelly, N. (1990). Object superiority: A comparison of complete and part probes. Acta Psychologica, 73(3), 225–243. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(90)90024-A
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchaine, B. (2011). Developmental prosopagnosia. In A. J. Calder, G. Rhodes, M. K. Johnson, & J. Haxby (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of face perception (pp. 821–838). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duchaine, B., Germine, L., & Nakayama, K. (2007). Family resemblance: Ten family members with prosopagnosia and within-class object agnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 24(4), 419–430. doi: 10.1080/02643290701380491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchaine, B., & Nakayama, K. (2006). The cambridge face memory test: Results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants. Neuropsychologia, 44(4), 576–585. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchaine, B., Yovel, G., & Nakayama, K. (2007). No global processing deficit in the Navon task in 14 developmental prosopagnosics. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2(2), 104–113. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsm003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, P., Palermo, R., & Brock, J. (2015). Faces and emotion questionnaire.
   Google Scholar
• Gerlach, C. (2001). Structural similarity causes different category-effects depending on task characteristics. Neuropsychologia, 39(9), 895–900. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00031-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlach, C. (2009). Category-specificity in visual object recognition. Cognition, 111(3), 281–301. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlach, C. (2017a). Different measures of structural similarity Tap different aspects of visual object processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1404. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01404
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gerlach, C. (2017b). Normal and abnormal category-effects in visual object recognition: A legacy of Glyn W. Humphreys. Visual Cognition, 25(1-3), 60–78. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2016.1258022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlach, C., Klargaard, S. K., Petersen, A., & Starrfelt, R. (2017). Delayed processing of global shape information in developmental prosopagnosia. PLoS One, 12(12), e0189253. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlach, C., Klargaard, S. K., & Starrfelt, R. (2016). On the relation between face and object recognition in developmental prosopagnosia: No dissociation but a systematic association. PLoS One, 11(10), e0165561. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165561
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlach, C., & Marques, J. F. (2014). Visual complexity exerts opposing effects on object categorization and identification. Visual Cognition, 22(6), 751–769. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2014.915908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlach, C., & Toft, K. O. (2011). Now you see it, now you don't: The context dependent nature of category-effects in visual object recognition. Visual Cognition, 19(10), 1262–1297. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2011.630044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geskin, J., & Behrmann, M. (2018). Congenital prosopagnosia without object agnosia? A literature review. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 35(1-2), 4–54. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2017.1392295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffaux, V., Hault, B., Michel, C., Vuong, Q. C., & Rossion, B. (2005). The respective role of low and high spatial frequencies in supporting configural and featural processing of faces. Perception, 34(1), 77–86. doi: 10.1068/p5370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffaux, V., Peters, J., Haubrechts, J., Schiltz, C., Jansma, B., & Goebel, R. (2011). From coarse to fine? Spatial and temporal dynamics of cortical face processing. Cerebral Cortex, 21(2), 467–476. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhq112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd-Jones, T. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1997). Perceptual differentiation as a source of category effects in object processing: Evidence from naming and object decision. Memory & Cognition, 25(1), 18–35. doi: 10.3758/BF03197282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConachie, H. R. (1976). Developmental prosopagnosia. A single case report. Cortex, 12(1), 76–82. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(76)80033-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9(3), 353–383. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(77)90012-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navon, D. (2003). What does a compound letter tell the psychologist's mind? Acta Psychologica, 114(3), 273–309. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossion, B. (2014). Understanding face perception by means of prosopagnosia and neuroimaging. Frontiers in Bioscience, 6, 258–307. doi: 10.2741/e706
   Google Scholar
• Rossion, B., Dricot, L., Goebel, R., & Busigny, T. (2011). Holistic face categorization in higher order visual areas of the normal and prosopagnosic brain: Toward a non-hierarchical view of face perception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4(225). doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00225
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schmalzl, L., Palermo, R., & Coltheart, M. (2008). Cognitive heterogeneity in genetically based prosopagnosia: A family study. Journal of Neuropsychology, 2(Pt 1), 99–117. doi: 10.1348/174866407X256554
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6(2), 174–215. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.174
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Starrfelt, R., Habekost, T., & Gerlach, C. (2010). Visual processing in pure alexia: A case study. Cortex, 46(2), 242–255. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.03.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starrfelt, R., Klargaard, S. K., Petersen, A., & Gerlach, C. (2018). Reading in developmental prosopagnosia: Evidence for a dissociation between word and face recognition. Neuropsychology, 32(2), 138–147. doi: 10.1037/neu0000428
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar