The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale as a measure for antenatal dysphoria

References

• Adouard, F., Glangeaud-Freudenthal, N. M. C., & Golse, B. (2005). Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in a sample of women with high-risk pregnancies in France. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 8, 89–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, A., Ward, C., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjorner, J., Kosinski, M., & Ware, J. (2003a). Calibration of an item pool assessing the burden of headaches: An application of IRT to headache impact (HIT). Quality of Life Research, 12, 913–935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjorner, J., Kosinski, M., & Ware, J. (2003b). The feasibility of applying item response theory to measures of migraine impact: A re-analysis of three clinical studies. Quality of Life Research, 12, 887–902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwers, E., Van Baar, A., & Pop, V. (2001). Does the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale measure anxiety? Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 51, 659–663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, L. (2010). Metropolis-Hastings Robbins–Monro algorithm for confirmatory item factor analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 35, 307–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, L., Thissen, D., & Du Toit, S. (n.d.). Item response theory for patient response outcomes. 2.0 edn. Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Chabrol, H., & Teissedre, F. (2004). Relation between Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale scores at 2–3 days and 4–6 weeks postpartum. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 22, 33–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chee, C., Lee, D., Chong, Y., Tan, L., Ng, T., & Fones, C. (2005). Confinement and other psychosocial factors in perinatal depression: A transcultural study in Singapore. Journal of Affective Disorders, 89, 157–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W. H., & Thissen, D. (1997). Local dependence indexes for item pairs using item response theory. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22, 265–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, J., Holden, J., & Sagovsky, R. (1987). Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. British Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 782–786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emberson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J., McKenzie-Mcharg, K., Shakespeare, J., Price, J., & Gray, R. (2009). A systematic review of studies validating the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in antepartum and postpartum women. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 119, 350–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J. (1998). Postnatal depression or perinatal dysphoria? Findings from a longitudinal community-based study using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Journal of Reproductive & Infant Psychology, 16, 143.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (1985). Methodology review: Assessing unidimensionality of tests and ltenls. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 139–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jomeen, J., & Martin, C. (2005). Confirmation of an occluded anxiety component within the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) during early pregnancy. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 23, 143–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabir, K., Sheeder, J., & Kelly, L. (2008). Identifying postpartum depression: Are 3 questions as good as 10? Pediatrics, 122, e696–e702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimova, G., & Martin, C. (2003). A psychometric evaluation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale during pregnancy. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 8, 89–103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kline, P. (1993). The handbook of psychological testing. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, P. (2000). Handbook of psychological testing (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, D., & Chung, T. (2007). Postnatal depression: An update. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 21, 183–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthey, S., Barnett, B., Howie, P., & Kavanagh, D. J. (2003). Diagnosing postpartum depression in mothers and fathers: Whatever happened to anxiety? Journal of Affective Disorders, 74, 139–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, R. (1985). Factor analysis and related methods. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, L., & Carothers, A. (1990). The validation of the Edinburgh Post-Natal Depression Scale on a community sample. British Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 288–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, D., & Cox, J. (1990). Screening for depression during pregnancy with the Edinburgh Depression Scale (EPDS). Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 8, 99–107.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (1998). Mplus. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Ohio Department of Mental Health (n.d.). Help me grow maternal depression screening program [online]. http://www.ohiocando4kids.org/MDSP_Edinburgh_Postnatal_Depression_Scale-EPDS [accessed 4 June 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS®). (2012). PROMIS® instrument development and psychometric evaluation scientific standards.
   Google Scholar
• Reichenheim, M., Moraes, C., Oliveira, A., & Lobato, G. (2011). Revisiting the dimensional structure of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS): Empirical evidence for a general factor. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11, 93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reise, S., Horan, W., & Blanchard, J. (2011). The challenges of fitting an item response theory model to the social anhedonia scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 213–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, L., Gilbert Evans, S., Sellers, E., & Romach, M. (2003). Measurement issues in postpartum depression part 1: Anxiety as a feature of postpartum depression. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 6, 51–57.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rush, A. J., Trivedi, M. H., Ibrahim, H. M., Carmody, T. J., Arnow, B., Klein, D. N., et al. (2003). The 16-item quick inventory of depressive symptomatology (QIDS), clinician rating (QIDS-C), and self-report (QIDS-SR): A psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic major depression. Biological Psychiatry, 54, 573–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samejima, F. (1970). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika, 35, 139–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samejima, F. (1997). Graded response model. In W. Van Der Linden & R. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Segars, A. H. (1997). Assessing the unidimensionality of measurement: A paradigm and illustration within the context of information systems research. Omega, 25, 107–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snaith, R., Constantinopoulis, A., Jardine, M., & McGuffin, P. (1978). A clinical scale for the self-assessment of irritability. British Journal of Psychiatry, 132, 164–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soh, S. E., Tint, M. T., Gluckman, P. D., Godfrey, K. M., Rifkin-Graboi, A., Chan, Y. H., et al. (2013). Cohort profile: Growing Up in Singapore Towards Healthy Outcomes (GUSTO) birth cohort study. International Journal of Epidemiology.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swalm, D., Brooks, J., Doherty, D., Nathan, E., & Jacques, A. (2010). Using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale to screen for perinatal anxiety. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 13, 515–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiagayson, P., Krishnaswamy, G., Lim, M. L., Sung, S. C., Haley, C. L., Fung, D. S. S., et al. (2012). Depression and anxiety in Singaporean high-risk pregnancies – prevalence and screening. General Hospital Psychiatry, 35, 112–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Ark, L. A. (2012). New developments in mokken scale analysis in r. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(5), 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vivilaki, V., Dafermos, V., Kogevinas, M., Bitsios, P., & Lionis, C. (2009). The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: Translation and validation for a greek sample. BMC Public Health, 9, 329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zigmond, A., & Snaith, R. (1983). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67, 361–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar