References
- Alsulaiman, A., & Hewison, J. (2006). Attitudes to prenatal and preimplantation diagnosis in Saudi parents at genetic risk. Prenatal Diagnosis, 26, 1010–1014.
- Bloom, P. (2012). Moral nativism and moral psychology. In M. Mikulincer, & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), The social psychology of morality (pp. 71–89). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
- Chamayou, S., Gulielmino, A., Giambona, A., Siciliano, S., Di Stefano, G., Scibilia, G., et al. (1998). Attitudes of potential users in Sicily towards preimplantation genetic diagnosis of betha-thalassaemia and aneuploidies. Human Reproduction, 13, 1936–1944.
- ESHRE (2012). Guidelines for organisation, a PGD centre. Retrieved from http://ESHRE/English/Specialty-Groups/Data-collection-Consortia/PGD-Consortium/PGD-Consortium-Publications/page.aspx/217 (accessed 10 December 2012)
- Hershberger, P., & Pierce, P. (2010). Conceptualizing couples’ decision making in PGD: Emerging cognitive, emotional and moral dimensions. Patient Education and Counseling, 81, 53–62.
- Hershberger, P., Gallo, A. M., Kavanaugh, K., Olshansky, E., Schwartz, A., & Tur-Kaspa, I. (2012). The decision-making process of genetically at-risk couples considering preimplantation genetic diagnosis: Initial findings from a grounded theory study. Social Science & Medicine, 74, 1536–1543.
- Hui, P., Lam, Y., Chen, M., Tang, M., Yeung, W., Ng, E., et al. (2006). Attitude of at-risk subjects towards preimplantion genetic diagnosis of α- and β-thalassaemias in Hong Kong. Prenatal Diagnosis, 26, 1010–1014.
- Karatas, J. C., Barlow-Stewart, K., Meiser, B., McMahnon, C., Strong, K. A., Hill, W., et al. (2010). Psychological adjustment, knowledge and unmet information needs in women undergoing PGD. Human Reproduction, 6, 1481–1489.
- Kelly, S. (2009). Choosing not to choose: Reproductive response of parents of children with genetic conditions or impairments. Sociology of Health & Illness, 31, 81–97.
- Lavery, S., Aurell, R., Turner, C., Castellu, C., Veiga, A., Barri, P. N., & Winston, R. M. (2002). Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: Patients’ experiences and attitudes. Human Reproduction, 9, 2464–2467.
- Liebaers, I., Desmyttere, S., Verpoest, W., De Rycke, M., Staessen, C., Sermon, K., et al. (2010). Report on consecutive series of 581 children born after blastomere biopsy for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Human Reproduction, 25, 275–282.
- Maddi, S. R. (2012). Creating meaning through making decisions. In P. T. P. Wong (Ed.), The human quest for meaning: Theories, research, and applications (pp. 57–80). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Mikels, J., Maglio, S., Reed, A., & Kaplowitz, L. (2011). Should I go with my gut? Investigation of the benefits of emotion-focused decision making. Emotion, 11, 743–753.
- Miller, C., Hewison, J., & Morley, S. (2012). A comparison of decisions about prenatal diagnosis and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 30, 377–387.
- Musters, A., Twisk, M., Leschot, N., Oosterwijk, C., Korevaar, C., Repping, S., et al. (2010). Perspectives of couples with high risk on transmitting genetic disorders. Fertility and Sterility, 94, 1239–1243.
- Rij, C., Geilen, M., Lulofs, R., Evres, J., Osch, L., Muntjewerff, N., et al. (2011). Profiles and motives for PGD: A prospective study of couples referred for PGD in the Netherlands. Human Reproduction, 7, 1826–1835.
- Snowdon, C., & Green, J. M. (1997). Preimplantion diagnosis and other reproductive options: Attitudes of male and female carriers of recessive disorders. Human Reproduction, 12, 341–350.
- Zeiler, K. (2007). Shared decision-making, gender and new technologies. Journal of Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 10, 279–87.