Liminality in education: generating a creative space of encounter and dialogue between teachers and students within educational structures

References

• Allen, B. (2014). Creativity as threshold – Learning and teaching in a liminal space. In C. O’Mahony, A. Buchanan, M. O’Rourke, & B. Higgs (Eds.), Threshold Concepts: From Personal Practice to Communities of Practice. Proceedings of the National Academy’s Sixth Annual Conference and the Fourth Biennial Threshold Concepts Conference [E-publication]. Cork: National Academy for Integration of Research, Teaching and Learning, NAIRTL, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Andilou, A., & Murphy, P. K. (2010). Examining variations among researchers’ and teachers’ conceptualizations of creativity: A review and synthesis of contemporary research. Educational Research Review, 5(3), 201–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, S., & Robson, M. (2012). Arts and health as a practice of liminality: Managing the spaces of transformation for social and emotional wellbeing with primary school children. Health & Place, 18, 1348–1355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakthtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayliss, A. (1999). Playing with words: An exploration of ludic terms and the linguistic permeation of play in a cultural context. Research in Drama Education, 4(1), 73–84.
   Google Scholar
• Beghetto, R. A. (2005). Does assessment kill student creativity? The Educational Forum, 69(3), 254–263.
   Google Scholar
• Bereczki, E., & Kárpati, A. (2018). Teachers’ beliefs about creativity and its nurture: A systematic review of the recent research literature. Educational Research Review, 23, 25–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besancon, M., & Lubart, T. (2008). Differences in the development of creative competencies of children schooled in diverse learning environments. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 381–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigger, S. 2010. Thresholds, liminality and fruitful chaos: Revolutionary change in education? Retrieved from http://eprints.worc.ac.uk/834/1/Turner_article_Submitted.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Boden, M. A. (2004). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms (2nd ed.). Routledge, London: Taylor & Francis e-Library.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce-Tillman, J. (2009). The transformative qualities of a liminal space created by musicking. Philosophy of Music Education Review, 17(2), 184–202.
   Google Scholar
• Burnard, P., & White, J. (2008). Creativity and performativity: Counterpoints in British and Australian education. British Educational Research Journal, 34(5), 667–682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, D. W., & Chan, L. K. (1999). Implicit theories of creativity: Teachers’ perception of student characteristics in Hong Kong. Creativity Research Journal, 12(3), 185–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conroy, J. C. (2004). Betwixt and between: The liminal imagination, education and democracy. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Craft, A. (2000). Creativity across the primary curriculum: Framing and developing practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Craft, A. (2001a). An analysis of research and literature on creativity in education. Report prepared for the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. Retrieved from http://www.creativetallis.com/uploads/2/2/8/7/2287089/creativity_in_education_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Craft, A. (2001b). Little c creativity. In A. Craft, B. Jeffrey, & M. Leibling (Eds.), Creativity in education(pp. 45–61). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Craft, A. (2003). The limits to creativity in education: Dilemmas for the educator. British Journal of Educational Studies, 51(2), 113–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craft, A. (2008). Retrieved from www.beyondcurrenthorizons.org.uk
   Google Scholar
• Cropley, A. J. (1992). More ways than one: Fostering creativity. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihlyi, M. (1996). Creativity: flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, D., Jindal-Snape, D., Collier, C., Digby, R., Hay, P., & Howe, A. (2013). Creative learning environments in education- A systematic review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 80–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ennis, G. M., & Tonkin, J. (2018). It’s like exercise for your soul’: How participation in youth arts activities contributes to young people’s wellbeing. Journal of Youth Studies, 21(3), 340–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishkin, A., & Johnson, A. S. (1998). Who is creative? Identifying children’s creative abilities. Roeper Review, 21(1), 40–46.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, C. R. (2007). Toward a pedagogy of dialogical resistance. Paideusis, 16(2), 15–33.
   Google Scholar
• Gadamer, H. G. (1975). Truth and method. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Grierson, E. (2011). Art and creativity in the global economies of education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(4), 336–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1973). Characteristics of creativity. Springfield, IL: Illinois State Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction, Gifted Children Section.
   Google Scholar
• Hallissy, M., Butler, D., Hurley, J., & Marshall, K. (2013). Redesigning education: Meeting the challenges of the 21st century. Dublin: Microsoft Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. (2016). Creativity and education. London: Palgrave McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffrey, B., & Craft, A. (2003, February 3). Creative teaching and teaching for creativity: Distinctions and relationships. Paper given at the British Educational Research Association Special Interest Group in Creativity in Education Conference, Milton Keynes, The Open University
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four-c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Land, R., Rattray, J., & Vivian, P. (2014). Learning in the liminal space: A semiotic approach to threshold concepts. Higher Education, 67(2), 199–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong, S. (2011). Creativity and the arts in Chinese societies. In J. Sefton-Green, P. Thomson, K. Jones, & L. Bresler (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of creative learning (pp. 54–62). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Y. (2011). Fostering creativity through education - A conceptual framework of creative pedagogy. Creative Education, 2(3), 149–155.
   Google Scholar
• Linsday, D. M. (2010). Organizational liminality and interstitial creativity: The fellowship of power. Social Forces, 81(1), 163–184.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzi, F. (2012). Assessment as dialogue, for dialogue, through dialogue (Unpublished PhD Thesis).
   Google Scholar
• Lyotard, F. (1984). The Post-Modern Condition. A report on Knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mælan, E. N., Tjomslan, H. E., Bakilien, B., Samdal, O., & Thurston, M. (2018). Supporting pupils’mental health through everyday practices: A qualitative study of teachers and head teachers. Pastoral Care in Education, 36(1), 16–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marjoram, T. (1988). Teaching able children. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• McLaren, P. L. (1988). The liminal servant and the ritual roots of critical pedagogy. Language Arts, 65(2), 164–179.
   Google Scholar
• National Advisory Committee on Creative and Cultural Education (NACCCE). (1999). All our futures: Creativity, culture and education. London: Department for Education and Employment.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, L. D., & Newton, D. P. (2014). Creativity in 21st century education. PROSPECTS: Quarterly Review of Comparative Education, 44(4), 575–589.
   Google Scholar
• Nickerson, R. S. (1999). Enhancing creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 392–430). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noddings, N. (2009). Responsibility. Learning Landscapes, Curriculum Issues and Innovations, Spring 2009, 2(2), 18–22.
   Google Scholar
• Noddings, N. (2013). Standardized curriculum and loss of creativity. Theory into Practice, 52(3), 210–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2013). Education at a glance 2013. Retrieved from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/education-at-a-glance-2013_eag-2013-en
   Google Scholar
• Reid, A., & Petocz, P. (2004). Learning domains and the process of creativity. The Australian Educational Researcher, 31(2), 45–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, & Mishra. (2018). Learning environments that support student creativity: Developing the SCALE*. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 47–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, K. (2011). Out of our minds: Learning to be creative. Oxford: Capstone Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, K., & Aronica, L. (2015). Creative schools: The grassroots revolution that’s transforming education. New York: Viking Press.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Okuda, S. M. (1993). Reaching creatively gifted children through their learning styles. In R. M. Milgram, R. Dunn, & G. E. Price (Eds.), Teaching and counselling gifted and talented adolescents: An international learning style perspective (pp. 103–115). New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Johnson, D. J. (2002). Parents’ and teachers’ implicit theories of children’s creativity: A cross-cultural perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 14(3–4), 427–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P. (2010). Rethinking accountability in a knowledge society. Journal of Educational Change, 11(1), 45–61.
   Google Scholar
• Saltofte, M. (2013). Challenging institutional conventions and forming a voice through creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 143–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, K. (2015). A call to action: The challenges of creative teaching and learning. Teachers College Record, 117(10), 1–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seltzer, K., & Bentley, T. (1999). The creative age: Knowledge and skills for the new economy. London: Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Shaheen, R. (2010). Creativity and education. Creative Education, 1(3), 166–169.
   Google Scholar
• Skiba, T., Tan, M., Sternberg, R. A., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2010). Roads not taken, new roads to take. In R. A. Beghetto & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (pp. 252–269). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soh, K. (2017). Fostering students creativity through teacher behaviours. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 58–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Szakolczai, A. (2009). Liminality and experience: Structuring transitory situations and transformative events. International Political Anthropology, 2(1), 141–172.
   Google Scholar
• Thomassen, B. (2009). The uses and meanings of liminality. International Political Anthropology, 2, 5–27.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 43–75). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Troman, G., Jeffrey, B., & Raggl, A. (2007). Creativity and performativity policies in primary school cultures. Journal of Education Policy, 22(5), 549–572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trotman, D. (2019). Creativity as a pastoral concern. Pastoral Care in Education, 37(1), 73–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, V. (1964). Betwixt and between: The liminal period in rites de passage. The Proceedings of the American Ethnological Society 1964. Symposium on New Approaches to the Study of Religion. 4–20. Reprinted in: Lessa, W. A. & Vogt, E. Z. 1979. Reader in Comparative Religion: An Anthropological Approach, 4th Edition. Harper & Row, Pittsburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, V. (1967). The forest of symbols: Aspects of the Ndembu ritual. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, V. (1969). The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, V. (1974). Liminal to liminoid, in play, flow, and ritual: An essay in comparative symbology. Rice Institute Pamphlet - Rice University Studies, 60(3), 53–92, Rice University.
   Google Scholar
• van Gennep, A. (1909). Les rites de passage. Paris: Emile Nourry.
   Google Scholar
• Weisberg, R. J. (1993). Beyond the myth of genius. New York: W.H. Freeman and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Wels, H., van der Waal, K., Spiegel, A., & Kamsteeg, F. (2011). Victor Turner and liminality: An introduction. Anthropology Southern Africa, 34(1–2), 1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar