1,989
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Can the English stand the bottle like the Dutch? Effects of relational categories on object perception

&
Pages 271-287 | Received 13 Nov 2018, Accepted 29 Mar 2019, Published online: 07 May 2019

References

  • Abdel-Rahman, R., & Sommer, W. (2008). Seeing what we know and understand: How knowledge shapes perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(6), 1055–1063. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.6.1055
  • Ameka, F. K., & Levinson, S. C. (Eds.). (2007). The typology and semantics of locative predication: Posturals, positionals and other beasts [special issue]. Linguistics, 45(5).
  • Barr, D., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
  • Boutonnet, B., Dering, B., Viñas-Guasch, N., & Thierry, G. (2013). Seeing objects through the language glass. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 1702–1710. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00415
  • Boutonnet, B., & Lupyan, G. (2015). Words jump-start vision: A label advantage in object recognition. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(25), 9329–9335. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5111-14.2015
  • Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Edmiston, P., & Lupyan, G. (2015). What makes words special? Words as unmotivated cues. Cognition, 143, 93–100. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.06.008
  • Firestone, C., & Scholl, B. J. (2016). Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for “top-down” effects. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, e229. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X15000965
  • Flecken, M., Athanasopoulos, P., Kuipers, J. R., & Thierry, G. (2015). On the road to somewhere: Brain potentials reflect language effects on motion event perception. Cognition, 141, 41–51. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.04.006
  • Folstein, J. R., Palmeri, T. J., & Gauthier, I. (2013). Category learning increases discriminability of relevant object dimensions in visual cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 23(4), 814–823. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs067
  • Francken, J. C., Kok, P., Hagoort, P., & de Lange, F. P. (2015). The behavioral and neural effects of language on motion perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27, 175–184. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00682
  • Gentner, D., & Namy, L. L. (2006). Analogical processes in language learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(6), 297–301. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00456.x
  • Gilbert, C. D., & Li, W. (2013). Top-down influences on visual processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(5), 350–363. doi: 10.1038/nrn3476
  • Gullberg, M. (2009). Reconstructing verb meaning in a second language. How English speakers of L2 Dutch talk and gesture about placement. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 221–244. doi: 10.1075/arcl.7.09gul
  • Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P., & Christensen, R. (2017). Lmertest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. doi: 10.18637/jss.v082.i13
  • Lemmens, M. (2002). The semantic network of Dutch posture verbs. In J. Newman (Ed.), The linguistics of sitting, standing and lying (pp. 103–139). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Lupyan, G., & Bergen, B. (2015). How language programs the mind. Topics in Cognitive Science, 8, 408–424. doi: 10.1111/tops.12155
  • Lupyan, G., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2012). The evocative power of words: Activation of concepts by verbal and nonverbal means. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(1), 170–186. doi: 10.1037/a0024904
  • Maier, M., Glage, P., Hohlfeld, A., & Abdel Rahman, R. (2014). Does the semantic content of verbal categories influence categorical perception? An ERP study. Brain and Cognition, 91, 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2014.07.008
  • Meteyard, L., Bahrami, B., & Vigliocco, G. (2007). Motion detection and motion verbs: Language affects low-level visual perception. Psychological Science, 18, 1007–1013. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02016.x
  • Newman, J. (2002). The linguistics of sitting, standing and lying. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Raftopoulos, A. (2017). Pre-cueing, the epistemic role of early vision, and the cognitive impenetrability of early vision. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1156. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01156
  • R Development Core Team. (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org
  • Regier, T., & Kay, P. (2009). Language, thought, and colour: Whorf was half right. Trends in Cognitive Science, 13(10), 439–446. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.07.001
  • Summerfield, C., & de Lange, F. P. (2014). Expectation in perceptual decision-making: Neural and computational mechanisms. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15, 745–756. doi: 10.1038/nrn3838
  • Thierry, G., Athanasopoulos, P., Wiggett, A., Dering, B., & Kuipers, J. R. (2009). Unconscious effects of language-specific terminology on preattentive color perception. Proceedings of the National Academia of Science, 106, 4567–4570. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0811155106
  • van Bergen, G., & Flecken, M. (2017). Putting things in new places: Linguistic experience modulates the predictive power of placement verb semantics. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 26–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2016.05.003
  • Vogel, E. K., & Luck, S. (2000). The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process. Psychophysiology, 37(2), 190–203. doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3720190
  • Whorf, B. (1976). Language, thought and reality. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Winawer, J., Witthoft, N., Frank, M., Wu, L., Wade, A., & Boroditsky, L. (2007). Russian blues reveal effects of language on color discrimination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 7780–7785. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701644104