1,509
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

In vivo monitoring of microwave ablation in a porcine model using ultrasonic differential attenuation coefficient intercept imaging

ORCID Icon, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 1157-1170 | Received 27 Jul 2017, Accepted 02 Feb 2018, Published online: 15 Feb 2018

References

  • Isfort P, Penzkofer T, Tanaka T, et al. (2013). Efficacy of antegrade pyeloperfusion to protect the renal pelvis in kidney microwave ablation using an in vivo swine model. Invest Radiol 48:863–8.
  • Zhang SY, Li C, Yin H, et al. (2013). Surface vibration and nearby cavitation of an ex vivo bovine femur exposed to high intensity focused ultrasound. J Acoust Soc Am 134:1656–62.
  • Chu KF, Dupuy DE. (2014). Thermal ablation of tumours: biological mechanisms and advances in therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 14:199–208.
  • Ahmed M, Brace CL, Lee FT, et al. (2011). Principles of and advances in percutaneous ablation. Radiology 258:351–69.
  • Carrafiello G, Mangini M, Fontana F, et al. (2012). Complications of microwave and radiofrequency lung ablation: personal experience and review of the literature. Radiol Med 117:201–13.
  • Wright AS, Sampson LA, Warner TF, et al. (2005). Radiofrequency versus microwave ablation in a hepatic porcine model. Radiology 236:132–9.
  • Goldberg SN, Gazelle GS, Solbiati L, et al. (1996). Radiofrequency tissue ablation: increased lesion diameter with a perfusion electrode. Acad Radiol 3:636–44.
  • Organ LW. (1976). Electrophysiologic principles of radiofrequency lesion making. Appl Neurophysiol 39:69–76.
  • Lu DS, Raman SS, Vodopich DJ, et al. (2002). Effect of vessel size on creation of hepatic radiofrequency lesions in pigs: assessment of the “heat sink” effect. Am J Roentgenol 178:47–51.
  • Stattner S, Primavesi F, Yip VS, et al. (2015). Evolution of surgical microwave ablation for the treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastasis: review of the literature and a single centre experience. Surg Today 45:407–15.
  • Mauri G, Cova L, De Beni S, et al. (2015). Real-time US-CT/MRI image fusion for guidance of thermal ablation of liver tumors undetectable with US: results in 295 cases. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 38:143–51.
  • Yang Y, Zhang J, Han ZY, et al. (2015). Ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for adenomyosis: efficacy of treatment and effect on ovarian function. Sci Rep 5:1–7.
  • Wei ZG, Zhang KX, Ye X, et al. (2015). Computed tomography-guided percutaneous microwave ablation combined with osteoplasty for palliative treatment of painful extraspinal bone metastases from lung cancer. Skeletal Radiol 44:1485–90.
  • Fornage BD, Hwang RF. (2014). Current status of imaging-guided percutaneous ablation of breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol 203:442–8.
  • Tsui PH, Shu YC, Chen WS, et al. (2012). Ultrasound temperature estimation based on probability variation of backscatter data. Med Phys 39:2369–85.
  • Birkl C, Langkammer C, Haybaeck J, et al. (2014). Temperature-induced changes of magnetic resonance relaxation times in the human brain: a postmortem study. Magn Reson Med 71:1575–80.
  • Yue WW, Wang SR, Wang B, et al. (2013). Ultrasound guided percutaneous microwave ablation of benign thyroid nodules: safety and imaging follow-up in 222 patients. Eur J Radiol 82:E11–16.
  • Zhou ZH, Wu WW, Wu SC, et al. (2014). A survey of ultrasound elastography approaches to percutaneous ablation monitoring. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 228:1069–82.
  • Rubert N, Bharat S, DeWall RJ, et al. (2010). Electrode displacement strain imaging of thermally-ablated liver tissue in an in vivo animal model. Med Phys 37:1075–82.
  • Korkusuz H, Happel C, Klebe J, et al. (2015). Diagnostic accuracy of elastography and scintigraphic imaging after thermal microwave ablation of thyroid nodules. Fortschr Röntgenstr 187:353–9.
  • Seo CH, Shi Y, Huang SW, et al. (2011). Thermal strain imaging: a review. Interface Focus 1:649–64.
  • Yang W, Alexander M, Rubert N, et al. (2014). Monitoring microwave ablation for liver tumors with electrode displacement strain imaging. 2014 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium; 2014 Sept 3?6; 1128–31.
  • DeWall RJ, Varghese T, Madsen EL. (2011). Shear wave velocity imaging using transient electrode perturbation: phantom and ex vivo validation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 30:666–78.
  • Techavipoo U, Varghese T, Chen Q, et al. (2004). Temperature dependence of ultrasonic propagation speed and attenuation in excised canine liver tissue measured using transmitted and reflected pulses. J Acoust Soc Am 115:2859–65.
  • Tsui PH, Chien YT, Liu HL, et al. (2012). Using ultrasound CBE imaging without echo shift compensation for temperature estimation. Ultrasonics 52:925–35.
  • Yang CL, Zhu H, Wu SC, et al. (2010). Correlations between B-mode ultrasonic image texture features and tissue temperature in microwave ablation. J Ultras Med 29:1787–99.
  • Choi K, Kong D, Park J, eds. (2012). Noninvasive ultrasound temperature imaging with fusion algorithm. 2012 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium; 2012 Oct 7–10, 933–6.
  • Subramanian S, Rudich SM, Alqadah A, et al. (2014). In vivo thermal ablation monitoring using ultrasound echo decorrelation imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 40:102–14.
  • Bevan PD, Sherar MD. (2001). B-scan ultrasound imaging of thermal coagulation in bovine liver: frequency shift attenuation mapping. Ultrasound Med Biol 27:809–17.
  • Bevan PD, Sherar MD. (2001). B-scan ultrasound imaging of thermal coagulation in bovine liver: log envelope slope attenuation mapping. Ultrasound Med Biol 27:379–87.
  • Samimi K, White JK, Brace CL, et al. (2017). Monitoring microwave ablation of ex vivo bovine liver using ultrasonic attenuation imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 43:1441–51.
  • Zhang SY, Li C, Zhou FY, et al. (2014). Enhanced lesion-to-bubble ratio on ultrasonic Nakagami imaging for monitoring of high-intensity focused ultrasound. J Ultras Med 33:959–70.
  • Zhang SY, Zhou FY, Wan MX, et al. (2012). Feasibility of using Nakagami distribution in evaluating the formation of ultrasound-induced thermal lesions. J Acoust Soc Am 131:4836–44.
  • Zhou ZH, Sheng L, Wu SC, et al. (2013). Ultrasonic evaluation of microwave-induced thermal lesions based on wavelet analysis of mean scatterer spacing. Ultrasonics 53:1325–31.
  • Ribault M, Chapelon JY, Cathignol D, et al. (1998). Differential attenuation imaging for the characterization of high intensity focused ultrasound lesions. Ultrason Imaging 20:160–77.
  • Rahimian S, Tavakkoli J. (2013). Estimating dynamic changes of tissue attenuation coefficient during high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment. J Ther Ultrasound 11:22.
  • Rahimian S, Tavakkoli J. (2012). An acoustic backscatter-based method for estimating attenuation towards monitoring lesion formation in high intensity focused ultrasound. AIP Conf Proc 1503:107–12.
  • Liang P, Wang Y, Zhang DK, et al. (2008). Ultrasound guided percutaneous microwave ablation for small renal cancer: initial experience. J Urol 180:844–8.
  • Zhang SY, Wan MX, Zhong H, et al. (2009). Dynamic changes of integrated backscatter, attenuation coefficient and bubble activities during high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment. Ultrasound Med Biol 35:1828–44.
  • Zhang SY, Ding T, Wan MX, et al. (2011). Minimizing the thermal losses from perfusion during focused ultrasound exposures with flowing microbubbles. J Acoust Soc Am 129:2336–44.
  • Zhang SY, Zong YJ, Wan MX, et al. (2012). Compare ultrasound-mediated heating and cavitation between flowing polymer- and lipid-shelled microbubbles during focused ultrasound exposures. J Acoust Soc Am 131:4845–55.
  • Zhang SY, Cui ZW, Xu TQ, et al. (2017). Inverse effects of flowing phase-shift nanodroplets and lipid-shelled microbubbles on subsequent cavitation during focused ultrasound exposures. Ultrason Sonochem 34:400–9.
  • Abd Manaf N, Aziz MNC, Ridzuan DS, et al. (2016). Feasibility of A-mode ultrasound attenuation as a monitoring method of local hyperthermia treatment. Med Biol Eng Comput 54:967–81.
  • Ophir J, Shawker TH, Maklad NF, et al. (1984). Attenuation estimation in reflection – progress and prospects. Ultrason Imaging 6:349–95.
  • He P, Greenleaf JF. (1986). Attenuation estimation on phantoms – a stability test. Ultrason Imaging 8:1–10.
  • Jang HS, Song TK, Park SB. (1988). Ultrasound attenuation estimation in soft tissue using the entropy difference of pulsed echoes between two adjacent envelope segments. Ultrason Imaging 10:248–64.
  • Kuc R. (1984). Estimating acoustic attenuation from reflected ultrasound signals – comparison of spectral-shift and spectral-difference approaches. IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Signal Process Speech 32:1–6.
  • Kuc R, Li H. (1985). Estimating the center-frequency of reflected ultrasound using maximum-entropy method spectral estimation. Ultrasonic Imaging 7:94.
  • Yao LX, Zagzebski JA, Madsen EL. (1990). Backscatter coefficient measurements using a reference phantom to extract depth-dependent instrumentation factors. Ultrason Imaging 12:58–70.
  • Kim H, Varghese T. (2008). Hybrid spectral domain method for attenuation slope estimation. Ultrasound Med Biol 34:1808–19.
  • Bush NL, Rivens I, Terhaar GR, et al. (1993). Acoustic properties of lesions generated with an ultrasound therapy system. Ultrasound Med Biol 19:789–801.
  • Towa RT, Miller RJ, Rizzell LA, et al. (2002). Attenuation coefficient and propagation speed estimates of rat and pig intercostal tissue as a function of temperature. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelect Freq Contr 49:1411–20.
  • Gertner MR, Wilson BC, Sherar MD. (1997). Ultrasound properties of liver tissue during heating. Ultrasound Med Biol 23:1395–403.
  • Choi MJ, Guntur SR, Lee JM, et al. (2011). Changes in ultrasonic properties of liver tissue in vitro during heating-cooling cycle concomitant with thermal coagulation. Ultrasound Med Biol 37:2000–12.
  • Worthington AE, Sherar MD. (2001). Changes in ultrasound properties of porcine kidney tissue during heating. Ultrasound Med Biol 27:673–82.
  • Damianou CA, Sanghvi NT, Fry FJ, et al. (1997). Dependence of ultrasonic attenuation and absorption in dog soft tissues on temperature and thermal dose. J Acoust Soc Am 102:628–34.
  • Kemmerer JP, Oelze ML. (2012). Ultrasonic assessment of thermal therapy in rat liver. Ultrasound Med Biol 38:2130–7.
  • Zhong H, Wan MX, Jiang YF, et al. (2007). Monitoring imaging of lesions induced by high intensity focused ultrasound based on differential ultrasonic attenuation and integrated backscatter estimation. Ultrasound Med Biol 33:82–94.
  • Divkovic GW, Liebler M, Braun K, et al. (2007). Thermal properties and changes of acoustic parameters in an egg white phantom during heating and coagulation by high intensity focused ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 33:981–6.
  • Yang C, Sheng L, Wu S, eds. (2011). Features of ultrasonic radio frequency signal in microwave ablation experiments. International Conference on Information Technology, Computer Engineering and Management Sciences; 2011 Sep 24–25, vol. 3, 55–8.
  • Fosnight TR, Hooi FM, Keil RD, et al. (2017). Echo decorrelation imaging of rabbit liver and vx2 tumor during in vivo ultrasound ablation. Ultrasound Med Biol 43:176–86.
  • Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. (1982). The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143:29–36.
  • Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. (1983). A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 148:839–43.
  • Abramoff MD, Magelhaes PJ, Ram SJ. (2004). Image processing with ImageJ. Biophoton Int 11:36–42.
  • Deardorff DL, Diederich CJ, Nau WH. (2001). Control of interstitial thermal coagulation: comparative evaluation of microwave and ultrasound applicators. Med Phys 28:104–17.
  • Pauly H, Schwan HP. (1971). Mechanism of absorption of ultrasound in liver tissue. J Acoust Soc Am 50:692–9.
  • Krzanowski WJ, Hand DJ. (2015). ROC Curves for continuous data. Rev Neurol 171(Suppl.1):A3.
  • Zhang SY, Han YQ, Zhu XG, et al. (2017). Feasibility of using ultrasonic Nakagami imaging for monitoring microwave-induced thermal lesion in ex vivo porcine liver. Ultrasound Med Biol 43:482–93.
  • Clarke RL, Bush NL, Ter Haar GR. (2003). The changes in acoustic attenuation due to in vitro heating. Ultrasound Med Biol 29:127–35.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.