- Norsk Retstitende 1918 p.401
- The Oslo District Court's decision of October 15, 1982 is unpublished. The 1984 decision of the Eidsivating Appellate Court is also officially unpublished, but a copy is reproduced in the Annual Bergen OGS newsletter, (1984) 1 Olje-og gassrett 18. The Supreme Court's December 19, 1985 decision is reported in Norsk Restitende 1925 p.1392.
- See A. Frihagen, Royalty (1979).
- In T. Daintith (Ed.), The Legal Character of Petroleum Licences (1981) pp. 191–3.
- A. Frihagen, Avtaler (1975).
- See A. Frihagen, footnote 3, supra.
- Fabri, “The Legal Nature of Petroleum Agreement: A Comparative Analysis”, (1986) Australian Mining and Petroleum Law Association Yearbook 1. Although I share his views in many respects, I feel that his analysis may be overly coloured by common law principles foreign to most oil producing states.
- A comparison of the principles of legal obligations versus unilateral state amendment in the Chinese first round contracts and in other countries was conducted at the 1984 Annual Bergen Oil and Gas Law Symposium. See my paper in Utvinningstillatelse (1985) pp. 15–19.
- See the 1984 report of the sixth Solstrand offshore seminar (1983) pp. 244–267 (in Norwegian).
- Knustad and Ramm have extensively commented upon the Appellate Court decision in (1985) 1 Olje-og gassrett 3. Knustad has commented upon the Supreme Court decision in (1986) 1 Olje-og gassrett 3. See the somewhat abbreviated versions in (1985) 3 J.E.R.L. 121 and (1986) 4 J.E.R.L. 203.
- (1986) 18 MarIus (June, 1986 in Norwegian). See also his paper in this issue.
- Cf. A. Frihagen, 2 Forvaltnigsloven (2nd ed. 1986) pp. 835, 902, 905.
- (1987) Lovog Rett 211.
- Choose new content alerts to be informed about new research of interest to you
- Easy remote access to your institution's subscriptions on any device, from any location
- Save your searches and schedule alerts to send you new results
- Export your search results into a .csv file to support your research