Publication Cover
International Journal of Advertising
The Review of Marketing Communications
Volume 42, 2023 - Issue 3
485
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Examining consumer reactions to sincere brands’ gratitude expressions: when a simple thank you just won’t do

, &
Pages 518-541 | Received 08 Dec 2021, Accepted 17 May 2022, Published online: 08 Jun 2022

References

  • Aaker, J. L. 1997. Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research 34, no. 3: 347–56.
  • Aaker, J. L., S. Fournier, and S. A. Brasel. 2004. When good brands do bad. Journal of Consumer Research 31, no. 1: 1–16.
  • Ambler, T., and E. A. Hollier. 2004. The waste in advertising is the part that works. Journal of Advertising Research 44, no. 4: 375–89.
  • Baek, T. H., C. Y. Yoo, and S. Yoon. 2018. Augment yourself through virtual mirror: The impact of self-viewing and narcissism on consumer responses. International Journal of Advertising 37, no. 3: 421–39.
  • Baker, M. J., and G. A. Churchill. 1977. The impact of physically attractive models on advertising evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research 14, no. 4: 538–55.
  • Bedford, G. 2013. Wounded Warrior tie-in boosts Brawny brand. Atlanta Business Chronicle. https://www.bizjournals.com/atlanta/print-edition/2013/02/22/wounded-warrior-tie-in-boosts-brawny.html?page=3. Accessed July 2021.
  • Bergami, M., and R. P. Bagozzi. 2000. Self‐categorization, affective commitment and group self‐esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization. British Journal of Social Psychology 39, no. 4: 555–77.
  • Bergkvist, L., and J. R. Rossiter. 2007. The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs. Journal of Marketing Research 44, no. 2: 175–84.
  • Bergkvist, L., and C. R. Taylor. 2016. Leveraged marketing communications: A framework for explaining the effects of secondary Brand associations. AMS Review 6, no. 3–4: 157–75.
  • Bergkvist, L., and K. Q. Zhou. 2019. Cause-related marketing persuasion research: An integrated framework and directions for further research. International Journal of Advertising 38, no. 1: 5–25.
  • Bleier, A., and M. Eisenbeiss. 2015. The importance of trust for personalized online advertising. Journal of Retailing 91, no. 3: 390–409.
  • Bock, D. E., and V. L. Thomas. 2021. Too exciting to care? When expressing gratitude is a detriment to the Brand. Journal of Advertising: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2021.1990812
  • Bock, D. E., V. L. Thomas, J. Wolter, C. Saenger, and P. Xu. 2021. An extended reciprocity cycle of gratitude. How gratitude strengthens existing and initiates new customer relationships. Psychology & Marketing 38, no. 3: 564–76.
  • Chang, C. 2011. Feeling ambivalent about going green. Journal of Advertising 40, no. 4: 19–32.
  • Chang, C. 2020. How branded videos can inspire consumers and benefit brands: Implications for consumers’ subjective wellbeing. Journal of Advertising 49, no. 5: 613–32.
  • D’Astous, A., F. A. Carrillat, and A. Przybysz. 2020. Legitimacy and sincerity as leveraging factors in social sponsorship: An experimental investigation. International Journal of Advertising 39, no. 4: 504–22.
  • Dionne, M. 2020. Little Ceasars thanking front-line workers with free pizza, Insauga. https://www.insauga.com/little-ceasars-thanking-front-line-workers-with-free-pizza/. Accessed September 2021.
  • Do, H., E. Ko, and A. G. Woodside. 2015. Tiger Woods, Nike, and I are (not) best friends: How brand’s sports sponsorship in social-media impacts Brand consumer’s congruity and relationship quality. International Journal of Advertising 34, no. 4: 658–77.
  • Dutta, S., and C. Pullig. 2011. Effectiveness of corporate responses to Brand crises: The role of crisis type and response strategies. Journal of Business Research 64, no. 12: 1281–7.
  • Edmondson, D., T. Graeff, L. Matthews, D. Roy, R. Srivastava, and C. Ward. 2020. Consumers honoring veterans and businesses that support them. Journal of Consumer Marketing 37, no. 1: 77–86.
  • Eisend, M. 2018. Explaining the use and effects of humour in advertising: An evolutionary perspective. International Journal of Advertising 37, no. 4: 526–47.
  • Ellen, P. S., L. A. Mohr, and D. J. Webb. 2000. Charitable programs and the retailer. Do they mix? Journal of Retailing 76, no. 3: 393–406.
  • Emmons, R. A., and M. E. McCullough. 2003. Counting blessings versus burdens: An experimental investigation of gratitude and subjective well‐being in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84, no. 2: 377–89.
  • Geuens, M., and P. De Pelsmacker. 2017. Planning and conducting experimental advertising research and questionnaire design. Journal of Advertising 46, no. 1: 83–100.
  • Grewal, L., and A. T. Stephen. 2019. In mobile we trust: The effects of mobile versus nonmobile reviews on consumer purchase intentions. Journal of Marketing Research 56, no. 5: 791–808.
  • Hatton, T. 2019. Who’s to blame for fast food on campus? You. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/29/style/the-edit-fast-food-college.html. Accessed September 2021.
  • Hayes, A.F. 2013. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. A regression‐based approach. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Herbst, K. C., E. J. Finkel, D. Allan, and G. M. Fitzsimons. 2012. On the dangers of pulling a fast one: Advertisement disclaimer speed, Brand trust, and purchase intention. Journal of Consumer Research 38, no. 5: 909–19.
  • Kalwani, M. U., and C. K. Yim. 1992. Consumer price and promotion expectations: An experimental study. Journal of Marketing Research 29, no. 1: 90–100.
  • Keller, K. L. 2020. Leveraging secondary associations to build brand equity: Theoretical perspectives and practical applications. International Journal of Advertising 39, no. 4: 448–65.
  • Kim, D. H., and Y. Sung. 2013. Gucci versus old navy: Interplay of brand personality and regulatory focus in advertising persuasion. Psychology & Marketing 30, no. 12: 1076–87.
  • Kim, S., S. Youn, and D. Yoon. 2019. Consumers’ responses to native vs. banner advertising: Moderation of persuasion knowledge on interaction effects of ad type and placement type. International Journal of Advertising 38, no. 2: 207–36.
  • Koch, O. F., and A. Benlian. 2015. Promotional tactics for online viral marketing campaigns: How scarcity and personalization affect seed stage referrals. Journal of Interactive Marketing 32: 37–52.
  • Kohan, S. E. 2021. YETI sales explode with 42% growth and 260% increase in net profits. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/shelleykohan/2021/05/13/yeti-sales-explode-with-42-growth-and-260-increase-in-net-profits/?sh=6d24c0a31cbb.
  • Kruger, J., D. Wirtz, L. V. Boven, and T. W. Altermatt. 2004. The effort heuristic. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 40, no. 1: 91–8.
  • Langan, R., and A. Kumar. 2019. Time versus money: The role of perceived effort in consumers’ evaluation of corporate giving. Journal of Business Research 99: 295–305.
  • Liljedal, K. T., H. Berg, and M. Dahlén. 2020. Effects of nonstereotyped occupational gender role portrayal in advertising: How showing women in male-stereotyped job roles sends positive signals about brands. Journal of Advertising Research 60, no. 2: 179–96.
  • Mandler, G. 1982. The structure of value: Accounting for taste. In Affect and cognition: The 17th Annual Carnegie Symposium, ed. M. S. Clark and S. T. Fiske, 3–36. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Meyers-Levy, J., and A. M. Tybout. 1989. Schema congruity as a basis for product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research 16, no. 1: 39–54.
  • Modig, E., M. Dahlén, and J. Colliander. 2014. Consumer-perceived signals of ‘creative’ versus ‘efficient’ advertising: Investigating the roles of expense and effort. International Journal of Advertising 33, no. 1: 137–54.
  • Mohr, L. A., and M. J. Bitner. 1995. The role of employee effort in satisfaction with service transactions. Journal of Business Research 32, no. 3: 239–52.
  • Morales, A. C. 2005. Giving firms an “E” for effort: Consumer responses to high-effort firms. Journal of Consumer Research 31, no. 4: 806–12.
  • Morales, A. C., O. Amir, and L. Lee. 2017. Keeping it real in experimental research—understanding when, where, and how to enhance realism and measure consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research 44, no. 2: 465–76.
  • Naderer, B., J. Matthes, and S. Schäfer. 2021. Effects of disclosing ads on instagram: The moderating impact of similarity to the influencer. International Journal of Advertising 40, no. 5: 686–707.
  • Neff, J. n.d. Top ad campaigns of the 21st century. https://adage.com/article/agency-news/top-15-ad-campaigns-21st-century/2162916#intro. Accessed July 2021.
  • Netemeyer, R. G., C. M. Heilman, and J. G. MaxhamIII. 2012. Identification with the retail organization and customer-perceived employee similarity: Effects on customer spending. The Journal of Applied Psychology 97, no. 5: 1049–58.
  • Osborne, J. H. 2020. Tuesday trivia: It’s national pizza month. https://www.timesnews.net/news/local-news/tuesday-trivia-its-national-pizza-month/article_e303e3f5-2135-56c5-b35f-22f630b2f315.html. Accessed September 2021.
  • Palmatier, R. W., R. P. Dant, D. Grewal, and K. R. Evans. 2006. Factors influencing the effectiveness of relationship marketing: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing 70, no. 4: 136–53.
  • Pracejus, J. W., and G. D. Olsen. 2004. The role of Brand/cause fit in the effectiveness of cause-related marketing campaigns. Journal of Business Research 57, no. 6: 635–40.
  • Radio Advertising Bureau. 2020. Radio ad effectiveness scores go sky high with COVID-19 messages. http://www.radiomatters.org/index.php/2020/06/09/radio-ad-effectiveness-scores-go-sky-high-with-covid-19-messages/. Accessed July 2021.
  • Raggio, R. D., and J. A. G. Folse. 2009. Gratitude works. Its impact and the mediating role of affective commitment in driving positive outcomes. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 37, no. 4: 455–69.
  • Raggio, R. D., and J. A. G. Folse. 2011. Expressions of gratitude in disaster management. An economic, social marketing, and public policy perspective on post-Katrina campaigns. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 30, no. 2: 168–74.
  • Schouten, A. P., L. Janssen, and M. Verspaget. 2020. Celebrity vs. influencer endorsements in advertising: The role of identification, credibility, and product-endorser fit. International Journal of Advertising 39, no. 2: 258–81.
  • Smith, T. 2020. #DisneyMagicMoments: Disney parks honor medical workers around the world. https://disneyparks.disney.go.com/blog/2020/04/disneymagicmoments-disney-parks-honor-medical-workers-around-the-world/.
  • Sundar, A., and T. J. Noseworthy. 2016. Too exciting to fail, too sincere to succeed: The effects of Brand personality on sensory disconfirmation. Journal of Consumer Research 43, no. 1: 44–67.
  • Swaminathan, V., K. M. Stilley, and R. Ahluwalia. 2009. When brand personality matters: The moderating role of attachment styles. Journal of Consumer Research 35, no. 6: 985–1002.
  • Tanis, M., and T. Postmes. 2005. A social identity approach to trust: Interpersonal perception, group membership, and trusting behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology 35, no. 3: 413–24.
  • Taylor, C. R. 2018. Red alert: On the need for more research on corporate social responsibility appeals in advertising. International Journal of Advertising 37, no. 3: 337–9.
  • Teeny, J. D., J. J. Siev, P. Briñol, and R. E. Petty. 2021. A review and conceptual framework for understanding personalized matching effects in persuasion. Journal of Consumer Psychology 31, no. 2: 382–414.
  • Thomas, V. L., and R. D. Jewell. 2019. I can’t get you out of my head: The influence of secrecy on consumers’ self‐Brand connections. Journal of Consumer Psychology 29, no. 3: 463–71.
  • Tsai, W. H. S. 2011. How minority consumers use targeted advertising as pathways to self-empowerment. Journal of Advertising 40, no. 3: 85–98.
  • Turner, J. C., M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher, and M. S. Wetherell. 1987. Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • Voorveld, H. A. M., G. van Noort, D. G. Muntinga, and F. Bronner. 2018. Engagement with social media and social media advertising: The differentiating role of platform type. Journal of Advertising 47, no. 1: 38–54.
  • Voorveld, H. A. 2019. Brand communication in social media: A research agenda. Journal of Advertising 48, no. 1: 14–26.
  • Walker, T. 2018. Where do teachers get the most respect? https://www.nea.org/advocating-for-change/new-from-nea/where-do-teachers-get-most-respect.
  • Wieden + Kennedy. 2010. P&G: Thank you, mom. https://www.wk.com/work/p-and-g-thank-you-mom/.
  • Yang, L. W., and P. Aggarwal. 2019. No small matter: How company size affects consumer expectations and evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research 45, no. 6: 1369–84.
  • You, Y., X. Yang, L. Wang, and X. Deng. 2020. When and why saying “thank you” is better than saying “sorry” in redressing service failures: The role of self-esteem. Journal of Marketing 84, no. 2: 133–50. [Mismatch ]

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.