Mucoadhesive gastroretentive microparticulate system for programmed delivery of famotidine and clarithromycin

References

• Abdel Mouez, M., et al. 2014. Bioavailability enhancement of verapamil HCl via intranasal chitosan microspheres. European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European federation for pharmaceutical sciences, 51, 59–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amidon, G.L., et al., 1995. A theoretical basis for a biopharmaceutic drug classification: the correlation of in vitro drug product dissolution and in vivo bioavailability. Pharmaceutical research, 12 (3), 413–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, M.L., Ahmed, T., and Mannan, M.A., 2016. Development of floating-mucoadhesive microsphere for site specific release of metronidazole. Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin, 6 (2), 195–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begum, S.A., and Raju, D.B., 2016. In-vitro and in-vivo evaluation of Cimetidine loaded mucoadhesive microspheres. International journal of drug delivery, 8 (2), 60–65.
   Google Scholar
• Bernkop-Schnürch, A., Hornof, M., and Zoidl, T., 2003. Thiolated polymers-thiomers: synthesis and in vitro evaluation of chitosan-2-iminothiolane conjugates. International journal of pharmaceutics, 260 (2), 229–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishnoi, M., et al., 2020. Sublingual delivery of chondroitin sulfate conjugated tapentadol loaded nanovesicles for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Journal of liposome research., 2, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunton, L. L., 2014. Goodman and Gilman's manual of pharmacology and therapeutics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Bulut, E., 2014. In-vitro evaluation of ibuprofen-loaded microspheres prepared from novel chitosan/poly (vinyl alcohol) interpenetrating polymer network. Polymer-plastics technology and engineering, 53 (4), 371–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, F. K., and Lau, J., 2016. Peptic ulcer disease. Sleisenger and Fordtran's gastrointestinal and liver disease: pathophysiology/diagnosis/management. 10th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders.
   Google Scholar
• Chordiya, M., Gangurde, H., and Borkar, V., 2017. Technologies, optimization and analytical parameters in gastroretentive drug delivery systems. Current science, 112 (05), 946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhalendra, K., et al., 2020. Alginate as promising natural polymer for pharmaceutical, food, and biomedical applications. Current drug delivery, 17, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhaliwal, S., et al., 2008. Mucoadhesive microspheres for gastroretentive delivery of acyclovir: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. The AAPS journal, 10 (2), 322–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehtezazi, T., Washington, C., and Melia, C.D., 2000. First order release rate from porous PLA microspheres with limited exit holes on the exterior surface. Journal of controlled release: official journal of the controlled release society, 66 (1), 27–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fule, R., et al., 2016. Formulation and characterization of sustained release microspheres of lornoxicam using gelatin with HPMCAS coating. Macromolecular symposia, 362 (1), 52–59., editors. Wiley Online Library.
   Google Scholar
• Gangurde, H., et al., 2011. Biodegradable chitosan-based ambroxol hydrochloride microspheres: effect of cross-linking agents. Journal of young pharmacists, 3 (1), 9–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garg, T., et al., 2014. Gastroretentive drug delivery systems for therapeutic management of peptic ulcer. Critical reviews in therapeutic drug carrier systems, 31 (6), 531–557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaur, P.K., et al., 2014. Development and optimization of gastroretentive mucoadhesive microspheres of gabapentin by Box-Behnken design. Artificial cells, nanomedicine, and biotechnology, 42 (3), 167–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibaldi, M., and Feldman, S., 1967. Establishment of sink conditions in dissolution rate determinations. Theoretical considerations and application to nondisintegrating dosage forms. Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 56 (10), 1238–1242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonsalves, K., et al., 2007. Biomedical nanostructures. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Gui, R., Wang, Y., and Sun, J., 2014. Encapsulating magnetic and fluorescent mesoporous silica into thermosensitive chitosan microspheres for cell imaging and controlled drug release in vitro. Colloids and surfaces B Biointerfaces, 113, 1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulbake, A., et al., 2016. Insight to drug delivery aspects for colorectal cancer. World journal of gastroenterology, 22 (2), 582–599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iqbal, J., et al., 2012. Preactivated thiomers as mucoadhesive polymers for drug delivery. Biomaterials, 33 (5), 1528–1535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, A., and Jain, S., 2016a. Ligand-mediated drug-targeted liposomes. UK: Future Medicine.
   Google Scholar
• Jain, A., and Jain, S.K., 2015a. Colon targeted liposomal systems (CTLS): theranostic potential. Current molecular medicine, 15 (7), 621–633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, A., and Jain, S.K., 2015b. Environmentally responsive chitosan-based nanocarriers (CBNs). Handbook of polymers for pharmaceutical technologies. Biodegradable polymers, 3, 105.
   Google Scholar
• Jain, A., and Jain, S.K., 2016b. In vitro release kinetics model fitting of liposomes: an insight. Chemistry and physics of lipids., 201, 28–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, A., and Jain, S.K., 2016c. Multipronged, strategic delivery of paclitaxel-topotecan using engineered liposomes to ovarian cancer. Drug development and industrial pharmacy, 42 (1), 136–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, A., and Jain, S.K., 2018. Stimuli-responsive smart liposomes in cancer targeting. Current drug targets, 19 (3), 259–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, A., et al., 2013. A new horizon in modifications of chitosan: syntheses and applications. Critical reviews in therapeutic drug carrier systems, 30 (2), 91–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, A., et al., 2016. Quasi emulsion spherical crystallization technique based environmentally responsive Tulsion®(pH dependent) microspheres for colon specific delivery. Journal of applied biomedicine, 14 (2), 147–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, A., et al., 2018. Ultrasound-based triggered drug delivery to tumors. Drug delivery and translational research, 8 (1), 150–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, A., et al., 2019a. Thiolated polymers: pharmaceutical tool in nasal drug delivery of proteins and peptides. International journal of peptide research and therapeutics, 25 (1), 15–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, A., et al., 2020a. Combination cancer therapy using multifunctional liposomes. Critical reviews in therapeutic drug carrier systems, 37 (2), 105–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, A., et al., 2020b. Engineered nanosponges as versatile biodegradable carriers: an insight. Journal of drug delivery science and technology, 57, 101643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, A., Hurkat, P., and Jain, S.K., 2019b. Development of liposomes using formulation by design: basics to recent advances. Chemistry and physics of lipids, 224, 104764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavianinia, I., et al., 2014. In vitro evaluation of spray‐dried chitosan microspheres crosslinked with pyromellitic  dianhydride for oral colon‐specific delivery of protein drugs. Journal of applied polymer science, 131 (15), 40514. doi:10.1002/app.40514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesharwani, P., et al., 2020. Systematic development and characterization of curcumin loaded nanogel for topical application. Drug development and industrial pharmacy, 46, 1–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, A.A., et al., 2016. Antifungal efficacy of amphotericin B encapsulated fibrin microsphere for treating Cryptococcus neoformans infection in Swiss albino mice. The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases, 20 (4), 342–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumari, A., et al., 2016. Microsponges: a pioneering tool for biomedical applications. Critical reviews in therapeutic drug carrier systems, 33 (1), 77–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumari, A., et al., 2018. Eudragit S100 coated microsponges for colon targeting of prednisolone. Drug development and industrial pharmacy, 44 (6), 902–913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laffleur, F., and Bernkop-Schnurch, A., 2012. Thiomers: promising platform for macromolecular drug delivery. Future medicinal chemistry, 4 (17), 2205–2216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laine, L., 2016. Clinical practice. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding due to a peptic ulcer. The new England journal of medicine, 374 (24), 2367–2376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, R., and Peppas, N., 1983. Chemical and physical structure of polymers as carriers for controlled release of bioactive agents: a review. Journal of macromolecular science, part c, 23 (1), 61–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, J.Y., et al., 2013. Challenges in the management of acute peptic ulcer bleeding. Lancet (London, England), 381 (9882), 2033–2043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitner, V.M., Walker, G.F., and Bernkop-Schnürch, A., 2003. Thiolated polymers: evidence for the formation of disulphide bonds with mucus glycoproteins. European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics, 56 (2), 207–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Z., et al., 2005. In vitro and in vivo studies on mucoadhesive microspheres of amoxicillin. Journal of Controlled Release, 102 (1), 135–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes, D., et al., 2014. Eradication of Helicobacter pylori: past, present and future. Journal of controlled release: official journal of the controlled release society, 189, 169–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao, S., et al., 2007. Effect of WOW process parameters on morphology and burst release of FITC-dextran loaded PLGA microspheres. International journal of pharmaceutics, 334 (1–2), 137–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagda, C., et al., 2009. Preparation and characterization of spray-dried mucoadhesive microspheres of aceclofenac. Drug development and industrial pharmacy, 35 (10), 1155–1166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panda, P.K., et al., 2019. Novel strategies for targeting prostate cancer. Current drug delivery, 16 (8), 712–727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil, M.D., Mahapatra, D.K., and Dangre, P.V., 2016. Formulation and in-vitro evaluation of once-daily sustained release matrix tablet of nifedipine using rate retardant polymers. Inventi rapid pharm tech, 4, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Prajapati, S.K., et al., 2019. Biodegradable polymers and constructs: a novel approach in drug delivery. European polymer journal, 120, 109191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha, N., et al., 2013. Design and development of sustained release microspheres of ibuprofen by emulsification solvent evaporation method using polymeric blend. Bangladesh pharmaceutical journal, 16 (1), 39–44.
   Google Scholar
• Saraf, S., et al., 2020a. Advances in liposomal drug delivery to cancer: an overview. Journal of drug delivery science and technology, 56, 101549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saraf, S., et al., 2020b. Engineered liposomes bearing camptothecin analogue for tumor targeting: in vitro and ex-vivo studies. Journal of liposome research, 11, 1–16. doi:10.1080/08982104.2020.1801725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subudhi, M.B., et al., 2015. Eudragit S100 coated citrus pectin nanoparticles for colon targeting of 5-fluorouracil. Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 8 (3), 832–849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwari, A., et al., 2018. Stimuli-responsive polysaccharides for colon targeted drug delivery. In: A.S.H. Makhlouf and N.Y. Abu-Thabit, eds. Stimuli responsive polymeric nanocarriers for drug delivery applications. 2nd ed. Sawston, UK: Woodhead Publishing, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Tiwari, A., et al., 2019. Alginate-based composites in drug delivery application. In: Md.Saquib Hasnain and Amit Kumar Nayak, editors, ALGINATES versatile polymers in biomedical applications and therapeutics. 1st ed. Apple Academic Press, 457–482.
   Google Scholar
• Torres, M.A., et al., 2007. Production of chemically modified chitosan microspheres by a spraying and coagulation method. Materials research, 10 (4), 347–352.
   Google Scholar
• Verma, A., et al., 2018. Emulgels: application potential in drug delivery. In: V. Thakur, ed. Functional biopolymers. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 343–371.
   Google Scholar
• Verma, A., et al., 2019a. Folate conjugated double liposomes bearing prednisolone and methotrexate for targeting rheumatoid arthritis. Pharmaceutical research, 36 (8), 123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma, A., et al., 2019b. Locust bean gum in drug delivery application. In: M. Hasnain, ed. Natural polysaccharides in drug delivery and biomedical applications. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, 203–222.
   Google Scholar
• Verma, A., et al., 2019c. Systematic optimization of cationic surface engineered mucoadhesive vesicles employing Design of Experiment (DoE): a preclinical investigation. International journal of biological macromolecules, 133, 1142–1155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma, A., et al., 2021. Emerging potential of niosomes in ocular delivery. Expert opinion on drug delivery, 18 (1), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Verma, A., et al., 2020. Liposomes for advanced drug delivery. In: A.K. Nayak and M.S. Hasnain, eds. Advanced biopolymeric systems for drug delivery. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 317–338.
   Google Scholar
• Zaman, M., Sajid, N., and Rehman, A.U., 2016. Gastrointestinal mucosa: the target site of mucoadhesive microspheres, a review. Advances in polymer technology, 35 (3), 269–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar