Examining native CSR advertising as a post-crisis response strategy

References

• Amazeen, M.A., and A.R. Muddiman. 2018. Saving media or trading on trust? The effects of native advertising on audience perceptions of legacy and online news publishers. Digital Journalism 6, no. 2: 176–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An, S., G. Kerr, and H.S. Jin. 2019. Recognizing native ads as advertising: Attitudinal and behavioural consequences. Journal of Consumer Affairs 53, no. 4: 1421–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker-Olsen, K.L., B.A. Cudmore, and R.P. Hill. 2006. The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research 59, no. 1: 46–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckmann, S.C. 2007. Consumers and corporate social responsibility: Matching the unmatchable?Australasian Marketing Journal 15, no. 1: 27–36.
   Google Scholar
• Biernat, M. 2005. Standards and expectancies: Contrast and assimilation in judgments of self and others. New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Boerman, S.C., E.A. Van Reijmersdal, and P.C. Neijens. 2012. Sponsorship disclosure: Effects of duration on persuasion knowledge and Brand responses. Journal of Communication 62, no. 6: 1047–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boerman, S.C., L.M. Willemsen, and E.P. Van Der Aa. 2017. “This post is sponsored”: Effects of sponsorship disclosure on persuasion knowledge and electronic word of mouth in the context of facebook. Journal of Interactive Marketing 38: 82–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, K.A., and E.J. Ki. 2013. Developing a valid and reliable measure of organizational crisis responsibility. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 90, no. 2: 363–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brühl, R., J.S. Basel, and M.F. Kury. 2018. Communication after an integrity-based trust violation: How organizational account giving affects trust. European Management Journal 36, no. 2: 161–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, M.C. 1995. When attention-getting advertising tactics elicit consumer inferences of manipulative intent: The importance of balancing benefits and investments. Journal of Consumer Psychology 4, no. 3: 225–54.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, C., and N. J. Evans. 2018. The role of a companion banner and sponsorship transparency in recognizing and evaluating article-style native advertising. Journal of Interactive Marketing 43, 17–32..
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, M. 2015. When news sites go native: Redefining the advertising–editorial divide in response to native advertising. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism 16, no.7: 849–65.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, D., and W. Werther, Jr. 2014. Strategic corporate responsibility: Stakeholders, globalization, and sustainable value creation. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhri, V. 2016. Corporate social responsibility and the communication imperative: Perspectives from CSR managers. International Journal of Business Communication 53, no. 4: 419–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, C.S., Y.N. Cho, E. Ko, S.J. Kim, K.H. Kim, and M.E. Sarkees. 2019. Corporate sustainability efforts and e-WOM intentions in social platforms. International Journal of Advertising 38, no. 8: 1224–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claeys, A. S., V. Cauberghe, and P. Vyncke. 2010. Restoring reputations in times of crisis: An experimental study of the situational crisis communication theory and the moderating effects of locus of control. Public Relations Review 36, no. 3: 256–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coombs, W.T. 2004. Impact of past crises on current crisis communication: Insights from situational crisis communication theory. Journal of Business Communication 41, no. 3: 265–89.
   Google Scholar
• Coombs, W.T. 2007. Attribution theory as a guide for post-crisis communication research. Public Relations Review 33, no. 2: 135–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coombs, W.T., and S.J. Holladay. 1996. Communication and attributions in a crisis: An experimental study in crisis communication. Journal of Public Relations Research 8, no. 4: 279–95.
   Google Scholar
• Coombs, W.T., and S.J. Holladay. 2002. Helping crisis managers protect reputational assets: Initial tests of the situational crisis communication theory. Management Communication Quarterly 16, no. 2: 165–86.
   Google Scholar
• Coombs, W.T., and S.J. Holladay. 2012. Managing corporate social responsibility: A communication approach. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Coombs, W.T., and S.J. Holladay. 2015. CSR as crisis risk: Expanding how we conceptualize the relationship. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 20, no. 2: 144–62.
   Google Scholar
• Crook, I. 2019. What’s the difference between native advertising and content marketing? https://nativeadvertisinginstitute.com/blog/whats-thedifference-between-native-advertising-and-content-marketing/ (accessed January 29, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• CSR Central. 2016. CSR-style campaigns at the 2016 media awards. http://csrcentral.com/tag/coffee-vs-gangs/#:∼:text=Coffee%20vs.,Central%20American%20country%20of%20Honduras.&text=In%20addition%20to%20trying%20to,in%20building%20their%20own%20businesses. (accessed January 29, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• de Graaf, A., B. van den Putte, and G.J. de Bruijn. 2015. Effects of issue involvement and framing of a responsible drinking message on attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Journal of Health Communication 20, no. 8: 989–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detrick, H. 2018. 4 ways P&G is trying to stop people from eating Tide pods. https://fortune.com/2018/01/22/pg-stop-eating-tide-pods/ (accessed January 29, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Eisenegger, M., and M. Schranz. 2011. Reputation management and corporate social responsibility. In The handbook of corporate social responsibility, ed. Øyvind Ihlen, Jennifer L. Bartlett, and Steve May, 128–46. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ellen, P.S., D.J. Webb, and L.A. Mohr. 2006. Building corporate associations: Consumer attributions for corporate social responsible programs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 34, no. 2: 147–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fediuk, T.A., W.T. Coombs, and I.C. Botero. 2010. Exploring crisis from a receiver perspective: Understanding stakeholder reactions during crisis events. In The handbook of crisis communication, ed. W. Timothy Coombs and Sherry J. Holladay, 635–56. United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Foreh, M.R., and S. Grier. 2003. When is honesty the best policy? The effect of stated company intent on consumer skepticism. Journal of Consumer Psychology 13, no. 3: 349–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friestad, M., and P. Wright. 1994. The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research 21, no. 1: 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geue, M., and C. Plewa. 2010. Cause sponsorship: A study on congruence, attribution and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Sponsorship 3, no. 3: 228–41.
   Google Scholar
• Groza, M.D., M.R. Pronschinske, and M. Walker. 2011. Perceived organizational motives and consumer responses to proactive and reactive CSR. Journal of Business Ethics 102, no. 4: 639–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ham, C.D., and J. Kim. 2019a. The role of CSR in crises: Integration of situational crisis communication theory and the persuasion knowledge model. Journal of Business Ethics 158, no. 2: 353–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ham, C.D., and J. Kim. 2019b. The effects of CSR communication in corporate crises: Examining the role of dispositional and situational CSR skepticism in context. Public Relations Review 46, no. 2: 101792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A.F. 2018. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holiday, S., J.L. Hayes, B.C. Britt, and Y. Lyu. 2021. The cause effect: The impact of corporate social responsibility advertising on cause consumer engagement behavior after Brand affiliation ceases. International Journal of Advertising 40, no. 2: 199–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, C., S. Sen, and C.B. Bhattacharya. 2015. Corporate crises in the age of corporate social responsibility. Business Horizons 58, no. 2: 183–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalansooriya, J. 2019. 3 goals of branded content and native ads. https://blog.markgrowth.com/3-goals-of-branded-content-and-native-ads-53a43ac6bfb3 (accessed January 29, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, H.H. 1967. Attribution theory in social psychology. In Nebraska symposium on motivation, ed. D. Levine, 192–240. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, H.H. 1972. Attribution in social interaction. In Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behaviour, ed. E.E. Jones, D.E. Kanouse, H.H. Kelley, R.E. Nisbett, S. Valins, and B. Weiner, 1–26. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. 2019. Underlying processes of SCCT: Mediating roles of preventability, blame, and trust. Public Relations Review 45, no. 3: 101775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J.N., and J.E. Grunig. 2011. Problem solving and communicative action: A situational theory of problem solving. Journal of Communication 61, no. 1: 120–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., and S.M. Choi. 2018. Congruence effects in post-crisis CSR communication: The mediating role of attribution of corporate motives. Journal of Business Ethics 153, no. 2: 447–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., and M.T. Ferguson. 2014. Public expectations of CSR communication: What and how to communicate CSR. Public Relations Journal 8, no. 3: 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S., and K.H. Sung. 2014. Revisiting the effectiveness of base crisis response strategies in comparison of reputation management crisis responses. Journal of Public Relations Research 26, no. 1: 62–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiousis, S. 2001. Public trust or mistrust? Perceptions of media credibility in the information age. Mass Communication and Society 4, no. 4: 381–403.
   Google Scholar
• Kotler, P., and N. Lee. 2005. Corporate social responsibility: Doing the most good for your company and your cause. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A.Y., and J.L. Aaker. 2004. Bringing the frame into focus: The influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 86, no. 2: 205–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, B.K. 2005. Hong Kong consumers’ evaluation in an airline crash: A path model analysis. Journal of Public Relations Research 17, no. 4: 363–92.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, E.M., S.-Y. Park, and H.J. Lee. 2013. Employee perception of CSR activities: Its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Business Research 66, no. 10: 1716–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., S. Kim, and C.D. Ham. 2016. A double-edged sword? Predicting consumers’ attitudes toward and sharing intention of native advertising on social media. American Behavioral Scientist 60, no. 12: 1425–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, L., and M. Zhan. 2016. Effects of attributed responsibility and response strategies on organizational reputation: A meta-analysis of situational crisis communication theory research. Journal of Public Relations Research 28, no. 2: 102–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, B.M., and J.C. Lellis. 2015. Response to marketplace advocacy messages by sponsor and topic within the energy industry: Should corporations or industry trade groups do the talking?Journal of Applied Communication Research 43, no. 1: 66–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morsing, M., M. Schultz, and K.U. Nielsen. 2008. The ‘catch 22’of communicating CSR: Findings from a Danish study. Journal of Marketing Communications 14, no. 2: 97–111.
   Google Scholar
• Native Advertising Institute. 2018. 51 award-winning native advertising examples. https://nativeadvertisinginstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Jenna-Edit_NAI_e-book_NAA18_Casebook_2018_2311_1.pdf (accessed January 29, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Oh, H.J., R. Chen, and C.J.F. Hung-Baesecke. 2017. Exploring effects of CSR initiatives in strategic postcrisis communication among millennials in China and South Korea. International Journal of Strategic Communication 11, no. 5: 379–94.
   Google Scholar
• Rim, H., and M.A.T. Ferguson. 2020. Proactive versus reactive CSR in a crisis: An impression management perspective. International Journal of Business Communication 57, no. 4: 545–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rim, H., and D. Song. 2013. The ability of corporate blog communication to enhance CSR effectiveness: The role of prior company reputation and blog responsiveness. International Journal of Strategic Communication 7, no. 3: 165–85.
   Google Scholar
• Schaefer, S.D., R. Terlutter, and S. Diehl. 2020. Talking about CSR matters: Employees’ perception of and reaction to their company’s CSR communication in four different CSR domains. International Journal of Advertising 39, no. 2: 191–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shim, K., and S.U. Yang. 2016. The effect of bad reputation: The occurrence of crisis, corporate social responsibility, and perceptions of hypocrisy and attitudes toward a company. Public Relations Review 42, no. 1: 68–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C.R. 2017a. Native advertising: The black sheep of the marketing family. International Journal of Advertising 36, no. 2: 207–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C.R. 2017b. How to avoid marketing disasters: Back to the basic communications model, but with some updates illustrating the importance of e-word-of-mouth research. International Journal of Advertising 36, no. 4: 515–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanhamme, J., and B. Grobben. 2009. “Too good to be true!” The effectiveness of CSR history in countering negative publicity. Journal of Business Ethics 85, no. S2: 273–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlachos, P.A., A. Tsamakos, A.P. Vrechopoulos, and P.K. Avramidis. 2009. Corporate social responsibility: Attributions, loyalty, and the mediating role of trust. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 37, no. 2: 170–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, T.J., E. Kim, L. Wu, and N.A. Dodoo. 2019. Activating persuasion knowledge in native advertising: The influence of cognitive load and disclosure language. International Journal of Advertising 39, no. 1: 74–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojdynski, B.W. 2016. The deceptiveness of sponsored news articles: How readers recognize and perceive native advertising. American Behavioral Scientist 60, no. 12: 1475–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojdynski, B.W., and N.J. Evans. 2016. Going native: Effects of disclosure position and language on the recognition and evaluation of online native advertising. Journal of Advertising 45, no. 2: 157–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, L., and H. Overton. 2020. Is native advertising effective for corporate social responsibility messaging? How advertising recognition affects consumer responses to proactive versus reactive CSR. Journal of Advertising Research. doi:https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-2020-019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, M., Y. Huang, R. Li, D.S. Bortree, F. Yang, A. Xiao, and R. Wang. 2016. A tale of two sources in native advertising: Examining the effects of source credibility and priming on content, organizations, and media evaluations. American Behavioral Scientist 60, no. 12: 1492–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar