References
- Anderson, N. H. (2008). Unified social cognition. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
- André, M., Milon, A., & de Richemont, H. (2008). Contribution à la réflexion sur la maternité pour autrui [Contribution to reflection on surrogate motherhood]. Retrieved from http://www.senat.fr/rap/r07-421/r07-421_mono.html
- Baykal, B., Korkmaz, C., Ceyhan, S., Goktolga, U., & Basser, I. (2008). Opinions of infertile Turkish women on gamete donation and gestational surrogacy. Fertility and Sterility, 89, 817–822. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.04.022
- Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2008). Principles of biomedical ethics (6th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Brahams, D. (1987). The hasty british ban on commercial surrogacy. Hastings Center Reports, 17, 16–19. 10.2307/3562435
- Bruce-Hickman, K., Kirkland, L., & Ba-Obeid, T. (2009). The attitudes and knowledge of medical students towards surrogacy. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 29, 229–232. 10.1080/01443610802712926
- Ciccarelli, J. C., & Beckman, L. J. (2005). Navigating rough waters: An overview of psychological aspects of surrogacy. The Journal of Social Issues, 61, 21–43. 10.1111/josi.2005.61.issue-1
- Claeys, A., & Vialatte, J.-S. (2008). L’évaluation de l’application de la loi du 6 Aout 2004 relative à la bioéthique [Assessment of the implementation of the law on bioethics]. Retrieved from http://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/13/rap-off/i1325-tI.asp
- Cour de Cassation. (2015). Arrêt n° 619 du 3 juillet 2015 (14-21.323) [Supreme Court]. Retrieved from https://www.courdecassation.fr/jurisprudence_2/assemblee_pleniere_22/619_3_32230.html
- Damelio, J., & Sorensen, K. (2008). Enhancing autonomy in paid surrogacy. Bioethics, 5, 77.
- Edelmann, R. J. (2004). Surrogacy: The psychological issues. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 22, 123–136. 10.1080/0264683042000205981
- Fletcher, J. (1969). Situation ethics. London: Billings & Sons.
- Hofmans, J., & Mullet, E. (2013). Towards unveiling individual differences in different stages of information processing: A clustering-based approach. Quality & Quantity, 47, 455–464. 10.1007/s11135-011-9529-7
- Humbyrd, C. (2009). Fair trade international surrogacy. Developing World Bioethics, 9, 111–118. 10.1111/dewb.2009.9.issue-3
- Kamble, S., Ahmed, R., Sorum, P. C., & Mullet, E. (2014). The acceptability among young Hindus and Muslims of actively ending the lives of newborns with genetic defects. Journal of Medical Ethics, 40, 186–191. 10.1136/medethics-2012-100934
- La recherche. (2009). Bioéthique : le conseil d’état reste pragmatique [The Research]. Retrieved from http://www.larecherche.fr/actualite/aussi/bioethique-conseil-etat-reste-pragmatique-06-05-2009-68398.
- Legifrance. (2016a). Article 16-7 of the civil code. Retrieved from https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichCodeArticle.do?idArticle=LEGIARTI000006419302&cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006070721
- Legifrance. (2016b). Artice 227-12 of the penal code. Retrieved from https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichCodeArticle.do?idArticle=LEGIARTI000006418043&cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006070719
- Legifrance. (2016c). Artice 227-13 of the penal code. Retrieved from https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichCodeArticle.docidTexte=LEGITEXT000006070719&idArticle=LEGIARTI000006418044&dateTexte=&categorieLien=cid
- Légifrance. (2011). Loi n°2011-814 du 7 juillet 2011 relative à la bioéthique [Legifrance]. Retrieved from http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000024323102&fastPos=1&fastReqId=750352775&categorieLien=cid&oldAction=rechTexte
- Lhermite, A., Muñoz Sastre, M. T., Sorum, P. C., & Mullet, E. (2015). French lay people’s and health professionals’ views regarding the acceptability of involuntary treatment of nursing home residents. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 38, 38–43. 10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.01.005
- Mullet, E., Neto, F., Pinto, C., Raich, R. M., Muñoz Sastre, M. T., & Sorum, P. C. (2014). The acceptability of ending a patient's life: A France–Portugal–Spain comparison. Death Studies, 38, 28–35. 10.1080/07481187.2012.712607
- Muñoz Sastre, M. T., Sorum, P. C., & Mullet, E. (2016). The acceptability of assisted reproductive technology among French lay people. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/02646838.2016.1188279.
- Muñoz Sastre, M. T., Petitfils, C., Sorum, P. C., & Mullet, E. (2015). A mapping of the positions of adults in Toulouse, France, regarding induced abortion. European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care, 20, 158–169. 10.3109/13625187.2014.971741
- Poote, A. E., & van den Akker, O. B. A. (2009). British women’s attitudes to surrogacy. Human Reproduction, 24, 139–145.
- Reilly, D. R. (2007). Surrogacy pregnancy: A guide for Canadian prenatal health care providers. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 176, 483–485. 10.1503/cmaj.060696
- Saito, Y., & Matsuo, H. (2009). Survey of Japanese infertile couples’ attitudes toward surrogacy. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 30, 156–161. 10.1080/01674820802429435
- Siffrein-Blanc, C. (2007). Le nouveau droit de la filiation : l’ordonnance répond-elle aux instructions législatives? [The new Law on filiation]. Recherches familiales, 4, 123–137. 10.3917/rf.004.0123
- Suzuki, K., Hoshi, K., Minai, J., Yanaihara, T., Takeda, Y., & Yamagata, Z. (2006). Analysis of national representative opinion surveys concerning gestational surrogacy in Japan. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 126, 39–47. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.07.030
- Svitnev, K. (2010). Legal regulation of assisted reproduction treatment in Russia. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 20, 892–894. 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.03.023
- Weisberg, D., & Kelly, H. (2005). The birth of surrogacy in Israel. Florida: University of Florida Press.