Publication Cover
International Journal of Advertising
The Review of Marketing Communications
Volume 37, 2018 - Issue 3
1,870
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The multidimensionality of anthropomorphism in advertising: the moderating roles of cognitive busyness and assertive language

, , &
Pages 440-462 | Received 18 Feb 2017, Accepted 01 Feb 2018, Published online: 09 Mar 2018

References

  • Aggarwal, Pankaj, and Ann L. McGill. 2007. Is that car smiling at me? Schema congruity as a basis for evaluating anthropomorphized products. Journal of Consumer Research 34, no. 4: 468–79.
  • Aggarwal, Pankaj, and Ann L. McGill. 2012. When brands seem human, do humans act like brands? Automatic behavioral priming effects of brand anthropomorphism. Journal of Consumer Research 39, no. 2: 307–23.
  • Aguirre‐Rodriguez, Alexandra. 2014. Cultural factors that impact brand personification strategy effectiveness. Psychology & Marketing 31, no. 1: 70–83.
  • Ahluwalia, Rohini, and Robert E Burnkrant. 2004. Answering questions about questions: A persuasion knowledge perspective for understanding the effects of rhetorical questions. Journal of Consumer Research 31, no. 1: 26–42.
  • Beilock, Sian L, and Thomas H Carr. 2005. When high-powered people fail working memory and choking under pressure ‘in math’. Psychological Science 16, no. 2: 101–5.
  • Brehm, Sharon S, and Jack W Brehm. 1981. Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. New York: Academic Press.
  • Butterfield, Max E., Sarah E. Hill, and Charles G. Lord. 2012. Mangy mutt or furry friend? Anthropomorphism promotes animal welfare. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 48, no. 4: 957–60.
  • Campbell, Margaret C. 1995. When attention-getting advertising tactics elicit consumer inferences of manipulative intent: The importance of balancing benefit and investments. Journal of Consumer Psychology 4, no. 3: 225–54.
  • Campbell, Margaret C, and Amna Kirmani. 2000. Consumers' use of persuasion knowledge: The effects of accessibility and cognitive capacity on perceptions of an influence agent. The Journal of Consumer Research 27, no. 1: 69–83.
  • Chandler, Jesse, and Norbert Schwarz. 2010. Use does not wear ragged the fabric of friendship: Thinking of objects as alive makes people less willing to replace them. Journal of Consumer Psychology 20, no. 2: 138–45.
  • Cuddy, Amy J. C., Mindi S. Rock, and Michael I. Norton. 2007. Aid in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina: Inferences of secondary emotions and intergroup helping. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 10, no. 1: 107–18.
  • Delbaere, Marjorie, Edward F. McQuarrie, and Barbara J. Phillips. 2011. Personification in advertising. Journal of Advertising 40, no. 1: 121–30.
  • Dillard, James Price, and Shen Lijiang. 2005. On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs 72, no. 2: 144–68.
  • Dotson, Michael J., and Eva M. Hyatt. 2008. Understanding dog-human companionship. Journal of Business Research 61, no. 5: 457–66.
  • Edwards, Steven M, Hairong Li, and Joo-Hyun Lee. 2002. Forced exposure and psychological reactance: Antecedents and consequences of the perceived intrusiveness of pop-up ads. Journal of Advertising 31, no. 3: 83–95.
  • Epley, Nicholas, Scott Akalis, Adam Waytz, and John T. Cacioppo. 2008. Creating social connection through inferential reproduction. Psychological Science 19, no. 2: 114–20.
  • Epley, Nicholas, Adam Waytz, and John T. Cacioppo. 2007. On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review 114, no. 4: 864–86.
  • Friestad, Marian, and Peter Wright. 1995. Persuasion knowledge: Lay people's and researchers' beliefs about the psychology of advertising. Journal of Consumer Research 22, no. 1: 62–74.
  • Garretson, Judith A., and Scot Burton. 2005. The role of spokes-characters as advertisement and package cues in integrated marketing communications. Journal of Marketing 69, no. 4: 118–32.
  • Gelbrich, K., D. Gathke, and S.A. Westjohn. 2012. Anthropomorphism and allegory in advertising across cultures: Effects on memory and persuasion. Journal of Euromarketing 21: 174–91.
  • Gilbert, Daniel T, and Randall E Osborne. 1989. Thinking backward: Some curable and incurable consequences of cognitive busyness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57, no. 6: 940–9.
  • Haslam, Nick. 2006. Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review 10, no. 3: 252–64.
  • Holzwarth, Martin, Chris Janiszewski, and Marcus M. Neumann. 2006. The influence of avatars on online consumer shopping behavior. Journal of Marketing 70, no. 4: 19–36.
  • Hosany, Sameer, Girish Prayag, Drew Martin, and Wai-Yee Lee. 2013. Theory and strategies of anthropomorphic brand characters from Peter Rabbit, Mickey Mouse, and Ronald McDonald, to Hello Kitty. Journal of Marketing Management 29, no. 1-2: 48–68.
  • Huang, Hazel H, and Vincent‐Wayne Mitchell. 2014. The role of imagination and brand personification in brand relationships. Psychology & Marketing 31, no. 1: 38–47.
  • Kardes, Frank R. 1988. Spontaneous inference processes in advertising: The effects of conclusion omission and involvement on persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research 15, no. 2: 225–33.
  • Kardes, Frank R., Steven S. Posavac, and Maria L. Cronley. 2004. Consumer inference: A review of processes, bases, and judgment contexts. Journal of Consumer Psychology 14, no. 3: 230–56.
  • Keaveney, Susan M., Andreas Herrmann, Rene Befurt, and Jan R. Landwehr. 2012. The eyes have it: How a car's face influences consumer categorization and evaluation of product line extensions. Psychology & Marketing 29, no. 1: 36–51.
  • Kim, Sara, and Ann L. McGill. 2011. Gaming with Mr. Slot or gaming the slot machine? Power, anthropomorphism, and risk perception. Journal of Consumer Research 38, no. 1: 94–107.
  • Lalwani, Ashok K. 2009. The distinct influence of cognitive busyness and need for closure on cultural differences in socially desirable responding. Journal of Consumer Research 36: 305–15.
  • Landwehr, Jan R., Ann L. McGill, and Andreas Herrmann. 2011. It's got the look: The effect of friendly and aggressive facial ‘Expressions on Product Liking and Sales’. Journal of Marketing 75, no. 3: 132–46.
  • McQuarrie, Edward F., and David Glen Mick. 1996. Figures of rhetoric in advertising language. Journal of Consumer Research 22, no. 4: 424–38.
  • McQuarrie, Edward F., and Barbara J. Phillips. 2005. Indirect persuasion in advertising: How consumers process metaphors presented in pictures and words. Journal of Advertising 34, no. 2: 7–20.
  • Meyers-Levy, Joan, and Prashant Malaviya. 1999. Consumers' processing of persuasive advertisements: An integrative framework of persuasion theories. The Journal of Marketing 63: 45–60.
  • Muehling, Darrel D, David E Sprott, and Abdullah J Sultan. 2014. Exploring the boundaries of nostalgic advertising effects: A consideration of childhood brand exposure and attachment on consumers’ responses to nostalgia-themed advertisements. Journal of Advertising 43, no. 1: 73–84.
  • Okazaki, Shintaro, Barbara Mueller, and Charles R Taylor. 2010. Measuring soft-sell versus hard-sell advertising appeals. Journal of Advertising 39, no. 2: 5–20.
  • Pashupati, Kartik. 2009. Beavers, bubbles, bees, and moths. Journal of Advertising Research 49, no. 3: 373–93.
  • Puzakova, Marina, Hyokjin Kwak, and Joseph F. Rocereto. 2013. When humanizing brands goes wrong: the detrimental effect of brand anthropomorphization amid product wrongdoings. Journal of Marketing 77, no. 3: 81–100.
  • Puzakova, Marina, Hyokjin Kwak, and Monique Bell. 2015. Beyond seeing McDonald's fiesta menu: The role of accent in brand sincerity of ethnic products and brands. Journal of Advertising 44, no. 3: 1–13.
  • Schultz, Johannes, Hiroshi Imamizu, Mitsuo Kawato, and Chris D Frith. 2004. Activation of the human superior temporal gyrus during observation of goal attribution by intentional objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16, no. 10: 1695–1705.
  • Shiv, Baba, and Alexander Fedorikhin. 1999. Heart and mind in conflict: the interplay of affect and cognition in consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research 26, no. 3: 278–92.
  • Small, Deborah A., and Nicole M. Verrochi. 2009. The face of need: Facial emotion expression on charity advertisements. Journal of Marketing Research 46, no. 6: 777–87.
  • Smith, Aaron, and Dana Page. 2015. The smartphone difference. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
  • Spears, Nancy, and Surendra N Singh. 2004. Measuring attitude toward the brand and purchase intentions. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 26, no. 2: 53–66.
  • Toncar, Mark, and James Munch. 2001. Consumer responses to tropes in print advertising. Journal of Advertising 30, no. 1: 55–65.
  • Vaes, Jeroen, Maria-Paola Paladino, and Jacques-Philippe Leyens. 2002. The lost e-mail: Prosocial reactions induced by uniquely human emotions. British Journal of Social Psychology 41, no. 4: 521–34.
  • Verhoef, Peter C., Katherine N. Lemon, A. Parasuraman, Anne Roggeveen, Michael Tsiros, and Leonard A. Schlesinger. 2009. Customer experience creation: Determinants, dynamics and management strategies. Journal of Retailing 85, no. 1: 31–41.
  • Waytz, Adam, John T. Cacioppo, and Nicholas Epley. 2010. Who sees human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism. Perspectives on Psychological Science 5, no. 3: 219–32.
  • Zemack-Rugar, Yael, Sarah G Moore, and Gavan J Fitzsimons. 2017. Just do it! Why committed consumers react negatively to assertive ads. Journal of Consumer Psychology 27, no. 3: 287–301.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.