Development and validation of a MRgHIFU non-invasive tissue acoustic property estimation technique

References

• Napoli A, Anzidei M, Ciolina F, et al. MR-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound: current status of an emerging technology. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2013;36:1190–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinden D, Haar G. Dosimetry implications for correct ultrasound dose deposition: uncertainties in descriptors, planning and treatment delivery. Transl Cancer Res 2014;3:459–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapareto SA, Dewey WC. Thermal dose determination in cancer therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1984;10:787–800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang CW, Sun MK, Chen BT, et al. Simulation of thermal ablation by high-intensity focused ultrasound with temperature-dependent properties. Ultrason Sonochem 2015;27:456–65.
   Google Scholar
• El-Brawany MA, Nassiri DK, Terhaar G, et al. Measurement of thermal and ultrasonic properties of some biological tissues. J Med Eng Technol 2009;33:249–56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mcdannold N, Tempany CM, Fennessy FM, et al. Uterine leiomyomas: MR imaging–based thermometry and thermal dosimetry during focused ultrasound thermal ablation 1. Radiology 2006;240:263–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damianou CA, Sanghvi NT, Fry FJ, Maass-Moreno R. Dependence of ultrasonic attenuation and absorption in dog soft tissues on temperature and thermal dose. J Acoust Soc Am 1997;102:628–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gertner MR, Wilson BC, Sherar MD. Ultrasound properties of liver tissue during heating. Ultrasound Med Biol 1997;23:1395–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke RL, Bush NL, Ter Haar GR. The changes in acoustic attenuation due to in vitro heating. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003;29:127–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worthington AE, Sherar MD. Changes in ultrasound properties of porcine kidney tissue during heating. Ultrasound Med Biol 2001;27:673–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Techavipoo U, Varghese T, Chen Q, et al. Temperature dependence of ultrasonic propagation speed and attenuation in excised canine liver tissue measured using transmitted and reflected pulses. J Acoust Soc Am 2004;115:2859–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi MJ, Guntur SR, Lee JM, et al. Changes in ultrasonic properties of liver tissue in vitro during heating-cooling cycle concomitant with thermal coagulation. Ultrasound Med Biol 2011;37:2000–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemmerer JP, Oelze ML. Ultrasonic assessment of thermal therapy in rat liver. Ultrasound Med Biol 2012;38:2130–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghoshal G, Luchies AC, Blue JP, Oelze ML. Temperature dependent ultrasonic characterization of biological media. J Acoust Soc Am 2011;130:2203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meaney P, Clarke R. A 3-D finite-element model for computation of temperature profiles and regions of thermal damage during focused ultrasound surgery exposures. Ultrasound Med Biol 1998;24:1489–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prakash P, Diederich CJ. Considerations for theoretical modelling of thermal ablation with catheter-based ultrasonic sources: implications for treatment planning, monitoring and control. Int J Hyperthermia 2012;28:69–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahimian S, Tavakkoli J. Estimating dynamic changes of tissue attenuation coefficient during high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment. Rahimian Tavakkoli J Ther Ultrasound 2013;1:14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bevan PD, Sherar MD. B-scan ultrasound imaging of thermal coagulation in bovine liver: log envelope slope attenuation mapping. Ultrasound Med Biol 2001;27:809–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Wan M, Zhong H, et al. Dynamic changes of integrated backscatter, attenuation coefficient and bubble activities during High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) treatment. Ultrasound Med Biol 2009;35:1828–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaezy S, Shi X, Martin RW, et al. Real-time visualization of high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment using ultrasound imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 2001;27:33–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemor RM, Hoss M, Peter L, et al. Three dimensional ultrasonic monitoring of interstitial thermal tumor therapies: in vivo results. IEEE Symp Ultrasonics 2003;2:1284–7.
   Google Scholar
• Azuma T, Sasaki K, Kawabata K, Umemura S. Tissue expansion imaging for tissue coagulation mapping during high intensity focused ultrasound therapy. Proceedings of the IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium 2006. Vancouver, BC. pp 1770–3.
   Google Scholar
• Parker KJ. Effects of heat conduction and sample size on ultrasonic absorption measurements. J Acoust Soc Am 1985;77:719–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris H, Rivens I, Shaw A, ter Haar G. Measurement of acoustic attenuation and absorption coefficients using thermometry. AIP Conference Proceedings [Internet]. 2007. p. 138–43. Available from: http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/proceeding/aipcp/10.1063/1.2744264
   Google Scholar
• Duback DW, Brien WDO. An automated system for measurement of absorption coefficients using the transient thermoelectric technique. IEEE Ultrasonnics Symposium. 1979. New Orleans, LA. pp 388–91.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan J, Mei C-S, Panych LP, et al. Towards fast and accurate temperature mapping with proton resonance frequency-based MR thermometry. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2012;2:21–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guy AW, Lehmann JF, Stonebridge JB. Therapeutic applications of electromagnetic power. Proc IEEE 1974;62:55–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon CR, Vyas U, Payne A, et al. An analytical solution for improved HIFU SAR estimation. Phys Med Biol 2012;57:4527–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vyas U, Christensen D. Ultrasound beam simulations in inhomogeneous tissue geometries using the hybrid angular spectrum method. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2012;59:1093–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrer AI, Odéen H, de Bever J, et al. Characterization and evaluation of tissue-mimicking gelatin phantoms for use with MRgFUS. J Ther Ultrasound 2015;3:9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruvada S, Harris GR, Herman BA, King RL. Acoustic power calibration of high-intensity focused ultrasound transducers using a radiation force technique. J Acoust Soc Am 2007;121:1434–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeqiri B, Scholl W, Robinson SP. Measurement and testing of the acoustic properties of materials: a review. Metrologia 2010;47:S156–S71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le LH. An investigation of pulse-timing techniques for broadband ultrasonic velocity determination in cancellous bone: a simulation study. Physics Med Biol 1998;43:2295–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron J. Physical properties of tissue. A comprehensive reference book, edited by Francis A. Duck. Med Phys 1991;18:834.
   Google Scholar
• Parker NG, Povey MJW. Ultrasonic study of the gelation of gelatin: phase diagram, hysteresis and kinetics. Food Hydrocoll 2012;26:99–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya A, Mahajan RL. Temperature dependence of thermal conductivity of biological tissues. Physiol Meas 2003;24:769–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guntur SR, Lee K, Il Paeng D-G, et al. Temperature-dependent thermal properties of ex vivo liver undergoing thermal ablation. Ultrasound Med Biol 2013;39:1771–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi J, Morrissey M, Bischof JC. Thermal processing of biological tissue at high temperatures: impact of protein denaturation and water loss on the thermal properties of human and porcine liver in the range 25–80 °C. J Heat Transfer 2013;135:06132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng H-LM, Plewes DB. Tissue thermal conductivity by magnetic resonance thermometry and focused ultrasound heating. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16:598–609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Mougenot C, Partanen A, et al. Volumetric MRI-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound for noninvasive, in vivo determination of tissue thermal conductivity: Initial experience in a pig model. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013;37:950–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon CR, Payne A, Roemer RB. The accuracy and precision of two non-invasive, magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound-based thermal diffusivity estimation methods. Int J Hyperth 2014;30:361–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragonu I, de Oliveira PL, Laurent C, et al. Non-invasive determination of tissue thermal parameters from high intensity focused ultrasound treatment monitored by volumetric MRI thermometry. NMR Biomed 2009;22:843–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon CR, Borasi G, Payne A. Analytical estimation of ultrasound properties, thermal diffusivity, and perfusion using magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound temperature data. Phys Med Biol 2016;61:923–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon CR, Christensen DA, Roemer RB, et al. Effects of MRTI sampling characteristics on estimation of HIFU SAR and tissue thermal diffusivity. Phys Med Biol 2013;58:7291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen DA, Almquist S. Incorporating tissue absorption and scattering in rapid ultrasound beam modeling. SPIE Proceedings. 2013. p 8584.
   Google Scholar