Properties of graphic motor plans in the writing system

References

• Baxter, D. M., & Warrington, E. K. (1986). Ideational agraphia: A single case study. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 49(4), 369–374. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.49.4.369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, S. E., Behrmann, M., Bass, K., & Hacker, P. (1989). Selective writing impairment: Beyond the allographic code. Aphasiology, 3(3), 265–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038908248994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boles, D. B., & Clifford, J. E. (1989). An upper-and lowercase alphabetic similarity matrix, with derived generation similarity values. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 21(6), 579–586. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210580
   Google Scholar
• Buchwald, A., & Rapp, B. (2006). Consonants and vowels in orthographic representations. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23(2), 308–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290442000527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., & Miceli, G. (1990). The structure of graphemic representations. Cognition, 37(3), 243–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(90)90047-N
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotelli, M., Abutalebi, J., Zorzi, M., & Cappa, S. F. (2003). Vowels in the buffer: A case study of acquired dysgraphia with selective vowel substitutions. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20(2), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290244000158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cubelli, R. (1991). A selective deficit for writing vowels in acquired dysgraphia. Nature, 353(6341), 258–260. https://doi.org/10.1038/353258a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bastiani, P., & Barry, C. (1989). A cognitive analysis of an acquired dysgraphic patient with an “allographic” writing disorder. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 6(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643298908253283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). Peabody picture vocabulary test- Revised. American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, A. W. (1982). Spelling and writing (and Reading and speaking). In A. W. Ellis (Ed.), Normality and pathology in cognitive functions (pp. 113–146). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, A. W. (1988). Normal writing processes and peripheral acquired dysgraphias. Language and Cognitive Processes, 3(2), 99–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690968808402084
   Google Scholar
• Fischer-Baum, S., & Rapp, B. (2014). The analysis of perseverations in acquired dysgraphia reveals the internal structure of orthographic representations. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 31(3), 237–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2014.880676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasspool, D. W., & Houghton, G. (2005). Serial order and consonant–vowel structure in a graphemic output buffer model. Brain and Language, 94(3), 304–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2005.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasspool, D. W., Shallice, T., & Cipolotti, L. (2006). Towards a unified process model for graphemic buffer disorder and deep dysgraphia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23(3), 479–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290500265109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, R. A. (1986). Patterns of acquired dysgraphia: Evidence for a model of the normal spelling system. Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Houghton, G., Glasspool, D., & Shallice, T. (1994). Spelling and serial recall: Insights from a competitive queueing model. In G. D. A. Brown, & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of spelling: Theory, process and intervention (pp. 365–404). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Houghton, G., & Zorzi, M. (2003). Normal and impaired spelling in a connectionist dual-route architecture. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20(2), 115–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290242000871
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. N., & Mewhort, D. J. (2004). Case-sensitive letter and bigram frequency counts from large-scale English corpora. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(3), 388–396. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195586
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kandel, S., Peereman, R., & Ghimenton, A. (2013). Further evidence for the interaction of central and peripheral processes: The impact of double letters in writing English words. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 729. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandel, S., Peereman, R., & Ghimenton, A. (2014). How do we code the letters of a word when we have to write it? Investigating double letter representation in French. Acta Psychologica, 148, 56–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandel, S., Peereman, R., Ghimenton, A., & Perret, C. (2019). Letter coding affects movement production in word writing: An English–Italian cross-linguistic study. Reading and Writing, 32(1), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9756-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandel, S., & Spinelli, E. (2010). Processing complex graphemes in handwriting production. Memory & Cognition, 38(6), 762–770. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.6.762
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (1983). The Boston naming test. Lea and Febiger.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, J., Viader, F., Eustache, F., & Morin, P. (1994). Contribution to peripheral agraphia: A case of post-allographic impairment? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11(1), 35–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643299408251965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolin, D. I. (1984). The neuropsychology of writing and spelling: Semantic, phonological, motor, and perceptual processes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A(3), 459–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748408402172
   Google Scholar
• McCloskey, M., Badecker, W., Goodman-Schulman, R. A., & Aliminosa, D. (1994). The structure of graphemic representations in spelling: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11(3), 341–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643299408251979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCloskey, M., Reilhac, C., & Schubert, T. (2018). A deficit in post-graphemic writing processes: Evidence for a graphomotor buffer. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 35(8), 430–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2018.1546683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menichelli, A., Rapp, B., & Semenza, C. (2008). Allographic agraphia: A case study. Cortex, 44(7), 861–868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2007.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miceli, G, Benvegnù, B, Capasso, R, & Caramazza, A. (1995). Selective deficit in processing double letters. Cortex, 31, 161–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miceli, G., Benvegnù, B., Capasso, R., & Caramazza, A. (2004). The categorical distinction of consonant and vowel representations: Evidence from dysgraphia. Neurocase, 10(2), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/13554790409609942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miceli, G., & Capasso, R. (2006). Spelling and dysgraphia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23(1), 110–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290500202730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miozzo, M., & De Bastiani, P. (2002). The organization of letter-form representations in written spelling: Evidence from acquired dysgraphia. Brain and Language, 80(3), 366–392. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2001.2598
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, B., & Caramazza, A. (1997). From graphemes to abstract letter shapes: Levels of representation in written spelling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23(4), 1130–1152. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.23.4.1130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D. E., & Norman, D. A. (1982). Simulating a skilled typist: A study of skilled cognitive-motor performance. Cognitive Science, 6(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0601_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert, T., Reilhac, C., & McCloskey, M. (2018). Knowledge about writing influences Reading: Dynamic visual information about letter production facilitates letter identification. Cortex, 103, 302–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.03.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shallice, T., Glasspool, D. W., & Houghton, G. (1995). Can neuropsychological evidence inform connectionist modelling? Analyses of spelling. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10(3–4), 195–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969508407094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tainturier, M. J., & Caramazza, A. (1996). The status of double letters in graphemic representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(1), 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.0003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tainturier, M.-J., & Rapp, B. (2001). The spelling process. In B. Rapp (Ed.), The handbook of cognitive neuropsychology: What deficits reveal about the human mind (pp. 263–289). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tainturier, M. J., & Rapp, B. C. (2004). Complex graphemes as functional spelling units: Evidence from acquired dysgraphia. Neurocase, 10(2), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/13554790409609943
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Galen, G. P. (1991). Handwriting: Issues for a psychomotor theory. Human Movement Science, 10(2–3), 165–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9457(91)90003-G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venneri, A., Cubelli, R., & Caffarra, P. (1994). Perseverative dysgraphia: A selective disorder in writing double letters. Neuropsychologia, 32(8), 923–931. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(94)90043-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, J., & Romani, C. (2000). Consonant-vowel encoding and orthosyllables in a case of acquired dysgraphia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17(7), 641–663. https://doi.org/10.1080/026432900750002208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weekes, B. S. (1994). A cognitive-neuropsychological analysis of allograph errors from a patient with acquired dysgraphia. Aphasiology, 8(5), 409–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687039408248667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zettin, M., Cubelli, R., Perino, C., & Rago, R. (1995). Impairment of letter formation: The case of ‘ideomotor’ apraxic agraphia. Aphasiology, 9(3), 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687039508248205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar