Publication Cover
International Journal of Advertising
The Review of Marketing Communications
Volume 37, 2018 - Issue 5
18,946
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The impact of creative media advertising on consumer responses: two field experiments

, , , &
Pages 749-768 | Received 24 Aug 2017, Accepted 17 May 2018, Published online: 31 Aug 2018

References

  • Alden, D.L., A. Mukherjee, and W.D. Hoyer. 2000. The effects of incongruity, surprise and positive moderators on perceived humor in television advertising. Journal of Advertising 29, no. 2: 1–15. doi:10.1080/00913367.2000.10673605
  • Bearden, W.O., D.R. Lichtenstein, and J.E. Teel. 1984. Comparison price, coupon, and brand effects on consumer reactions to retail newspaper advertisements. Journal of Retailing 60, no. 2: 11–34.
  • Bellman, S., R.F. Potter, S. Treleaven-Hassard, J.A. Robinson, and D. Varan. 2011. The effectiveness of branded mobile phone apps. Journal of Interactive Marketing 25, no. 4: 191–200. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2011.06.001
  • Chattopadhyay, A., and K. Basu. 1990. Humor in advertising: The moderating role of prior brand evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research 27: 466–476.
  • Dahlén, M. 2005. The medium as a contextual cue: Effects of creative media choice. Journal of Advertising 34, no. 3: 89–98.
  • Dahlén, M., and M. Edenius. 2007. When is advertising advertising? Comparing responses to non-traditional and traditional advertising media. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 29, no. 1: 33–42. doi:10.1080/10641734.2007.10505206
  • Dahlén, M., L. Friberg, and E. Nilsson. 2009. Long live creative media choice. Journal of Advertising 38, no. 2: 121–129. doi:10.2753/JOA0091-3367380208
  • Dahlén, M., S. Rosengren, F. Törn, and N. Öhman. 2008. Could placing ads wrong be right? Advertising effects of thematic incongruence. Journal of Advertising 37, no. 3: 57–67. doi:10.2753/JOA0091-3367370305
  • Derbaix, C., and J. Vanhamme. 2003. Inducing word-of-mouth by eliciting surprise – A pilot investigation. Journal of Economic Psychology 24, no. 1: 99–116. doi:10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00157-5
  • Eelen, J., and R.V.J. Seiler. 2015. Creative media use increases online sharing of your ad (but seems less effective for your brand). In Advances in advertising research. Vol. VI, The digital, the classic, the subtle and the alternative, ed. P.W.J. Verlegh, H.A.M. Voorveld and M. Eisend, 291–308. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Gabler.
  • Eelen, J., Rauwers, F., Wottrich, V.M., Voorveld, H. A. and G. van Noort. 2016. Consumer responses to creative media advertising: A literature review. In Advertising in new formats and media: Current research and implications for marketers, ed. P. De Pelsmacker, 19–46. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Eisend, M. 2009. A meta-analysis of humor in advertising. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science 37, no. 2: 191–203. doi:10.1007/s11747-008-0096-y
  • Friestad, M., and P. Wright. 1994. The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research 21: 1–31. doi:10.1086/209380
  • Friestad, M., and P. Wright. 1995. Persuasion knowledge: Lay people's and researchers' beliefs about the psychology of advertising. Journal of Consumer Research 22, no. 1: 62–74. doi:10.1086/209435
  • Hutter, K. 2015. Unusual location and unexpected execution in advertising: A content analysis and test of effectiveness in ambient advertisements. Journal of Marketing Communications 21, no. 1: 33–47. doi:10.1080/13527266.2014.970823
  • Hutter, K., and S. Hoffmann. 2014. Guerilla marketing: The nature of the concept and propositions for further research. Asian Journal of Marketing 5, no. 2: 39–54. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2013.08.001
  • Izard, C.E. 1977. Human emotions. New York: Plenum Press.
  • Johnston, W.A., and K.J. Hawley. 1994. Perceptual inhibition of expected inputs: The key that opens closed minds. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1, no. 1: 56–72. doi:10.3758/BF03200761
  • Koslow, S. 2000. Can the truth hurt? How honest and persuasive advertising can unintentionally lead to increased consumer skepticism. Journal of Consumer Affairs 3, no. 2: 245–267. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6606.2000.tb00093.x
  • Long, D.L., and A.C. Graesser. 1988. Wit and humor in discourse processing. Discourse Processes 11, no. 1: 35–60. doi:10.1080/01638538809544690
  • Meijers, M.H.C., J. Eelen, and H.A.M. Voorveld. 2016. Creative media advertising (SWOCC; No. 72). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Stichting Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Commerciële Communicatie.
  • Morrin, M., and S. Ratneshwar. 2000. The impact of ambient scent on evaluation, attention, and memory for familiar and unfamiliar brands. Journal of Business Research 49, no. 2: 157–165. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(99)00006-5
  • Obermiller, C., E. Spangenberg, and D.L. MacLachlan. 2005. Ad skepticism: The consequences of disbelief. Journal of Advertising 34, no. 3: 7–17. doi:10.1080/00913367.2005.10639199
  • Petty, R.E., J.T. Cacciopo, A.J. Strathman, and J.R. Priester (1994). To think or not to think: Exploring two routes to persuasion. In Persuasion: Psychological insights and perspectives, ed. S. Shavitt and T.C., 113–148. Boston: Allyn and Bacon
  • Rauwers, F., and G. Van Noort. 2015. The underlying processes of creative media advertising. In Advances in advertising research: The digital, the classic, the subtle and the alternative, ed P.W.J. Verlegh, H.A.M. Voorveld and M. Eisend, 309–324. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Gabler.
  • Roedder, D., and J.C. Whitney. 1986. The development of consumer knowledge in children: A cognitive structure approach. Journal of Consumer Research 12, no. 4: 406–417.
  • Rosengren, S., E. Modig, and M. Dahlén. 2015. The value of ambient communication from a consumer perspective. Journal of Marketing Communications 21, no. 1: 20–32. doi:10.1080/13527266.2014.970825
  • Rozendaal, E., M.A. Lapierre, E.A. Van Reijmersdal, and M. Buijzen. 2011. Reconsidering advertising literacy as defense against advertising effects. Media Psychology 14, no. 4: 333–354. doi:10.1080/15213269.2011.620540
  • Speck, P.S. 1991. The humorous message taxonomy: A framework for the study of humorous ads. Current Issues and Research in Advertising 13, no. 12: 1–44. doi:10.1080/01633392.1991.10504957
  • Speck, P.S., and M.T. Elliott. 1997. Predictors of advertising avoidance in print and broadcast media. Journal of Advertising 26, no. 3: 61–76. doi:10.1080/00913367.1997.10673529
  • Vanhamme, J. 2000. The link between surprise and satisfaction: An exploratory research on how best to measure surprise. Journal of Marketing Management 16, no. 6: 565–582. doi:10.1362/026725700785045949
  • Van Noort, G., M.L. Antheunis, and E.A. Van Reijmersdal. 2012. Social connections and the persuasiveness of viral campaigns in social network sites: Persuasive intent as the underlying mechanism. Journal of Marketing Communications 18, no. 1: 39–53. doi:10.1080/13527266.2011.620764
  • Van Reijmersdal, E.A., E. Rozendaal, and M. Buijzen. 2012. Effects of prominence, involvement, and persuasion knowledge on children's cognitive and affective responses to advergames. Journal of Interactive Marketing 26, no. 1: 33–42. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2011.04.005
  • Warlaumont, H.G. 1997. Appropriating reality: Consumers’ perceptions of schema inconsistent advertising. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 74, no. 1: 39–54. doi:10.1177/107769909707400104
  • Weinberger, M.G., and C.S. Gulas. 1992. The impact of humor in advertising: A review. Journal of Advertising 21, no. 4: 35–59. doi:10.1080/00913367.1992.10673384
  • Zhang, Y. 1996. Responses to humorous advertising: The moderating effect of need for cognition. Journal of Advertising 25, no. 1: 15–32. doi:10.1080/00913367.1996.10673493