Clinical efficacy and mechanism for focused ultrasound (FUS) in the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1 (CIN1)

References

• National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: cervical cancer (V1. 2016) [EB/OL]. [cited 2015 Nov 25]. Available from: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician.gls/pdf/cervical.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Henk HJ, In Sing a. R, Singhal PK, et al. Incidence and costs of cervical intraepithelial neoplasiain a US commercially insured Population. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2010; 14(1):29–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velasco J, Álvarez-Ruiz E, González-Fernández L, et al. Expression of p16/Ki-67 in ASC-US/LSIL or Normal Cytology with Presence of Oncogenic HPV DNA. Anticancer Res . 2015;35:6291–6296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neerja B, Daisuke A, Daya NS, et al. Cancer of the cervix uteri [J]. Int. J Gynecol Obstet. 2018;143(supp12):22–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu SY, Zhao FH, Ma JF, etc. A prospective cohort study of prognosis of mild cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and its association with human papilloma virus. Chin J Prev Med. 2014;48(5):361–365.
   Google Scholar
• Gao BL, Qian P, Ma ZY, etc. Expression and significance of human papilloma virus L1 protein and p16. Ki 67 in Cervical Squamous Epithelial Lesions. Mat Child Health Care China. 2015;30(7):1109–1111.
   Google Scholar
• Sari Aslani F, Safaei A, Pourjabali M, et al. Evaluation of Ki – 67, p16 and CK17 markers in differentiating cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and benign lesions. Iran J Med Sci. 2013;38(1):15–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malinowski DP. Molecular diagnostic assays for cervical neoplasia: emerging markers for the detection of high-grade cervical disease. Biotechniques. 2005;38(4S):S17–S23.
   Google Scholar
• Wang RM, Peng JJ, You ZX. Interpretation of ASCCP 2012 guidelines for cervical cancer screening and management of precancerous lesions (two) [J]. Int J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;42(2):238–240.
   Google Scholar
• Petry KU. Management options for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;25(5):641–651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Zhang W, Orsi F, et al. Ultrasound – guided high intensity focused Ultrasound for the treatment of gynecological diseases: a review of safety and efficacy[J]. Int J Hyperthermia. 2015;31(3):280–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poissonnier L, Chapelon JY, Rouviere O, et al. Control of prostate cancer by transrectal HIFU in 227 patients. Eur Urol. 2007;51(2):381–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye M, Deng X, Mao S, et al. High intensity focused ultrasound treatment for non-neoplastic epithelial disorders of the vulva: factors affecting effectiveness and recurrence. Int J Hyperthermia. 2015;31(7):771–776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C-Z, Wang Z-B, Yang X, et al. Feasibility of focused ultrasound therapy for recurrent cervicitis with high-risk human papillomavirus infectionet. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34(5):590–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin C, Yang J, Li CZ, etc. Treatment of low grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia with focused ultrasound. Chin Int Imag Thera. 2012;12(9):873–876.
   Google Scholar
• Chen J, Zhou D, Liu Y, et al. A comparison between ultrasound therapy and laser therapy for symptomatic cervical ectopy. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008;34(11):1770–1774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao ZY. Obstetrics and Gynecology. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House; 2010. 567.
   Google Scholar
• Ren YF, Wu FY, Cai HF, etc. the comparison of curative effect for Focused ultrasound and laser power with electric coagulation for treating CIN I patients with high-risk human papilloma virus infection. J Third Military Med University. 2012;34(4):350–353.
   Google Scholar
• Lesnikova I, Lidang M, Hamilton-Dutoit S, et al. P16 as a diagnostic marker of cervical neoplasia: a tissue micmarray study of 796 archival specimens. Diagn Pathol. 2009;4(1):22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortecchia S, Galanti G, Sgadari C, et al. Follow -up study of patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 overexpressing p16 Ink 4a. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013;23(9):1663–1669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuschenbach M, Seiz M, von Knebel Doeberitz C, et al. Evaluation of cervical cone biopsies for coexpression of p16 INK 4a and Ki – 67 in epithelial cells. Int J Cancer. 2012;130(2):388–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bean SM, Eltoum I, Horton DK, et al. Immunohistochemical expression of p16 and Ki – 67 Correlates with degree of anal intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Aurg Pathol. 2007;31(4):555–561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu JY, Qin WP. The clinical significance of p16 and Ki – 67 in cervical lesions. Chin General Practitioner J. 2011;189(3):81–88.
   Google Scholar
• Calil LN, Edelweiss MI, Meurer L, et al. p16 INK 4a and Ki – 67 expression in normal dysplastic and neoplastic uterine cervical epithelium and human papilloma virus (HPV) infection. PatholRes Pract. 2014;210(8):482–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu SF, Zhang JW, Qiu M, etc. Expression and relationship of survivin fas and fasl in cervical carcinoma. J Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Edition). 2010;30(9):1138–1142.
   Google Scholar
• Li C, Xiong X, Li Y, et al. Therapeutic effects of focused ultrasound in 4014 patients with symptomatic cervical ectopy. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013;39(4):604–610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan J, Li HY, Xiong J, et al. Comparative analysis of clinical efficacy of microwave and focused ultrasound in the treatment of CIN I. Public Health Prevent Med. 2010;21(6):124–125.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang B, Xu DM, Su XR. Efficacy of leep and focused Ultrasound in the treatment of CIN I with High risk HPV infection.China Med Eng. 2014;22(5):134–135.
   Google Scholar