References
- Benner, P. (1994). The tradition and skill of interpretive phenomenology in studying health, illness, and caring practices. In P. Benner (Ed.), Interpretive phenomenology: Embodiment, caring, and ethics in health and illness (pp. 99–128). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Craige, M., Loader, B., Burrows, R., & Muncer, S. (2002). Reliability of health information on the Internet: An examination of expert’s ratings. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 4(1): e2. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1761929/
- Crist, J. D., & Tanner, C. A. (2003). Interpretation/analysis methods in hermeneutic interpretive phenomenology. Nursing Research, 52, 202–205.
- Declercq, E. R., Sakala, C., Corry, M. P., Applebaum, S., & Herrlich, A. (2013). Listening to mothers III: Report of the third national U.S. survey of women’s childbearing experiences. New York, NY: Childbirth Connection 2013. Available from: http://transform.childbirthconnection.org/reports/listeningtomothers/
- Diekelmann, N., & Magnussen Ironside, P. (2006). Hermeneutics. In J. Fitzpatrick (Ed.), Encyclopedia of nursing research (pp. 260–262). New York, NY: Springer.
- Ficarra, B. (2012). Too much hype in the mobile health app world? Huffingtonpost. Available from: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/barbara-ficarra/health-apps_b_1689033.html
- Fleming, S., Smart, D., & Eide, P. (2011). Grand multiparous women’s perceptions of birthing, nursing care and childbirth technology. The Journal of Perinatal Education, 20, 108–117. doi:10.1891/10581243.20.2.108
- Fleming, S., & Vandermause, R. (2011). Grand multiapare’s evolving experiences of birthing and technology in U.S. hospitals. Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Neonatal Nurses, 40, 742–752. doi:10.1111/j.1552-6909.2011.01304.x.
- Healy, M. (2011). Heidegger;s contribution to hermeneutic phenomenological research. In G. Thomson, F. Dykes, & S. Downe (Eds.), Qualitative health research in midwifery and childbirth (chapter 12m, pp. 215–231). London: Routledge Taylor Francis.
- Lothian, J. & Grauer, A. (2003). Reality birth: Marketing fear to childbearing women. Journal of Perinatal Education, 12(2), vi–viii.
- Medline Plus (2013). Evaluating health information. Available from: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/evaluatinghealthinformation.html
- Morris, T., & McInerney, K. (2010). Media representations of pregnancy and childbirth: An analysis of reality television programs in the United States. Birth, 37, 134–140. doi.org/10.1111/2Fj.1523-536X.2010.00393
- Namey, E., & Lyerly, A. (2010). The meaning of control for childbearing women in the US. Sociology & Scientific Medicine, 71, 769–776. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.05.024
- Pew. (2012). Pew Internet and American Life Project. Cell Internet use. 26 June, pp. 1–16. Available from: http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Cell-Internet-Use-2012.aspx
- Rydfors, J. & Schuftan, A. (2013). Pregnancy companion. Available from: http://www.pregnancycompanionapp.com/home.html
- Sandelowski, M. (2000). Focus on research methods: Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing and Health, 23, 334–340. doi.org/10.1002/2F1098-240X/28200008/2923/3A4/3C334/3A/3AAID-NUR9/3E3.0.CO/3B2-G
- Simkin, P. (2008). The birth partner: A complete guide to childbirth for dads, doulas, and all other labor companions (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Harvard Common Press.
- Smythe, E. (2011). From beginning to end: How to do hermeneutic interpretive phenomenology. In G. Thomson, F. Dykes, & S. Downe (Eds.), Qualitative health research in midwifery and childbirth (chapter 3, pp. 35–54). London: Routledge Taylor Francis.
- Vandermause, R. (2012). Being wholesome: The paradox of methamphetamine addiction and recovery – A hermeneutical phenomenological interpretation within an interdisciplinary, transmethodological study. Qualitative Social Work, 11, 299–318.
- Vandermause, R., & Fleming, S. (2011). The philosophical hermeneutic interview. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 10, 367–377.
- Whittemore, R., Chase, S., & Mandle, C. (2001). Validity in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 11, 522–537.