Two sides of the same coin? Comparing structural priming between production and comprehension in choice data and in reaction times

References

• Altmann, G. T., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73(3), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00059-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arai, M., & Mazuka, R. (2014). The development of Japanese passive syntax as indexed by structural priming in comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(1), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.790454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arai, M., Van Gompel, R. P., & Scheepers, C. (2007). Priming ditransitive structures in comprehension. Cognitive Psychology, 54(3), 218–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, C. W., & Bliwise, N. G. (2014). Interactions are critical. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(3), 371–372. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-05-0086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernolet, S., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2010). Does verb bias modulate syntactic priming? Cognition, 114(3), 455–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.11.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernolet, S., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2009). Persistence of emphasis in language production: A cross-linguistic approach. Cognition, 112(2), 300–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, J. K. (1986). Meaning, sound, and syntax: Lexical priming in sentence production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12(4), 575–586. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.12.4.575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, J. K., & Warren, R. K. (1985). Conceptual accessibility and syntactic structure in sentence formulation. Cognition, 21(1), 47–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90023-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce, V., Futrell, R., & Levy, R. P. (2020). Maze Made Easy: Better and easier measurement of incremental processing difficulty. Journal of Memory and Language, 111, 104082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2019.104082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branigan, H. (2007). Syntactic priming. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(1-2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2006.00001.x
   Google Scholar
• Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., & McLean, J. F. (2005). Priming prepositional-phrase attachment during comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(3), 468–481. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, F., Dell, G. S., & Bock, K. (2006). Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review, 113(2), 234–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Q., Xu, X., Tan, D., Zhang, J., & Zhong, Y. (2013). Syntactic priming in Chinese sentence comprehension: Evidence from event-related potentials. Brain and Cognition, 83(1), 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2013.07.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Wang, S., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2022). Error-based structure prediction in language comprehension: Evidence from verb bias effects in a visual-world structural priming paradigm for Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 48(1), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cichoń, M. (2020). Reporting statistical methods and outcome of statistical analyses in research articles. Pharmacological Reports, 72(3), 481–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43440-020-00110-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corley, M., & Scheepers, C. (2002). Syntactic priming in English sentence production: Categorical and latency evidence from an internet-based study. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(1), 126–131. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engqvist, L. (2005). The mistreatment of covariate interaction terms in linear model analyses of behavioural and evolutionary ecology studies. Animal Behaviour, 70(4).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferreira, V. S., & Bock, K. (2006). The functions of structural priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21(7–8), 1011–1029. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960600824609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, A. B., & Jaeger, T. F. (2013). Evidence for implicit learning in syntactic comprehension. Cognitive Science, 37(3), 578–591. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, A. B., & Jaeger, T. F. (2016). The role of verb repetition in cumulative structural priming in comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(9), 1362–1376. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I., Guerrera, C., & Elliot, L. (2009). The maze task: Measuring forced incremental sentence processing time. Behavior Research Methods, 41(1), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.1.163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, L. (1979). On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies. [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Connecticut.
   Google Scholar
• Giavazzi, M., Sambin, S., de Diego-Balaguer, R., Le Stanc, L., Bachoud-Lévi, A. C., & Jacquemot, C. (2018). Structural priming in sentence comprehension: A single prime is enough. PLoS One, 13(4), e0194959. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194959
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartsuiker, R. J., Bernolet, S., Schoonbaert, S., Speybroeck, S., & Vanderelst, D. (2008). Syntactic priming persists while the lexical boost decays: Evidence from written and spoken dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(2), 214–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, G. F., & Gennari, S. P. (2014). Competitive mechanisms in sentence processing: Common and distinct production and reading comprehension networks linked to the prefrontal cortex. NeuroImage, 84, 354–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaschak, M. P. (2007). Long-term structural priming affects subsequent patterns of language production. Memory & Cognition, 35(5), 925–937. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, C. S., Carbary, K. M., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2014). Syntactic priming without lexical overlap in Reading comprehension. Language and Speech, 57(2), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830913496052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemhöfer, K., & Broersma, M. (2012). Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid lexical test for advanced learners of English. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 325–343. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0146-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, J. A. (2022). jtools: Analysis and presentation of social scientific data. R package version 2.2.0. https://cran.r-project.org/package=jtools
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101(4), 676–703. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahowald, K., James, A., Futrell, R., & Gibson, E. (2016). A meta-analysis of syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 91, 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peirce, J., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., Kastman, E., & Lindeløv, J. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (1998). The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(4), 633–651. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., McLean, J. F., & Branigan, H. P. (2013). Persistent structural priming and frequency effects during comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(3), 890–897. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., Traxler, M. J., & Crocker, M. W. (2000). Ambiguity resolution in sentence processing: Evidence against frequency-based accounts. Journal of Memory and Language, 43(3), 447–475. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, M. J. (2009). The BOBYQA algorithm for bound constrained optimization without derivatives (pp. 26–46). Cambridge NA Report NA2009/06. University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Segaert, K., Kempen, G., Petersson, K. M., & Hagoort, P. (2013). Syntactic priming and the lexical boost effect during sentence production and sentence comprehension: An fMRI study. Brain and Language, 124(2), 174–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2012.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segaert, K., Menenti, L., Weber, K., & Hagoort, P. (2011). A paradox of syntactic priming: Why response tendencies show priming for passives, and response latencies show priming for actives. PLoS One, 6(10), e24209. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segaert, K., Menenti, L., Weber, K., Petersson, K. M., & Hagoort, P. (2012). Shared syntax in language production and language comprehension--An fMRI study. Cerebral Cortex, 22(7), 1662–1670. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhr249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segaert, K., Wheeldon, L., & Hagoort, P. (2016). Unifying structural priming effects on syntactic choices and timing of sentence generation. Journal of Memory and Language, 91, 59–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thothathiri, M., & Snedeker, J. (2008a). Give and take: Syntactic priming during spoken language comprehension. Cognition, 108(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thothathiri, M., & Snedeker, J. (2008b). Syntactic priming during language comprehension in three- and four-year-old children. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(2), 188–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tooley, K. M., & Bock, K. (2014). On the parity of structural persistence in language production and comprehension. Cognition, 132(2), 101–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tooley, K. M., Swaab, T. Y., Boudewyn, M. A., Zirnstein, M., & Traxler, M. J. (2014). Evidence for priming across intervening sentences during on-line sentence comprehension. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(3), 289–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2013.770892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tooley, K. M., & Traxler, M. J. (2010). Syntactic priming effects in comprehension: A critical review. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4(10), 925–937. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00249.x
   Google Scholar
• Tooley, K. M., & Traxler, M. J. (2018). Implicit learning of structure occurs in parallel with lexically-mediated syntactic priming effects in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 98, 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tooley, K. M., Traxler, M. J., & Swaab, T. Y. (2009). Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence of syntactic priming in sentence comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(1), 19–45. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013984
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traxler, M. J. (2008). Lexically independent priming in online sentence comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(1), 149–155. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.1.149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traxler, M. J. (2015). Priming of early closure: Evidence for the lexical boost during sentence comprehension. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(4), 478–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2014.933243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, H., Dong, Y., Boland, J. E., & Yuan, F. (2016). Structural priming and frequency effects interact in Chinese sentence comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 191. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witzel, J., & Forster, K. (2014). Lexical co-occurrence and ambiguity resolution. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(2), 158–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2012.748925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witzel, N., Witzel, J., & Forster, K. (2012). Comparisons of online Reading paradigms: Eye tracking, moving-window, and maze. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 41(2), 105–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-011-9179-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J., & Snedeker, J. (2019). The use of syntax and information structure during language comprehension: Evidence from structural priming. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(3), 365-384. doi:10.1080/23273798.2018.1539757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar