Prediction of pelvic tumour coverage by magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MRgHIFU) from referral imaging

References

• Hurwitz MD, Ghanouni P, Kanaev SV, et al. Magnetic resonance– guided focused ultrasound for patients with painful bone metastases: phase III trial results. JNCI. 2014;106(5):dju082.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siedek F, Yeo SY, Heijman E, et al. Magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU): technical background and overview of current clinical applications (Part 1). Rofo. 2019;191(6):522–530.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Giles SL, Imseeh G, Rivens I, et al. MR guided high intensity focused ultrasound (MRgHIFU) for treating recurrent gynaecological tumours: a pilot feasibility study. Br J Radiol. 2019;92(1098):20181037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giles SL, Brown MRD, Rivens I, et al. Comparison of imaging changes and pain responses in patients with intra- or extraosseous bone metastases treated palliatively with magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity-focused ultrasound. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019; 30(9):1351–1360.e1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggers H, Brendel B, Duijndam A, et al. Dual-echo Dixon imaging with flexible choice of echo times. Magn Reson Med. 2011;65(1):96–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yushkevich PA, Piven J, Hazlett HC, et al. User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage. 2006;31(3):1116–1128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HOROS Dicom Viewer. Version 2.4.0. HOROS Project; 2015. Available from: https://horosproject.org/
   Google Scholar
• Späth H. Fitting affine and orthogonal transformations between two sets of points. Mathematical Communications. 2004;9(1):27–34.
   Google Scholar
• Otsu N. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. 1979;9(1):62–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro LG. Connected component labeling and adjacency graph construction. In: Kong TY, Rosenfeld A, editors. Machine intelligence and pattern recognition. Vol. 19. North-Holland; 1996. p. 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez RC, Woods RE. Digital image processing. 4th ed. New York, USA: Pearson; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Soille P. Morphological Image Analysis: Principles and Applications. Berlin (Germany): Springer-Verlag; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Rosset A, Spadola L, Ratib O. OsiriX: an open-source software for navigating in multidimensional DICOM images. J Digit Imaging. 2004;17(3):205–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kullberg J, Ahlström H, Johansson L, et al. Automated and reproducible segmentation of visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue from abdominal MRI. Int J Obes (Lond). 2007;31(12):1806–1817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia Y, Fripp J, Chandra SS, et al. Automated bone segmentation from large field of view 3D MR images of the hip joint. Phys Med Biol. 2013;58(20):7375–7390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fripp J, Crozier S, Warfield SK, et al. Automatic segmentation of the bone and extraction of the bone-cartilage interface from magnetic resonance images of the knee. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52(6):1617–1631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhler MO, Mougenot C, Quesson B, et al. Volumetric HIFU ablation under 3D guidance of rapid MRI thermometry. Med Phys. 2009;36(8):3521–3535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enholm JK, Kohler MO, Quesson B, et al. Improved volumetric MR-HIFU ablation by robust binary feedback control. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010;57(1):103–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sannholm F. Automated Treatment Planning in Magnetic Resonance guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound [Master's Thesis]. Espoo, Finland: Aalto University School of Electrical Engineering; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Ostergaard NK, Denis de Senneville B, Elstrom UV, et al. Acceleration and validation of optical flow based deformable registration for image-guided radiotherapy. Acta Oncol. 2008;47(7):1286–1293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Platel B, Ivanovskaya T, et al., editors. Fully automatic breast segmentation in 3D breast MRI. 2012 9th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI); 2012 2–5 May 2012; Barcelona, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson D, Boylan C, Liptrot T, et al. Evaluation of an automatic segmentation algorithm for definition of head and neck organs at risk. Radiat Oncol. 2014;9(1):173.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pulkkinen A, Werner B, Martin E, et al. Numerical simulations of clinical focused ultrasound functional neurosurgery. Phys Med Biol. 2014;59(7):1679–1700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbas MA, Coussios C-C, Cleveland RO, editors. Patient Specific Simulation of HIFU Kidney Tumour Ablation. 2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC); 2018 18–21 July 2018; Honolulu, HI, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Marinova M, Rauch M, Mücke M, et al. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for pancreatic carcinoma: evaluation of feasibility, reduction of tumour volume and pain intensity. Eur Radiol. 2016;26(11):4047–4056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch BT, Schmitz JJ, Kurup AN, et al. Feasibility and outcomes of percutaneous thermal ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma in a transplanted allograft. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018;43(6):1478–1481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyamoto K, Kapa S, Mulpuru SK, et al. Safety and efficacy of cryoablation in patients with ventricular arrhythmias originating from the Para-Hisian region. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018; 4(3):366–373.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williamson T, Everitt S, Chauhan S. Automated geometric optimization for robotic HIFU treatment of liver tumors. Comput Biol Med. 2018;96:1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roeske JC, Forman JD, Mesina CF, et al. Evaluation of changes in the size and location of the prostate, seminal vesicles, bladder, and rectum during a course of external beam radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;33(5):1321–1329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scaife J, Harrison K, Romanchikova M, et al. Random variation in rectal position during radiotherapy for prostate cancer is two to three times greater than that predicted from prostate motion. Br J Radiol. 2014;87(1042):20140343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar