3,141
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Image-guided thermal ablation in the management of symptomatic adenomyosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

, &
Pages 948-962 | Received 11 Mar 2021, Accepted 01 Jun 2021, Published online: 17 Jun 2021

References

  • Maheshwari A, Gurunath S, Fatima F, et al. Adenomyosis and subfertility: a systematic review of prevalence, diagnosis, treatment and fertility outcomes. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18(4):374–392.
  • Naftalin J, Hoo W, Pateman K, et al. How common is adenomyosis? A prospective study of prevalence using transvaginal ultrasound in a gynaecology clinic. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(12):3432–3439.
  • Farquhar C, Brosens I. Medical and surgical management of adenomyosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;20(4):603–616.
  • Vannuccini S, Luisi S, Tosti C, et al. Role of medical therapy in the management of uterine adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(3):398–405.
  • Mikos T, Lioupis M, Anthoulakis C, et al. The outcome of fertility-sparing and nonfertility-sparing surgery for the treatment of adenomyosis. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27(2):309–331.e3.
  • Younes G, Tulandi T. Conservative surgery for adenomyosis and results: a systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25(2):265–276.
  • Grimbizis GF, Mikos T, Tarlatzis B. Uterus-sparing operative treatment for adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(2):472–487.
  • Chen J, Porter AE, Kho KA. Current and future surgical and interventional management options for adenomyosis. Semin Reprod Med. 2020;38(2/3):157–167.
  • Zhang L, Rao F, Setzen R. High intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of adenomyosis: selection criteria, efficacy, safety and fertility. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96(6):707–714.
  • Meng X, He G, Zhang J, et al. A comparative study of fibroid ablation rates using radio frequency or high-intensity focused ultrasound. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010;33(4):794–799.
  • Zhao WP, Han ZY, Zhang J, et al. A retrospective comparison of microwave ablation and high intensity focused ultrasound for treating symptomatic uterine fibroids. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84(3):413–417.
  • Wang Y, Liang P, Yu X, et al. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation of adrenal metastasis: preliminary results. Int J Hyperthermia. 2009;25(6):455–461.
  • Zhang L, Zhang W, Orsi F, et al. Ultrasound-guided high intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of gynaecological diseases: a review of safety and efficacy. Int J Hyperthermia. 2015;31(3):280–284.
  • Harding G, Coyne KS, Thompson CL, et al. The responsiveness of the uterine fibroid symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaire (UFS-QOL). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008;6(1):99.
  • Cardella JF, Kundu S, Miller DL, et al. Society of Interventional Radiology clinical practice guidelines. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20(7 Suppl.):S189–S191.
  • Luo D, Wan X, Liu J, et al. Optimally estimating the sample mean from the sample size, median, mid-range, and/or mid-quartile range. Stat Methods Med Res. 2018;27(6):1785–1805.
  • Huang YF, Deng J, Wei XL, et al. A comparison of reproductive outcomes of patients with adenomyosis and infertility treated with high-intensity focused ultrasound and laparoscopic excision. Int J Hyperthermia. 2020;37(1):301–307.
  • Dev B, Gadddam S, Kumar M, et al. MR-guided focused ultrasound surgery: a novel non-invasive technique in the treatment of adenomyosis – 18 month's follow-up of 12 cases. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2019;29(3):284–288.
  • Lee JS, Hong GY, Lee KH, et al. Safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for uterine fibroids and adenomyosis. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019;45(12):3214–3221.
  • Guo Q, Xu F, Ding Z, et al. High intensity focused ultrasound treatment of adenomyosis: a comparative study. Int J Hyperthermia. 2018;35(1):505–509.
  • Liu Y, Zhang WW, He M, et al. Adverse effect analysis of high-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of benign uterine diseases. Int J Hyperthermia. 2018;35(1):56–61.
  • Zhang X, Guo Y, Chen J, et al. Effect of pre-treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue GnRH- on high-intensity focussed ultrasound ablation for diffuse adenomyosis: a preliminary study. Int J Hyperthermia. 2018;34:1289–1297.
  • Lee JS, Hong GY, Lee KH, et al. Changes in anti-müllerian hormone levels as a biomarker for ovarian reserve after ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment of adenomyosis and uterine fibroid. BJOG. 2017;124(Suppl. 3):18–22.
  • Liu XF, Huang LH, Zhang C, et al. A comparison of the cost-utility of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound and hysterectomy for adenomyosis: a retrospective study. BJOG. 2017;124(Suppl. 3):40–45.
  • Huang X, Yu D, Zou M, et al. The effect of exercise on high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment efficacy in uterine fibroids and adenomyosis: a retrospective study. BJOG. 2017;124(Suppl. 3):46–52.
  • Guo Y, Duan H, Cheng J, et al. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist combined with high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation for adenomyosis: a clinical study. BJOG. 2017;124(Suppl. 3):7–11.
  • Jayaram R, Subbarayan K, Mithraprabhu S, et al. Heavy menstrual bleeding and dysmenorrhea are improved by magnetic resonance guided focused ultrasound surgery (MRgFUS) of adenomyosis. Fertil Res Pract. 2016;2:8.
  • Feng Y, Hu L, Chen W, et al. Safety of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation for diffuse adenomyosis: a retrospective cohort study. Ultrason Sonochem. 2017;36:139–145.
  • Park J, Lee JS, Cho JH, et al. Effects of high-intensity-focused ultrasound treatment on benign uterine tumor. J Korean Med Sci. 2016;31(8):1279–1283.
  • Gong C, Yang B, Shi Y, et al. Factors influencing the ablative efficiency of high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment for adenomyosis: a retrospective study. Int J Hyperthermia. 2016;32(5):496–503.
  • Liu X, Wang W, Wang Y, et al. Clinical predictors of long-term success in ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation treatment for adenomyosis: a retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(3):e2443.
  • Long L, Chen J, Xiong Y, et al. Efficacy of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation for adenomyosis therapy and sexual life quality. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8:11701–11707.
  • Xiong Y, Yue Y, Shui L, et al. Ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (USgHIFU) ablation for the treatment of patients with adenomyosis and prior abdominal surgical scars: a retrospective study. Int J Hyperthermia. 2015;31(7):777–783.
  • Ferrari F, Arrigoni F, Miccoli A, et al. Effectiveness of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery (MRgFUS) in the uterine adenomyosis treatment: technical approach and MRI evaluation. Radiol Med. 2016;121(2):153–161.
  • Chen J, Chen W, Zhang L, et al. Safety of ultrasound-guided ultrasound ablation for uterine fibroids and adenomyosis: a review of 9988 cases. Ultrason Sonochem. 2015;27:671–676.
  • Lee JS, Hong GY, Park BJ, et al. Ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for uterine fibroid & adenomyosis: a single center experience from the Republic of Korea. Ultrason Sonochem. 2015;27:682–687.
  • Shui L, Mao S, Wu Q, et al. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for adenomyosis: two-year follow-up results. Ultrason Sonochem. 2015;27:677–681.
  • Cheng CQ, Zhang RT, Xiong Y, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for evaluation of high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment of benign uterine diseases: retrospective analysis of contrast safety. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94(16):e729.
  • Zhang X, Zou M, Zhang C, et al. Effects of oxytocin on high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation of adenomyosis: a prospective study. Eur J Radiol. 2014;83(9):1607–1611.
  • Zhang X, Li K, Xie B, et al. Effective ablation therapy of adenomyosis with ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;124(3):207–211.
  • Fan TY, Zhang L, Chen W, et al. Feasibility of MRI-guided high intensity focused ultrasound treatment for adenomyosis. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(11):3624–3630.
  • Zhou M, Chen JY, Tang LD, et al. Ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation for adenomyosis: the clinical experience of a single center. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(3):900–905.
  • Kim KA, Yoon SW, Lee C, et al. Short-term results of magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery for patients with adenomyosis: symptomatic relief and pain reduction. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(3):1152–1155.
  • Fukunishi H, Funaki K, Sawada K, et al. Early results of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery of adenomyosis: analysis of 20 cases. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15(5):571–579.
  • Lin XL, Hai N, Zhang J, et al. Comparison between microwave ablation and radiofrequency ablation for treating symptomatic uterine adenomyosis. Int J Hyperthermia. 2020;37(1):151–156.
  • Xu C, Tang Y, Zhao Y, et al. Use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in evaluating the efficacy and application value of microwave ablation for adenomyosis. J Can Res Ther. 2020;16(2):365–371.
  • Liu JX, Li JY, Zhao XY, et al. Transvaginal ultrasound- and laparoscopy-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for adenomyosis: preliminary results. Int J Hyperthermia. 2019;36:1233–1238.
  • Hai N, Zhang J, Xu R, et al. Percutaneous microwave ablation with artificial ascites for symptomatic uterine adenomyosis: initial experience. Int J Hyperthermia. 2017;33(6):646–652.
  • Xu RF, Zhang J, Han ZY, et al. Variables associated with vaginal discharge after ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for adenomyosis. Int J Hyperthermia. 2016;32(5):504–510.
  • Yang Y, Zhang J, Han ZY, et al. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for adenomyosis: efficacy of treatment and effect on ovarian function. Sci Rep. 2015;5:10034.
  • Nam JH. Pregnancy and symptomatic relief following ultrasound-guided transvaginal radiofrequency ablation in patients with adenomyosis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020;46(1):124–132.
  • Hai N, Hou Q, Ding X, et al. Ultrasound-guided transcervical radiofrequency ablation for symptomatic uterine adenomyosis. Br J Radiol. 2017;90(1069):20160119.
  • Ti SAD, Er WF, Lei Z, et al. Clinical evaluation of three methods in the treatment of adenomyosis. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2018;45:508–512.
  • Scarperi S, Pontrelli G, Campana C, et al. Laparoscopic radiofrequency thermal ablation for uterine adenomyosis. JSLS. 2015;19(4):e2015.00071.
  • McCausland AM, McCausland VM. Depth of endometrial penetration in adenomyosis helps determine outcome of rollerball ablation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174(6):1786–1793; 1793–1794.