Feasibility of heating metal implants with alternating magnetic fields (AMF) in scaled up models

References

• Kremers HM, et al. Prevalence of total hip and knee replacement in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg. 2014;97(17):1386–1397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birlutiu RM, Birlutiu V, Mihalache M, et al. Diagnosis and management of orthopedic implant-associated infection: a comprehensive review of the literature. Biomed Res. 2017;28:5063–5073.
   Google Scholar
• Cui Q, Mihalko WM, Shields JS, et al. Antibiotic-impregnated cement spacers for the treatment of infection associated with total hip or knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 2007;89(4):871–882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runner RP, Mener A, Roberson JR, et al. Prosthetic joint infection trends at a dedicated orthopaedics specialty hospital. Adv Orthoped. 2019;2019:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charette RS, Melnic CM. Two-Stage revision arthroplasty for the treatment of prosthetic joint infection. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2018;11(3):332–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luria S, Kandel L, Segal D, et al. Revision total knee arthroplasty. Israel Med Assoc J. 2003;5(8):552–555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gooding CR, Masri BA, Duncan CP, et al. Durable infection control and function with the PROSTALAC spacer in two-stage revision for infected knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthopaed Relat Res. 2011;469(4):985–993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedorka CJ, Chen AF, McGarry WM, et al. Functional ability after above-the-knee amputation for infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthopaed Relat Res. 2011;469(4):1024–1032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtz SM, Lau E, Watson H, et al. Economic burden of periprosthetic joint infection in the United States. J Arthroplast. 2012;27(8 Suppl):61–65.e1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen AB, Mehnert F, Johnsen SP, et al. Risk of revision of a total hip replacement in patients with diabetes mellitus: a population-based follow up study. J Bone Joint Surg. 2010;92(7):929–934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, et al. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg. 2007;89:780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Premkumar A, et al. Projected economic burden of periprosthetic joint infection of the hip and knee in the United States. J Arthroplast. 2021;36(5):1484–1489.e3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett TR, Bhakoo M, Zhang Z. Bacterial adhesion and biofilms on surfaces. Prog Nat Sci . 2008;18(9):1049–1056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro M, Monteiro FJ, Ferraz MP. Infection of orthopedic implants with emphasis on bacterial adhesion process and techniques used in studying bacterial-material interactions. Biomatter. 2012;2(4):176–194.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rasmussen RM, Epperson RT, Taylor NB, et al. Plume height and surface coverage analysis of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates grown in a CDC biofilm reactor. Biofouling. 2019;35(4):463–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Ahmad A, et al. Biofilm formation and composition on different implant materials in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res. 2010; 95(1):101–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larimer C, Suter JD, Bonheyo G, et al. In situ non-destructive measurement of biofilm thickness and topology in an interferometric optical microscope. J Biophoton. 2016;9(6):656–666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donlan RM. Biofilms: microbial life on surfaces. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8(9):881–890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gielen FLH, Wallinga-de Jonge W, Boon KL. Electrical conductivity of skeletal muscle tissue: Experimental results from different muscles in vivo. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1984;22(6):569–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang L, Yu H, Jiang L, et al. Improved anticorrosion properties and electrical conductivity of 316L stainless steel as bipolar plate for proton exchange membrane fuel cell by lower temperature chromizing treatment. J Power Sources. 2010;195(9):2810–2814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soetaert F, Korangath P, Serantes D, et al. Cancer therapy with iron oxide nanoparticles: agents of thermal and immune therapies. Adv Drug Deliv Rev Vols. 2020;163–164:65–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wentworth SM, Baginski ME, Faircloth DL, et al. Calculating effective skin depth for thin conductive sheets. 2006 IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, 2006. pp. 4845–4848
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg IN, Stepanov PY, Fricke ST, et al. Increasing the oscillation frequency of strong magnetic fields above 101 kHz significantly raises peripheral nerve excitation thresholds. Med Phys. 2012;39(5):2578–2583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadaphal V, Mukherjee S, Ghosh S. Hybrid photomagnetic modulation of magnetite/gold-nanoparticle-deposited dextran-covered carbon nanotubes for hyperthermia applications. Appl Phys Express. 2018;11(9):097001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Vachon J, Prasad B, et al. Alternating magnetic fields and antibiotics eradicate biofilm on metal in a synergistic fashion. Npj Biofilms Microbiomes. 2021;7(1):1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopra R, Shaikh S, Chatzinoff Y, et al. Employing high-frequency alternating magnetic fields for the non-invasive treatment of prosthetic joint infections. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):7520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pijls BG, Sanders IMJG, Kuijper EJ, et al. Segmental induction heating of orthopaedic metal implants. Bone Joint Res. 2018;7(11):609–619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stauffer PR, Cetas TC, Jones RC. Magnetic induction heating of ferromagnetic implants for inducing localized hyperthermia in Deep-Seated tumors. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1984;31(2):235–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stauffer PR, Sneed PK, Hashemi H, et al. Practical induction heating coil designs for clinical hyperthermia with ferromagnetic implants. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1994;41(1):17–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stauffer PR, Cetas TC, Fletcher AM, et al. Observations on the use of ferromagnetic implants for inducing hyperthermia. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1984;31(1):76–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams DL, Woodbury KL, Haymond BS, et al. A modified CDC biofilm reactor to produce mature biofilms on the surface of PEEK membranes for an in vivo animal model application. Curr Microbiol. 2011;62(6):1657–1663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams DL, et al. Experimental model of biofilm implant-related osteomyelitis to test combination biomaterials using biofilms as initial inocula. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2012;100(7):1888–1900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen RK, Shih AJ. Multi-modality gellan gum-based tissue-mimicking phantom with targeted mechanical, electrical, and thermal properties. Phys Med Biol. 2013; 58(16):5511–5525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng B, Chatzinoff Y, Szczepanski D, et al. Remote acoustic sensing as a safety mechanism during exposure of metal implants to alternating magnetic fields. PLOS One. 2018;13(5):e0197380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song CW. Effect of local hyperthermia on blood flow and microenvironment: a review. Cancer Research. 1984;44(10 Suppl):4721s–4730s.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasgall PA, Di Gennaro F, Baumgartner C, et al. IT’IS database for thermal and electromagnetic parameters of biological tissues, version 4.0. IT’IS; 2018. https://doi.org/10.13099/VIP21000-04-0
   Google Scholar
• Prasad B, Kim S, Cho W, et al. Effect of tumor properties on energy absorption, temperature mapping, and thermal dose in 13.56-MHz radiofrequency hyperthermia. J Therm Biol. 2018;74:281–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain MT, Prasad B, Park KS, et al. Simulation and experimental evaluation of selective heating characteristics of 13.56 MHz radiofrequency hyperthermia in phantom models. Int J Precis Eng Manuf. 2016;17(2):253–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strohbehn JW. Theoretical temperature distributions for solenoidal-type hyperthermia systems. Med Phys. 1982;9(5):673–682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kok HP, van der Zee J, Guirado FN, et al. Treatment planning facilitates clinical decision making for hyperthermia treatments. Int J Hyperthermia. 2021;38(1):532–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavazzi S, van Lier ALHMW, Zachiu C, et al. Advanced patient-specific hyperthermia treatment planning. Int J Hyperthermia. 2020;37(1):992–1007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu D, Adams MS, Diederich CJ. Endobronchial high-intensity ultrasound for thermal therapy of pulmonary malignancies: simulations with patient-specific lung models. Int J Hyperthermia. 2019;36(1):1107–1120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennes HH. Analysis of tissue and arterial blood temperatures in the resting human forearm. J Appl Physiol. 1948;1(2):93–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Rhoon GC. Is CEM43 still a relevant thermal dose parameter for hyperthermia treatment monitoring? Int J Hyperthermia. 2016;32(1):50–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce JA. Comparative analysis of mathematical models of cell death and thermal damage processes. Int J Hyperthermia. 2013;29(4):262–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadobny J, Klopfleisch R, Brinker G, et al. Experimental investigation and histopathological identification of acute thermal damage in skeletal porcine muscle in relation to whole-body SAR, maximum temperature, and CEM43 °C due to RF irradiation in an MR body coil of birdcage type at 123 MHz. Int J Hyperthermia. 2015;31(4):409–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Rhoon GC, Samaras T, Yarmolenko PS, et al. CEM43 °C thermal dose thresholds: a potential guide for magnetic resonance radiofrequency exposure levels? Eur Radiol. 2013;23(8):2215–2227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce JA. Relationship between Arrhenius models of thermal damage and the CEM 43 thermal dose. Proceedings Volume 7181, Energy-based Treatment of Tissue and Assessment V, 718104; 2009
   Google Scholar
• Burtnyk M, Chopra R, Bronskill M. Thermal analysis of the surrounding anatomy during 3-D MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound prostate therapy. AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1215; 2010;26(8):804–821.
   Google Scholar