Leveraged brand evaluations in branded entertainment: Effects of alliance exclusivity and presentation style

References

• Aaker, D.A., and K.L. Keller. 1990. Consumer evaluations of Brand extensions. Journal of Marketing 54, no. 1: 27–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm, J. 2017. The 10 best branded content partnerships of 2017. Adage, https://adage.com/article/agency-viewpoint/10-branded-content-partnerships-2017/311725/
   Google Scholar
• Riess, D. 2018. New study reveals the emotional impact of branded content increase ROI. Adage, https://adage.com/article/turner-ignite/biometric-research-proves-purchase-power-branded-content-ad-age-turner-ignite/315635/
   Google Scholar
• Griner, D. 2014. GoPro’s super bowl ad looks a lot like red bull, Circa 2012. AdWeek, https://www.adweek.com/creativity/gopros-super-bowl-ad-looks-lot-red-bull-circa-2012-155386/
   Google Scholar
• Allen, C.T., and T.J. Madden. 1985. A closer look at classical conditioning. Journal of Consumer Research 12, no. 3: 301–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baek, T.H., J. Kim, and J.H. Yu. 2010. The differential roles of Brand credibility and Brand prestige in consumer Brand choice. Psychology & Marketing 27, no. 7: 662–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baek, T.H., and K.W. King. 2011. Exploring the consequences of Brand credibility in services. Journal of Services Marketing 25, no. 4: 260–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R.M., and D.A. Kenny. 1986. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51, no. 6: 1173–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batra, R., and P.M. Homer. 2004. The situational impact of Brand image beliefs. Journal of Consumer Psychology 14, no. 3: 318–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergkvist, L., and, and C.R. Taylor. 2016. Leveraged marketing communications: a framework for explaining the effects of secondary Brand associations. AMS Review 6, no. 3–4: 157–75.
   Google Scholar
• Bernazzani, S. 2018. 13 examples of successful co-branding partnerships. HubSpot, https://blog.hubspot.com/marketing/best-cobranding-partnerships.
   Google Scholar
• Bjork, R.A., and T.W. Allen. 1970. The spacing effect: Consolidation or differential encoding? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 9, no. 5: 567–72.
   Google Scholar
• Bluemelhuber, C., L.L. Carter, and C.J. Lambe. 2007. Extending the view of Brand alliance effects. International Marketing Review 24, no. 4: 427–43. no.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boerman, S.C., E.A. Van Reijmersdal, and P.C. Neijens. 2012. Sponsorship disclosure: Effects of duration on persuasion knowledge and Brand responses. Journal of Communication 62, no. 6: 1047–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boerman, S.C., E.A. Van Reijmersdal, and P.C. Neijens. 2014. Effects of sponsorship disclosure timing on the processing of sponsored content: a study on the effectiveness of European disclosure regulations. Psychology & Marketing 31, no. 3: 214–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boush, D.M., and B. Loken. 1991. A process-tracing study of Brand extension evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research 28, no. 1: 16–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, I., K.M. Dubas, and L.A. Babin. 1999. The influence of product-placement type & exposure time on product-placement recognition. International Journal of Advertising 18, no. 3: 323–37.
   Google Scholar
• Broniarczyk, S.M., and J.W. Alba. 1994. The importance of the Brand in Brand extension. Journal of Marketing Research 31, no. 2: 214–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, R.R., and T.K. Srull. 1988. Competitive interference and consumer memory for advertising. Journal of Consumer Research 15, no. 1: 55–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnkrant, R.E. 1976. A motivational model of information processing intensity. Journal of Consumer Research 3, no. 1: 21–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, M.C., and C. Warren. 2012. A risk of meaning transfer: Are negative associations more likely to transfer than positive associations? Social Influence 7, no. 3: 172–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cepeda, N.J., H. Pashler, E. Vul, J.T. Wixted, and D. Rohrer. 2006. Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: a review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin 132, no. 3: 354–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, T., and H. Lee. 2014. Why do we share? the impact of viral videos dramatized to sell: How microfilm advertising works. Journal of Advertising Research 54, no. 3: 292–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, D., H. Bang, B.W. Wojdynski, Y. Lee, and K.M. Keib. 2018. How Brand disclosure timing and Brand prominence influence consumer's intention to share branded entertainment content. Journal of Interactive Marketing 42: 18–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunha, M., M.R. Forehand Jr, and J.W. Angle. 2015. Riding coattails: When co-branding helps versus hurts less-known brands. Journal of Consumer Research 41, no. 5: 1284–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dacin, P.A., and D.C. Smith. 1994. The effect of Brand portfolio characteristics on consumer evaluations of Brand extensions. Journal of Marketing Research 31, no. 2: 229–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempster, F.N. 1996. Distributing and managing the conditions of encoding and practice. In Memory. 317–344. Boston: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dimofte, C.V., and R.F. Yalch. 2011. The mere association effect and Brand evaluations. Journal of Consumer Psychology 21, no. 1: 24–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovan, J.J., and D.J. Radosevich. 1999. A Meta-analytic review of the distribution of practice effect: Now you see it, now you don't. Journal of Applied Psychology 84, no. 5: 795–805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdem, T., and J. Swait. 1998. Brand equity as a signaling phenomenon. Journal of Consumer Psychology 7, no. 2: 131–57.
   Google Scholar
• Erdem, T., J. Swait, and A. Valenzuela. 2006. Brands as signals: a cross-country validation study. Journal of Marketing 70, no. 1: 34–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farquhar, P.H. 1994. Strategic challenges for branding. Marketing Management 3, no. 2: 8–15.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, X., and S. Mishra. 2002. The effect of Brand alliance portfolio on the perceived quality of an unknown Brand. Advances in Consumer Research 29: 519–20.
   Google Scholar
• Dool, G. 2018. As branded content moves to the forefront, trust and accountability remain key. Folio. https://www.foliomag.com/hearstus-weekly-branded-content/
   Google Scholar
• Gagné, R.M. 1950. The effect of sequence of presentation of similar items on the learning of paired associates. Journal of Experimental Psychology 40, no. 1: 61–73.
   Google Scholar
• Galli, M., and G. Gorn. 2011. Unconscious transfer of meaning to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology 21, no. 3: 215–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gammoh, B.S., K.E. Voss, and G. Chakraborty. 2006. Consumer evaluation of Brand alliance signals. Psychology and Marketing 23, no. 6: 465–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gammoh, B.S., K.E. Voss, and X. Fang. 2010. Multiple Brand alliances: a portfolio diversification perspective. Journal of Product & Brand Management 19, no. 1: 27–33.
   Google Scholar
• Gentner, D., J. Loewenstein, L. Thompson, and K.D. Forbus. 2009. Reviving inert knowledge: Analogical abstraction supports relational retrieval of past events. Cognitive Science 33, no. 8: 1343–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A.M. 1979. Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition. Memory & Cognition 7, no. 2: 95–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geylani, T., J.J. Inman, and F.T. Hofstede. 2008. Image reinforcement or impairment: the effects of co-branding on attribute uncertainty. Marketing Science 27, no. 4: 730–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gwinner, K.P., and J. Eaton. 1999. Building Brand image through event sponsorship: the role of image transfer. Journal of Advertising 28, no. 4: 47–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haberman, R. 2018. Branded entertainment growing branded entertainment growing twice as fast as advertising spend, study finds. Skyword. https://www.skyword.com/contentstandard/creativity/branded-entertainment-growing-twice-as-fast-as-advertising-spend-study-finds/
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, and R. E. Anderson. 1998. Multivariate data analysis. London: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Harlam, B.A., A. Krishna, D.R. Lehmann, and C. Mela. 1995. Impact of bundle type, price framing and familiarity on purchase intention for the bundle. Journal of Business Research 33, no. 1: 57–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A.F. 2013. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hillyer, C., and S. Tikoo. 1995. Effect of cobranding on consumer product evaluaitons. Advances in Consumer Research 22, no. 1: 123–7.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, S., and D. Hudson. 2006. Branded entertainment: a new advertising technique or product placement in disguise? Journal of Marketing Management 22, no. 5–6: 489–504. no.
   Google Scholar
• IAB. 2018. Branded Content Creation & Distribution Guide Steps for Success. https://www.iab.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/IAB_Branded_Content_Creation_and_Distribution_Guide_2018-04_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Janiszewski, C., and S.M. Van Osselaer. 2000. A connectionist model of Brand–quality associations. Journal of Marketing Research 37, no. 3: 331–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, Y., and P.M. Herr. 2006. Beauty and the beholder: toward an integrative model of communication source effects. Journal of Consumer Research 33, no. 1: 123–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, K.L. 1993. Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based Brand equity. Journal of Marketing 57, no. 1: 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelting, K., and D.H. Rice. 2013. Should we hire David Beckham to endorse our Brand? Contextual interference and consumer memory for brands in a celebrity's endorsement portfolio. Psychology & Marketing 30, no. 7: 602–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, R.J., and C.T. Allen. 1994. Competitive interference effects in consumer memory for advertising: the role of Brand familiarity. Journal of Marketing 58, no. 3: 97–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirmani, A., and B. Shiv. 1998. Effects of source congruity on Brand attitudes and beliefs: the moderating role of issue‐relevant elaboration. Journal of Consumer Psychology 7, no. 1: 25–47.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, A. 2000. Interference effects of contextual cues in advertisements on memory for ad content. Journal of Consumer Psychology 9, no. 3: 155–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, A., and S. Krishnan. 2004. Memory interference in advertising: a replication and extension. Journal of Consumer Research 30, no.4: 602–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafferty, B.A. 2009. Selecting the right cause partners for the right reasons: the role of importance and fit in cause‐Brand alliances. Psychology and Marketing 26, no. 4: 359–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafferty, B.A., and R.E. Goldsmith. 2005. Cause–Brand alliances: does the cause help the Brand or does the Brand help the cause? Journal of Business Research 58, no. 4: 423–9. no.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A.Y., and J.L. Aaker. 2004. Bringing the frame into focus: the influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 86, no. 2: 205–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, I.P., and A.M. Levin. 2000. Modeling the role of Brand alliances in the assimilation of product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Psychology 9, no. 1: 43–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., and H. He. 2013. Evaluation of international Brand alliances: Brand order and consumer ethnocentrism. Journal of Business Research 66, no. 1: 89–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundqvist, A., V. Liljander, J. Gummerus, and A.V. Riel. 2013. The impact of storytelling on the consumer Brand experience: the case of a firm-originated story. Journal of Brand Management 20, no. 4: 283–97.
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, S.B., and R.J. Lutz. 1989. An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting context. Journal of Marketing 53, no. 2: 48–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthes, J., and B. Naderer. 2016. Product placement disclosures: Exploring the moderating effect of placement frequency on Brand responses via persuasion knowledge. International Journal of Advertising 35, no. 2: 185–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCracken, G. 1989. Who is the celebrity endorser? cultural foundations of the endorsement process. Journal of Consumer Research 16, no. 3: 310–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T. 2014. Branded entertainment in emotional scenes: excitation transfer or direct affect transfer? PhD diss., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
   Google Scholar
• Oakes, L.M., and R.J. Ribar. 2005. A comparison of infants' categorization in paired and successive presentation familiarization tasks. Infancy 7, no. 1: 85–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, E.L. 2010. Does sponsorship work in the same way in different sponsorship contexts? European Journal of Marketing 44, no.1/2: 180–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, A.W., and M.R. Forehand. 2012. Implicit self-referencing: the effect of nonvolitional self-association on Brand and product attitude. Journal of Consumer Research 39, no. 1: 142–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R.E., and J.T. Cacioppo. 1986. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In Communication and persuasion, 1–24. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Phelps, J.E., R. Lewis, L. Mobilio, D. Perry, and N. Raman. 2004. Viral marketing or electronic word-of-mouth advertising: Examining consumer responses and motivations to pass along email. Journal of Advertising Research 44, no. 4: 333–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruekert, R.W., and A. Rao. 1994. Brand alliances as signals of product quality. Sloan Management Review 36, no. 1: 87–97.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, A.R., L. Qu, and R.W. Ruekert. 1999. Signaling unobservable product quality through a Brand ally. Journal of Marketing Research 36, no. 2: 258–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, D.H., K. Kelting, and R.J. Lutz. 2012. Multiple endorsers and multiple endorsements: the influence of message repetition, source congruence and involvement on Brand attitudes. Journal of Consumer Psychology 22, no. 2: 249–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigue, C.S., and A. Biswas. 2004. Brand alliance dependency and exclusivity: an empirical investigation. Journal of Product & Brand Management 13, no. 7: 477–87.
   Google Scholar
• Saleem, F. 2007. Effect of single celebrity and multiple celebrity endorsement on low involvement and high involvement product advertisements. European Journal of Social Sciences 5, no. 3: 125–32.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, C.J., and K.L. Becker-Olsen. 2006. Achieving marketing objectives through social sponsorships. Journal of Marketing 70, no. 4: 154–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonin, B.L., and J.A. Ruth. 1998. Is a company known by the company it keeps? assessing the spillover effects of Brand alliances on consumer Brand attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research 35, no. 1: 30–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smarandescu, L., R. Rose, and D.H. Wedell. 2013. Priming a cross‐category Brand alliance: the moderating role of attribute knowledge and need for cognition. Psychology & Marketing 30, no. 2: 133–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, M. 1973. Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 87, no. 3: 355–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spry, A., R. Pappu, and T.B. Cornwell. 2011. Celebrity endorsement, Brand credibility and Brand equity. European Journal of Marketing 45, no. 6: 882–909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Washburn, J.H., B.D. Till, and R. Priluck. 2004. Brand alliance and customer‐based Brand‐equity effects. Psychology and Marketing 21, no. 7: 487–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tirole, J. 1988. The theory of industrial organization. Cambridge: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Tripp, C., T.D. Jensen, and L. Carlson. 1994. The effects of multiple product endorsements by celebrities on consumers' attitudes and intentions. Journal of Consumer Research 20, no. 4: 535–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varadarajan, P.R., and A. Menon. 1988. Cause-related marketing: a coalignment of marketing strategy and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Marketing 52, no. 3: 58–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlach, H.A., C.M. Sandhofer, and N. Kornell. 2008. The spacing effect in children's memory and category induction. Cognition 109, no. 1: 163–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss, K.E., and B.S. Gammoh. 2004. Building brands through Brand alliances: does a second ally help? Marketing Letters 15, no. 2/3: 147–59. no.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walchli, S.B. 2007. The effects of between‐partner congruity on consumer evaluation of co‐branded products. Psychology & Marketing 24, no. 11: 947–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, G., K.P. Gwinner, and S.R. Swanson. 2004. What makes mavens tick? exploring the motives of market mavens’ initiation of information diffusion. Journal of Consumer Marketing 21, no. 2: 109–22.
   Google Scholar
• Weisberg, R.W., and L.M. Reeves. 2013. Cognition: from memory to creativity. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar