Real-time monitoring radiofrequency ablation using tree-based ensemble learning models

References

• Shah DR, Green S, Elliot A, et al. Current oncologic applications of radiofrequency ablation therapies. WJGO. 2012;5:71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brace CL. Radiofrequency and microwave ablation of the liver, lung, kidney, and bone: what are the differences? Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2009;38:135–143.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tateishi R, Shiina S, Teratani T, et al. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: an analysis of 1000 cases. Cancer. 2005;103:1201–1209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiina S, Teratani T, Obi S, et al. A randomized controlled trial of radiofrequency ablation with ethanol injection for small hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2005;129:122–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupuy DE, Zagoria RJ, Akerley W, et al. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of malignancies in the lung. Ajr Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:57–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunkle DA, Uzzo RG. Cryoablation or radiofrequency ablation of the small renal mass: a meta-analysis. Cancer. 2008;113:2671–2680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdalla EK, Vauthey JN, Ellis LM, et al. Recurrence and outcomes following hepatic resection, radiofrequency ablation, and combined resection/ablation for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg. 2004;239:818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wi H, McEwan AL, Lam V, et al. Real-time conductivity imaging of temperature and tissue property changes during radiofrequency ablation: an ex vivo model using weighted frequency difference. Bioelectromagnetics. 2015;36:277–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu KF, Dupuy DE. Thermal ablation of tumours: biological mechanisms and advances in therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14(3):199–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu DS, Raman SS, Vodopich DJ, et al. Effect of vessel size on creation of hepatic radiofrequency lesions in pigs: assessment of the “heat sink effect”. Ajr Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:47–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sliwa JW, Ma Z, Goetz JP, et al. Apparatus and methods for acoustic monitoring of ablation procedures. United States patent application US 12/636,837. 2010 Jul 1.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou Z, Wu S, Wang CY, et al. Monitoring radiofrequency ablation using real-time ultrasound nakagami imaging combined with frequency and temporal compounding techniques. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0118030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu YD, Li Q, Zhou Z, et al. Adaptive ultrasound temperature imaging for monitoring radiofrequency ablation. PloS One. 2017;12:e0182457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang GA, Bay E, Deán-Ben XL, et al. Three-dimensional optoacoustic monitoring of lesion formation in real time during radiofrequency catheter ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015;26:339–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larina IV, Larin KV, Esenaliev RO. Real-time optoacoustic monitoring of temperature in tissues. J Phys D: Appl Phys. 2005;38:2633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holder DS, editor. Electrical impedance tomography: methods, history and applications. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Wi H, McEwan AL, Lam V, et al. Real-time conductivity imaging of temperature and tissue property changes during radiofrequency ablation: an ex vivo model using weighted frequency difference. Bioelectromagnetics. 2015;36(4):277–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherepenin VA, Karpov AY, Korjenevsky AV, et al. Three-dimensional EIT imaging of breast tissues: system design and clinical testing. IEEE Trans Med Imag. 2002;21(6):662–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javaherian A, Soleimani M, Moeller K. A fast time-difference inverse solver for 3D EIT with application to lung imaging. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2016;54(8):1243–1255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang I. Finite element analysis of hepatic radiofrequency ablation probes using temperature-dependent electrical conductivity. Biomed Eng Online. 2003;2:12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin S, Choi CT. A post-processing method for three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):7212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magoulas GD, Prentza A. Machine learning in medical applications. Advanced course on artificial intelligence; Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 1999. p. 300–307.
   Google Scholar
• Foster KR, Koprowski R, Skufca JD. Machine learning, medical diagnosis, and biomedical engineering research-commentary. Biomed Eng Online. 2014;13:94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durichen R, Pimentel MA, Clifton L, et al. Multi-task Gaussian process models for biomedical applications. IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI); 2014 Jun 1; Valencia, Spain. p. 492–495.
   Google Scholar
• Yu W, Liu T, Valdez R, et al. Application of support vector machine modeling for prediction of common diseases: the case of diabetes and pre-diabetes. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010;10:16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son YJ, Kim HG, Kim EH, et al. Application of support vector machine for prediction of medication adherence in heart failure patients. Healthc Inform Res. 2010;16:253–259.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shaikhina T, Lowe D, Daga S, et al. Decision tree and random forest models for outcome prediction in antibody incompatible kidney transplantation. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2017 (In press).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan J, Wei JS, Ringner M, et al. Classification and diagnostic prediction of cancers using gene expression profiling and artificial neural networks. Nat Med. 2001;7:673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan YJ, Sim KS, Ting FF. Breast cancer detection using convolutional neural networks for mammogram imaging system. 2017 International Conference on Robotics, Automation and Sciences (ICORAS); 2017 Nov 27; Melaka, Malaysia. p. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Esteva A, Kuprel B, Novoa RA, et al. Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature. 2017;542:115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YC, Chan TC, Sahakian AV. Real-time estimation of lesion depth and control of radiofrequency ablation within ex vivo animal tissues using a neural network. Int J Hyperther. 2018;34(7):1104–1113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg SN, Gazelle GS, Dawson SL, et al. Tissue ablation with radiofrequency: effect of probe size, gauge, duration, and temperature on lesion volume. Acad Radiol. 1995;2:399–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Ma Y, editor. Ensemble machine learning: methods and applications. New York (NY): Springer Science & Business Media; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Schapire RE. The boosting approach to machine learning: an overview. In: Denison DD, Hansen MH, Holmes CC, editors. Nonlinear estimation and classification. New York (NY): Springer; 2003. p. 149–171.
   Google Scholar
• Loh WY. Fifty years of classification and regression trees. Int Stat Rev. 2014;82:329–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer E, Kohavi R. An empirical comparison of voting classification algorithms: bagging, boosting, and variants. Machine Learning. 1999;36:105–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar