Evaluation of a numerical simulation for cryoablation – comparison with bench data, clinical kidney and lung cases

References

• Rubinsky B. Cryosurgery. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2000;2(1):157–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yiu W, Basco MT, Aruny JE, et al. Cryosurgery: A review. Int J Angiol. 2007; 16(1):1–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keanini RG, Rubinsky B. Optimization of multiprobe cryosurgery. ASME. J. Heat Transfer. November 1992; 114(4):796–801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baissalov R, Sandison GA, Donnelly BJ, et al. A semi-empirical treatment planning model for optimization of multiprobe cryosurgery. Phys Med Biol. 2000;45(5):1085–1098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giorgi G, Avalle L, Brignone M, et al. An optimisation approach to multiprobe cryosurgery planning. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2013;16(8):885–895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolley ML, Schulsinger DA, Durand DB, et al. Effect of freezing parameters (freeze cycle and thaw process) on tissue destruction following renal cryoablation. J Endourol. 2002;16(7):519–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mala T, Edwin B, Tillung T, et al. Percutaneous cryoablation of colorectal liver metastases: potentiated by two consecutive freeze-thaw cycles. Cryobiology. 2003;46(1):99–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinshaw JL, Littrup PJ, Durick N, et al. Optimizing the protocol for pulmonary cryoablation: a comparison of a dual- and triple-freeze protocol. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010;33(6):1180–1185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gage AA, Baust J. Mechanisms of tissue injury in cryosurgery. Cryobiology. 1998;37(3):171–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erinjeri J, Clark T. Cryoablation: mechanism of action and devices. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21(8 Suppl):S187–S191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yılmaz S, Özdoğan M, Cevener M, et al. Use of cryoablation beyond the prostate. Insights Imaging. 2016;7(2):223–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maria T, Georgiades C. Percutaneous cryoablation for renal cell carcinoma. J Kidney Cancer Vhl. 2015;2(3):105–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Baere T, Tselikas L, Woodrum D, et al. Evaluating cryoablation of metastatic lung tumors in patients-safety and efficacy: the ECLIPSE Trial-interim analysis at 1 year. J Thorac Oncol. 2015;10(10):1468–1474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramajayam KK, Kumar A, Sarangi SK, et al. Adjuvant-perfluorocarbon based approach for improving the effectiveness of cryosurgery in gel phantoms. Int J Therm Sci. 2018;132:296–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakkala C, Chiang CL, Kandalaft L, et al. Cryoablation and immunotherapy: an enthralling synergy to confront the tumors. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakkala C, Denys A, Kandalaft L, et al. Cryoablation and immunotherapy of cancer. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2020;65:60–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi MR, Rabin Y. Experimental verification of numerical simulations of cryosurgery with application to computerized planning. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52(15):4553–4567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi MR, Tanaka D, Shimada K, et al. An efficient numerical technique for bioheat simulations and its application to computerized cryosurgery planning. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2007;85(1):41–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keelan R, Zhang H, Shimada K, et al. Graphics processing unit-based bioheat simulation to facilitate rapid decision making associated with cryosurgery training. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2016;15(2):377–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabin Y, Shimada K, Joshi P, et al. A computerized tutor prototype for prostate cryotherapy: key building blocks and system evaluation. Proceedings of SPIE 10066, Energy-based Treatment of Tissue and Assessment IX, 100660Z; 22 Feb 2017. doi:10.1117/12.2257151
   Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Sandison GA, Murthy JY, et al. Numerical simulation for heat transfer in prostate cancer cryosurgery. J Biomech Eng. 2005;127(2):279–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Hossain SMC, Zhao G, et al. Two-phase heat transfer model for multiprobe cryosurgery. Appl Therm Eng. 2017;113:47–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain SMC, Zhang X, Haider Z, et al. Optimization of prostatic cryosurgery with multi-cryoprobe based on refrigerant flow. J Therm Biol. 2018;76:58–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaikh AM, Srivastava A, Atrey MD. Next generation design, development, and evaluation of cryoprobes for minimally invasive surgery and solid cancer therapeutics: in silico and computational studies. OMICS. 2015;19(2):131–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Hossain SMC, Wang Q, et al. Two-phase flow and heat transfer in a self-developed MRI compatible LN2 cryoprobe and its experimental evaluation. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2019;136:709–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golkar E, Rao PP, Joskowicz L, et al. GPU-based 3D iceball modeling for fast cryoablation simulation and planning. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2019;14(9):1577–1588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah TT, Arbel U, Foss S, et al. Modeling cryotherapy ice ball dimensions and isotherms in a novel gel-based model to determine optimal cryo-needle configurations and settings for potential use in clinical practice. Urology. 2016;91:234–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes LJ, Diller KR. Implementation of phase change in numerical models of heat transfer. Trans Asme, J Energy Resour Technol. 1983;105(4):431–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinbaum S, Jiji LM. A new simplified bioheat equation for the effect of blood flow on local average tissue temperature. J Biomech Eng. 1985;107(2):131–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgii J, Pätz T, Rieder C, et al. Efficient GPU-based numerical simulation of cryoablation of the kidney. In: Miller K, Wittek A, Joldes G, et al., editors. Computational biomechanics for medicine. MICCAI 2019, MICCAI 2018. Cham: Springer; 2020. p. 171–193.
   Google Scholar
• IT’IS Foundation. Tissue properties - database. Available from: https://itis.swiss/virtual-population/tissue-properties/database/.
   Google Scholar
• Permpongkosol S, Link RE, Kavoussi LR, et al. Temperature measurements of the low-attenuation radiographic ice ball during CT-guided renal cryoablation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2008;31(1):116–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgiades C, Rodriguez R, Azene E, et al. Determination of the nonlethal margin inside the visible "ice-ball" during percutaneous cryoablation of renal tissue. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013;36(3):783–790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar