The power of e-WOM using the hashtag: focusing on SNS advertising of SPA brands

References

• Bezjian-Avery, A., B. Calder, and D. Iacobucci. 1998. New media interactive advertising vs. traditional advertising. Journal of Advertising Research 38, no. 4: 23–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brackett, L.K., and B.N. Carr. 2001. Cyberspace advertising vs. other media: Consumer vs. mature student attitudes. Journal of Advertising Research 41, no. 5: 23–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chae, H., E. Ko, and J. Han. 2015. How do customers’ SNS participation activities impact on customer equity drivers and customer loyalty? Focus on the SNS services of a global SPA brand. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science 25, no. 2: 122–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chae, H., J. Shin, and E. Ko. 2015. The effects of usage motivation of Hashtag of fashion brands’ image based SNS on customer social participation and brand equity: Focusing on moderating effect of SNS involvement. Fashion & Textile Research Journal 17, no. 6: 942–55.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, P. 2011. Drivers of new product recommending and referral behavior at social network sites. International Journal of Advertising 30, no. 1: 77–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaykowski, Kathleen. 2016. Instagram pushes into shopping with new mobile tools. Forbes, Nov 1. http://www.forbes.com.
   Google Scholar
• Chu, S-C., and Y. Kim. 2011. Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites. International Journal of Advertising 30, no. 1: 47–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ducoffe, R.H. 1995. How consumers assess the value of advertising. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising 17, no. 1: 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Ducoffe, R.H. 1996. Advertising value and advertising on the web. Journal of Advertising Research 36, no. 5: 21–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, T., and S.E. Moriarty. 1998. A communication-based marketing model for managing relationships. Journal of Marketing 62, no. 2: 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, J.F., R.J. Kegerreis, and R.D. Blackwell. 1969. Word-of-mouth communication by the innovator. Journal of Marketing 33, no. 3: 15–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, J.S., and J.E. Lim. 2013. SNS as a strategic corporate communication tool: A content analysis of corporate Facebook fan-pages in Korea and the US. The Korean Journal of Advertising 24, no. 4: 143–78.
   Google Scholar
• Jee, J., and W.N. Lee. 2002. Antecedents and consequences of perceived interactivity: An exploratory study. Journal of Interactive Advertising 3, no. 1: 34–45.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Sarah. 2014. Top 10 luxury brand social marketers of 2014. Luxury Daily, Dec. http://www.luxurydaily.com.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M.S., L.K. Ferrell, and D.T. LeClair. 2001. Consumers’ trust of salesperson and manufacturer: An empirical study. Journal of Business Research 51, no. 1: 73–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.H. 2015. Analysis and pattern of use of SNS (social network service). KISDISTAT report (15-03-02). Seoul: KISDI.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, N.E., and J.J. Koo. 2014. An impact of SPA brand's marketing strategies on customers’ purchase intention. Korean Society of Basic Design & Art 15, no. 5: 71–9.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H., and C. Cho. 2014. Effects of source's social distance on consumer's responses to corporate facebook page: Focusing on moderating effects of blatant persuasive intention, normative interpersonal influence and informative interpersonal influence. The Korean Journal of Advertising 25, no. 5: 7–42.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K.R., and S.J. Yang. 2015. Exploratory study on the success factors of SPA brands from marketing perspectives-based on grounded theory. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles 39, no. 2: 190–203.
   Google Scholar
• Ko, E., E. Chun, S. Song, and P. Mattila. 2015. Exploring SNS as a consumer tool for retail therapy: Explicating semantic networks of “shopping makes me happy (unhappy)” as a new product development method. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science 25, no. 1: 37–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko, J., J. Shin, E. Ko, and H. Chae. 2014. The effects of image contents based fashion brands’ SNS toward flow and brand attitude: Focus on pleasure emotion as mediator. Fashion & Textile Research Journal 16, no. 6: 908–20.
   Google Scholar
• Koo, H.R. 2015. Uniqlo, the first ‘1 trillion won fashion Brand’. Joongang Ilbo. http://news.joins.com.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S.Y., and C.H. Cho. 2011. Influences of interactive Ads’ participation types on advertising effectiveness focusing on perceived interactivity of interactive film Ads. The Korean Journal of Advertising and Public Relations 13, no. 4: 95–124.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J.Y., and P.S. Jang. 2013. Effects of message polarity and type on word of mouth through SNS (social network service). Journal of Digital Convergence 11, no. 6: 129–35.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, J.G., and D. Ariely. 1998. Interactive home shopping: effects of search cost for price and quality information on consumer price sensitivity, satisfaction with merchandise, and retention. In Marketing Science and the Internet, INFORM College on Marketing Mini-Conference, March 6–8. Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Mcdowell, Meghan. 2017. In the age of Instagram, murals take on new meaning. https://www.businessoffashion.com.
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, S.J., J.S. Hwang, and G. Lee. 2003. Effects of structural and perceptual factors on attitudes toward the website. Journal of Advertising Research 43, no. 04: 400–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, H.N., Y.J. Lee, and S.H. Park. 2015. A study on change of gamification marketing through social media. Focusing on the marketing of Facebook fan page and Instargram hashtag. Design Convergence Study 14, no. 4: 209–21.
   Google Scholar
• Nam, H.K., H.J. Son, and Y.R. Lee. 2015. Effect of SPA brand consumers’ emotional consumption value orientation and assessment of marketing mix attributes on brand loyalty. Journal of the Korean Society of Costume 65, no. 4: 45–60.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J.C. 1978. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Oh, S.Y. 2015. Marketing, sulf in the sea of hashtag(#). Marketing 49, no. 10: 59–64.
   Google Scholar
• Park, M.K. 2015. Instagram, 400 million users per month …40 billion shared photos. Hankyung. http://www.hankyung.com.
   Google Scholar
• Park, K.I., and C.H. Cho. 2014. Factors influencing sharing activities in SNS: Focusing on moderating effects of social capital. The Korean Journal of Advertising 25, no. 5: 153–80.
   Google Scholar
• Park, K., H. Park, H. Kim, and H. Ko. 2011. A study of opinion mining in SNS. Journal of KIISE: Computer Systems and Theory 29, no. 11: 54–60.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, H.C. 2016. “Maximization of marketing effectiveness through SNS”… fashion market; fall in love with Hashtag. Seoul Economic Daily. http://news.naver.com.
   Google Scholar
• Socialbakers. 2015. Socialbakers. http://socialbakers.com/statisticss
   Google Scholar
• Sung, Y.H., and C.H. Cho. 2011. The effects of internet Ads on credibility and attitude toward the host site focusing on spillover effect. The Korean Journal of Advertising and Public Relations 13, no. 3: 448–81.
   Google Scholar
• Strahilevitz, M.A., and G. Myer. 1998. Donation to charity as purchase incentives: How well they work may depend on what you are trying to sell. Journal of Consumer Research 24, no. 4: 434–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, R., and P. Solomon. 1998. Toward an understanding of the dynamics of relevance judgment: An analysis of one person's search behavior. Information Processing & Management 34, no. 2: 237–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, D.G., J.E. Lewin, and D. Strutton. 2011. Friends, fans, and followers: Do Ads work on social networks? Journal of Advertising Research 51, no. 1: 258–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo, B., N. Donthu, and S. Lee. 2000. An examination of selected marketing mix elements and brand equity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 28, no. 2: 195–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar