The role of socialization agents in adolescents’ responses to app-based mobile advertising

References

• Anderson, M., and J. Jiang.2018 “Teens, Social Media & Technology 2018.” https://www.pewinternet.org/2018/05/31/teens-social-media-technology-2018/
   Google Scholar
• Baek, T.H., and C.Y. Yoo. 2018. Branded app usability: Conceptualization, measurement, and prediction of consumer loyalty. Journal of Advertising 47, no. 1: 70–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellman, S., J. Murphy, S. Treleaven-Hassard, J. O'Farrell, L. Qiu, and D. Varan. 2013. Using internet behavior to deliver relevant television commercials. Journal of Interactive Marketing 27, no. 2: 130–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellman, S., R.F. Potter, S. Treleaven-Hassard, J.A. Robinson, and D. Varan. 2011. The effectiveness of branded mobile phone apps. Journal of Interactive Marketing 25, no. 4: 191–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentley, F., K. Church, B. Harrison, K. Lyons, and M. Rafalow. 2015. Three hours a day: Understanding current teen practices of smartphone application use. ArXiv:1510.05192
   Google Scholar
• Bristol, T., and T.F. Mangleburg. 2005. Not telling the whole story: Teen deception in purchasing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 33, no. 1: 79–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buijzen, M. 2009. The effectiveness of parental communication in modifying the relation between food advertising and children’s consumption behaviour. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 27no.1: 105–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buijzen, M., and P.M. Valkenburg. 2005. Parental mediation of undesired advertising effects. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 49, no. 2: 153–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bukowski, W.M., M. Brendgen, and F. Vitaro. 2007. “Peers and Socialization: Effects on Externalizing and Internalizing Problems.” In Handbook of socialization. edited by J. E. Grusec and Paul D Hastings, 355–81. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, C.-H., and H.C. Cheon 2004. Why do people avoid advertising on the internet? Journal of Advertising 33, no. 4: 89–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, L.S. 2011. Parental mediation theory for the digital age. Communication Theory 21, no. 4: 323–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, K., and C. Yeung. 2015. “Kids' Apps Disclosures Revisited.” https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/blogs/business-blog/2015/09/kids-apps-disclosures-revisited
   Google Scholar
• Common Sense Media 2016. “New Report Finds Teens Feel Addicted to Their Phones, Causing Tension at Home.” https://www.commonsensemedia.org/about-us/news/press-releases/new-report-finds-teens-feel-addicted-to-their-phones-causing-tension-at.
   Google Scholar
• Daems, K., P. De Pelsmacker, and I. Moons. 2019. Advertisers' perceptions regarding the ethical appropriateness of new advertising formats aimed at minors. Journal of Marketing Communications 25, no. 4: 438–56.
   Google Scholar
• Das, G., C. Cheung, C. Nebeker, M. Bietz, and C. Bloss. 2018. Privacy policies for apps targeted toward youth: Descriptive analysis of readability. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 6, no. 1: e3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, K. 2013. Young people's digital lives: the impact of interpersonal relationships and digital media use on adolescents' sense of identity. Computers in Human Behavior 29, no. 6: 2281–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jans, S., D. Van de Sompel, L. Hudders, and V. Cauberghe. 2019. Advertising targeting young children: an overview of 10 years of research (2006–2016). International Journal of Advertising 39, no. 2: 1–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espinoza, G., and J. Juvonen. 2011. The pervasiveness, connectedness, and intrusiveness of social network site use among young adolescents. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking 14, no. 12: 705–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Trade Commission 2012. “Mobile Apps for Kids: Disclosures Still Not Making the Grade.” http://www.ftc.gov/reports/mobile-apps-kids-disclosures-still-not-making-grade.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, X., S. Fu, and J. Qin. 2016. Determinants of consumers’ attitudes toward mobile advertising: the mediating roles of instrinsic and extrinsic motivations. Computers in Human Behavior 63: 334–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flurry Analytics 2018. “Seven Years into the Mobile Revolution: Content Is King… Again.” http://flurrymobile.tumblr.com/post/127638842745/seven-years-into-the-mobile-revolution-content-is.
   Google Scholar
• Friestad, M., and P. Wright. 1994. The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research 21, no. 1: 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujioka, Y., and E.W. Austin. 2003. The implications of vantage point in parental mediation of television and child’s attitudes toward drinking alcohol. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 47, no. 3: 418–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Future of Privacy Forum 2016. “August 2016 FPF Mobile Apps Study.” https://fpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/2016-FPF-Mobile-Apps-Study_final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, I., and S. O’Donohoe. 2007. Why young consumers are not open to mobile marketing communication. International Journal of Advertising 26, no. 2: 223–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez, A., S. O'Leary, N.P. Rana, Y.K. Dwivedi, and T. Calle. 2019. Using privacy calculous theory to explore enterpreneurial directions in mobile location-based advetising: Identifying intrusiveness as the critical risk factor. Computers in Human Behavior 95: 295–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakuhodo DY Media Partners Inc 2018. “First Asean Media Content Survey Results: Average Age of Japan Content Fans in Thailand, Vietnam, and Indonesia Is 30.3 Japan Content Fans in Thailand and Indonesia Score High in Japan’s Image Value and Intention to Visit Japan.” http://www.hakuhodody-media.co.jp.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, E.T. 1997. Beyond pleasure and pain. The American Psychologist 52, no. 12: 1280–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, Y., I. Choi, J.-Y. Yum, and S.-H. Jeong. 2017. Parental nediation regarding children’s smartphone use: Role of protection motivation and parenting style. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking 20, no. 6: 362–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, D.R. 1999. Consumer socialization of children: a retrospective look at Twenty-Five years of research. Journal of Consumer Research 26, no.3: 183–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamaruddin, A.R., and S. Mokhlis. 2003. Consumer socialization, social structural factors and Decision-Making styles: A case study of adolescents in Malaysia. International Journal of Consumer Studies 27, no. 2: 145–56.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, H., and W. Shin. 2016. Do smartphone power users protect mobile privacy better than nonpower users? Exploring power usage as a factor in mobile privacy protection and disclosure. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 19, no. 3: 179–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, C., Z. Yang, and H. Lee. 2015. Parental style, parental practices, and socialization outcomes: an investigation of their linkages in the consumer socialization context. Journal of Economic Psychology 49, August: 15–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapierre, M.A., F. Fleming-Milici, E. Rozendaal, A. R mCaLISTER, and J. Castonguay. 2017. The effects of adveritisng on children and adolescents. Pediatrics 140, no. Supplement 2: S152–S6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee, S.-J., C. Lee, and C. Lee. 2016. Smartphone addiction and application usage in Korean adolescents: Effects of mediation strategies. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal 44, no. 9: 1525–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenhart, A. 2015. “Teens, Social Media & Technology Overview 2015.” https://www.pewinternet.org/2018/05/31/teens-social-media-technology-2018/
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone S., L. Haddon, A. Gorzi, and G. K. Olafsson. 2011. “EU Kids Online.” http://www.lse.ac.uk/media%40lse/research/EUKidsOnline/EU Kids II (2009-11)/EUKidsOnlineIIReports/Final report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., and E.J. Helsper. 2008. Parental mediation of children’s internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 52, no. 4: 581–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lwin, M.O., W. Shin, A.Z.H. Yee, and R.J. Wardoyo. 2017. A parental health education model of children’s food consumption: Influence on children’s attitudes, intention, and consumption of healthy and unhealthy foods. Journal of Health Communication 22, no. 5Routledge: 403–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lwin, M.O., A.J.S. Stanaland, and A.D. Miyazaki. 2008. Protecting children’s privacy online: How parental mediation strategies affect website safeguard effectiveness. Journal of Retailing 84, no. 2: 205–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden M., A. Lenhart, S. Cortes, and U. Gasser. 2013. “Teens and Mobile Apps Privacy.” http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/08/22/teens-and-mobile-apps-privacy/.
   Google Scholar
• Mangleburg, T.F., and T. Bristol. 1998. Socialization and adolescents’ skepticism toward advertising. Journal of Advertising 27, no. 3: 11–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangleburg, T.F., P.M. Doney, and T. Bristol. 2004. Shopping with friends and teens’ susceptibility to peer influence. Journal of Retailing 80, no. 2: 101–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendoza, K. 2009. Surveying parental mediation: Connections, challenges, and questions for media literacy. The Journal of Media Literacy Education 1, no. 1: 28–41.
   Google Scholar
• Milkaite, I., and E. Lievens. 2019. “The Changing Patchwork of the Child's Age of Consent for Data Processing Across the EU (January 2019).” https://www.betterinternetforkids.eu/web/portal/practice/awareness/detail?articleId=3017751
   Google Scholar
• Millward Brown 2017. “Digital & Media Predictions 2014.” Accessed February 2. http://www.millwardbrown.com/DigitalPredictions/2013/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Moscardelli, D.M., and C. Liston-Heyes. 2004. Teens surfing the net: How do they learn to protect their privacy? Journal of Business & Economics Research 2, no. 9: 43–6.
   Google Scholar
• Moschis, G.P., and A. Churchill. Jr. 1978. Consumer socialization: a theoretical and empirical analysis. Journal of Marketing Research 15no.4: 599–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathanson, A.I. 2001. Parent and child perspectives on the presence and meaning of parental television mediation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 45, no. 2: 201–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, N., and C.J. Oates. 2014. Parental mediation of food marketing communications aimed at children. International Journal of Advertising 33, no. 3: 579–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ofcom 2014. “Children and Parents: Media USE AND Attitudes Report.” Accessed 1 December 2015. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0027/76266/childrens_2014_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Opgenhaffen, M., L. Vandenbosch, S. Eggermont, and E. Frison. 2012. Parental mediation of television viewing in the context of changing Parent-Child relationships in Belgium: a latent growth curve aanalysis in early and Middle adolescence. Journal of Children and Media 6, no. 4: 469–84.
   Google Scholar
• Park, Y.J., and S. Mo Jang. 2014. Understanding privacy knowledge and skill in mobile communication. Computers in Human Behavior 38, September: 296–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P.M., S.B. MacKenzie, J.-Y. Lee, and N.P. Podsakoff. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology 88, no. 5: 879–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PrivacyPolicies.com 2019. “GDPR Compliance for Apps.” https://www.privacypolicies.com/blog/gdpr-compliance-apps/
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J.A., C. Manolis, and J.F. Tanner. 2008. Interpersonal influence and adolescent materialism and compulsive buying. Social Influence 3, no. 2: 114–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasson, H., and G. Mesch. 2014. Parental mediation, peer norms and risky online behavior among adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior 33, : 32–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp, B., N. Danenberg, and S. Bellman. 2018. Psychological targeting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, no. 34: E7890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, W., J. Huh, and R.J. Faber. 2012. Developmental antecedents to children’s responses to online advertising. International Journal of Advertising 31, no. 4: 719–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, W., and H. Kang. 2016. Adolescents’ privacy concerns and information disclosure online: the role of parents and the internet. Computers in Human Behavior 54, January: 114–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, W., and M.O. Lwin. 2017. How does ‘talking about the internet with others’ affect teenagers’ experience of online risks? The role of active mediation by parents, peers, and school teachers. New Media & Society 19, no. 7: 1109–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statista 2018a. “Number of Available Apps in the Apple App Store from July 2008 to January 2017.” https://www.statista.com/statistics/263795/number-of-available-apps-in-the-apple-app-store/.
   Google Scholar
• Statista 2018b. “Number of Available Applications in the Google Play Store from December 2009 to December 2017.” https://www.statista.com/statistics/266210/number-of-available-applications-in-the-google-play-store/.
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S.S., H. Kang, M. Wu, E. Go, and B. Zhang. 2013. Unlocking the privacy paradox: Do cognitive heuristics hold the key? CHI’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems: ACM 811–6.
   Google Scholar
• Technokeens.com 2016. “Mobile Application.” https://www.technokeens.com/mobileapplication/
   Google Scholar
• Warren, R. 2001. In words and deeds: Parental involvement and mediation of children’s television viewing. Journal of Family Communication 1, no. 4: 211–31.
   Google Scholar
• Youn, S. 2008. Parental influence and teens’ attitude toward online privacy protection. Journal of Consumer Affairs 42, no. 3: 362–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youn, S., and W. Shin. 2019. Adolescents’ responses to social media newsfeed advertising: the interplay of persuasion knowledge, Benefit-Risk assessment, and ad scepticism in explaining information disclosure. International Journal of Advertising 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarouali, B., K. Poels, M. Walrave, and K. Ponnet. 2018. You talking to me?' the influence of peer communication on adolescents' persuasion knowledge and attitude towards social advertisements. Behaviour & Information Technology 37, no. 5: 502–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarouali, B., K. Poels, M. Walrave, and K. Ponnet. 2019. The impact of regulatory focus on adolescents’ evaluation of targeted advertising on social networking sites. International Journal of Advertising 38, no. 2: 316–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar