‘Together … for only a moment’: British newspaper constructions of altruistic non-commercial surrogate motherhood

References

• ABC News. (2014). Retrieved December 9, from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-12-09/man-appears-in-court-thai-surrogacy-child-sex-abuse-charge/5954954
   Google Scholar
• van den Akker, O. B. A. (2001). The acceptable face of parenthood. Psychology, Evolution and Gender, 3, 137–153.10.1080/14616660110067366
   Google Scholar
• van den Akker, O. B. A. (2007). Psychosocial aspects of surrogate motherhood. Human Reproduction Update, 13, 53–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andsager, J., Chen, L., Miles, S., Smith, C., & Nothwehr, F. (2015). Nutrition information in community newspapers: Goal framing. Story Origins, and Topics, Health Communication, 30, 1013–1021. doi:10.1080/10410236.2014.914620.
   Google Scholar
• Appleton, T. (2001). Surrogacy. Curr Obstet Gynecol, II, 256–257.
   Google Scholar
• Arvidsson, A., Johnsdotter, S., & Essén, B. (2015). Views of Swedish commissioning parents relating to the exploitation discourse in using transnational surrogacy. PLOS ONE., 10, e0126518. doi:10.1371/journal.none.0126518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASRM. (1990). Surrogate gestational mothers: Women who gestate a genetically unrelated embryo. Fertil. Steril., 53, 64–67.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, C. L., Jarlenski, M., Grob, R., Schlesinger, M., & Gollust, S. E. (2011). News media framing of childhood obesity in the United States from 2000 to 2009. Pediatrics, 128, 132–145. doi:10.15421/peds.2010-3924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, K. (2013). Constructions of ‘infertility’ and some lived experiences of involuntary childlessness. Affilia, 28, 284–295. doi:10.1177/0886109913495726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blyth E., Crawshaw, M., & van den Akker, O. (2014). What are the best interests of the child in international surrogacy? BioNews 742: 17 February.
   Google Scholar
• BMA. (1996). Changing conceptions of motherhood. The practice of surrogacy in Britain. London, UK: British Medical Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bromham, D. (1991). Public acceptance of surrogacy: what are the limits? (Abstr: 0698). In Ratnam, S., et al. (eds), Proceedings of the 13th World Congress of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Abstr. 3 (pp. 220). NY.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, J., & Oliver, M. (2009). Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carlyle, K. E., Slater, M. D., & Chakroff, J. L. (2008). Newspaper coverage of intimate partner violence: Skewing representations of risk. Journal of communication, 58, 168–186. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00379.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, C. (2012). News coverage of health-related issues and its impacts on perceptions: Taiwan as an example. Health communication, 27, 111–123.10.1080/10410236.2011.569004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chliaoutakis, J., Koukouli, S., & Papadakaki, M. (2002). Using attitudinal indicators to explain the public’s intention to have recourse to gamete donation and surrogacy. Hum Reprod, 17, 2995–3002.10.1093/humrep/17.11.2995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103–126. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantinidis, D., & Cook, R. (2012). Australian perspectives on surrogacy: The influence of cognitions, psychological and demographics characteristics. Human Reproduction, 1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covey, J. (2014). The role of dispositional factors in moderating message framing effects. Health Psychology, 33, 52–65.10.1037/a0029305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawshaw, M., Blyth, E., & van den Akker, O. (2012). The changing profile of surrogacy in the UK – Implications for policy and practice. Journal of Social welfare and family law, 34, 267–277.10.1080/09649069.2012.750478
   Google Scholar
• Dempsey, D., & Critchley, C. (2010). Comfort with use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) for family formation by same-sex and heterosexual couples. Gay and Lesbian Issues and Psychology Review, 6, 90–102.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, P. C., Ryan, I. J., & O’Brien, K. (1988). College students’ acceptance of adoption and five alternative fertilization techniques. J Sex Res, 24, 282–287.10.1080/00224498809551425
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frasier, L., & Chapman, A. (1994). Three little miracles. Mail on Sunday, 27 February, 149.
   Google Scholar
• Frith, L. (2015). The limits of evidence: Evidence based policy and the removal of gamete donor anonymity in the UK. Monash Bioethics Review, 33, 29–44.
   Google Scholar
• Fronek, P., & Crawshaw, M. (2014). The ‘new family’ as an emerging norm: A commentary on the position of social work in assisted reproduction. British Journal of Social Work, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamble, N. (2013). The HFEA gets into gear about surrogacy. BioNews 703. Retrieved from http://www.bionews.org.uk/page_294528.asp
   Google Scholar
• Genius, S. J., Chang, W., & Genius, S. K. (1993). Public attitudes in Edmonton toward assisted reproductive technology. Can Med Assoc J, 150, 701–708.
   Google Scholar
• Halman, L. J., Abbey, A., & Andrews, F. M. (1992). Attitudes about infertility interventions among fertile and infertile couples. Am J Pub Health, 82, 191–194.10.2105/AJPH.82.2.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilton, S., Hunt, K., Langan, M., Bedford, H., & Petticrew, M. (2010). Newsprint media representations of the introduction of the HPV vaccination programme for cervical cancer prevention in the UK (2005-2008). Social Science & Medicine, 70, 942–950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Human Ferilization and Embryology Authority (HFEA). (2015). Retrieved October 16, 2015, from http://www.hfea.gov.uk/fertility-treatment-options-surrogacy.html
   Google Scholar
• Jaworski, B. K. (2009). Reproductive justice and media framing: a case-study analysis of problematic frames in popular media. Sex Education, 9, 105–121.10.1080/14681810802639830
   Google Scholar
• Krishnan, V. (1994). Attitudes toward surrogate motherhood in Canada. Health Care Women Int., 15, 333–357.10.1080/07399339409516126
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Markens, S. (2007). Surrogate motherhood and the politics of reproduction. Berkely, CA: University of California Press.10.1525/california/9780520252035.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton-Cassill, M. E. (2001). The news media and psychological distress. Anxiety, Stress & Coping: An International Journal., 14, 193–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, T., Oxley, Z., & R. Clawson (1997). Toward a psychology of framing effects. Political Behaviour., 19, 221–246.10.1023/A:1024834831093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poote, A., & van den Akker, O. B. A. (2009). British women’s attitudes to surrogacy. Human Reproduction, 24, 139–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riffe, D., Lacy, S., & Fico, F. (2005). Analysing media messages: using quantitative content analysis in research. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Riggs, D. A., & Due, C. (2013). Representations of reproductive citizenship and vulnerability in media reports of surrogacy. Citizenship Studies, 17, 956–969.10.1080/13621025.2013.851145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman, A. J., & Salovey, P. (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behaviour: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 3–19.10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sangster S., & Lawson, K. (2014). Falling down the rabbit hole’: The construction of infertility in print media. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 32, 486–496.10.1080/02646838.2014.962016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalev, S., & Lemish, D. (2011). Women as Consumers of Reproductive Technology: Media Representation versus Reality. Journal of Interdisciplinary Feminist Thought, 5, 1–23
   Google Scholar
• Simon, A. F., & Jerit, J. (2007). Toward a theory relating political discourse, media, and public opinion. Journal of Communication, 57, 254–271. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00342.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki, K., Hoshi, K., Minai, J., Yanaihara, T., Takeda, Y., & Yamagata, Z. (2006). Analysis of national representative opinion surveys concerning gestational surrogacy in Japan. European J Obstetrics & Gynecology Reproductive Biology., 126, 39–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teman, E. (2008). The social construction of surrogacy research: An anthropological critique of the psychosocial scholarship on surrogate motherhood. Social Science & Medicine, 67, 1104–1112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, D., & Scheufele, D. A., (2009). News framing theory and research. In Media effects: Advances in theory and research. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research, (3rd ed.) (pp. 1–16). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458.10.1126/science.7455683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Akker, O., Fronek, P., Blyth, E., & Frith, L. (2016). This neo-natal menage a trois’: British media framing of transnational surrogavcy. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 34, 15–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, S. J., Seale, C., Boden, S., Lowe, P., & Steinberg, D. C. (2008). Medicalization and beyond: the social construction of insomnia and snoring in the news. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine, 12, 251–268. DOI: 10.1177/1363459307086846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mail online. 23 December. 2014. Retrieved from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2884625/From-abandoned-Thailand-living-new-house-enjoying-family-trips-beach-Baby-Gammy-celebrates-birthday-centre-international-surrogacy-scandal.html
   Google Scholar
• Surrogacy Arrangements Act. (1985). CHAPTER 49. Retrieved June 15 2015, from http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1985/49
   Google Scholar