Pseudoword spelling: insights into sublexical representations and lexical interactions

References

• Apel, K., Henbest, V. S., & Masterson, J. (2019). Orthographic knowledge: Clarifications, challenges, and future directions. Reading and Writing, 32(4), 873–889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9895-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database. (Vol. Linguistic data consortium). University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Beauvois, M. F., & Dérouesné, J. (1979). Phonological alexia: Three dissociations.. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 42(12), 1115–1124. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.42.12.1115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeson, P. M., Rewega, M. A., Vail, S., & Rapcsak, S. Z. (2000). Problem-solving approach to agraphia treatment: Interactive use of lexical and sublexical spelling routes. Aphasiology, 14(5–6), 551–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/026870300401315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berndt, R. S., Reggia, J. A., & Mitchum, C. C. (1987). Empirically derived probabilities for grapheme-to-phoneme correspondences in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 19(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207663
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, M. E., Kristensen, K., van Benthem, K. J., Magnusson, A., Berg, C. W., Nielsen, A., Skaug, H. J., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B. M. (2017). glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. The R Journal, 9(2), 378–400. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2017-066
   Google Scholar
• Brookshire, C. E., Wilson, J. P., Nadeau, S. E., Gonzalez Rothi, L. J., & Kendall, D. L. (2014). Frequency, nature, and predictors of alexia in a convenience sample of individuals with chronic aphasia. Aphasiology, 28(12), 1464–1480. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2014.945389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 977–990. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, R. (1983). Writing nonwords to dictation. Brain and Language, 19(1), 153–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(83)90061-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, E., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Bouton, B. (2014). Examining the predictive validity of a dynamic assessment of decoding to forecast response to tier 2 intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(5), 409–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219412466703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M. (2006). Dual route and connectionist models of Reading: An overview. London Review of Education, 4(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110600574322
   Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., & Ulicheva, A. (2018). Why is nonword reading so variable in adult skilled readers? PeerJ, 6, e4879. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coxe, S, West, S G, & Aiken, L S. (2009). The Analysis of Count Data: A Gentle Introduction to Poisson Regression and Its Alternatives. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(2), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802634175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enderby, J L, Carroll, J M, Tarczynski-Bowles, M L, & Breadmore, H L. (2021). The roles of morphology, phonology, and prosody in reading and spelling multisyllabic words. Applied Psycholinguistics, 42(4), 865–885. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716421000096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folk, J. R., & Jones, A. C. (2004). The purpose of lexical/sublexical interaction during spelling: Further evidence from dysgraphia and articulatory suppression. Neurocase, 10(1), 65–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/13554790490960512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folk, J. R., Rapp, B., & Goldrick, M. (2002). The interaction of lexical and sublexical information in spelling: What’s the point? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19(7), 653–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290244000184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost, R. (2006). Becoming literate in Hebrew: The grain size hypothesis and Semitic orthographic systems.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, R., Katz, L., & Bentin, S. (1987). Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: A multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13(1), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.13.1.104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry, E. (2004). Phonics: A large phoneme—grapheme frequency count revised. Journal of Literacy Research, 36(36), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15548430jlr3601_5
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, N. P., Abbott, R. D., & Berninger, V. W. (2010). Predicting poor, average, and superior spellers in grades 1 to 6 from phonological, orthographic, and morphological, spelling, or Reading composites. Written Language & Literacy, 13(1), 61–98. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.13.1.03gar
   Google Scholar
• Gentaz, E., Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Theurel, A. (2015). Differences in the predictors of reading comprehension in first graders from Low socio-economic status families with either good or poor decoding skills. PLOS ONE, 10(3), e0119581. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, R. A., & Caramazza, A. (1986). Aspects of the spelling process: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1(4), 263–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690968608404678
   Google Scholar
• Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104
   Google Scholar
• Hanna, P. R., Hanna, J. S., Hodges, R. E. & Rudorf, Jr, E. H. (1966). Phoneme-grapheme correspondences as cues to spelling improvement. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
   Google Scholar
• Hepner, C, Mccloskey, M, & Rapp, B. (2017). Do reading and spelling share orthographic representations? Evidence from developmental dysgraphia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 34(3-4), 119–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2017.1375904
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jared, D, Mcrae, K, & Seidenberg, M S. (1990). The basis of consistency effects in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(6), 687–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(90)90044-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, D. (2015). Syllable-based generalizations in English phonology. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, L., & Frost, R. (1992). The Reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Advances in psychology (Vol. 94, pp. 67–84). North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, J., & Bishop, D. (2016). Anatomical differences between nose, palm, and foot, or, the body in question: Further dissection of the processes of sub-lexical spelling-sound translation. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII) (pp. 449–469). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Key, K. M. (2022). Sublexical representations in adult skilled spellers [Master's thesis]. The University of North Carolina at Greensboro.
   Google Scholar
• Kuperman, V., Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H., & Brysbaert, M. (2012). Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30 thousand English words. Behavior Research Methods, 44(4), 978. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0210-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labov, W., Ash, S., & Boberg, C. (2006). The atlas of north American English: Phonetics, phonology, and sound change: A multimedia reference tool. Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Lindeman, R. H., Merenda, P. F., & Gold, R. Z. (1980). Introduction to bivariate and multivariate analysis. Scott, Foresman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Litman, L., Robinson, J., & Abberbock, T. (2017). Turkprime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 433–442. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0727-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüdecke, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Patil, I., Waggoner, P., & Makowski, D. (2021). Performance: An R package for assessment, comparison and testing of statistical models. Journal of Open Source Software, 6, 60.
   Google Scholar
• Marian, V., Bartolotti, J., Chabal, S., & Shook, A. (2012). CLEARPOND: Cross-linguistic easy-access resource for phonological and orthographic neighborhood densities. PLoS ONE, 7(8), e43230. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marjou, X. (2021). OTEANN: Estimating the transparency of orthographies with an artificial neural network. Proceedings of the third workshop on computational typology and multilingual NLP, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Miceli, G., Capasso, R., & Caramazza, A. (1994). The interaction of lexical and sublexical processes in reading, writing and repetition. Neuropsychologia, 32(3), 317–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(94)90134-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monsell, S, Patterson, K E, Graham, A, Hughes, C H, & Milroy, R. (1992). Lexical and Sublexical Translation of Spelling to Sound: Strategic Anticipation of Lexical Status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(3), 452–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neophytou, K., Wiley, R. W., Rapp, B., & Tsapkini, K. (2019). The use of spelling for variant classification in primary progressive aphasia: Theoretical and practical implications. Neuropsychologia, 133, 107157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouellette, G., & Sénéchal, M. (2017). Invented spelling in kindergarten as a predictor of reading and spelling in grade 1: A new pathway to literacy, or just the same road, less known? Developmental Psychology, 53(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, R. L., Pennington, B. F., & Olson, R. K. (2013). Subtypes of developmental dyslexia: Testing the predictions of the dual-route and connectionist frameworks. Cognition, 126(1), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.08.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, B., Epstein, C., & Tainturier, M.-J. (2002). The integration of information across lexical and sublexical processes in spelling. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/0264329014300060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, B., & Fischer-Baum, S. (2014). Representation of orthographic knowledge. In M. A. Goldrick, V. Ferreira, & M. Miozzo (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language production (pp. 338–357).
   Google Scholar
• Rapp, B., Folk, J. R., & Tainturier, M.-J. (2001). Word Reading. In B. Rapp (Ed.), The handbook of cognitive neuropsychology: What deficits reveal about the human mind (pp. 233–262). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, E. A., & Thompson, C. K. (2015). Training pseudoword reading in acquired dyslexia: A phonological complexity approach. Aphasiology, 29(2), 129–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2014.955389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Barnes, M. A., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23(3), 383–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(84)90270-6
   Google Scholar
• Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of Reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, J., Wiley, R. W., Moss, N., & Rapp, B. (2020). Pseudoword spelling ability predicts response to word spelling treatment in acquired dysgraphia. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 32, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegelman, N, Kearns, D M, & Rueckl, J G. (2020). Using information-theoretic measures to characterize the structure of the writing system: The case of orthographic-phonological regularities in English. Behavior Research Methods, 52(3), 1292–1312. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01317-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, E., Siegel, L. S., & Gottardo, A. (1997). Converging evidence for phonological and surface subtypes of Reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 114–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tainturier, M.-J., Bosse, M.-L., Roberts, D. J., Valdois, S., & Rapp, B. (2013). Lexical neighborhood effects in pseudoword spelling. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00862
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taroyan, N. A., & Nicolson, R. I. (2009). Reading words and pseudowords in dyslexia: ERP and behavioural tests in English-speaking adolescents. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 74(3), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Themistocleous, C., Neophytou, K., Rapp, B., & Tsapkini, K. (2020). A tool for automatic scoring of spelling performance. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 63(12), 4179–4192. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treiman, R., Hulslander, J., Olson, R. K., Samuelsson, S., Elwér, Å, Furnes, B., & Byrne, B. (2023). Predicting later spelling from kindergarten spelling in U.S., Australian, and Swedish children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 27(5), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2023.2186234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treiman, R., Mullennix, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R., & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995). The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124(2), 107–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.124.2.107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulicheva, A., Coltheart, M., Grosseck, O., & Rastle, K. (2021). Are people consistent when reading nonwords aloud on different occasions? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28, 1679–1687. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-021-01925-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolter, J. A., & Apel, K. (2010). Initial acquisition of mental graphemic representations in children with language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53(1), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2009/07-0130)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yap, R., & Van Der Leij, A. (1993). Word processing in dyslexics: An automatic decoding deficit? Reading and Writing, 5(3), 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01027391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. C., Bertrand, D., Tóth, D., Csépe, V., Reis, A., Faísca, L., Saine, N., Lyytinen, H., Vaessen, A., & Blomert, L. (2010). Orthographic depth and its impact on universal predictors of reading: A cross-language investigation. Psychological Science, 21(4), 551–559. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610363406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. C., Stone, G. O., & Jacobs, A. M. (1997). What is the pronunciation for -ough and the spelling for lui? A database for computing feedforward and feedback consistency in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 29(4), 600–618. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210615
   Google Scholar