7,353
Views
44
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The psychological impact of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) on girls/women’s mental health: a narrative literature review

, &
Pages 469-485 | Received 06 Nov 2013, Accepted 25 Jul 2014, Published online: 19 Sep 2014

References

  • Ahmadu, F. S., & Shweder, R. A. (2009). Disputing the myth of sexual dysfunction of circumcised women: Interview with Richard Shweder. Anthropology Today, 25(6), 14–19.
  • Al-krenawi, A., & Wiesel-Lev, R. (1999). Attitudes toward and perceived psychosocial impact of female circumcision as practiced among the Bedouin-Arabs of the Negrev. Family Process, 38, 431–443.
  • Alsibiani, S. A., & Rouzi, A. A. (2010). Sexual function in women with female genital mutilation. Fertility and Sterility, 93, 722–724.
  • Applebaum, J., Cohen, H., Matar, M., Abu Rabia, Y., & Kaplan, Z. (2008). Symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder after ritual female genital surgery among Bedouin in Israel: Myth or reality? Primary Care Companion Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 10, 453–456.
  • Banks, E., Meirik, O., Farley, T., & Akande, O. (2006). Female genital mutilation and obstetric outcome: WHO collaborative prospective study in six African countries. The Lancet, 367, 1835–1841.
  • Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1997). Writing narrative literature reviews. Review of General Psychology, 1, 311–320.
  • Behrendt, A., & Moritz, S. (2005). Post-traumatic stress disorder and memory problems after female genital mutilation. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 1000–1002.
  • Berg, R. C., Denison, E., & Fretheim, A. (2010). Psychological, social and sexual consequences of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C): A systematic review of quantitative studies. Oslo: Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services (NOKC).
  • Berggren, V., Yagoub, A. E., Satti, A. M., Khalifa, M. A., Aziz, F. A., & Bergstrom, S. (2006). Postpartum tightening operations on two delivering wards in Sudan. British Journal of Midwifery, 14, 1–4.
  • Boyle, E. (2002). Female genital cutting: Cultural conflict in the global community. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Brettle, A., & Grant, M. J. (2004). Finding the evidence for practice: A workbook for health professionals. London: Churchill Livingstone.
  • British Medical Association (BMA). (2008). Access to healthcare for asylum and refused asylum seekers. London: BMA.
  • Catania, L. (2007). Pleasure and orgasm in women with Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C). Journal of Sexual Medicine, 4, 1666–1678.
  • Centre for Reproductive Rights. (2003). Female Circumcision/Female genital mutilation (FC/FGM): Legal prohibitions worldwide (fact sheets). http://www.crlp.org/pub_fac_fgmicpd.html
  • Chibber, R., El-Saleh, E., & El Harmi, J. (2011). Female circumcision: Obstetrical and psychological sequelae continues unabated in the 21st century. Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 24, 833–836.
  • Cochrane Library. (2008). Chichester: Wiley. www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgibin/mrwhome/106568753/HOME
  • Daley, A. (2004). Female genital mutilation: Consequences for midwifery. British Journal of Midwifery, 12, 292–298.
  • Dare, F. O., Oboro, V. O., Fadiora, S. O., Orji, E. O., Sule-Odu, A. O., & Olabode, T. O. (2004). Female genital mutilation: An analysis of 522 cases in South-Western Nigeria. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 24, 281–283.
  • De Lucas, J. (Ed.). (2004). Evaluating the impact of existing legislation in Europe with regard to female genital mutilation. Valencia (University of Valencia) Spain: Spanish National Report.
  • Dorkenoo, E., Morison, L., & Macfarlane, A. (2007). A statistical study to estimate the prevalence of Female Genital Mutilation in England and Wales: FORWARD. London: DoH.
  • Elnashar, A., & Abdelhady, R. (2007). The impact of female genital cutting on health of newly married women. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 97, 238–244.
  • Esho, T. (2010). Female genital cutting and sexual function: in search of an alternate theoretical model. African Identities, 8, 221–235.
  • Gordon, H. (2005). A clinician’s experience. In C. Momoh (Ed.), Female genital mutilation (pp. 29–42). Milton Keynes: Radcliffe.
  • Gruenbaum, E. (2001). The female circumcision controversy: An anthropological perspective. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Hastings Center Report. (2012). The public policy advisory network on female genital surgeries in Africa: Seven things to know about female genital surgeries in Africa. Hastings Center Report, 42(6), 19–27.
  • Horwitz, R. I. (1995). Large-scale randomized evidence: Large, simple trials and overviews of trials: Discussion. A clinician’s perspective on meta-analyses. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 48, 41–44.
  • Jaeger, F., Schulze, S., & Hohlfeld, P. (2002). Female genital mutilation in Switzerland: A survey among gynaecologists. Swiss Medical Weekly, 132, 259–264.
  • Kea, P. J., & Roberts-Holmes, G. (2013). Producing victim identities: Female genital mutilation and the politics of asylum claims in the United Kingdom. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 20, 96–113.
  • Keizer, C. (2003). Acculturation and psychic effects of female circumcision: A research on key persons and representatives own language and culture of the Somali community in the NL. Netherlands: Psychology.
  • Kizilhan, J. I. (2011). Impact of psychological disorders after female genital mutilation among Kurdish girls in Northern Iraq. The European Journal of Psychiatry, 25, 92–100.
  • Lockhat, H. (2004). Female genital mutilation: Treating the tears. London: Middlesex University Press.
  • Lundberg, P. C., & Gerezgiher, A. (2008). Experiences from pregnancy and childbirth related to female genital mutilation among Eritrean immigrant women in Sweden. Midwifery, 24, 214–225.
  • Momoh, C. (2005). Female genital mutilation. Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing.
  • Momoh, C., Ladhani, S., Lochrie, D. P., & Rymer, J. (2001). Female genital mutilation: Analysis of the first twelve months of a southeast London specialist clinic. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 108, 186–191.
  • Nienhuis, G., Hendriks, M., & Naleie, Z. (2008). Zware dingen moet je voorzichtig duwen: achtergronden gevolgen en aanpak meisjesbesnijdenis (2e herziene druk). Utrecht: Pharos/FSAN.
  • Nnodum, B. I. (2002). Female genital mutilation and its effects: Implications for counselling. The Nigerian Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 8, 112–132.
  • Obermeyer, C. M. (1999). Female genital surgeries: The known, the unknown, and the unknowable. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 13, 79–106.
  • Osinowo, H. O., & Taiwo, A. O. (2003). Impact of female genital mutilation on sexual functioning, self-esteem and marital instability of women in Ajegunle. IFE Psychologia: An International Journal, 11, 123–130.
  • Pearce, A. J., & Bewley, S. (2014). Medicalization of female genital mutilation. Harm reduction or unethical? Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Reproductive Medicine, 24, 29–30.
  • Professionals Working in Ireland (2013). Female Genital Mutilation (FGM). Information for health-care professionals working in Ireland. This document was recently updated in June. Dublin: AkiDwA.
  • Purchase, T. C. D., Lamoudi, M., Colman, S., Allen, S., Latthe, P., & Jolly, K. (2013). A survey on knowledge of female genital mutilation guidelines. Acta Obstetrica et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 92, 858–861.
  • Scotland.gov.uk. (2014). Available at: www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/People/Equality/violence-women/MinorityEthnicIssuesPages/FemaleGenitalMutilation.
  • Serour, G. I. (2013). Medicalization of female genital mutilation/cutting. African Journal of Urology, 19, 145–149.
  • Shell-Duncan, B. (2001). The medicalization of female circumcision: Harm reduction or promotion of a dangerous practice? Social Science & Medicine, 52, 1013–1028.
  • Shell-Duncan, B., Wander, K., Hernlund, Y., & Moreau, A. (2011). Dynamics of change in the practice of female genital cutting in Senegambia: Testing predictions of social convention theory. Social Science and Medicine, 73, 1275–1283.
  • Toubia, N. (1995). Female genital mutilation: A call for global action (pp. 24–25). New York, NY: Rainbow.
  • Vloeberghs, E., Knipscheer, J., van der Kwaak, A., Naleie, Z., & van den Muijsenbergh, M. (2011). Veiled pain: Study in the Netherlands on the psychological, social and relational consequences of female genital mutilation. Utrecht: Pharos.
  • Whitehorn, J., Ayonrinde, O., & Maingay, S. (2002). Female genital mutilation: Cultural and psychological implications. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 17, 161–170.
  • World Health Organisation (WHO) (2008). Eliminating female genital mutilation: An interagency statement, OHCHR, UNAIDS, UNDP, UNECA, UNESCO, UNFPA, UNHCR, UNICEF, UNIFEM, WHO. Geneva: WHO.
  • Yoder, P. S., & Kahn, S. (2008). Numbers of women circumcised in Africa: The production of a total. Washington, DC: United States Agency for International Development DHS working papers.
  • Yoder, P. S., Wang, S., & Johansen, E. (2013). Estimates of female genital mutilation/cutting in 27 African countries and Yemen. Studies in Family Planning, 44, 189–204.
  • Zaidi, N., Khalil, A., Roberts, C., & Browne, M. (2007). Knowledge of female genital mutilation among healthcare professionals. Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 27, 161–164.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.