Clearance of HR-HPV within one year after focused ultrasound or loop electrosurgical excision procedure in patients with HSIL under 30

References

• Sahlgren H, Elfström KM, Lamin H, et al. Colposcopic and histopathologic evaluation of women with HPV persistence exiting an organized screening program. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(3):253.e1–253.e8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sand FL, Kjaer SK, Frederiksen K, et al. Risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse after conization in relation to HPV vaccination status. Int J Cancer. 2020;147(3):641–647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjaer SK, van den Brule AJ, Paull G, et al. Type specific persistence of high risk human papillomavirus (HPV) as indicator of high grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions in young women: population based prospective follow up study. BMJ. 2002;325(7364):572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan PK, Ho WC, Wong MC, et al. Epidemiologic risk profile of infection with different groups of human papillomaviruses. J Med Virol. 2009;81(9):1635–1644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baandrup L, Munk C, Andersen KK, et al. HPV16 is associated with younger age in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 and 3. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;124(2):281–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joura EA, Giuliano AR, Iversen OE, et al. A 9-valent HPV vaccine against infection and intraepithelial neoplasia in women. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(8):711–723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildesheim A, Gonzalez P, Kreimer AR, et al. Impact of human papillomavirus (HPV) 16 and 18 vaccination on prevalent infections and rates of cervical lesions after excisional treatment. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(2):212.e1–212.e15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castle PE, Schiffman M, Wheeler CM, et al. Evidence for frequent regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia-grade 2. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113(1):18–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCredie MR, Sharples KJ, Paul C, et al. Natural history of cervical neoplasia and risk of invasive cancer in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9(5):425–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBride E, Marlow LAV, Forster AS, et al. Anxiety and distress following receipt of results from routine HPV primary testing in cervical screening: the psychological impact of primary screening (PIPS) study. Int J Cancer. 2020;146(8):2113–2121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCaffery K, Waller J, Forrest S, et al. Testing positive for human papillomavirus in routine cervical screening: examination of psychosocial impact. BJOG. 2004;111(12):1437–1443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. WHO guideline for screening and treatment of cervical pre-cancer lesions for cervical cancer prevention. 2nd ed. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Wu J, Jia Y, Luo M, et al. Analysis of residual/recurrent disease and its risk factors after loop electrosurgical excision procedure for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2016;81(4):296–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang Y, Chen C, Li L. Comparison of cold-knife conization versus loop electrosurgical excision for cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (ACIS): a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(1):e0170587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogani G, DI Donato V, Sopracordevole F, et al. Recurrence rate after loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) and laser conization: a 5-year follow-up study. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;159(3):636–641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conner SN, Cahill AG, Tuuli MG, et al. Interval from loop electrosurgical excision procedure to pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(6):1154–1159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li CZ, Wang ZB, Yang X, et al. Feasibility of focused ultrasound therapy for recurrent cervicitis with high-risk human papillomavirus infection. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34(5):590–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu Z, Fan Y, Wu C, et al. Clinical efficacy and mechanism for focused ultrasound (FUS) in the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1 (CIN1). Int J Hyperthermia. 2020;37(1):339–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W, Liu Y, Pu Y, et al. Effectiveness of focused ultrasound for high risk human papillomavirus infection-related cervical lesions. Int J Hyperthermia. 2021;38(2):96–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman SR, Le T, Lockhart A, et al. Patterns of persistent HPV infection after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN): a systematic review. Int J Cancer. 2017;141(1):8–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi MC, Jung SG, Park H, et al. Photodynamic therapy for management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II and III in young patients and obstetric outcomes. Lasers Surg Med. 2013;45(9):564–572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao XL, Liu ZH, Zhao S, et al. Efficacy of point-of-care thermal ablation among high-risk human papillomavirus positive women in China. Int J Cancer. 2021;148(6):1419–1427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore EE, Danielewski JA, Garland SM, et al. Clearance of human papillomavirus in women treated for cervical dysplasia. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(1):101–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreimer AR, Guido RS, Solomon D, et al. Human papillomavirus testing following loop electrosurgical excision procedure identifies women at risk for posttreatment cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 disease. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(5):908–914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang WD, Choi HS, Kim SM. Is vaccination with quadrivalent HPV vaccine after loop electrosurgical excision procedure effective in preventing recurrence in patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2-3)? Gynecol Oncol. 2013;130(2):264–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vintermyr OK, Iversen O, Thoresen S, et al. Recurrent high-grade cervical lesion after primary conization is associated with persistent human papillomavirus infection in Norway. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;133(2):159–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjaer SK, Frederiksen K, Munk C, et al. Long-term absolute risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse following human papillomavirus infection: role of persistence. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102(19):1478–1488.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huh WK, Ault KA, Chelmow D, et al. Use of primary high-risk human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening: interim clinical guidance. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;136(2):178–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronco G, Dillner J, Elfström KM, et al. International HPV screening working group. Efficacy of HPV-based screening for prevention of invasive cervical cancer: follow-up of four European randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 2014;383(9916):524–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosvig CF, Huusom LD, Deltour I, et al. Role of human papillomavirus testing and cytology in follow-up after conization. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94(4):405–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabasa J, Bradbury M, Sanchez-Iglesias JL, et al. Evaluation of the intraoperative human papillomavirus test as a marker of early cure at 12 months after electrosurgical excision procedure in women with cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: a prospective cohort study. BJOG. 2020;127(1):99–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuschieri K, Bhatia R, Cruickshank M, et al. HPV testing in the context of post-treatment follow up (test of cure). J Clin Virol. 2016;76(1):S56–S61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, et al. Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and Meta-analysis. Lancet. 2006;367(9509):489–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciavattini A, Clemente N, Delli Carpini G, et al. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and risk of miscarriage. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(4):1043–1048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frega A, Santomauro M, Sesti F, et al. Preterm birth after loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP): how cone features and microbiota could influence the pregnancy outcome. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2018;22(20):7039–7044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santesso N, Mustafa RA, Wiercioch W, et al. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of benefits and harms of cryotherapy, LEEP, and cold knife conization to treat cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;132(3):266–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijlemans JW, de Greef M, Schubert G, et al. A clinically feasible treatment protocol for magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation in the liver. Invest Radiol. 2015;50(1):24–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C, Xiong X, Li Y, et al. Therapeutic effects of focused ultrasound in 4014 patients with symptomatic cervical ectopy. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013;39(4):604–610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar