Look at that body! How anthropomorphic package shapes systematically appeal to consumers

References

• Aggarwal, P., and A. L. McGill. 2007. Is that Car Smiling at Me? Schema Congruity as a Basis for Evaluating Anthropomorphized Products. Journal of Consumer Research 34 (4): 468–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch, P. H. 1995. Seeking the Ideal Form: Product Design and Consumer Response. Journal of Marketing 59 (3): 16–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch, P. H., F. F. Brunel, and T. J. Arnold. 2003. Individual Differences in the Centrality of Visual Product Aesthetics: Concept and Measurement. Journal of Consumer Research 29 (4): 551–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, B. A. 1998. Gender Stereotypes in Advertising on Children's Television in the 1990s: A Cross-National Analysis. Journal of Advertising 27 (1): 83–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buss, D. M. 2009. The Great Struggles of Life: Darwin and the Emergence of Evolutionary Psychology. American Psychologist 64 (2): 140–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of the Species. London, UK: Watts.
   Google Scholar
• Castelli, F., F. Happé, U. Frith, and C. Frith. (2000). Movement and Mind: A Functional Imaging Study of Perception and Interpretation of Complex Intentional Movement Patterns. Neuroimage 12 (3): 314–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, J., and N. Schwarz. 2010. Use Does Not Wear Ragged the Fabric of Friendship: Thinking of Objects as Alive Makes People Less Willing to Replace Them. Journal of Consumer Psychology 20 (2): 138–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dion, K. K., and E. Berscheid. 1974. Physical Attractiveness and Peer Perception among Children. Sociometry 37: 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• DiSalvo, C., F. Gemperle, and J. Forlizzi. 2005. Imitating the Human Form: Four Kinds of Anthropomorphic Form. In Unpublished Manuscript, 69–78 Pittsburgh, PA: School of Design, Carnegie Mellon University.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., R. D. Ashmore, M. G. Makhijani, and L. C. Longo. 1991. What is Beautiful is Good, but…: A Meta-Analytic Review of Research on the Physical Attractiveness Stereotype. Psychological Bulletin 110 (1): 109–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epley, N., A. Waytz, and J. T. Cacioppo. 2007. On Seeing Human: A Three-Factor Theory of Anthropomorphism. Psychological Review 114 (4): 864–886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazio, R. H. 1990. A Practical Guide to the Use of Response Latency in Social Psychological Research. In Research Methods in Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 11, edited by Clyde Hendrick and Margaret S. Clark, 74–97. Newbury, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Griskevicius, V., and D. T. Kenrick. 2013. Fundamental Motives: How Evolutionary Needs Influence Consumer Behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology 23 (3): 372–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grohmann, B. 2009. Gender Dimensions of Brand Personality. Journal of Marketing Research 46 (1): 105–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagtvedt, H., and V. M. Patrick. 2014. Consumer Response to Overstyling: Balancing Aesthetics and Functionality in Product Design. Psychology & Marketing 31 (7): 518–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, P. M., S. R. Jones, and M. B. Royne. 2013. The Human Lens: How Anthropomorphic Reasoning Varies by Product Complexity and Enhances Personal Value. Journal of Marketing Management 29 (1–2): 105–121.
   Google Scholar
• Hende, E. A., and R. Mugge. 2014. Investigating Gender-Schema Congruity Effects on Consumers’ Evaluation of Anthropomorphized Products. Psychology & Marketing 31 (4): 264–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hur, J. D., M. Koo, and W. Hofmann. 2015. When Temptations Come Alive: How Anthropomorphism Undermines Self-Control. Journal of Consumer Research 42 (2): 340–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huyghe, E., J. Verstraeten, M. Geuens, and A. Van Kerckhove. 2017. Clicks as a Healthy Alternative to Bricks: How Online Grocery Shopping Reduces Vice Purchases. Journal of Marketing Research 54 (1): 61–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssens, K., M. Pandelaere, B. Van den Bergh, K. Millet, I. Lens, and K. Roe. 2011. Can Buy Me Love: Mate Attraction Goals Lead to Perceptual Readiness for Status Products. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 47 (1): 254–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keaveney, S. M., A. Herrmann, R. Befurt, and J. R. Landwehr. 2012. The Eyes have it: How a Car's Face Influences Consumer Categorization and Evaluation of Product Line Extensions. Psychology & Marketing 29 (1): 36–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., R. P. Chen, and K. Zhang. 2016. Anthropomorphized Helpers Undermine Autonomy and Enjoyment in Computer Games. Journal of Consumer Research 43 (2): 282–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., and A. L. McGill. 2011. Gaming with Mr. Slot or Gaming the Slot Machine? Power, Anthropomorphism, and Risk Perception. Journal of Consumer Research 38 (1): 94–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyrousi, A. G., G. G. Panigyrakis, and A. P. Panopoulos. 2016. Attitudes Toward Ads Portraying Women in Decorative Roles and Female Competition: An Evolutionary Psychology Perspective. International Journal of Advertising 35 (5): 771–798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landwehr, J. R., A. L. McGill, and A. Herrmann. 2011. It's Got the Look: The Effect of Friendly and Aggressive “Facial” Expressions on Product Liking and Sales. Journal of Marketing 75 (3): 132–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langlois, J. H., L. Kalakanis, A. J. Rubenstein, A. Larson, M. Hallam, and M. Smoot. 2000. Maxims or Myths of Beauty? A Meta-Analytic and Theoretical Review. Psychological Bulletin 126 (3): 390–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidwell, W., K. Holden, and J. Butler. 2010. Universal Principles of Design: 125 Ways to Enhance Usability, Influence Perception, Increase Appeal, Make Better Design Decisions, and Teach Through Design. Beverly, MA: Rockport Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Luchs, M. G., R. W. Naylor, J. R. Irwin, and R. Raghunathan. 2010. The Sustainability Liability: Potential Negative Effects of Ethicality on Product Preference. Journal of Marketing 74 (5): 18–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonagh, D., and P. Hekkert. 2004. Design and Emotion. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Meert, K., M. Pandelaere, and V. M. Patrick. 2014. Taking a Shine to It: How the Preference for Glossy Stems from an Innate Need for Water. Journal of Consumer Psychology 24 (2): 195–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miesler, L., J. R. Landwehr, A. L. McGill, and A. Herrmann. 2011a. Paper 1: The Face of Anthropomorphism: The Effects of Face-Like Product Design Features on Consumers’ Perceptions and Evaluations of Products. In Imitating Human Forms in Product design: How does Anthropomorphism Work, When does it Work, and What does it Affect, 5–43. Zürich: ZSUZ Druckerei.
   Google Scholar
• Miesler, L., H. Leder, and A. Herrmann. 2011b. Isn't it Cute: An Evolutionary Perspective of Baby-Schema Effects in Visual Product Designs. International Journal of Design 5 (3): 17–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montoya, A. K., & A. F. Hayes. 2017. Two Condition Within-Participant Statistical Mediation Analysis: A Path-Analytic Framework. Psychological Methods 22 (1): 6–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mourey, J. A., J. G. Olson, and C. Yoon. 2017. Products as Pals: Engaging with Anthropomorphic Products Mitigates the Effects of Social Exclusion. Journal of Consumer Research 44 (2): 414–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely, J. H. 1991. Semantic Priming Effects in Visual Word Recognition: A Selective Review of Current Findings and Theories. Basic Processes in Reading: Visual Word Recognition 11: 264–336.
   Google Scholar
• Orth, U. R., and K. Malkewitz. 2008. Holistic Package Design and Consumer Brand Impressions. Journal of Marketing 72 (3): 64–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J., and T. L. Childers. 2003. Individual Differences in Haptic Information Processing: The “Need for Touch” Scale. Journal of Consumer Research 30 (3): 430–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postrel, V. 2004. The Substance of Style: How the Rise of Aesthetic Value is Remaking Commerce, Culture, and Consciousness. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., and A. F. Hayes. 2008. Asymptotic and Resampling Strategies for Assessing and Comparing Indirect Effects in Multiple Mediator Models. Behavior Research Methods 40(3): 879–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puzakova, M., J. F. Rocereto, and H. Kwak. 2013. Ads are Watching Me: A View from the Interplay Between Anthropomorphism and Customisation. International Journal of Advertising 32 (4): 513–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghubir, P., and E. A. Greenleaf. 2006. Ratios in Proportion: What should the Shape of the Package be? Journal of Marketing 70 (2): 95–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimann, M., O. Schilke, and J. S. Thomas. 2010. Toward an Understanding of Industry Commoditization: Its Nature and Role in Evolving Marketing Competition. International Journal of Research in Marketing 27 (2): 188–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero, M., and A. W. Craig. 2017. Costly Curves: How Human-Like Shapes can Increase Spending. Journal of Consumer Research 44 (1): 80–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothblum, E. D., P. A. Brand, C. T. Miller, and H. A. Oetjen. 1990. The Relationship between Obesity, Employment Discrimination, and Employment-Related Victimization. Journal of Vocational Behavior 37 (3): 251–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schifferstein, H. N., and P. Hekkert. 2011. Product Experience. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, D. 1993. Adaptive Significance of Female Physical Attractiveness: Role of Waist-to-Hip Ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65 (2): 293–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, D. 1994. Is Thin Really Beautiful and Good? Relationship between Waist-to-Hip Ratio (WHR) and Female Attractiveness. Personality & Individual Differences 16 ( 1): 123–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, D. 1995. Female Judgment of Male Attractiveness and Desirability for Relationships: Role of Waist-to-Hip Ratio and Financial Status. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 69 (6): 1089–1101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, D., and D. Singh. 2011. Shape and Significance of Feminine Beauty: An Evolutionary Perspective. Sex Roles 64 (9): 723–731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirgy, M. J. 1982. Self-Concept in Consumer Behavior: A Critical Review. Journal of Consumer Research 9 (3): 287–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, C. 2012. Managing Sensory Expectations Concerning Products and Brands: Capitalizing on the Potential of Sound and Shape Symbolism. Journal of Consumer Psychology 22 (1): 37–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, C., and S. Sood. 2012. Self-Affirmation through the Choice of Highly Aesthetic Products. Journal of Consumer Research 39 (2): 415–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triantos, A., E. Plakoyiannaki, E. Outra, and N. Petridis. 2016. Anthropomorphic Packaging: Is there Life on “Mars”? European Journal of Marketing 50 (1): 260–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Ooijen, I., M. L. Fransen, P. W. Verlegh, and E. G. Smit. 2017a. Packaging Design as an Implicit Communicator: Effects on Product Quality Inferences in the Presence of Explicit Quality Cues. Food Quality and Preference 62: 71–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Ooijen, I., M. L. Fransen, P. W. Verlegh, and E. G. Smit. 2017b. Signalling Product Healthiness through Symbolic Package Cues: Effects of Package Shape and Goal Congruence on Consumer Behaviour. Appetite 109: 73–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waytz, A., J. Heafner, and N. Epley. 2014. The Mind in the Machine: Anthropomorphism Increases Trust in an Autonomous Vehicle. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 52: 113–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen Wan, E., R. Peng Chen, and L. Jin. 2017. Judging a Book by its Cover? The Effect of Anthropomorphism on Product Attribute Processing and Consumer Preference. Journal of Consumer Research 43 (6): 1008–1030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, K., and D. W. Dahl. 2007. Are All Out-Groups Created Equal? Consumer Identity and Dissociative Influence. Journal of Consumer Research 34 (4): 525–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar