Role of acoustic cavitation in the delivery and monitoring of cancer treatment by high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU)

References

• Church CC. Spontaneous homogeneous nucleation, inertial cavitation and the safety of diagnostic ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002; 28: 1349–1364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller MW, Everbach EC, Miller WM, Battaglia LF. Biological and environmental factors affecting ultrasound-induced hemolysis in vitro: 2. Medium dissolved gas (pO(2)) content. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003; 29: 93–102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apfel RE. Acoustic cavitation series. 4. Acoustic cavitation inception. Ultrasonics 1984; 22: 167–173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neppiras EA. Acoustic cavitation. Phys Rep 1980; 61: 159–251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apfel RE. Acoustic cavitation. Methods of experimental physics, Edmonds. Academic. 1981; 19: 355–411
   Google Scholar
• Apfel RE. Acoustic cavitation prediction. J Acoust Soc Am 1981; 69: 1624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crum LA, Fowlkes JB. Acoustic cavitation generated by microsecond pulses of ultrasound. Nature 1986; 319: 52–54
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland CK, Apfel RE. Thresholds for transient cavitation produced by pulsed ultrasound in a controlled nuclei environment. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 88: 2059–2069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller DL. Acoustic cavitation series. 6. Gas body activation. Ultrasonics 1984; 22: 261–269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller DL. A review of the ultrasonic bioeffects of microsonation, gas-body activation, and related cavitation-like phenomena. Ultrasound Med Biol 1987; 13: 443–470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller DL. Update on safety of diagnostic ultrasonography. J Clin Ultrasound 1991; 19: 531–540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardinale A, Lagalla R, Giambanco V, Aragona F. Bioeffects of ultrasound: An experimental study on human embryos. Ultrasonics 1991; 29: 261–263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland CK, Deng CX, Apfel RE, Alderman JL, Fernandez LA, Taylor KJW. Direct evidence of cavitation in vivo from diagnostic ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 1996; 22: 917–925
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller MW, Miller DL, Brayman AA. A review of in vitro bioeffects of inertial ultrasonic cavitation from a mechanistic perspective. Ultrasound Med Biol 1996; 22: 1131–1154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett SB, Ter Haar GR, Ziskin MC, Rott HD, Duck FA, Maeda K. International recommendations and guidelines for the safe use of diagnostic ultrasound in medicine. Ultrasound Med Biol 2000; 26: 355–366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowlkes JB, Holland CK. Mechanical bioeffects from diagnostic ultrasound: AIUM consensus statements—Introduction. J Ultrasound Med 2000; 19: 69–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland CK, Roy RA, Biddinger PW, Disimile CJ, Cawood C. Cavitation mediated rat lung bioeffects from diagnostic ultrasound. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 109: 2433
   Google Scholar
• Church CC. A theoretical study of acoustic cavitation produced by “positive-only” and “negative-only” pressure waves in relation to in vivo studies. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology 2003; 29: 319–330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland CK, Apfel RE. An improved theory for the prediction of microcavitation thresholds. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 1989; 36: 204–208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apfel RE, Holland CK. Gauging the likelihood of cavitation from short-pulse, low-duty cycle diagnostic ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 1991; 17: 179–185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Church CC. Frequency, pulse length, and the mechanical index. Acoust Res Lett Online-Arlo 2005; 6: 162–168
   Google Scholar
• Ter Haar GR. Ultrasonic contrast agents: safety considerations reviewed. European Journal of Radiology 2002; 41: 217–221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaezy S, Martin R, Schmiedl U, Caps M, Taylor S, Beach K, Carter S, Kaczkowski P, Keilman G, Helton S, et al. Liver hemostasis using high-intensity focused ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 1997; 23: 1413–1420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaezy S, Martin R, Yaziji H, Kaczkowski P, Keilman G, Carter S, Caps M, Chi EY, Bailey M, Crum L. Hemostasis of punctured blood vessels using high-intensity focused ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 1998; 24: 903–910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin RW, Vaezy S, Kaczkowski P, Keilman G, Carter S, Caps M, Beach K, Plettt M, Crum L. Hemostasis of punctured vessels using Doppler-guided high-intensity ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 1999; 25: 985–990
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaezy S, Martin R, Kaczkowski P, Keilman G, Goldman B, Yaziji H, Carter S, Caps M, Crum L. Use of high-intensity focused ultrasound to control bleeding. J Vasc Surg 1999; 29: 533–542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poliachik SL, Chandler WL, Mourad PD, Ollos RJ, Crum LA. Activation, aggregation and adhesion of platelets exposed to high-intensity focused ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 2001; 27: 1567–1576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaezy S, Martin R, Crum L. High intensity focused ultrasound: A method of hemostasis. Echocardiography 2001; 18: 309–315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang JH, Vaezy S, Martin RW, Cho MY, Noble ML, Crum LA, Kimmey MB. High-intensity focused US: A potential new treatment for GI bleeding. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2003; 58: 111–115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaezy S, Noble ML, Keshavarzi A, Paun M, Prokop AF, Cornejo C, Sharar S, Chi EY, Crum LA, Martin RW. Liver hemostasis with high-intensity ultrasound—Repair and healing. J Ultrasound Med 2004; 23: 217–225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaezy S, Vaezy S, Starr F, Chi E, Cornejo C, Crum L, Martin RW. Intra-operative acoustic hemostasis of liver: Production of a homogenate for effective treatment. Ultrasonics 2005; 43: 265–269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zderic V, Keshavarzi A, Noble ML, Paun M, Sharar SR, Crum LA, Martin RW. Hemorrhage control in arteries using high-intensity focused ultrasound: A survival study. Ultrasonics 2006; 44: 46–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivens IH, Rowland I, Denbow M, Fisk NM, Leach MO, Ter Haar GR. Focused ultrasound surgery-induced vascular occlusion in fetal medicine. Proceedings of SPIE 2003; 3249: 260
   Google Scholar
• Denbow ML, Rivens IH, Rowland IJ, Leach MO, Fisk NM, Ter Haar GR. Preclinical development of noninvasive vascular occlusion with focused ultrasonic surgery for fetal therapy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182: 387–392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trubestein G, Engel C, Etzel F, Sobbe A, Cremer H, Stumpff U. Thrombolysis by ultrasound. Clin Sci Mol Med Suppl 1976; 3: 697s–698s
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lauer CG, Burge R, Tang DB, Bass BG, Gomez ER, Alving BM. Effect of ultrasound on tissue-type plasminogen activator-induced thrombolysis. Circulation 1992; 86: 1257–1264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo H, Steffen W, Cercek B, Arunasalam S, Maurer G, Siegel RJ. Enhancement of thrombolysis by external ultrasound. Am Heart J 1993; 125: 1564–1569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sehgal CM, Leveen RF, Shlansky-Goldberg RD. Ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis. Invest Radiol 1993; 28: 939–943
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson SB, Johansson B, Nilsson AM, Olsson C, Roijer A. Enhancement of thrombolysis by ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 1994; 20: 375–382
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornowski R, Meltzer RS, Chernine A, Vered Z, Battler A. Does external ultrasound accelerate thrombolysis? Results from a rabbit model. Circulation 1994; 89: 339–344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shlansky-Goldberg RD, Cines DB, Sehgal CM. Catheter-delivered ultrasound potentiates in vitro thrombolysis. J Vascular and Interventional Radiology 1996; 7: 313–320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamm CW, Steffen W, Terres W, De Scheerder I, Reimers J, Cumberland D, Siegel RJ, Meinertz T. Intravascular therapeutic ultrasound thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarctions. Am J Cardiol 1997; 80: 200–204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tachibana K. Prototype therapeutic ultrasound emitting catheter for accelerating thrombolysis. Am Inst Ultrasound Med 1997; 16: 529–535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter TR, Kricsfeld D, Lof J, Everbach EC, Xie F. Effectiveness of transcranial and transthoracic ultrasound and microbubbles in dissolving intravascular thrombi. J Ultrasound Med 2001; 20: 1313–1325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw GJ, Meunier JM, Cheng JY, Holland CK. Duty cycle dependence of ultrasound enhanced thrombolysis in an in-vitro human clot model. Ann Emerg Med 2005; 46: S27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parikh DS, Tiukinhoy-Laing S, Huang SL, Holland CK, MacDonald RC, McPherson DD, Klegerman ME. Targeting of tissue plasminogen activator-loaded echogenic liposomes for site-specific thrombolysis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2006; 26: E102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tata DB, Biglow J, Wu J, Tritton TR, Dunn F. Ultrasound-enhanced hydroxyl radical production from two clinically employed anti-cancer drugs, adriamycin and mitomycin C. Ultrason Sonochem 1996; 3: 39–45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umemura SI, Yumita N, Nishigaki R, Umemura K. Sonochemical activation of hematoporphyrin: A potential modality for cancer treatment. Ultrason Symp 1989 Proc, IEEE 1989 1989; 955–960
   Google Scholar
• Jeffers J, Feng RQ, Fowlkes JB, Brenner DE, Cain CA. Sonodynamic therapy: Activation of anticancer agents with ultrasound. Ultrason Symp 1991 Proc, IEEE 1991 1991; 1367–1370
   Google Scholar
• Miyoshi N, Misik V, Fukuda M, Riesz P. Effect of gallium-porphyrin analogue ATX-70 on nitroxide formation from a cyclic secondary amine by ultrasound: On the mechanism of sonodynamic activation. Radiat Res 1995; 143: 194–202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynynen K, McDannold N, Vykhodtseva N, Jolesz FA. Noninvasive MR imaging-guided focal opening of the blood-brain barrier in rabbits. Radiology 2001; 220: 640–646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesiwala AH, Farrell L, Wenzel HJ, Silbergeld DL, Crum LA, Winn HR, Mourad PD. High-intensity focused ultrasound selectively disrupts the blood-brain barrier in vivo. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002; 28: 389–400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynynen K, McDannold N, Martin H, Jolesz FA, Vykhodtseva N. The threshold for brain damage in rabbits induced by bursts of ultrasound in the presence of an ultrasound contrast agent (Optison (R)). Ultrasound Med Biol 2003; 29: 473–481
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDannold N, Vykhodtseva N, Jolesz FA, Hynynen K. MRI investigation of the threshold for thermally induced blood-brain barrier disruption and brain tissue damage in the rabbit brain. Magn Reson Med 2004; 51: 913–923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheikov N, McDannold N, Vykhodtseva N, Jolesz F, Hynynen K. Cellular mechanisms of the blood–brain barrier opening induced by ultrasound in presence of microbubbles. Ultrasound Med Biol 2004; 30: 979–989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynynen K, McDannold N, Sheikov NA, Jolesz FA, Vykhodtseva N. Local and reversible blood–brain barrier disruption by noninvasive focused ultrasound at frequencies suitable for trans-skull sonications. Neuroimage 2005; 24: 12–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDannold N, Vykhodtseva N, Raymond S, Jolesz FA, Hynynen K. MRI-guided targeted blood–brain barrier disruption with focused ultrasound: Histological findings in rabbits. Ultrasound Med Biol 2005; 31: 1527–1537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynynen K, McDannold N, Vykhodtseva N, Raymond S, Weissleder R, Jolesz FA, Sheikov N. Focal disruption of the blood–brain barrier due to 260-kHz ultrasound bursts: A method for molecular imaging and targeted drug delivery. J Neurosurg 2006; 105: 445–454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinoshita M, McDannold N, Jolesz FA, Hynynen K. Noninvasive localized delivery of Herceptin to the mouse brain by MRI-guided focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier disruption. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103: 11719–11723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinoshita M, McDannold N, Jolesz FA, Hynynen K. Targeted delivery of antibodies through the blood–brain barrier by MRI-guided focused ultrasound. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2006; 340: 1085–1090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDannold N, Vykhodtseva N, Hynynen K. Targeted disruption of the blood-brain barrier with focused ultrasound: Association with cavitation activity. Phys Med Biol 2006; 51: 793–807
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao SP, Thrall BD, Miller DL. Transfection of a reporter plasmid into cultured cells by sonoporation in vitro. Ultrasound Med Biol 1997; 23: 953–959
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller DL, Bao SP, Gies RA, Thrall BD. Ultrasonic enhancement of gene transfection in murine melanoma tumors. Ultrasound Med Biol 1999; 25: 1425–1430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller DL, Dou CY, Song JM. DNA transfer and cell killing in epidermoid cells by diagnostic ultrasound activation of contrast agent gas bodies in vitro. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003; 29: 601–607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everbach EC, Francis CW. Cavitational mechanisms in ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis at 1 MHz. Ultrasound Med Biol 2000; 26: 1153–1160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta S, Coussios CC, McAdory LE, Tan J, Porter T, De Courten-Myers G, Holland CK. Correlation of cavitation with ultrasound enhancement of thrombolysis. Ultrasound Med Biol 2006; 32: 1257–1267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller DL, Pislaru SV, Greenleaf JF. Sonoporation: Mechanical DNA delivery by ultrasonic cavitation. Som Cell Mol Genet 2002; 27: 115–134
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ohl CD, Arora M, Ikink R, De Jong N, Versluis M, Delius M, Lohse D. Sonoporation from jetting cavitation bubbles. Biophys J 2006; 91: 4285–4295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J, Ross JP, Chui JF. Repairable sonoporation generated by microstreaming. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2002; 111: 1460–1464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry WJ, Fry RB. Temperature changes produced in tissue during ultrasonic irradiation. J Acoust Soc Am 1953; 25: 6–11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnard JW, Fry WJ, Fry FJ, Krumins RF. Effects of high intensity ultrasound on the central nervous system of the cat. J Comp Neurol 1955; 103: 459–484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry WJ, Mosberg WH, Jr, Barnard JW, Fry FJ. Production of focal destructive lesions in the central nervous system with ultrasound. J Neurosurg 1954; 11: 471–478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy JE. High-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of solid tumours. Nat Rev Cancer 2005; 5: 321–327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooney JA, Gammell PM, Hestenes JD, Chin HP, Blankenhorn DH. Velocity and attenuation of sound in arterial tissues. J Acoust Soc Am 1982; 71: 462–466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker KJ. Ultrasonic attenuation and absorption in liver tissue. Ultrasound Med Biol 1983; 9: 363–369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill CR, Bamber JC, Haar GR. Physical principles of medical ultrasonics. John Wiley & Sons. 2004
   Google Scholar
• Chivers RC, Hill CR. Ultrasonic attenuation in human tissue. Ultrasound Med Biol 1975; 2: 25–29
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hynynen K, Watmough DJ, Mallard JR. Design of ultrasonic transducers for local hyperthermia. Ultrasound Med Biol 1981; 7: 397–402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill CR. Optimum acoustic frequency for focused ultrasound surgery. Ultrasound Med Biol 1994; 20: 271–277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynynen K. The threshold for thermally significant cavitation in dog thigh muscle in vivo. Ultrasound Med Biol 1991; 17: 157–169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt RG, Roy RA. Measurements of bubble-enhanced heating from focused, MHz-frequency ultrasound in a tissue-mimicking material. Ultrasound Med Biol 2001; 27: 1399–1412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller DL, Gies RA. The interaction of ultrasonic heating and cavitation in vascular bioeffects on mouse intestine. Ultrasound Med Biol 1998; 24: 123–128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen WS, Lafon C, Matula TJ, Vaezy S, Crum LA. Mechanisms of lesion formation in high intensity focused ultrasound therapy. Acoust Res Lett Online 2003; 4: 41–46
   Google Scholar
• Farny CH. Identifying and monitoring the roles of cavitation in heating from high intensity focussed ultrasound. Boston University, Boston 2006
   Google Scholar
• Leighton TG. The acoustic bubble. Academic Press, London 1994
   Google Scholar
• Mellen RH. Ultrasonic spectrum of cavitation noise in water. J Acoust Soc Am 1954; 26: 356–360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt RG, Crum LA. Acoustically forced-oscillations of air bubbles in water—Experimental results. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 91: 1924–1932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynynen K. The role of nonlinear ultrasound propagation during hyperthermia treatments. Med Phys 1991; 18: 1156–1163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang X, Church CC. A model for the dynamics of gas bubbles in soft tissue. J Acoust Soc Am 2005; 118: 3595–3606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabkin BA, Zderic V, Vaezy S. Hyperecho in ultrasound images of HIFU therapy: Involvement of cavitation. Ultrasound Med Biol 2005; 31: 947–956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damianou C, Hynynen K. The effect of various physical parameters on the size and shape of necrosed tissue volume during ultrasound surgery. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 95: 1641–1649
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damianou CA, Hynynen K, Fan XB. Evaluation of accuracy of a theoretical-model for predicting the necrosed tissue volume during focused ultrasound surgery. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 1995; 42: 182–187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meaney PM, Cahill MD, Ter Haar GR. The intensity dependence of lesion position shift durig focused ultrasound surgery. Ultrasound Med Biol 2000; 26: 441–450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey MR, Couret LN, Sapozhnikov OA, Khokhlova VA, ter Haar G, Vaezy S, Shi XG, Martin R, Crum LA. Use of overpressure to assess the role of bubbles in focused ultrasound lesion shape in vitro. Ultrasound Med Biol 2001; 27: 695–708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khokhlova VA, Bailey MR, Reed JA, Cunitz BW, Kaczkowski PJ, Crum LA. Effects of nonlinear propagation, cavitation, and boiling in lesion formation by high intensity focused ultrasound in a gel phantom. J Acoust Soc Am 2006; 119: 1834–1848
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prosperetti A. Thermal effects and damping mechanisms in forced radial oscillations of gas-bubbles in liquids. J Acoust Soc Am 1977; 61: 17–27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prosperetti A. Acoustic cavitation series. 2. Bubble phenomena in sound fields 1. Ultrasonics 1984; 22: 69–78
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minnaert M. On musical air bubbles and the sounds of running water. Philos Mag 1933; 16: 235–248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt RG, Roy RA. Bubble dynamics in therapeutic ultrasound. Bubble and particle dynamics in acoustic fields: Modern trends and applications, A Dionikov. Transworld Research Network, Kerala 2005; 108–229
   Google Scholar
• Prosperetti A. Acoustic cavitation series 3. Bubble phenomena in sound fields 2. Ultrasonics 1984; 22: 115–124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apfel RE. Acoustic cavitation. Methods Exp Phys (ed PD Edmonds) 1981; 19: 355–411
   Google Scholar
• Yang XM, Church CC. A simple viscoelastic model for soft tissues in the frequency range 6–20 MHz. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2006; 53: 1404–1411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller JB, Miksis M. Bubble oscillations of large amplitude. J Acoust Soc Am 1980; 68: 628–633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prosperetti A, Lezzi A. Bubble dynamics in a compressible liquid 1. 1st-order theory. J Fluid Mech 1986; 168: 457–478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crum LA, Hansen GM. Generalized equations for rectified diffusion. J Acoust Soc Am 1982; 72: 1586–1592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Church CC. Prediction of rectified diffusion during nonlinear bubble pulsations at biomedical frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 83: 2210–2217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elder SA. Cavitation microstreaming. J Acoust Soc Am 1959; 31: 54–64
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyborg WLM. Acoustic streaming. Physical Acoustics, WP Mason. Academic Press, New York 1965; IIB: 265–331
   Google Scholar
• Miller DL. Particle gathering and microstreaming near ultrasonically activated gas-filled micropores. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 84: 1378–1387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J, Du G. Streaming generated by a bubble in an ultrasound field. J Acoust Soc Am 1997; 101: 1899–1907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooney JA. Acoustic streaming as a mechanism in treatment of suspensions. J Acoust Soc Am 1970; 48: 114–117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooney JA. Hemolysis near an ultrasonically pulsating gas bubble. Science 1970; 169: 869–871
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams AR. Disorganization and disruption of mammalian and amoeboid cells by acoustic microstreaming. J Acoust Soc Am 1972; 52: 688–693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey EN. Sonoluminescence and sonic chemiluminescence. J Am Chem Soc 1939; 61: 2392–2398
   Google Scholar
• Suslick KS. Sonochemistry. Science 1990; 247: 1439–1445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy RA. Physical aspects of sonoluminescence from acoustic cavitation. Ultrason Sonochem 1994; 1: S5–S8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilgenfeldt S, Lohse D. The acoustics of diagnostic microbubbles: Dissipative effects and heat deposition. Ultrasonics 2000; 38: 99–104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen JS, Roy RA, Church CC. On the role of shear viscosity in mediating inertial cavitation from short-pulse, megahertz-frequency ultrasound. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 1997; 44: 743–751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atchley AA, Prosperetti A. The crevice model of bubble nucleation. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 86: 1065–1084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu T, Wang G, Hu K, Ma P, Bai J, Wang Z. A microbubble agent improves the therapeutic efficiency of high intensity focused ultrasound: A rabbit kidney study. Urol Res 2004; 32: 14–19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Umemura S, Kawabata K, Sasaki K. In vivo acceleration of ultrasonic tissue heating by microbubble agent. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2005; 52: 1690–1698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaneko Y, Maruyama T, Takegami K, Watanabe T, Mitsui H, Hanajiri K, Nagawa H, Matsumoto Y. Use of a microbubble agent to increase the effects of high intensity focused ultrasound on liver tissue. Eur Radiol 2005; 15: 1415–1420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDannold NJ, Vykhodtseva NI, Hynynen K. Microbubble contrast agent with focused ultrasound to create brain lesions at low power levels: MR imaging and histologic study in rabbits. Radiology 2006; 241: 95–106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apfel RE. Vapor nucleation at a liquid-liquid interface. J Chem Phys 1971; 54: 62–63
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller DL, Thomas RM. Ultrasound contrast agents nucleate inertial cavitation in-vitro. Ultrasound Med Biol 1995; 21: 1059–1065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ophir J, Parker KJ. Contrast agents in diagnostic ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 1989; 15: 319–333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong N, Ten Cate FJ, Lancee CT, Roelandt JR, Bom N. Principles and recent developments in ultrasound contrast agents. Ultrasonics 1991; 29: 324–330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Church CC. The effects of an elastic solid-surface layer on the radial pulsations of gas-bubbles. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 97: 1510–1521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen JS, May DJ, Ferrara KW. Dynamics of therapeutic ultrasound contrast agents. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002; 28: 805–816
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stride E, Saffari N. Theoretical and experimental investigation of the behaviour of ultrasound contrast agent particles in whole blood. Ultrasound Med Biol 2004; 30: 1495–1509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poliachik SL, Chandler WL, Mourad PD, Bailey MR, Bloch S, Cleveland RO, Kaczkowski P, Keilman G, Porter T, Crum LA. Effect of high-intensity focused ultrasound on whole blood with and without microbubble contrast agent. Ultrasound Med Biol 1999; 25: 991–998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coussios CC, Holland CK, Jakubowska L, Huang SL, MacDonald RC, Nagaraj A, McPherson DD. In vitro characterization of liposomes and Optison (R) by acoustic scattering at 3.5 MHz. Ultrasound Med Biol 2004; 30: 181–190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller DL, Williams AR. Nucleation and evolution of ultrasonic cavitation in a rotating exposure chamber. J Ultrasound Med 1992; 11: 407–412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farny CH, Wu TM, Holt RG, Murray TW, Roy RA. Nucleating cavitation from laser-illuminated nano-particles. Acoust Res Lett Online 2005; 6: 138–143
   Google Scholar
• Miller DL, Kripfgans OD, Fowlkes JB, Carson PL. Cavitation nucleation agents for nonthermal ultrasound therapy. J Acoust Soc Am 2000; 107: 3480–3486
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Z, Fowlkes JB, Cain CA. A new strategy to enhance cavitational tissue erosion using a high-intensity, initiating sequence. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2006; 53: 1412–1424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt RG, Roy RA, Edson PE, Yang XM. Bubbles and HIFU: The good, the bad and the ugly. International Symposium of Therapeutic Ultrasound 2003, MA Andrew, LA Crum, S Vaezy. American Institute of Physics, Seattle 2003; 120–131
   Google Scholar
• Hilgenfeldt S, Lohse D, Zomack M. Sound scattering and localized heat deposition of pulse-driven microbubbles. J Acoust Soc Am 2000; 107: 3530–3539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edson PL. The role of acoustic cavitation in enhanced ultrasound-induced heating in a tissue-mimicking phantom. Boston University, Boston 2001
   Google Scholar
• Yang XM, Roy RA, Holt RG. Bubble dynamics and size distributions during focused ultrasound insonation. J Acoust Soc Am 2004; 116: 3423–3431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eller A, Flynn HG. Rectified diffusion during nonlinear pulsations of cavitation bubbles. J Acoust Soc Am 1965; 37: 493–503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eller AI. Growth of bubbles by rectified diffusion. J Acoust Soc Am 1969; 46: 1246–1250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crum LA, Hansen GM. Growth of air bubbles in tissue by rectified diffusion. Phys Med Biol 1982; 27: 413–417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang XM. Investigation of bubble dynamics and heating during focused ultrasound insonation in tissue-mimicking materials. Boston University, Boston 2003
   Google Scholar
• Miller DL, Thomas RM. Thresholds for hemorrhages in mouse skin and intestine induced by lithotripter shock-waves. Ultrasound Med Biol 1995; 21: 249–257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller DL, Creim JA, Gies RA. Heating vs. cavitation in the induction of mouse hindlimb paralysis by ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 1999; 25: 1145–1150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokka SD, King R, Hynynen K. MRI-guided gas bubble enhanced ultrasound heating in in vivo rabbit thigh. Phys Med Biol 2003; 48: 223–241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokka SD, Vykhodtseva N, Hynynen K. Cavitation-enhanced ultrasound heating in vivo: Therapy protocols, mechanisms, and acoustic and MRI monitoring. J Acoust Soc Am 2006; 119: 3227
   Google Scholar
• Huang J, Holt RG, Cleveland RO, Roy RA. Experimental validation of a tractable numerical model for focused ultrasound heating in flow-through tissue phantoms. J Acoust Soc Am 2004; 116: 2451–2458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafon C, Zderic V, Noble ML, Yuen JC, Kaczkowski PJ, Sapozhnikov OA, Chavrier F, Crum LA, Vaezy S. Gel phantom for use in high-intensity focused ultrasound dosimetry. Ultrasound Med Biol 2005; 31: 1383–1389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang P, Everbach EC, Apfel RE. Applications of mixture laws for predicting the compositions of tissue phantoms. Ultrasound Med Biol 1991; 17: 829–838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ANSI technical report: Bubble detection and cavitation monitoring. Mellive, NY, 2002. Standards Secretariat, Acoustical Society of America
   Google Scholar
• Leighton TG. A strategy for the development and standardisation of measurement methods for high power/cavitating ultrasonic fields: Review of cavitation monitoring techniques. University of Southampton—Institute of Sound and Vibration Research. 1997
   Google Scholar
• Pennes HH. Analysis of tissue and arterial blood temperatures in the resting human forearm. J Appl Physiol 1948; 1: 93–122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynynen K. Demonstration of enhanced temperature elevation due to nonlinear propagation of focused ultrasound in dogs thigh in vivo. Ultrasound Med Biol 1987; 13: 85–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke RL, Bush NL, Ter Haar GR. The changes in acoustic attenuation due to in vitro heating. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003; 29: 127–135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zderic V, Keshavarzi A, Andrew MA, Vaezy S, Martin RW. Attenuation of porcine tissues in vivo after high-intensity ultrasound treatment. Ultrasound Med Biol 2004; 30: 61–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao Y, Prosperetti A. The dynamics of vapor bubbles in acoustic pressure fields. Phys Fluid 1999; 11: 2008–2019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prosperetti A, Hao Y. Vapor bubbles in flow and acoustic fields. Microgravity transport processes in fluid, thermal, biological, and materials sciences, SS Sadhal. New York Academy of Sciences, New York 2002; 328–347
   Google Scholar
• Konofagou EE, Thierman J, Karjalainen T, Hynynen K. The temperature dependence of ultrasound-stimulated acoustic emission. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002; 28: 331–338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaezy S, Shi XG, Martin RW, Chi E, Nelson PI, Bailey MR, Crum LA. Real-time visualization of high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment using ultrasound imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 2001; 27: 33–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan AH, Fujimoto VY, Moore DE, Martin RW, Vaezy S. An image-guided high intensity focused ultrasound device for uterine fibroids treatment. Med Phys 2002; 29: 2611–2620
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo J, Tran BC, Hall TL, Fowlkes JB, Abrams GD, O’Donnell M, Cain CA. Evaluation of ultrasound tissue damage based on changes in image echogenicity in canine kidney. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2005; 52: 1111–1120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Held RT, Zderic V, Nguyen TN, Vaezy S. Annular phased-array high-intensity focused ultrasound device for image-guided therapy of uterine fibroids. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2006; 53: 335–348
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coussios CC, Farny CH, Thomas CR, Cleveland RO, Holt RG, Roy RA. Cavitation detection during and following HIFU exposure in vitro. J Acoust Soc Am 2004; 115: 2448
   Google Scholar
• Rabkin BA, Zderic V, Crum LA, Vaezy S. Biological and physical mechanisms of HIFU-induced hyperecho in ultrasound images. Ultrasound Med Biol 2006; 32: 1721–1729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas CR, Farny CH, Coussios CC, Roy RA, Holt RG. Dynamics and control of cavitation during high-intensity focused ultrasound application. Acoust Res Lett Online 2005; 6: 182–187
   Google Scholar
• Chapelon JY, Dupenloup F, Cohen H, Lenz P. Reduction of cavitation using pseudorandom signals [therapeutic US]. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 1996; 43: 623–625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Z, Ludomirsky A, Eun LY, Hall TL, Tran BC, Fowlkes JB, Cain CA. Controlled ultrasound tissue erosion. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2004; 51: 726–736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokka SD, Gauthier TP, Hynynen K. Theoretical and experimental validation of a dual-frequency excitation method for spatial control of cavitation. Phys Med Biol 2005; 50: 2167–2179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Z, Fowlkes JB, Rothman ED, Levin AM, Cain CA. Controlled ultrasound tissue erosion: The role of dynamic interaction between insonation and microbubble activity. J Acoust Soc Am 2005; 117: 424–435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo AH, Kripfgans OD, Carson PL, Fowlkes JB. Spatial control of gas bubbles and their effects on acoustic fields. Ultrasound Med Biol 2006; 32: 95–106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts WW, Hall TL, Ives K, Wolf JS, Fowlkes JB, Cain CA. Pulsed cavitational ultrasound: A noninvasive technology for controlled tissue ablation (histotripsy) in the rabbit kidney. J Urol 2006; 175: 734–738
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar