The role of T1 perfusion-based classification in predicting the outcome of magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment of adenomyosis

References

• Taran FA, Stewart EA, Brucker S. (2013). Adenomyosis: epidemiology, risk factors, clinical phenotype and surgical and interventional alternatives to hysterectomy. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 73:924–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergholt T, Eriksen L, Berendt N, et al. (2001). Prevalence and risk factors of adenomyosis at hysterectomy. Hum Reprod 16:2418–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kepkep K, Tuncay YA, Goynumer G, Tutal E. (2007). Transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of adenomyosis: which findings are most accurate? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30:341–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedele L, Bianchi S, Dorta M, et al. (1992). Transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of diffuse adenomyosis. Fertil Steril 58:94–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atzori E, Tronci C, Sionis L. (1996). Transvaginal ultrasound in the diagnosis of diffuse adenomyosis. Gynecol Obstet Invest 42:39–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azzir R. (1989). Adenomyosis: current perspectives. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 16:221–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jha RC, Takahama J, Imaoka I, et al. (2003). Adenomyosis: MRI of the uterus treated with uterine artery embolization. Am J Roentgenol 181:851–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vercellini P, Ragni G, Trespidi L, et al. (1993). Adenomyosis: a déjà vu? Obstet Gynecol Surv 48:789–94.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matalliotakis IM, Katsikis IK, Panidis DK. (2005). Adenomyosis: what is the impact on fertility? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 17:261–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood C. (2001). Adenomyosis: difficult to diagnose, and difficult to treat. Diagn Ther Endosc 7:89–95.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parazzini F, Mais V, Cipriani S, et al. (2009). Determinants of adenomyosis in women who underwent hysterectomy for benign gynecological conditions: results from a prospective multicentric study in Italy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 143:103–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horng HC, Chen CH, Chen CY, et al. (2014). Uterine-sparing surgery for adenomyosis and/or adenomyoma. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 53:3–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levgur M. (2007). Therapeutic options for adenomyosis: a review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 276:1–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goodwin SC, Spies JB, Worthington-Kirsch R, et al. (2008). Uterine artery embolization for treatment of leiomyomata: long-term outcomes from the FIBROID registry. Obstet Gynecol 111:22–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim MD, Kim S, Kim NK, et al. (2007). Long-term results of uterine artery embolization for symptomatic adenomyosis. Am J Roentgenol 188:176–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratby MJ, Walker WJ. (2009). Uterine artery embolisation for symptomatic adenomyosis-mid-term results. Eur J Radiol 70:128–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W, Wang Y, Tang J. (2009). Safety and efficacy of high intensity focused ultrasound ablation therapy for adenomyosis. Acad Radiol 16:1416–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou M, Chen J Y, Tang LD, et al. (2011). Ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation for adenomyosis: the clinical experience of a single center. Fertil Steril 95:900–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Li K, Xie B, et al. (2014). Effective ablation therapy of adenomyosis with ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 124:207–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JS, Hong GY, Park BJ, Kim TE. (2015). Ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for uterine fibroid and adenomyosis: a single center experience from the Republic of Korea. Ultrasonics Sonochem 27:682–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shui L, Mao S, Wu Q, et al. (2015). High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for adenomyosis: two-year follow-up results Ultrasonics Sonochem 22:677–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Wang W, Wang Y, et al. (2016). Clinical predictors of long-term success in ultrasound guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation treatment for adenomyosis: a retrospective study. Medicine 95:e2443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong C, Yang B, Shi Y, et al. (2016). Factors influencing the ablative efficiency of high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment for adenomyosis: a retrospective study. Int J Hyperthermia 32:496–503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong C, Setzen R, Liu Z, et al. (2017). High intensity focused ultrasound treatment of adenomyosis: the relationship between the features of magnetic resonance imaging on T2 weighted images and therapeutic efficacy. Eur J Radiol 89:117–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukunishi H, Funaki K, Sawada K, et al. (2008). Early results of magnetic resonance guided focused ultrasound surgery of adenomyosis: analysis of 20 cases. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15:571–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim KA, Yoon SW, Lee C, et al. (2011). Short-term results of magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery for patients with adenomyosis: symptomatic relief and pain reduction. Fertil Steril 95:1152–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan TY, Zhang L, Chen W, et al. (2012). Feasibility of MRI-guided high intensity focused ultrasound treatment for adenomyosis. Eur J Radiol 81:3624–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrari F,·Arrigoni F, Miccoli A, et al. (2006). Effectiveness of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery (MRgFUS). Radiol Med 121:153–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennes HH. (1948). Analysis of tissue and arterial blood temperatures in the resting human forearm. J Appl Physical 1:93–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spies JB, Coyne K, Guaou N, et al. (2002). The UFS-QOL, a new disease-specific symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaire for leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol 99:290–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks D, McClenny TE, Cardella JF, Lewis CA. (2003). Society of interventional radiology clinical practice guidelines. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:S199–S202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin CN, Liao YS, Chen WC, et al. (2016). Use of myometrium as an internal reference for endometrial and cervical cancer on multiphase contrast enhanced MRI. PLoS One 21:11:e0157820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao WP, Chen JY, Chen WZ. (2015). Effect of biological characteristics of different types of uterine fibroids, as assessed with T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, on ultrasound-guided high intensity focused ultrasound ablation. Ultrasound Med Biol 41:423–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imaoka I, Ascher SM, Sugimura K, et al. (2002). MR imaging of diffuse adenomyosis changes after GnRH analog therapy. J Magn Reson Imaging 15:285–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitamura Y, Allison SJ, Jha RC, et al. (2006). MRI of adenomyosis: changes with uterine artery embolization. Am J Roentgenol 186:855–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinovici J, Stewart EA. (2006). New interventional techniques for adenomyosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 4:617e636.
   Google Scholar
• Rabinovici J, Inbar Y, Eylon SC, et al. (2006). Pregnancy and live birth after focused ultrasound surgery for symptomatic focal adenomyosis: a case report. Hum Reprod 21:1255–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon SW, Kim KA, Cha SH, et al. (2008). Successful use of magnetic resonance–guided focused ultrasound surgery to relieve symptoms in a patient with symptomatic focal adenomyosis. Fertil Steril 90:2008e13–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohan PP, Hamblin MH, Vogelzang RL. (2013). Uterine artery embolization and its effect on fertility. J Vasc Interv Radiol 24:925–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar