Women’s interpretation, understanding and attribution of the anhedonia question in the PHQ-4 and modified-Whooley questions in the antenatal period

References

• Abrahams, Z., Schneider, M., Fields, S., & Honikman, S. (2019). Validation of a brief mental health screening tool for pregnant women in a low socio-economic setting. BMC Psychiatry, 7, 77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5 (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, M.-P., & Highet, N., and the Expert Working Group. (2017). Mental health care in the perinatal period: Australian clinical practice guideline. Centre of Perinatal Excellence.
   Google Scholar
• Beyondblue. (2011). Clinical practice guidelines for depression and related disorders – Anxiety, bipolar disorder and puerperal psychosis – In the perinatal period. A guideline for primary care health professionals.
   Google Scholar
• Camoni, L., Mirabella, F., Palumbo, G., Del Re, D., Gigantesco, A., Calamandrei, G., … Brescianini, S. (2020). A screening and treatment programme to deal with perinatal anxiety and depression during the COVID-19 pandemic. Epidemiologia E Prevenzione, 44(5–6 Suppl 2), 369–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coates, R., Ayers, S., de Visser, R., & Thornton, A., & the Wellbeing in Pregnancy (WiP) Collaborative Group. (2020). Evaluation of the CORE-10 to assess psychological distress in pregnancy. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 38(3), 311–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2019.1702631
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1990). Things I have learned (so far). American Psychologist, 45(12), 1304–1312. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.45.12.1304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, J., Holden, J., & Sagovsky, R. (1987). Detection of postnatal depression: Development of the 10 item Edinburgh postnatal depression scale. British Journal of Psychiatry, 150(6), 782–786. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.150.6.782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming, G. (2013). The new statistics: A how-to guide. Australian Psychologist, 48(3), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/ap.12018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darwin, Z., McGowan, L., & Edozien, L. C. (2016). Identification of women at risk of depression in pregnancy: Using women’s accounts to understand the poor specificity of the Whooley and Arroll case finding questions in clinical practice. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 19(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-015-0508-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2005). c8057: Research methods 2: Effect sizes. www.statisticshell.com/docs/effectsizes.pdf (accessed 10/March/2016)
   Google Scholar
• Fontein-Kuipers, Y., & Jomeen, J. (2019). Validity and accuracy of the Whooley questions to identify maternal distress in Dutch pregnant women. The Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice, 14(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMHTEP-06-2018-0034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. J., La Porte, L. M., Saleh, M. P., Allweiss, S., Adams, M. G., Zhou, Y., & Silver, R. K. (2015). Suicide risk among perinatal women who report thoughts ofself-harm on depressionscreens. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 125, 885–893.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (ed). (2009). Becoming a behavioural science researcher. The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B., & Löwe, B. (2009). An ultra-brief screening scale for anxiety and depression: The PHQ-4. Psychosomatics, 50, 613–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. (2003). The Patient health questionnaire-2: Validity of a two-item depression screener. Medical Care, 41(11), 1284–1292. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.MLR.0000093487.78664.3C
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, A., Dalfen, A., Murphy, K. E., Milligan, N., & Lancee, W. (2019). Use of text messaging for postpartum depression screening and information provision. Psychiatric Services, 70(5), 389–395. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201800269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lui, Z. (2005). Reading behavior in the digital environment: Changes in reading behavior over the past ten years. Journal of Documentation, 61(6), 700–712. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410510632040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcano-Belisario, J. S., Gupta, A. K., O’Donoghue, J., Ramchandani, P., Morrison, C., & Car, J. (2017). Implementation of depression screening in antenatal clinics through tablet computers: Results of a feasibility study. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 17(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-017-0459-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marsay, C., Manderson, L., & Subramaney, U. (2017). Validation of the Whooley questions for antenatal depression and anxiety among low-income women in urban South Africa. South African Journal of Psychiatry, 23, a1013. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v23i0.1013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthey, S., & Ross-Hamid, C. (2011). The validity of DSM symptoms for depression and anxiety disorders during pregnancy. Journal of Affective Disorders, 133(3), 546–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2011.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthey, S., Souter, K., Valenti, B., & Ross-Hamid, C. (2019). Validation of the MGMQ in screening for emotional difficulties in pregnancy. Journal of Affective Disorders, 256, 156–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2019.05.037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthey, S., Valenti, B., Souter, K., & Ross-Hamid, C. (2013). Comparison of four self-report measures, and a generic mood question, to screen for anxiety during pregnancy in English-speaking women. Journal of Affective Disorders, 148(23), 347–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2012.12.022
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• NICE - National Institute for Clinical Excellence. (2014). Antenatal and postnatal mental health: Clinical management and service guidance guidelines. NICE clinical guideline CG192. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, N., Talcevska, K., Black, E., Matthey, S., & Austin, M.-P. (2019). A comparison of the interviewer-administered phone and self-complete online versions of the eMINI 6.0 in a sample of pregnant women. Journal of Affective Disorders, 242, 265–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.08.055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins, L. N., Wing, J., Wittchen, H. V., Helzer, J. E., BAbon, T. F., Burke, J., Farmer, A., Jablenski, A., Pickens, R., & Regier, D. A. (1988). The composite international diagnostic interview: An epidemiologic instrument suitable for use in conjunction with different diagnostic systems and in different cultures. Archives of General Psychiatry, 45, 1069–1077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, J. A. (1996). Qualitative descriptors of strength of association and effect size. Journal of Social Service Research, 21(4), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.1300/J079v21n04_02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sergeant, E. S. G., (2018). Epitools epidemiological calculators. Ausvet. Available at: http://epitools.ausvet.com.au/ciproportion ( Wilson method: accessed 29 June 2021)
   Google Scholar
• Sheehan, D. V., Lecrubier, Y., Sheehan, K. H., Amorim, P., Janavs, J., Weiller, E., Hergueta, T., Baker, R., & Dunbar, G. C. (1998). The mini-international neuropsychiatric interview (M.I.N.I.): The development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 59(Suppl 20), 22–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shibata, Y., & Suzuki, S. (2020). Comparison of the Edinburgh Postnatal depression scale and the Whooley questions in screening for postpartum depression in Japan. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 33(16), 2785–2788. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2018.1560413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B. W., & Lowe, B. (2006). A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166(10), 1092–1097. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Damme, R., Van Parys, A. S., Vogels, C., Roelens, K., & Lemmens, G. (2020). A mental health care protocol for the screening, detection and treatment of perinatal anxiety and depressive disorders in Flanders. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 128, 109865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.109865
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Heyningen, T., Honikman, S., Tomlinson, M., Field, S., Myer, L., & Hay, P. J. (2018). Comparison of mental health screening tools for detecting antenatal depression and anxiety disorders in South African women. PloS ONE, 13(4), e0193697. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Heyningen, T., Myer, L., Tomlinson, M., Field, S., & Honikman, S. (2019). The development of an ultra-short, maternal mental health screening tool in South Africa. Global Mental Health, 6, e24. https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2019.21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whooley, M. A., Avins, A. L., Miranda, J., & Browner, W. S. (1997). Case finding instruments for depression: Two questions as good as many. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 12(7), 439–445. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.00076.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, C. J., Turner, K. M., Burns, A., Evans, J., & Bennert, K. (2016). Midwives and women’s views on using UK recommended depression case finding questions in antenatal care. Midwifery, 35, 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.01.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, M. (2018). Skim reading is the new normal. The effect on society is profound. The Guardian online paper: Sat 25 Aug 2018. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/aug/25/skim-reading-new-normal-maryanne-wolf. Accessed 29 June 2020
   Google Scholar