Semantic feature production norms for manipulable objects

References

• Almeida, J., Amaral, L., Garcea, F. E., Aguiar de Sousa, D., Xu, S., Mahon, B. Z., & Martins, I. P. (2018). Visual and visuomotor processing of hands and tools as a case study of cross talk between the dorsal and ventral streams. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 355–6), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2018.1463980
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida, J., Fracasso, A., Kristensen, S., Valério, D., Bergström, F., Chakravarthi, R., Tal, Z., & Walbrin, J. (2023). Neural and behavioral signatures of the multidimensionality of manipulable object processing. Communications Biology, 6(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-023-05323-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida, J., Mahon, B. Z., Zapater-Raberov, V., Dziuba, A., Cabaço, T., Marques, J. F., & Caramazza, A. (2014). Grasping with the eyes: The role of elongation in visual recognition of manipulable objects. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 14(1), 319–335. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-013-0208-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashcraft, M. H. (1976). Priming and property dominance effects in semantic memory. Memory & Cognition, 4(5), 490–500. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boronat, C. B., Buxbaum, L. J., Coslett, H. B., Tang, K., Saffran, E. M., Kimberg, D. Y., & Detre, J. A. (2005). Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Cognitive Brain Research, 23(2–3), 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.11.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buchanan, E. M., Holmes, J. L., Teasley, M. L., & Hutchison, K. A. (2013). English semantic word-pair norms and a searchable web portal for experimental stimulus creation. Behavior Research Methods, 45(3), 746–757. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0284-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, E. M., Valentine, K. D., & Maxwell, N. P. (2019). English semantic feature production norms: An extended database of 4436 concepts. Behavior Research Methods, 51(4), 1849–1863. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01243-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buxbaum, L. J., & Saffran, E. M. (2002). Knowledge of object manipulation and object function: Dissociations in apraxic and nonapraxic subjects. Brain and Language, 82(2), 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00014-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buxbaum, L. J., Veramontil, T., & Schwartz, M. F. (2000). Function and manipulation tool knowledge in apraxia: Knowing ‘what for’ but not ‘how’. Neurocase, 6(2), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/13554790008402763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capitani, E., Laiacona, M., Mahon, B., & Caramazza, A. (2003). What are the facts of semantic category-specific deficits? A critical review of the clinical evidence. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20(3–6), 213–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290244000266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., & Mahon, B. Z. (2003). The organization of conceptual knowledge: The evidence from category-specific semantic deficits. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(8), 354–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00159-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao, L. L., & Martin, A. (2000). Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. NeuroImage, 12(4), 478–484. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2000.0635
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Q., Garcea, F. E., & Mahon, B. Z. (2016). The representation of object-directed action and function knowledge in the human brain. Cerebral Cortex, 26(4), 1609–1618. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhu328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, A., Taylor, K. I., Devereux, B., Randall, B., & Tyler, L. K. (2013). From perception to conception: How meaningful objects are processed over time. Cerebral Cortex, 23(1), 187–197. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhs002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cree, G. S., & McRae, K. (2003). Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of chipmunk, cherry, chisel, cheese, and cello (and many other such concrete nouns). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(2), 163–201. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.132.2.163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culham, J. C., Danckert, S. L., DeSouza, J. F. X., Gati, J. S., Menon, R. S., & Goodale, M. A. (2003). Visually guided grasping produces fMRI activation in dorsal but not ventral stream brain areas. Experimental Brain Research, 153(2), 180–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1591-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Deyne, S., Verheyen, S., Ameel, E., Vanpaemel, W., Dry, M. J., Voorspoels, W., & Storms, G. (2008). Exemplar by feature applicability matrices and other Dutch normative data for semantic concepts. Behavior Research Methods, 40(4), 1030–1048. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.4.1030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devereux, B. J., Tyler, L. K., Geertzen, J., & Randall, B. (2014). The Centre for Speech, Language and the Brain (CSLB) concept property norms. Behavior Research Methods, 46(4), 1119–1127. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0420-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duarte, L. R., Marquié, L., Marquié, J. C., Terrier, P., & Ousset, P. J. (2009). Analyzing feature distinctiveness in the processing of living and non-living concepts in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain and Cognition, 71(2), 108–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2009.04.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galili, T. (2015). Dendextend: An R package for visualizing, adjusting and comparing trees of hierarchical clustering. Bioinformatics, 31(22), 3718–3720. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv428
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcea, F. E., Dombovy, M., & Mahon, B. Z. (2013). Preserved tool knowledge in the context of impaired action knowledge: Implications for models of semantic memory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7(120), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00120
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garcea, F. E., & Mahon, B. Z. (2012). What is in a tool concept? Dissociating manipulation knowledge from function knowledge. Memory & Cognition, 40(8), 1303–1313. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-012-0236-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrard, P., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Hodges, J. R., & Patterson, K. (2001). Prototypicality, distinctiveness, and intercorrelation: Analyses of the semantic attributes of living and nonliving concepts. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18(2), 125–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290125857
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, R. F., Perfetti, C. A., & Schneider, W. (2006). Distinct and common cortical activations for multimodal semantic categories. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 6(3), 214–222. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.6.3.214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodale, M. A., Meenan, J. P., Bülthoff, H. H., Nicolle, D. A., Murphy, K. J., & Racicot, C. I. (1994). Separate neural pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension. Current Biology, 4(7), 604–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00132-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebart, M. N., Zheng, C. Y., Pereira, F., & Baker, C. I. (2020). Revealing the multidimensional mental representations of natural objects underlying human similarity judgements. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(11), 1173–1185. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00951-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillis, A. E., & Caramazza, A. (1991). Category-specific naming and comprehension impairment: A double dissociation. Brain, 114(5), 2081–2094. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/114.5.2081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalénine, S., Buxbaum, L. J., & Coslett, H. B. (2010). Critical brain regions for action recognition: Lesion symptom mapping in left hemisphere stroke. Brain, 133(11), 3269–3280. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awq210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivisaari, S. L., van Vliet, M., Hultén, A., Lindh-Knuutila, T., Faisal, A., & Salmelin, R. (2019). Reconstructing meaning from bits of information. Nature Communications, 10(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08848-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klatzky, R. L., Pellegrino, J., McCloskey, B. P., & Lederman, S. J. (1993). Cognitive representations of functional interactions with objects. Memory & Cognition, 21(3), 294–303. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleiner, M., Brainard, D., Pelli, D., Ingling, A., Murray, R., & Broussard, C. (2007). What’s new in psychtoolbox-3. Perception, 36(14), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1068/v070821
   Google Scholar
• Kremer, G., & Baroni, M. (2011). A set of semantic norms for German and Italian. Behavior Research Methods, 43(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-010-0028-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesourd, M., Reynaud, E., Navarro, J., Gaujoux, V., Faye-Védrines, A., Alexandre, B., Baumard, J., Federico, G., Lamberton, F., Ibarrola, D., Rossetti, Y., & Osiurak, F. (2023). Involvement of the posterior tool processing network during explicit retrieval of action tool and semantic tool knowledge: An fMRI study. Cerebral Cortex, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhac522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2003). Constraining questions about the organisation and representation of conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20(3–6), 433–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290342000014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, J. F., Raposo, A., & Almeida, J. (2013). Structural processing and category-specific deficits. Cortex, 49(1), 266–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2011.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathôt, S., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). Opensesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0168-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRae, K., Cree, G. S., Seidenberg, M. S., & McNorgan, C. (2005). Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things. Behavior Research Methods, 37(4), 547–559. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192726
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRae, K., De Sa, V. R., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1997). On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126(2), 99–130. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.126.2.99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montefinese, M., Ambrosini, E., Fairfield, B., & Mammarella, N. (2013). Semantic memory: A feature-based analysis and new norms for Italian. Behavior Research Methods, 45(2), 440–461. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0263-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, H. E., & Tyler, L. K. (2000). A progressive category-specific semantic deficit for non-living things. Neuropsychologia, 38(1), 60–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00044-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myung, J., Blumstein, S. E., & Sedivy, J. C. (2006). Playing on the typewriter, typing on the piano: Manipulation knowledge of objects. Cognition, 98(3), 223–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.11.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myung, J., Blumstein, S. E., Yee, E., Sedivy, J. C., Thompson-Schill, S. L., & Buxbaum, L. J. (2010). Impaired access to manipulation features in apraxia: Evidence from eyetracking and semantic judgment tasks. Brain and Language, 112(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2009.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peelen, M. V., & Caramazza, A. (2012). Conceptual object representations in human anterior temporal cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32(45), 15728–15736. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1953-12.2012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perri, R., Zannino, G., Caltagirone, C., & Carlesimo, G. A. (2012). Alzheimer’s disease and semantic deficits: A feature-listing study. Neuropsychology, 26(5), 652–663. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randall, B., Moss, H. E., Rodd, J. M., Greer, M., & Tyler, L. K. (2004). Distinctiveness and correlation in conceptual structure: Behavioral and computational studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(2), 393–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruts, W., De Deyne, S., Ameel, E., Vanpaemel, W., Verbeemen, T., & Storms, G. (2004). Dutch norm data for 13 semantic categories and 338 exemplars. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36(3), 506–515. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195597
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taylor, K. I., Devereux, B. J., & Tyler, L. K. (2011). Conceptual structure: Towards an integrated neurocognitive account. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(9), 1368–1401. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2011.568227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, L. K., Moss, H. E., Durrant-Peatfield, M. R., & Levy, J. P. (2000). Conceptual structure and the structure of concepts: A distributed account of category-specific deficits. Brain and Language, 75(2), 195–231. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2000.2353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valério, D., Santana, I., Aguiar de Sousa, D., Schu, G., Leal, G., Pavão Martins, I., & Almeida, J. (2021). Knowing how to do it or doing it? A double dissociation between tool-gesture production and tool-gesture knowledge. Cortex, 141, 449–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2021.05.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinson, D., & Vigliocco, G. (2008). Feature norms for a large set of object and event concepts. Behavior Research Methods, 40(1), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.1.183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vivas, J., Vivas, L., Comesaña, A., Coni, A. G., & Vorano, A. (2017). Spanish semantic feature production norms for 400 concrete concepts. Behavior Research Methods, 49(3), 1095–1106. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0777-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vivas, L., Montefinese, M., Bolognesi, M., & Vivas, J. (2020). Core features: Measures and characterization for different languages. Cognitive Processing, 21(4), 651–667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-020-00969-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warrington, E. W., & Shallice, T. (1984). Category specific semantic impairment. Brain, 107(3), 829–853. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/107.3.829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, C. E., & Buxbaum, L. J. (2015). A distributed network critical for selecting among tool-directed actions. Cortex, 65, 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.01.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar