What helps young people at risk of exclusion to remain in high school? Using Q methodology to hear student voices

References

• Agenda. (2022) Serious concerns about racial disparity among girls ‘kicked out’ of school, September. https://www.agendaalliance.org/news/serious-concerns-about-racial-disparity-among-girls-kicked-out-of-school/
   Google Scholar
• Alanazi, A. S., Wharrad, H., Moffatt, F., Taylor, M., & Ladan, M. (2021). Q methodology in the COVID-19 Era. Healthcare, 9(11), 1491. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9111491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkhateeb, H., & Romanowski, M. H. (2021). Identifying administrators’ and faculty’s perspectives regarding CAEP accreditation in a college of education: A Q methodology research. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, 101004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnez, J., & Rachel Condry, R. (2021). Criminological perspectives on school exclusion and youth offending. Emotional & Behavioural Difficulties, 26(1), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2021.1905233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, G., & Rowley, J. (2019). Pupils’ views on mainstream reintegration from alternative provision: A Q methodological study. Emotional & Behavioural Difficulties, 24(4), 339–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2019.1625245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouchard, K. L., & Berg, D. H. (2017). Students’ school belonging: Juxtaposing the perspectives of teachers and students in the late elementary school years (grades 4–8). School Community Journal, 27(1), 107–136. Retrieved July 5, 2023, from https://www.adi.org/journal/2017ss/BouchardBergSpring2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• British Educational Research Association. (2018). Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research. 4th ed. Retrieved June 3, 2022. https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2018-online
   Google Scholar
• British Psychological Society. (2021). Ethics guidelines for internet-mediated research. Retrieved June 5, 2021. https://www.bps.org.uk/news-and-policy/ethics-guidelines-internet-mediated-research
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. R., Danielson, S., & van Exel, J. (2015). Overly ambitious critics and the Medici Effect: A reply to Kampen and Tamás. Quality & Quantity, 49, 523–537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0007-x
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, C., & Hurry, J. (2018). Supporting pupils in school with social, emotional and mental health needs: A scoping review of the literature. Emotional & Behavioural Difficulties, 23(3), 310–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2018.1452590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Children’s Commissioner. (2019). Skipping school: Invisible children. How children disappear from England’s schools. Author. Retrieved July 5, 2023, from https://www.childrenscommissioner.gov.uk/report/skipping-school-invisiblechildren/
   Google Scholar
• Churruca, K., Ludlow, K., Wu, W., Gibbons, K., Nguyen, H., Ellis, L., & Braithwaite, J. (2021). A scoping review of Q-methodology in healthcare research. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 21(1), 125. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01309-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, L., Baron, C., Grim, L., & Sandling, G. (2018). Teaching teachers onsite: Using evaluation to develop effective professional development programs. The Journal of Museum Education, 43(3), 274–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/10598650.2018.1489196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Leeuw, R. R., de Boer, A. A., Beckmann, E. J., van Exel, J., & Minnaert, A. E. M. G. (2019). Young children’s perspectives on resolving social exclusion within inclusive classrooms. International Journal of Educational Research, 98, 324–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2016). DfE Strategy 2015-2020. World-class education and care. Retrieved July 5, 2023, from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/508421/DfE-strategy-narrative.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education (DfE). (2015). Special educational needs and disability code of practice: 0 to 25 year. Statutory guidance for organisations which work with and support children and young people who have special educational needs or disabilities. Retrieved July 21, 2022. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/send-code-of-practice-0-to-25
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education (DfE). (2022). Suspension and permanent exclusion from maintained schools, academies and pupil referral units in England, including pupil movement. Guidance for maintained schools, academies, and pupil referral units in England. Retrieved July 20, 2022. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/school-exclusion
   Google Scholar
• Dimitrellou, E., & Hurry, J. (2019). School belonging among young adolescents with SEMH and MLD: The link with their social relations and school inclusivity. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 34(3), 312–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Done, E. J., & Andrews, M. J. (2020). How inclusion became exclusion: Policy, teachers and inclusive education. Journal of Education Policy, 35(4), 447–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2018.1552763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Embieta, C. (2019). Reintegration to secondary education following school exclusion: An exploration of the relationship between home and school from the perspective of parents. Educational and Child Psychology, 36(3), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsecp.2019.36.3.18
   Google Scholar
• Flewitt, R. (2005). Conducting research with young children: Some ethical considerations. Early Child Development and Care, 175(6), 553–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430500131338
   Google Scholar
• Gazeley, L., Marrable, T., Brown, C., & Boddy, J. (2015). Contextualising inequalities in rates of school exclusion in english schools: Beneath the ‘tip of the iceberg. British Journal of Educational Studies, 63(4), 487–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2015.1070790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, K., Quilter-Pinner, H., & Swift, D. (2017). Making the difference: Breaking the link between school exclusion and social exclusion. Institute for Public Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K., Henderson, S., & Wink, B. (2019). Mobilising Q methodology within a realist evaluation: Lessons from an empirical study. Evaluation, 25(4), 430–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389019841645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellström, L., & Lundberg, A. (2020). Understanding bullying from young people’s perspectives: An exploratory study. Educational Research, 62(4), 414–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2020.1821388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensel, D., Toronto, C., Lawless, J., & Burgess, J. (2022). A scoping review of Q methodology nursing education studies. Nurse Education Today, 109, 105220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickinbotham, L., & Soni, A. (2021). A systematic literature review exploring the views and experiences of children and young people of the label Social. Emotional and Mental Health (SEMH), Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 26(2), 135–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, M. (2016). Critical, respectful, person-centred: Q Methodology for educational psychologists. Educational & Child Psychology, 33, 63–75. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsecp.2016.33.3.63
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, J., & Crenna-Jennings, W. (2019). Unexplained pupil exits from schools: Further analysis and data by multi-academy trust and local authority. Education Policy Institute. Retrieved March 18, 2022. https://epi.org.uk/publications-and-research/unexplained-pupil-exits-data-multi-academy-trust-local-authority/
   Google Scholar
• IntegratEd. (2020). Annual report. Fewer exclusions. Better alternative provision. Retrieved March 18, 2022. https://www.integrated.org.uk/report/integrated-annual-report-2020/
   Google Scholar
• Jalali, R., & Morgan, G. (2018). ‘They won’t let me back.’ Comparing student perceptions across primary and secondary pupil referral units (PRUs). Emotional & Behavioural Difficulties, 23(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2017.1347364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, L. (2019). Guardians of research: Negotiating the strata of gatekeepers in research with vulnerable participants. PRACTICE, 1(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/25783858.2019.1589988
   Google Scholar
• Kenward, L. (2019). A literature review to guide novice researchers using Q methodology in the development of a framework for concourse management. Nurse Researcher, 27(1), 17–21. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2019.e1616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, S., Bang, H., & Ark, A. (2022). Using Q methodology to explore american adolescents’ self-images and images of their parents. The Family Journal, 30(1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480720986501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobe, B., Morgan, D., & Hoffman, K. A. (2020, January). Qualitative data collection in an Era of social distancing. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 160940692093787. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920937875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundberg, A., de Leeuw, R., & Aliani, R. (2020). Using Q methodology: Sorting out subjectivity in educational research. Educational Research Review, 31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutfallah, S., & Buchanan, L. (2019). Quantifying subjective data using online Q-methodology software. The Mental Lexicon, 14(3), 415–423. https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.20002.lut
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malcolm, A. (2018). Exclusions and alternative provision: Piecing together the picture. Emotional & Behavioural Difficulties, 23(1), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2017.1366099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCluskey, G., Cole, T., Daniels, H., Thompson, I., & Tawell, A. (2019). Exclusion from school in Scotland and across the UK: Contrasts and questions. British Educational Research Journal, 45(6), 1140–1159. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeown, B., & Thomas, D. B. (2013). Q methodology quantitative applications in the social sciences (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Meader, K., & Larwin, K. H. (2021, March). Exploring the perceptions of male teachers about the shortage of male elementary school teachers: A Q methodology. Journal of Education, 202(4), 416–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022057421996243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messeter, T., & Anita Soni, A. (2018). A systematic literature review of the ‘managed move’ process as an alternative to exclusion in UK schools. Emotional & Behavioural Difficulties, 23(2), 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2017.1383676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ofsted. (2019). Off-rolling: Exploring the issue. Retrieved May 6, 2022. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/off-rolling-exploring-the-issue
   Google Scholar
• Owen, C., Woods, K., & Stewart, A. (2021). A systematic literature review exploring the facilitators and barriers of reintegration to secondary mainstream schools through ‘alternative provision’. Emotional & Behavioural Difficulties, 26(3), 322–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2021.1963119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partridge, L., Landreth Strong, F., Lobley, E., & Mason, D. (2020). Pinball kids: Preventing schools exclusions. RSA.
   Google Scholar
• Pillay, J., Dunbar-Krige, H., & Mostert, J. (2013). Learners with behavioural, emotional and social difficulties’ experiences of reintegration into mainstream education. Emotional & Behavioural Difficulties, 18(3), 310–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2013.769709
   Google Scholar
• Pinzone, C., & Reschly, A. L. (2021). Cultivating student engagement and connectedness. In P. J. Lazarus, Suldo, S. (Eds.), Fostering the emotional well-being of our youth: A school-based approach (pp. 163–182). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/med-psych/9780190918873.003.0009
   Google Scholar
• Power, S., & Taylor, C. (2020). Not in the classroom, but still on the register: Hidden forms of school exclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24(8), 867–881. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1492644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramlo, S. (2016). Mixed method lessons learned from 80 years of Q methodology. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(1), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815610998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramlo, S. (2017). Improving student evaluation of teaching: Determining multiple perspectives within a course for future math educators. Journal of Research in Education, 27(1), 49–78. Retrieved July 5, 2023, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1142362.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ramlo, S. (2022). Mixed methods research and quantum theory: Q methodology as an exemplar for complementarity. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 16(2), 226–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898211019497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodl, J. E., Cruz, R. A., & Knollman, G. A. (2020). Applying Q methodology to teacher evaluation research. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheffield, E. M., & Morgan, G. (2017). The perceptions and experiences of young people with a BESD/SEMH classification. Educational Psychology in Practice, 33(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2016.1225192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanforth, A., & Rose, J. (2020). ‘You kind of don’t want them in the room’: Tensions in the discourse of inclusion and exclusion for students displaying challenging behaviour in an English secondary school. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24(12), 1253–1267. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1516821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, T. (2020). Using participatory methods with young children; reflections on emergent ‘ethically important moments’ in school-based research. Irish Educational Studies, 39(3), 375–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2019.1697944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tejerina-Arreal, M., Parker, C., Paget, A., Henley, W., Logan, S., Emond, A., & Ford, T. (2020). Child and adolescent mental health trajectories in relation to exclusion from school from the avon longitudinal study of parents and children. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 25(4), 217–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. (2015). Factors affecting successful reintegration. Educational Studies, 41(1–2), 188–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2015.955749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, I., Tawell, A., & Daniels, H. (2021). Conflicts in professional concern and the exclusion of pupils with SEMH in England. Emotional & Behavioural Difficulties, 26(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2021.1898769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timpson, E. (2019). Timpson review of school exclusion, command paper 92. Department for Education, Retrieved June 1, 2022. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/807862/Timpson_review.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (1989). United nations convention on the rights of the child.
   Google Scholar
• Valdebenito, S., Eisner, M., Farrington, D. P., Ttofo, M. M., & Sutherland, A. (2019). What can we do to reduce disciplinary school exclusion? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 15(3), 253–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-018-09351-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vančíková, K., Basarabová, B., Sabo, R., & Šukolová, D. (2021). Various perceptions of inclusive school: Q methodological study. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 11(5), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2021-0100
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Steen, S., Geveke, C. H., Steenbakkers, A. T., & Steenbeek, H. W. (2020). Teaching students with autism spectrum disorders: What are the needs of educational professionals? Teaching & Teacher Education, 90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, B. B., Lin, Y., & McCline, R. M. (2018). Q methodology and Q-perspectives® online: Innovative research methodology and instructional technology. TechTrends, 62(5), 450–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0314-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, S., & Stenner, P. (2012). Doing Q methodological research: Theory, method and interpretation. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446251911
   Google Scholar
• Wester, K. L., Morris, C. A. W., Trustey, C. E., Cory, J. S., & Grossman, L. M. (2021). Promoting rigorous research using innovative qualitative approaches. Journal of Counseling and Development, 99(2), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams-Brown, Z., & Hodkinson, A. (2021). ‘What is considered good for everyone may not be good for children with special educational needs and disabilities’: Teacher’s perspectives on inclusion in England. Education 3-13, 49(6), 688–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2020.1772845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, J. M., & Shepardson, D. P. (2018). Using Q methodology to investigate undergraduate students’ attitudes toward the geosciences. Science Education, 102(1), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar