Publication Cover
International Journal of Advertising
The Review of Marketing Communications
Volume 42, 2023 - Issue 3
1,546
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

When influencers promote unhealthy products and behaviours: the role of ad disclosures in YouTube eating shows

&
Pages 542-561 | Received 23 Feb 2021, Accepted 14 Nov 2022, Published online: 28 Nov 2022

References

  • Abidin, C. 2015. Communicative intimacies: Influencers and perceived interconnectedness.
  • Amazeen, M. A, and B. W. Wojdynski. 2020. The effects of disclosure format on native advertising recognition and audience perceptions of legacy and online news publishers. Journalism 21, no. 12: 1965–84.
  • An, S., G. Kerr, and H. S. Jin. 2019. Recognizing native ads as advertising: Attitudinal and behavioural consequences. Journal of Consumer Affairs 53, no. 4: 1421–42.
  • Ardrini, D. A. M., D. Lubis, and N. W. A. Utami. 2020. I want what they’re eating”: college students’ experiences in watching food content on YouTube. Public Health and Preventive Medicine Archive 8, no. 1: 11–6.
  • Auter, P. J. 1992. Psychometric: TV that talks back: an experimental validation of a parasocial interaction scale. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 36, no. 2: 173–81.
  • Barmore, J. 2019. Bethany Gaskin is the queen of eating shellfish online. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/11/style/youtube-mukbang-bloveslife-bethany-gaskin.html.
  • Boerman, S. C., and E. A. Van Reijmersdal. 2020. Disclosing influencer marketing on YouTube to children: the moderating role of Para-social relationship. Frontiers in Psychology 10, 3042.
  • Boerman, S. C., E. A. Van Reijmersdal, and P. C. Neijens. 2012. Sponsorship disclosure: Effects of duration on persuasion knowledge and brand responses. Journal of Communication 62, no. 6: 1047–64.
  • Boerman, S. C., E. A. Van Reijmersdal, and P. C. Neijens. 2014. Effects of sponsorship disclosure timing on the processing of sponsored content: a study on the effectiveness of European disclosure regulations. Psychology & Marketing 31, no. 3: 214–24.
  • Boerman, S. C., L. M. Willemsen, and E. P. Van Der Aa. 2017. “This post is sponsored”: effects of sponsorship disclosure on persuasion knowledge and electronic word of mouth in the context of Facebook. Journal of Interactive Marketing 38, 82–92.
  • Borchers, N. S., J. Hagelstein, and J. Beckert. 2022. Are many too much? Examining the effects of multiple influencer endorsements from a persuasion knowledge model perspective. International Journal of Advertising 41, no. 6: 1–23.
  • Breves, P. L., N. Liebers, M. Abt, and A. Kunze. 2019. The perceived fit between instagram influencers and the endorsed brand: How influencer–brand fit affects source credibility and persuasive effectiveness. Journal of Advertising Research 59 no.4: 440–54.
  • Breves, P., J. Amrehn, A. Heidenreich, N. Liebers, and H. Schramm. 2021. Blind trust? The importance and interplay of parasocial relationships and advertising disclosures in explaining influencers’ persuasive effects on their followers. International Journal of Advertising 40, no. 7: 1209–29.
  • Bruno, A. L., and S. Chung. 2017. Mŏkpang: Pay me and I’ll show you how much I can eat for your pleasure. Journal of Japanese and Korean Cinema 9, no. 2: 155–71.
  • Brusse, E. D., M. L. Fransen, and E. G. Smit. 2015. The more you say, the less they hear: the effect of disclosures in entertainment-education. Journal of Media Psychology 27, no. 4: 159–69.
  • Campbell, M. C. 1995. When attention-getting advertising tactics elicit consumer inferences of manipulative intent: the importance of balancing benefits and investments. Journal of Consumer Psychology 4, no. 3: 225–54.
  • Campbell, M. C., and N. J. Evans. 2018. The role of a companion banner and sponsorship transparency in recognizing and evaluating article-style native advertising. Journal of Interactive Marketing 43, 17–32.
  • Campbell, M. C., and L. J. Marks. 2015. Good native advertising isn’t a secret. Business Horizons 58, no. 6: 599–606.
  • Campbell, M. C., G. S. Mohr, and P. W. J. Verlegh. 2013. Can disclosures lead consumers to resist covert persuasion? The important roles of disclosure timing and type of response. Journal of Consumer Psychology 23, no. 4: 483–95.
  • Choe, H. 2019. Eating together multimodally: Collaborative eating in Mukbang, a Korean livestream of eating. Language in Society 48, no. 2: 171–208.
  • Chung, S, and H. Cho. 2017. Fostering parasocial relationships with celebrities on social media: Implications for celebrity endorsement. Psychology & Marketing 34, no. 4: 481–95.
  • Coates, A. E., C. A. Hardman, J. C. Halford, P. Christiansen, and E. J. Boyland. 2019. Social media influencer marketing and children’s food intake: a randomized trial. Pediatrics 143, no. 4: e20182554.
  • Cotte, J., R. A. Coulter, and M. Moore. 2005. Enhancing or disrupting guilt: the role of ad credibility and perceived manipulative intent. Journal of Business Research 58, no. 3: 361–8.
  • De Cicco, R., S. Iacobucci, and S. Pagliaro. 2021. The effect of influencer–product fit on advertising recognition and the role of an enhanced disclosure in increasing sponsorship transparency. International Journal of Advertising 40, no. 5: 733–59.
  • Dibble, J. L., T. Hartmann, and S. F. Rosaen. 2016. Parasocial interaction and parasocial relationship: Conceptual clarification and a critical assessment of measures. Human Communication Research 42, no. 1: 21–44.
  • Djafarova, E, and C. Rushworth. 2017. Exploring the credibility of online celebrities’ Instagram profiles in influencing the purchase decisions of young female users. Computers in Human Behavior 68, 1–7.
  • Donnar, G. 2017. Food porn’ or intimate sociality: Committed celebrity and cultural performances of overeating in Meokbang. Celebrity Studies 8, no. 1: 122–7.
  • Eisend, M., and F. Tarrahi. 2022. Persuasion knowledge in the marketplace: a meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Psychology 32, no. 1: 3–22.
  • Evans, N. J., B. W. Wojdynski, and M. Grubbs Hoy. 2019. How sponsorship transparency mitigates negative effects of advertising recognition. International Journal of Advertising 38, no. 3: 364–82.
  • Farivar, S., F. Wang, and Y. Yuan. 2021. Opinion leadership vs. para-social relationship: Key factors in influencer marketing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 59, 102371.
  • Federal Trade Commission. 2019. Disclosures 101 for social media influencers. https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/plain-language/1001a-influencer-guide-508_1.pdf (accessed November 24, 2020).
  • Folkvord, F, and M. De Bruijne. 2020. The effect of the promotion of vegetables by a social influencer on adolescents’ subsequent vegetable intake: A pilot study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17 no.7: 2243.
  • Friestad, M, and P. Wright. 1994. The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research 21, no. 1: 1–31.
  • Geyser, W. 2022. The state of influencer marketing 2022: Benchmark report. https://influencermarketinghub.com/influencer-marketing-benchmark-report/ (accessed April 24, 2022).
  • Ha, S. 2020. No “thanks to brand”… Naver strengthens regulation on ad disclosure. Yeonhap News. https://news.joins.com/article/23896966 (accessed December 29, 2020).
  • Hair, J.F. et al., 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed.; Pearson Education, Inc.: Upper Saddle River, NJ,600-638. Confirmatory factor analysis.
  • Hakimey, H., and R. Yazdanifard. 2015. The review of Mokbang (broadcast eating) phenomena and its relations with South Korean culture and society. International Journal of Management, Accounting & Economics 2, 444–56.
  • Hayes, A.F. 2013. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Hongyu ASMR. 2022. https://www.youtube.com/c/HongyuASMR/about (accessed May 16, 2022).
  • Horton, D., and R. Wohl. 1956. Mass communication and Para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry 19, no. 3: 215–29.
  • Hwang, K., and Q. Zhang. 2018. Influence of parasocial relationship between digital celebrities and their followers on followers’ purchase and electronic word-of-mouth intentions, and persuasion knowledge. Computers in Human Behavior 87, 155–73.
  • Isaac, M. S., and K. Grayson. 2017. Beyond scepticism: Can accessing persuasion knowledge bolster credibility? Journal of Consumer Research 43, no. 6: 895–912.
  • Jiang, M., B. A. McKay, J. I. Richards, and W. Snyder. 2017. Now you see me, but you don’t know: Consumer processing of native advertisements in online news sites. Journal of Interactive Advertising 17, no. 2: 92–108.
  • Jin, S. V., A. Muqaddam, and E. Ryu. 2019. Instafamous and social media influencer marketing. Marketing Intelligence & Planning 37, no. 5: 567–79.
  • Jing Wen, T., E. Kim, L. Wu, and N. A. Dodoo. 2020. Activating persuasion knowledge in native advertising: the influence of cognitive load and disclosure language. International Journal of Advertising 39, no. 1: 74–93.
  • Kang, E., J. Lee, K. H. Kim, and Y. H. Yun. 2020. The popularity of eating broadcast: Content analysis of “mukbang” YouTube videos, media coverage, and the health impact of “mukbang” on public. Health Informatics Journal 26, no. 3: 2237–48.
  • Kim, H., E. Ko, and J. Kim. 2015. SNS users’ Para-social relationships with celebrities: Social media effects on purchase intentions. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science 25, no. 3: 279–94.
  • Kim, M., and D. Song. 2018. When brand-related UGC induces effectiveness on social media: the role of content sponsorship and content type. International Journal of Advertising 37, no. 1: 105–24.
  • Kim, S.Y. 2020. Picky Sunny mention covert ad issue “I don’t do that”. Mae-Kyung Economy. https://www.mk.co.kr/star/hot-issues/view/2020/08/802856/ (accessed April 4, 2021).
  • Kircaburun, K., A. Harris, F. Calado, and M. D. Griffiths. 2020. The psychology of mukbang watching: a scoping review of the academic and non-academic literature. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction19, no.4: 1–24.
  • Knoll, J., H. Schramm, C. Schallhorn, and S. Wynistorf. 2015. Good guy vs. bad guy: the influence of parasocial interactions with media characters on brand placement effects. International Journal of Advertising 34, no. 5: 720–43.
  • Krouwer, S., K. Poels, and S. Paulussen. 2017. To disguise or to disclose? the influence of disclosure recognition and brand presence on readers’ responses toward native advertisements in online news media. Journal of Interactive Advertising 17, no. 2: 124–37.
  • Lazauskas, J. 2014. Study: Sponsored content has a trust problem. The Content Strategist. http://contently.com/strategist/2014/07/09/study-sponsored-content-has-a-trust-problem-2/ (accessed January 19, 2021)
  • Lee, J., S. Kim, and C. D. Ham. 2016. A double-edged sword? Predicting consumers’ attitudes toward and sharing intention of native advertising on social media. American Behavioral Scientist 60, no. 12: 1425–41.
  • Lee, J.E., and B. Watkins. 2016. YouTube vloggers’ influence on consumer luxury brand perceptions and intentions. Journal of Business Research 69, no. 12: 5753–60.
  • Lee, H.J. 2020. Mukbang YouTubers face criticism for undeclared paid ads. The Korea Times. https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/nation/2020/12/251_293996.html (accessed September 8, 2020).
  • Lou, C., S.-S. Tan, and X. Chen. 2019. Investigating consumer engagement with influencer-vs. brand-promoted ads: the roles of source and disclosure. Journal of Interactive Advertising 19, no. 3: 169–86.
  • Lunardo, R., and A. Mbengue. 2013. When atmospherics lead to inferences of manipulative intent: Its effects on trust and attitude. Journal of Business Research 66, no. 7: 823–30.
  • Malm, S. 2014. South Korean woman known as the diva makes £5,600 a month streaming herself eating online for three hours a day (yet manages to stay chopstick thin). Daily Mail. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2547254/South-Korean-woman-known-The-Diva-makes-9-400-month-streaming-eating-online-three-hours-day-manages-stay-chopstick-thin.html (accessed September 8, 2020).
  • MGH. 2021. (SURVEY) How TikTok influences restaurant dining behaviour. https://www.mghus.com/blog/how-tiktok-influences-restaurant-dining-behavior (accessed February 2, 2022).
  • Moses, L.J., and D.A. Baldwin. 2005. What can the study of cognitive development reveal about children’s ability to appreciate and cope with advertising? Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 24, no. 2: 186–201.
  • Munnukka, J., D. Maity, H. Reinikainen, and V. Luoma-Aho. 2019. “Thanks for watching”. The effectiveness of YouTube vlog endorsements. Computers in Human Behavior 93, 226–34.
  • Munnukka, J., O. Uusitalo, and H. Toivonen. 2016. Credibility of a peer endorser and advertising effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Marketing 33, no. 3: 182–92.
  • Oates, C., M. Blades, and B. Gunter. 2002. Children and television advertising: When do they understand persuasive intent? Journal of Consumer Behaviour 1, no. 3: 238–45.
  • Qutteina, Y., L. Hallez, N. Mennes, C. De Backer, and T. Smits. 2019. What do adolescents see on social media? A diary study of food marketing images on social media. Frontiers in Psychology 10, 2637.
  • Reinikainen, H., J. Munnukka, D. Maity, and V. Luoma-Aho. 2020. You really are a great big sister’–parasocial relationships, credibility, and the moderating role of audience comments in influencer marketing. Journal of Marketing Management 36, no. 3–4: 279–98.
  • Rubin, A. M., and E. M. Perse. 1987. Audience activity and soap opera involvement a uses and effects investigation. Human Communication Research 14, no. 2: 246–68.
  • Rubin, A. M., and M. M. Step. 2000. Impact of motivation, attraction, and parasocial interaction on talk radio listening. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 44, no. 4: 635–54.
  • Russell, C. A., B. B. Stern, and B. B. Stern. 2006. Consumers, characters, and products: a balance model of sitcom product placement effects. Journal of Advertising 35, no. 1: 7–21.
  • Sagarin, B. J., R. B. Cialdini, W. E. Rice, and S. B. Serna. 2002. Dispelling the illusion of invulnerability: the motivations and mechanisms of resistance to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83, no. 3: 526–41.
  • Sah, J. 2021. Spicy taste worked… 3 billion Buldak Noodles sold worldwide. Dong-Ah Daily. https://www.donga.com/news/article/all/20210628/107684715/1 (accessed January 28, 2022).
  • Sebastian, M. 2014. Native ad spending to jump despite marketer reservations. Advertising Age. http://adage.com/article/digital/native-ad-spending-jumps-marketers-reservations/295956/ (accessed January 26, 2021).
  • Sokolova, K., and H. Kefi. 2020. Instagram and YouTube bloggers promote it, why should I buy? How credibility and parasocial interaction influence purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 53, 101742.
  • Spears, N., and S. N. Singh. 2004. Measuring attitude toward the brand and purchase intentions. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 26, no. 2: 53–66.
  • Spence, C., M. Mancini, and G. Huisman. 2019. Digital commensality: Eating and drinking in the company of technology. Frontiers in Psychology 10, 2252.
  • Sweney, M. 2020. UK set to bring in strict new junk food rules including pre-9pm ad ban. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/jul/23/new-rules-on-junk-food-ads-could-threaten-uk-economic-recovery (accessed December 21, 2020).
  • Talavera, M. 2015. 10 reasons why influencer marketing is the next big thing. Adweek, July 14. http://www.adweek.com/digital/10-reasons-why-influencer-marketing-is-the-next-big-thing/ (accessed January 23, 2020).
  • Tukachinsky, R., and G. Stever. 2019. Theorizing development of parasocial engagement. Communication Theory 29, no. 3: 209–30.
  • Van Reijmersdal, E. A., M. L. Fransen, G. van Noort, S. J. Opree, L. Vandeberg, S. Reusch, F. van Lieshout, and S. C. Boerman. 2016. Effects of disclosing sponsored content in blogs: How the use of resistance strategies mediates effects on persuasion. The American Behavioral Scientist 60, no. 12: 1458–74.
  • Wang, A. 2010. The practices of mobile advertising disclosure on consumer trust and attitude. International Journal of Mobile Marketing 5, no. 2: 171–29.
  • Wentzel, D., T. Tomczak, and A. Herrmann. 2010. The moderating effect of manipulative intent and cognitive resources on the evaluation of narrative ads. Psychology and Marketing 27, no. 5: 510–30.
  • Wojdynski, B. W. 2016. Native advertising: Engagement, deception, and implications for theory. In The new advertising: Branding, content and consumer relationships in a data-driven social media era, eds. Brown, R. E., V. K. Jones, and M. Wang, Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger/ABC Clio. 203–236. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Bartosz_Wojdynski/publication/281972887_Native_Advertising_Engagement_Deception_and_Implications_for_Theory/links/5785c82208ae3949cf5393ce/Native-Advertising-Engagement-Deception-and-Implications-for-Theory.pdf.
  • Wojdynski, B. W., and N. J. Evans. 2016. Going native: Effects of disclosure position and language on the recognition and evaluation of online native advertising. Journal of Advertising 45, no. 2: 157–68.
  • Wright, P., M. Friestad, and D. M. Boush. 2005. The development of marketplace persuasion knowledge in children, adolescents, and young adults. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 24, no. 2: 222–33.
  • Yang, Y., and L. Ha. 2021. Why people use TikTok (Douyin) and how their purchase intentions are affected by social media influencers in China: a uses and gratifications and parasocial relationship perspective. Journal of Interactive Advertising 21, no. 3: 297–305.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.