References
- Arcara, G., Franzon, F., Gastaldon, S., Brotto, S., Semenza, C., Peressotti, F., & Zanini, C. (2019). One can be some but some cannot be one: ERP correlates of numerosity incongruence are different for singular and plural. Cortex, 116, 104–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.10.022
- Bickerton, D. (2007). Language evolution: A brief guide for linguists. Lingua. International Review of General Linguistics. Revue internationale De Linguistique Generale, 117(3), 510–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2005.02.006
- Cantlon, J. (2018). How evolution constrains human numerical concepts. Child Development Perspectives, 12(1), 65–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12264
- Cantlon, C. J., & Brannon, E. M. (2007). How much does number matter to a monkey (Macaca mulatta)? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 33(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.33.1.32
- Carreiras, M., Carr, L., Barber, H. A., & Hernandez, A. (2010). Where syntax meets math: Right intraparietal sulcus activation in response to grammatical number agreement violations. Neuroimage, 49(2), 1741–1749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.058
- Corbett, G. (2000). Number. Cambridge University Press.
- Dye, M., Milin, P., Futrell, R., & Ramscar, M. (2017). A functional theory of gender paradigms. In F. Kiefer, J. Blevins, & H. Bartos (Eds.), Perspectives on morphological organization: Data and analyses (pp. 212–239). Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004342934_011
- Everett, C. (2019). Is native quantitative thought concretized in linguistically privileged ways? A look at the global picture. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2019.1668368
- Ferrer-i-Cancho, R., & Bentz, C. (2019). Optimal coding and the origins of Zipfian laws. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.01545.
- Franzon, F., & Zanini, C. (2020). Functional and semantic properties modulate information in inflectional features. Talk presented at the 19th international morphology meeting, Vienna, February 6–8. https://www.wu.ac.at/fileadmin/wu/d/bizcomm/Sonstiges/IMM19/Abstracts_WS_Pirrelli_v1.pdf.
- Franzon, F., Zanini, C., & Rugani, R. (2019). Do non-verbal number systems shape grammar? Numerical cognition and number morphology compared. Mind & Language, 34(1), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12183
- Greenberg, J. (1963). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of Language (pp. 73–113). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Haspelmath, Martin. (2013). Occurrence of Nominal Plurality. In Dryer Matthew S. & Martin Haspelmath (Eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://wals.info/chapter/34
- Malouf, R., Ackerman, F., & Seyfarth, S. (2015). Explaining the number hierarchy. In R. Dale, C. Jennings, P. P. Maglio, T. Matlock, D. C. Noelle, A. Warlaumont, & J. Yoshimi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th Annual Cognitive Science Society Meeting, 1500–1506. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
- Ramscar, M. (2019, March 21). Source codes in human communication. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/e3hps
- Rinaldi, L., & Marelli, M. (2019). The use of number words in natural language obeys Weber’s law. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000715
- Roettger, T. B., & Domahs, F. (2015). Grammatical number elicits SNARC and MARC effects as a function of task demands. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(6), 1231–1248. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.979843
- Rugani, R. (2018). Towards numerical cognition's origin: Insights from day-old domestic chicks. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1740), 20160509. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0509
- Rugani, R., Regolin, L., & Vallortigara, G. (2010). Imprinted numbers: Newborn chicks’ sensitivity to number vs. continuous extent of objects they have been reared with. Developmental Science, 13(5), 790–797. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00936.x
- Rugani, R., Vallortigara, G., Priftis, K., & Regolin, L. (2015). Number-space mapping in the newborn chick resembles humans’mental number line. Science, 347, 534–536. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1379
- Spelke, E. S. (2000). Core knowledge. American Psychologist, 55(11), 1233–1243. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.11.1233
- Strickland, B. (2017). Language reflects “core” cognition: A new theory about the origin of cross-linguistic regularities. Cognitive Science, 41(1), 70–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12332
- Wicha, N. Y., Moreno, E. M., & Kutas, M. (2004). Anticipating words and their gender: An event-related brain potential study of semantic integration, gender expectancy, and gender agreement in Spanish sentence reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(7), 1272–1288. https://doi.org/10.1162/0898929041920487
- Zanini, C., Rugani, R., Giomo, D., Peressotti, F., & Franzon, F. (2020). Effects of animacy on the processing of morphological number: A cognitive inheritance? Word Structure, 13(1), 22–44. https://doi.org/10.3366/word.2020.0158